The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 115 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Partisan Bias in Political Judgment
Open accessAbstract
This article reviews empirical data demonstrating robust ingroup favoritism in political judgment. Partisans display systematic tendencies to seek out, believe, and remember information that supports their political beliefs and affinities. However, the psychological drivers of partisan favoritism have been vigorously debated, as has its consistency with rational inference. We characterize decades-long debates over whether such tendencies violate normative standards of rationality, focusing on the phenomenon of motivated reasoning. In light of evidence that both motivational and cognitive factors contribute to partisan bias, we advocate for a descriptive approach to partisan bias research. Rather than adjudicating the (ir)rationality of partisan favoritism, future research should prioritize the identification and measurement of its predictors and clarify the cognitive mechanisms underlying motivated political reasoning. Ultimately, we argue that political judgment is best evaluated by a standard of ecological rationality based on its practical implications for individual well-being and functional democratic governance.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
Bem, D. J. (1972) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60024-6 · Cited by 5,241
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098 · Cited by 4,583
Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa1160 · Cited by 3,245
Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena.
Bem, D. J. (1967) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0024835 · Cited by 2,959
Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction?
Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0076486 · Cited by 2,575
Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization
Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12152 · Cited by 2,452
Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135109 · Cited by 2,031
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011 · Cited by 2,022
Simon, H. A. (1990) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.000245 · Cited by 2,000
Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use
Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x · Cited by 1,940
Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, J. G., & Rand, D. G. (2020) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797620939054 · Cited by 1,715
The end of the end of ideology.
Jost, J. T. (2006) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.61.7.651 · Cited by 1,614
Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions
Bartels, L. M. (2002) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1021226224601 · Cited by 1,468
Party Over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.
Cohen, G. L. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808 · Cited by 1,400
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007 · Cited by 1,360
Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure
Stroud, N. J. (2010) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x · Cited by 1,346
Ditto, P. H., & Lopez, D. F. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.568 · Cited by 1,329
Self-citationFeeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information
Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J., & Merrill, L. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0015701 · Cited by 1,292
How to Make Cognitive Illusions Disappear: Beyond “Heuristics and Biases”
Gigerenzer, G. (1991) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792779143000033 · Cited by 1,190
Value and need as organizing factors in perception.
Bruner, J. S., & Goodman, C. C. (1947) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0058484 · Cited by 1,138
Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users
Garrett, R. K. (2009) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01440.x · Cited by 1,040
Political Sectarianism in America
Finkel, E. J., Bail, C. A., Cikara, M., Ditto, P. H., Iyengar, S., Klar, S., Mason, L., McGrath, M. C., Nyhan, B., Rand, D. G., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abe1715 · Cited by 931
Self-citationThe Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic: Why the Adjustments Are Insufficient
Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01704.x · Cited by 920
Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government
KAHAN, D. M., PETERS, E., DAWSON, E. C., & SLOVIC, P. (2017) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2016.2 · Cited by 883
Hastorf, A. H., & Cantril, H. (1954) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0057880 · Cited by 882
Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence.
Darley, J. M., & Fazio, R. H. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.10.867 · Cited by 853
Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information
Frey, D. (1986) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60212-9 · Cited by 820
The Partisan Brain: An Identity-Based Model of Political Belief
Van Bavel, J. J., & Pereira, A. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.004 · Cited by 743
The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation
Druckman, J. N., & McGrath, M. C. (2019) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0360-1 · Cited by 733
Politically Motivated Reinforcement Seeking: Reframing the Selective Exposure Debate
Garrett, R. K. (2009) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x · Cited by 714
Individuals and groups in social psychology.
Tajfel, H. (1979) · British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1979.tb00324.x · Cited by 704
Anderson, C., Lepper, M. R., & Ross, L. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077720 · Cited by 684
A new look at the new look: Perceptual defense and vigilance.
Erdelyi, M. H. (1974) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0035852 · Cited by 647
Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (1987) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60417-7 · Cited by 640
Grossman, G., Kim, S., Rexer, J. M., & Thirumurthy, H. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2007835117 · Cited by 564
Statistically controlling for confounding constructs is harder than you think
Westfall, J., & Yarkoni, T. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152719 · Cited by 547
Ditto, P. H., Liu, B. S., Clark, C. J., Wojcik, S. P., Chen, E. E., Grady, R. H., Celniker, J. B., & Zinger, J. F. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617746796 · Cited by 535
Self-citationMISPERCEPTIONS ABOUT PERCEPTUAL BIAS
Gerber, A. S., & GREEN, D. P. (1999) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.189 · Cited by 507
Myside Bias, Rational Thinking, and Intelligence
Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2013) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721413480174 · Cited by 427
Personal values as selective factors in perception.
Postman, L. J., Bruner, J. S., & McGinnies, E. M. (1948) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0059765 · Cited by 407
Motivated recruitment of autobiographical memories.
Sanitioso, R. B., Kunda, Z., & Fong, G. T. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.59.2.229 · Cited by 401
Motivated sensitivity to preference-inconsistent information.
Ditto, P. H., Scepansky, J. A., Munro, G., Apanovitch, A., & Lockhart, L. K. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.53 · Cited by 389
Self-citationLiberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to avoid exposure to one another's opinions
Frimer, J. A., Skitka, L. J., & Motyl, M. S. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.04.003 · Cited by 383
Krueger, J. I., & Funder, D. C. (2004) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x04000081 · Cited by 374
Attribution bias: On the inconclusiveness of the cognition-motivation debate
Tetlock, P. E., & Levi, A. S. (1982) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(82)90082-8 · Cited by 363
Westfall, J., Van Boven, L., Chambers, J. R., & Judd, C. M. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615569849 · Cited by 363
The Influence of Prior Beliefs on Scientific Judgments of Evidence Quality
Koehler, J. J. (1993) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1993.1044 · Cited by 357
Kahan, D. M. (2016) · Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0417 · Cited by 341
Ego involvement and attributions for success and failure.
Miller, D. T. (1976) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.34.5.901 · Cited by 337
Munro, G. D., & Ditto, P. H. (1997) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167297236007 · Cited by 325
Self-citationTaking a Closer Look: Reasserting the Role of the Self-Concept in Dissonance Theory
Thibodeau, R., & Aronson, E. (1992) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167292185010 · Cited by 312
A Turn Toward Avoidance? Selective Exposure to Online Political Information, 2004-2008
Garrett, R. K., Carnahan, D., & Lynch, E. K. (2013) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-011-9185-6 · Cited by 311
The Redux of Cognitive Consistency Theories: Evidence Judgments by Constraint Satisfaction.
Simon, D., Snow, C. J., & Read, S. J. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.814 · Cited by 306
de Bruin, W. B., Saw, H.-W., & Goldman, D. P. (2020) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-020-09336-3 · Cited by 287
Motivated recruitment of autobiographical memories.
Sanitioso, R. B., Kunda, Z., & Fong, G. T. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.2.229 · Cited by 280
How Moral Migration Geographically Segregates and Polarizes Groups
Motyl, M. S., Iyer, R., Oishi, S., Trawalter, S., & Nosek, B. A. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.010 · Cited by 261
Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts
Lees, J., & Cikara, M. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0766-4 · Cited by 259
Myside bias in thinking about abortion
Baron, J. (1995) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546789508256909 · Cited by 248
Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Meng, J. (2009) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650209333030 · Cited by 245
Partisan Bias and the Bayesian Ideal in the Study of Public Opinion
Bullock, J. G. (2009) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381609090914 · Cited by 240
Cohen, G. L., Sherman, D. K., Bastardi, A., Hsu, L., McGoey, M., & Ross, L. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.415 · Cited by 239
Why Do We Hate Hypocrites? Evidence for a Theory of False Signaling
Jordan, J., Sommers, R., Bloom, P., & Rand, D. G. (2017) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797616685771 · Cited by 233
Gimpel, J. G., & Hui, I. S. (2015) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.11.003 · Cited by 228
False Equivalence: Are Liberals and Conservatives in the United States Equally Biased?
Baron, J., & Jost, J. T. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691618788876 · Cited by 213
A Signal Detection Approach to Understanding the Identification of Fake News
Batailler, C., Brannon, S. M., Teas, P. E., & Gawronski, B. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620986135 · Cited by 209
Tappin, B. M., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.01.003 · Cited by 203
Oeberst, A., & Imhoff, R. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916221148147 · Cited by 200
Preelection Selective Exposure
Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Kleinman, S. (2012) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650211400597 · Cited by 199
The learning and forgetting of controversial material.
Levine, J. M., & Murphy, G. (1943) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0062586 · Cited by 198
Biased Assimilation of Sociopolitical Arguments: Evaluating the 1996 U.S. Presidential Debate
Munro, G. D., Ditto, P. H., Lockhart, L. K., Fagerlin, A., Gready, M., & Peterson, E. (2002) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2401_2 · Cited by 191
Self-citationClark, C. J., Liu, B. S., Winegard, B. M., & Ditto, P. H. (2019) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721419862289 · Cited by 185
Self-citationTaber, C. S., & Lodge, M. G. (2016) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12321 · Cited by 174
Ditto, P. H., Munro, G. D., Apanovitch, A. M., Scepansky, J. A., & Lockhart, L. K. (2003) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167203254536 · Cited by 154
Self-citationThe impact of attitudes on memory: An affair to remember.
Eagly, A. H., Chen, S., Chaiken, S., & Shaw-Barnes, K. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.64 · Cited by 151
False memories of fabricated political events
Frenda, S. J., Knowles, E. D., Saletan, W., & Loftus, E. F. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.013 · Cited by 146
False Memories for Fake News During Ireland’s Abortion Referendum
Murphy, G., Loftus, E. F., Grady, R. H., Levine, L. J., & Greene, C. M. (2019) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797619864887 · Cited by 134
Warning, distraction, and resistance to influence.
Freedman, J. L., & Sears, D. O. (1965) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0021872 · Cited by 134
Chew, S. H., Huang, W., & Zhao, X. (2020) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/709971 · Cited by 113
Arkes, H. R., Gigerenzer, G., & Hertwig, R. (2015) · Decision · doi:10.1037/dec0000043 · Cited by 108
The Distortion of Syllogistic Reasoning Produced by Personal Convictions
Morgan, J. J. B., & Morton, J. T. (1944) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.1944.9918830 · Cited by 103
Wallace, J., Goldsmith-Pinkham, P. S., & Schwartz, J. L. (2023) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1154 · Cited by 101
Social media behavior is associated with vaccine hesitancy
Rathje, S., He, J. K., Roozenbeek, J., Van Bavel, J. J., & van der Linden, S. (2022) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac207 · Cited by 100
How Technology Encourages Political Selective Exposure
Dylko, I. B. (2015) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/comt.12089 · Cited by 94
Janis, I. L., & Frick, F. C. (1943) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0060675 · Cited by 88
Citizens' Perceptions of Ideological Bias in Research on Public Policy Controversies
MacCoun, R. J., & Paletz, S. B. F. (2009) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00680.x · Cited by 79
Partisan selective exposure: The role of party, ideology and ideological extremity over time.
Rodriguez, C. G., Moskowitz, J. P., Salem, R. M., & Ditto, P. H. (2017) · Translational Issues in Psychological Science · doi:10.1037/tps0000121 · Cited by 74
Self-citationThe politics of mask-wearing: Political preferences, reactance, and conflict aversion during COVID
Young, D. G., Rasheed, H., Bleakley, A., & Langbaum, J. B. S. (2022) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114836 · Cited by 74
(Ideo)Logical Reasoning: Ideology Impairs Sound Reasoning
Gampa, A., Wojcik, S. P., Motyl, M. S., Nosek, B. A., & Ditto, P. H. (2019) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550619829059 · Cited by 72
Self-citationExploring the relationship between political partisanship and COVID-19 vaccination rate
Ye, X. (2021) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdab364 · Cited by 72
Do Attitudes Affect Memory? Tests of the Congeniality Hypothesis
Eagly, A. H., Kulesa, P., Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (2001) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00102 · Cited by 70
The Heart Trumps the Head: Desirability Bias in Political Belief Revision
Tappin, B. M., van der Leer, L., & McKay, R. T. (2017) · Journal of experimental psychology. General · doi:10.1037/xge0000298 · Cited by 69
A preregistered replication of motivated numeracy
Persson, E., Andersson, D., Koppel, L., Västfjäll, D., & Tinghög, G. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104768 · Cited by 61
Anglin, S. M. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.02.004 · Cited by 61
The Association Between COVID-19 Mortality And The County-Level Partisan Divide In The United States
Sehgal, N. J., Yue, D., Pope, E. F., Wang, R. H., & Roby, D. H. (2022) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00085 · Cited by 59
Correlates of Political and Civic Engagement Among Youth During the 2012 Presidential Campaign
Wicks, R. H., Wicks, J. L., Morimoto, S. A., Maxwell, A., & Schulte, S. R. (2013) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764213515226 · Cited by 53
Partisan Bias and Its Discontents
Ditto, P. H., Clark, C. J., Liu, B. S., Wojcik, S. P., Chen, E. E., Grady, R. H., Celniker, J. B., & Zinger, J. F. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691618817753 · Cited by 51
Self-citationToward a General Framework of Biased Reasoning: Coherence-Based Reasoning
Simon, D., & Read, S. J. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231204579 · Cited by 47
Truth sensitivity and partisan bias in responses to misinformation.
Gawronski, B., Ng, N. L., & Luke, D. M. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001381 · Cited by 42
In the Eye of the Beholder? Motivated Reasoning in Disputed Elections
Kopko, K. C., Bryner, S. M., Budziak, J., Devine, C. J., & Nawara, S. P. (2010) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9133-x · Cited by 34
Derreumaux, Y., Bergh, R., & Hughes, B. (2022) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000375 · Cited by 30
Stagnaro, M. N., Tappin, B. M., & Rand, D. G. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2301491120 · Cited by 29
Greene, C. M., Laurent, C. D. S., Hegarty, K., & Murphy, G. (2022) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4002 · Cited by 27
News media impact on sociopolitical attitudes
Earle, M., & Hodson, G. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0264031 · Cited by 24
Partisan bias in false memories for misinformation about the 2021 U.S. Capitol riot
Calvillo, D. P., Harris, J. D., & Hawkins, W. C. (2022) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2022.2127771 · Cited by 22
Attitudes towards feminism predict susceptibility to feminism‐related fake news
Murphy, G., Murray, E., & Gough, D. (2021) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3851 · Cited by 20
Partisan selective exposure in news consumption
Lumeau, M. (2022) · HAL · Cited by 17
Was Cognitive Dissonance Theory a Mistake
Lord, C. G. (1992) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0304_12 · Cited by 16
Understanding the Impact of Risk Factor Test Results: Insights from a Basic Research Program
Croyle, P. H. D. R. T. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195075564.003.0007 · Cited by 16
Relihan, D. P., Holman, E. A., Garfin, D. R., Ditto, P. H., & Silver, R. C. (2023) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12894 · Cited by 14
Self-citationPassion, Reason, and Necessity: A Quantity-of-Processing View of Motivated Reasoning
Bayne, T., & Fernández, J. (2010) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203838044-8 · Cited by 13
Of preferences and priors: Motivated reasoning in partisans’ evaluations of scientific evidence.
Celniker, J. B., & Ditto, P. H. (2024) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000417 · Cited by 13
Self-citationHelgason, B. A., & Effron, D. A. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104308 · Cited by 12
Partisan selective exposure in news consumption
Déjean, S., Lumeau, M., & Peltier, S. (2022) · Information Economics and Policy · doi:10.1016/j.infoecopol.2022.100992
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- 1957, A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
- 1958, The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations
- 1995, Varieties of confirmation bias, 32, 385
- 2014, Choice and Preference in Media Use: Advances in Selective Exposure Theory and Research
- 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment
- 2020, Metacognitive experiences as information: processing fluency in consumer judgment and decision making. Consum, Psychol. Rev., 4, 4
- 1984, Ordinary Vices
- 2021, The Bias That Divides Us: The Science and Politics of Myside Thinking
- 2023, Megastudy identifying effective interventions to strengthen Americans’ democratic attitudes, OSF Preprints
- 1946 (1917), Science as a vocation, 129
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Debunking Three Myths About Misinformation
Gawronski, B., Nahon, L. S., & Ng, N. L. (2024) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09637214241280907 · Cited by 27
Ideology: Psychological Similarities and Differences Across the Ideological Spectrum Reexamined
Kteily, N., & Brandt, M. J. (2024) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-020124-115253 · Cited by 35
Understanding the neurocognitive mechanisms of cognitive security
Crum, J. E., II, Allred, A. R., Bostrom, S. R., Doherty, E. J., McLain, M., Richardson, E. E., Spencer, C. A., Niemeyer, R. E., Anderson, A. P., Tossell, C. C., et al. (2025) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106448 · Cited by 4
Hubeny, T. J., Nahon, L. S., & Gawronski, B. (2026) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976251404040 · Cited by 3
“Some have argued that partisan bias is driven in part by motivated reasoning (Celniker & Ditto, 2024; Ditto et al., 2025; Kahan, 2016; Peterson & Iyengar, 2021; Van Bavel et al., 2024).”
InfluentialUsing Artificial Intelligence to Better Understand Human Intelligence
Pennycook, G., Costello, T. H., & Rand, D. G. (2026) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09637214261417960 · Cited by 2
“…consequence of focusing on the social implications of our reasoning, research on motivated reasoning often conjectures that accuracy or truth-related goals are superseded by identity-based or so-called tribalistic concerns (Clark & Winegard, 2020; Ditto et al., 2024; Haidt, 2001; Kahan, 2013).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Ditto, P. H., Celniker, J. B., Siddiqi, S. S., Güngör, M., & Relihan, D. P.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Psychology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2025-01-17
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 717-740
- ISSN
- 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2085
- OpenAlex
- W4402265865
- Semantic Scholar
- cd99f85b5e1645cddffe103d4b529ca872c658f6
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 113
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 9
- FWCI
- 3.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- partisan bias, political judgment, motivated reasoning, in-group favoritism, confirmation bias, rational inference, ecological rationality, cognitive mechanisms, democratic governance
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Judgment, Motivation, Politics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-23 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review