Cited by 593Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesBehavioral Health and Interventions

Predictors of smoking cessation in a cohort of adult smokers followed for five years

Open access
Hymowitz, N, Cummings, K., Hyland, A, Lynn, W., Pechacek, T., Hartwell, T.·1997·Tobacco Control

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify variables predictive of smoking cessation in a cohort of cigarette smokers followed for five years. DESIGN: Data analysed in this paper come from a cohort tracking telephone survey of 13415 cigarette smokers aged 25-64 years from 20 American and two Canadian communities who were interviewed in 1988 and re-interviewed in 1993 as part of the National Cancer Institute's Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation. Predictors of smoking cessation evaluated in this study included measures of past and current smoking behaviour, past quit attempts, stated desire to quit smoking, and demographic characteristics. OUTCOME MEASURES: Smoking cessation was based on self report. A "quitter" was defined as a cohort member who, at the final annual contact in 1993, reported not smoking any cigarettes for the preceding six months or longer. Any smoker who reported having made a serious quit attempt between 1988 and 1993 was asked to indicate reasons that contributed to their decision to try to stop smoking. RESULTS: 67% of smokers reported making at least one serious attempt to stop smoking between 1988 and 1993 and, of these, 33% were classified as having quit smoking in 1993. The most common reasons given for quitting smoking were concern over health (91%), expense (60%), concern about exposing others to secondhand smoke (56%), and wanting to set a good example for others (55%). Statistically significant predictors of smoking cessation included male gender, older age, higher income, less frequent alcohol intake, lower levels of daily cigarette consumption, longer time to first cigarette in the morning, the use of premium cigarettes, initiation of smoking after age 20, history of past quit attempts, a strong desire to stop smoking, and the absence of other smokers in the household. Predictor variations with the largest relative risks for smoking cessation were those associated with nicotine dependence such as amount smoked daily and time to first cigarette in the morning. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the fact that most smokers expressed a strong desire to stop smoking in 1988, the majority, especially the most dependent heavy smokers (>25 cigarettes/day), struggled unsuccessfully to achieve this goal.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/tc.6.suppl_2.s57

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 8 US Centers for Disease Control. Smoking cessation during the previous year among adults—United States. MMWR 1993;42:504-7.
  2. 17 COMMIT Research Group. Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT): summary of design and intervention. F Natl Cancer Inst 1991;83:1620-8.
  3. 24 US Centers for Disease Control. Smokers' beliefs about the health benefits of smoking cessation—20 U.S. communities. MMWR 1990;39:653-6.
  4. 26 US Food and Drug Administration. Notice; analysis regarding agency jurisdiction: analysis regarding the Food and Drug Administration's jurisdiction over nicotinecontaining cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products. Federal Register 1995;60:41453-786.
  5. 27 US Food and Drug Administration. Proposed rule: regulations restricting the sale and distribution of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products to protect children and adolescents. Federal Register 1995;60:41314-75.
  6. 28 Benowitz NL, Henningfield JE. Establishing a nicotine threshold for addiction. N Engl f Med 1994;331:123-5.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hymowitz, N., Cummings, K., Hyland, A., Lynn, W., Pechacek, T., & Hartwell, T.
Affiliations
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Tobacco Control
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1997-06-01
Volume
6
Issue
Supplement 2
Pages
S57-S62
ISSN
0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145657763
Cited by
593
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 32
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tobacco Control (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
smoking cessation, predictors of quitting, nicotine dependence, heavy smokers, quit attempts, desire to quit, reasons for quitting, household smoking, alcohol consumption, time to first cigarette, adult smokers
MeSH terms
Adult, Canada, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Plants, Toxic, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Nicotiana, Tobacco Use Disorder, United States, Cohort Studies, Smoking Cessation, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review