Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,854

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only anova procedures

Wobbrock, Jacob O., Findlater, Leah, Gergle, Darren, Higgins, James J.·2011·Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Nonparametric data from multi-factor experiments arise often in human-computer interaction (HCI). Examples may include error counts, Likert responses, and preference tallies. But because multiple factors are involved, common nonparametric tests (e.g., Friedman) are inadequate, as they are unable to examine interaction effects. While some statistical techniques exist to handle such data, these techniques are not widely available and are complex. To address these concerns, we present the Aligned Rank Transform (ART) for nonparametric factorial data analysis in HCI. The ART relies on a preprocessing step that "aligns" data before applying averaged ranks, after which point common ANOVA procedures can be used, making the ART accessible to anyone familiar with the F-test. Unlike most articles on the ART, which only address two factors, we generalize the ART to N factors. We also provide ARTool and ARTweb, desktop and Web-based programs for aligning and ranking data. Our re-examination of some published HCI results exhibits advantages of the ART.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1978942.1978963

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Conover , W. J. and Iman , R. L. ( 1981 ). Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics . The American Statistician 35 ( 3 ), 124 -- 129 . Conover, W. J. and Iman, R. L. (1981). Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. The American Statistician 35 (3), 124--129. · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1080/03610918408812368 · DOI
  3. 10.1145/1518701.1518956 · DOI
  4. 10.4148/2475-7772.1443 · DOI
  5. Higgins , J. J. and Tashtoush , S. ( 1994 ). An aligned rank transform test for interaction . Nonlinear World 1 ( 2 ), 201 -- 211 . Higgins, J. J. and Tashtoush, S. (1994). An aligned rank transform test for interaction. Nonlinear World 1 (2), 201--211.
  6. 10.1214/aoms/1177704575 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1145/1753326.1753686 · DOI
  8. 10.2527/1998.7641216x · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1145/302979.302983 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1080/03610918508812475 · doi:10.1080/03610918508812475
  11. 10.1080/03610919308813085 · DOI
  12. 10.3102/00346543060001091 · doi:10.3102/00346543060001091 · Paper page
  13. Vermunt , J. K. ( 1997 ). Log-linear Models for Event Histories . Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications . Vermunt, J. K. (1997). Log-linear Models for Event Histories. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  14. 10.1145/1294211.1294238 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wobbrock, J. O., Findlater, L., Gergle, D., & Higgins, J. J.
Venue
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2011-05-07
Pages
143-146
OpenAlex
W2128213565
Cited by
2,854
References
0
FWCI
89.08
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.