Cited by 80Sleep and related disordersSleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Daytime napping, sleep duration and serum C reactive protein: a population-based cohort study

Open access
Leng, Yue, Ahmadi-Abhari, Sara, Wainwright, Nick W J, Cappuccio, Francesco P, Surtees, Paul G, Luben, Robert, Brayne, Carol, Khaw, Kay-Tee·2014·BMJ Open

Abstract

Objectives: To explore whether daytime napping and sleep duration are linked to serum C reactive protein (CRP), a pro-inflammatory marker, in an older aged British population. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Norfolk study. Participants: A total of 5018 men and women aged 48–92 years reported their sleep habits and had serum CRP levels measured. Outcome and measures: CRP was measured (mg/L) during 2006–2011 in fresh blood samples using high-sensitivity methods. Participants reported napping habits during 2002–2004, and reported sleep quantity during 2006–2007. Multivariable linear regression models were used to examine the association between napping and log-transformed CRP, and geometric mean CRP levels were calculated. Results: After adjustment for age and sex, those who reported napping had 10% higher CRP levels compared with those not napping. The association was attenuated but remained borderline significant (β=0.05 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.10)) after further adjustment for social class, education, marital status, body mass index, physical activity, smoking, alcohol intake, self-reported health, pre-existing diseases, systolic blood pressure, hypnotic drug use, depression and in women-only hormone replacement therapy use. The geometric means (95% CI) of CRP levels were 2.38 (2.29 to 2.47) mg/L and 2.26 (2.21 to 2.32) mg/L for those who reported napping and no napping, respectively. A U-shaped association was observed between time spent in bed at night and CRP levels, and nighttime sleep duration was not associated with serum CRP levels. The association between napping and CRP was stronger for older participants, and among extremes of time spent in bed at night. Conclusions: Daytime napping was associated with increased CRP levels in an older aged British population. Further studies are needed to determine whether daytime napping is a cause for systemic inflammation, or if it is a symptom or consequence of underlying health problems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006071

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In over 5,000 older participants, self-reported napping was associated with higher CRP levels, particularly in older participants, but the relationship was attenuated after adjusting for health-related variables such as pre-existing diseases, blood pressure, and depression.

    “Self-reported napping assessed in over 5,000 older participants was also associated with higher CRP levels, particularly in older participants, but the relationship was attenuated after adjusting for health-related variables such as pre-existing diseases, blood pressure, and depression (335).”

    From The Sleep-Immune Crosstalk in Health and Disease (2019) · cites this paper as [335]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leng, Y., Ahmadi-Abhari, S., Wainwright, N. W. J., Cappuccio, F. P., Surtees, P. G., Luben, R., Brayne, C., & Khaw, K.-T.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Strangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Leng, Yue
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014-11
Volume
4
Issue
11
Pages
e006071
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134023549
Cited by
80
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
6.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK (C864/A2883, C/864/A8257)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0512-10114, NF-SI-0611-10084)
  • Cambridge Overseas Trust
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/K002910/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
daytime napping, sleep duration, C-reactive protein, systemic inflammation, older adults, time in bed, nocturnal sleep, EPIC-Norfolk cohort
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, C-Reactive Protein, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Habits, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Time Factors, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review