Cited by 475Gut microbiota and healthNutritional Studies and DietPolyamine Metabolism and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 133 of the 133 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 4 of the 214 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Trimethylamine N -Oxide, the Microbiome, and Heart and Kidney Disease

Open access
Zeisel, Steven H., Warrier, Manya·2017·Annual Review of Nutrition

Abstract

Trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) is a biologically active molecule and is a putative promoter of chronic diseases including atherosclerosis in humans. Host intestinal bacteria produce its precursor trimethylamine (TMA) from carnitine, choline, or choline-containing compounds. Most of the TMA produced is passively absorbed into portal circulation, and hepatic flavin-dependent monooxygenases (FMOs) efficiently oxidize TMA to TMAO. Both observational and experimental studies suggest a strong positive correlation between increased plasma TMAO concentrations and adverse cardiovascular events, such as myocardial infarction, stroke, and death. However, a clear mechanistic link between TMAO and such diseases is not yet validated. Therefore, it is debated whether increased TMAO concentrations are the cause or result of these diseases. Here, we have tried to review the current understanding of the properties and physiological functions of TMAO, its dietary sources, and its effects on human metabolism. Studies that describe the potential role of TMAO in the etiology of cardiovascular and other diseases are also discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071816-064732

Cites

133 of 133 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

184 Not checked yet · 23 No basis given · 22 Own interpretation · 2 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Own method · 1 Own result · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 210 references — free account

Show all 134 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 78
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 31
100 of 100
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Plasma TMAO concentration is a valid proxy for the biologically relevant TMAO exposure at target tissues.

    “Both observational and experimental studies suggest a strong positive correlation between increased plasma TMAO concentrations and adverse cardiovascular events, such as myocardial infarction, stroke, and death.”
    “TMAO-mediated atherosclerosis could potentially be a significant cause of heart and kidney disease, but the underlying mechanisms whereby TMAO is related to heart and kidney disease need to be fully elucidated and validated.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Fish contain high concentrations of TMA, and gut bacteria convert this TMA to TMAO in people who eat fish.

    “Fish contain high concentrations of TMA, which are converted to TMAO by bacteria in the gut of people who eat fish.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Renal clearance determines plasma TMAO concentrations.

    “Because renal clearance is a determinant of plasma TMAO concentrations, kidney function and TMAO must be correlated even if TMAO does not cause kidney damage.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Normal mouse diets contain 0.1% choline.

    “Interpretation of such results is difficult, as normal mouse diets contain 0.1% choline, and the authors treated mice with amounts of choline twelve times higher; these levels are not physiologic.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Show all 133 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Chebotareva NA, 2007, Biochemistry, 72, 1478
  2. Hand SC, 1986, Am. J. Physiol., 250, R505
  3. Herlaar E, 1999, Trends Mol. Med., 5, 439
  4. Jawien J, 2004, J. Physiol. Pharmacol., 55, 503
  5. Mackay RJ, 2011, Clin. Biochem. Rev., 32, 33
  6. Mitchell SC, 2001, Drug Metab. Dispos., 29, 517
  7. US Dep. Aric., 2008, USDA Database for the Choline Content of Common Foods, Release 2
  8. Zeisel SH, 1986, Cancer Res, 46, 6136
  9. 10.1093/jn/133.5.1302 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 468

Metadata

Authors
Zeisel, S. H., & Warrier, M.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina System (US)
Corresponding author
Zeisel, Steven H.
Venue
Annual Review of Nutrition
Published
2017-08-21
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
157-181
ISSN
  • 0199-9885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4312
OpenAlex
W2566137938
Cited by
475
References
133
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 4
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Polyamine Metabolism and Applications
Keywords
trimethylamine N-oxide, trimethylamine, gut microbiota, cardiovascular disease, heart disease, kidney disease, atherosclerosis, flavin-dependent monooxygenase, L-carnitine, choline, food sources, myocardial infarction, stroke
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacteria, Diet, Female, Heart Diseases, Humans, Kidney Diseases, Liver, Male, Methylamines, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review