PreprintCited by 321Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyBirth, Development, and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Can the impact of childhood adiposity on disease risk be reversed? A Mendelian randomization study.

Open access
Richardson, Tom G., Sanderson, Eleanor, Elsworth, Benjamin, Tilling, Kate, Davey Smith, George·2019·BMJ

Preprint — published as 10.1136/bmj.m1203 · Paper page

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether early life adiposity has an independent effect on later life disease risk or whether its influence is mediated by adulthood body mass index (BMI). Design: Two-sample univariable and multivariable Mendelian randomization. Setting: The UK Biobank (UKB) prospective cohort study and four large-scale genome-wide association study (GWAS) consortia. Participants: 453,169 participants enrolled in the UKB and a combined total of over 700,000 individuals from different GWAS consortia. Exposures: Measured BMI during adulthood (mean age: 56.5) and self-reported adiposity at age 10. Main outcome measures: Coronary artery disease (CAD), type 2 diabetes (T2D), breast cancer and prostate cancer. Results: Individuals with genetically predicted higher BMI in early life had increased odds of CAD (OR:1.49, 95% CI:1.33-1.68) and T2D (OR:2.32, 95% CI:1.76-3.05) based on univariable MR (UVMR) analyses. However, there was little evidence of a direct effect (i.e. not via adult BMI) based on multivariable MR (MVMR) estimates (CAD OR:1.02, 95% CI:0.86-1.22, T2D OR:1.16, 95% CI:0.74-1.82). In the MVMR analysis of breast cancer risk, there was strong evidence of a protective direct effect for early BMI (OR:0.59, 95% CI:0.50-0.71), although adult BMI did not appear to have a direct effect on this outcome (OR:1.08, 95% CI:0.93-1.27). Adding age of menarche as an additional exposure provided weak evidence of a total causal effect (UVMR OR:0.98, 95% CI:0.91-1.06) but strong evidence of a direct causal effect, independent of early and adult BMI (MVMR OR:0.90, 95% CI:0.85-0.95). Weak evidence of a causal effect was observed in the MVMR analysis of prostate cancer (early life BMI OR:1.06, 95% CI:0.81-1.40, adult BMI OR:0.87, 95% CI:0.70-1.08). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that increased CAD and T2D risk attributed to early life adiposity can be mitigated if individuals reduce their weight in later life. However, having a low BMI during childhood may increase risk of breast cancer regardless of changes to weight in later life, with timing of puberty also putatively playing an important role.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/19008011

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [79]Hughes RA Davies NM Davey Smith G Selection bias in instrumental variable analyses. bioRxiv [Preprint] 2018:192237. 10.1101/192237%J. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richardson, T. G., Sanderson, E., Elsworth, B., Tilling, K., & Davey Smith, G.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Richardson, Tom G.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2019-10-05
Volume
369
Pages
m1203-m1203
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3011942165
Cited by
321
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 1
FWCI
25.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (102215/2/13/2), 217065/Z/19/Z, 102215)
  • University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
  • UK Research and Innovation (MR/S003886/1)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (MC_UU_00011/1)
  • University of Bristol (MC_UU_00011/1, 102215/2/13/2, MC_UU_00,011/3, MC_UU_00011/2)
  • Medical Research Council (102215, MC_UU_00011/2, MC_UU_00011/3, MR/S003886/1, 102215/2/13/2, MC_PC_17228, MC_PC_15018, MC_UU_00011/1, MC_PC_19009, MC_UU_00011)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
body size, body mass index, body size perception, coronary artery disease, type 2 diabetes, breast cancer, prostate cancer, age at menarche, causal mediation analysis, adult body size, disease risk, genetic variants, Mendelian randomization, UK Biobank
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Child, Coronary Artery Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Prospective Studies, Prostatic Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Genetic Variation, Body Mass Index, Risk Assessment, Adiposity, Genome-Wide Association Study, Mendelian Randomization Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review