Cited by 104Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsMemory Processes and Influences

Roles of medial prefrontal cortex and orbitofrontal cortex in self-evaluation

Open access
Beer, Jennifer S., Lombardo, Michael V., Bhanji, Jamil Palacios·2010·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Empirical investigations of the relation of frontal lobe function to self-evaluation have mostly examined the evaluation of abstract qualities in relation to self versus other people. The present research furthers our understanding of frontal lobe involvement in self-evaluation by examining two processes that have not been widely studied by neuroscientists: on-line self-evaluations and correction of systematic judgment errors that influence self-evaluation. Although people evaluate their abstract qualities, it is equally important that perform on-line evaluations to assess the success of their behavior in a particular situation. In addition, self-evaluations of task performance are sometimes overconfident because of systematic judgment errors. What role do the neural regions associated with abstract self-evaluations and decision bias play in on-line evaluation and self-evaluation bias? In this fMRI study, self-evaluation in two reasoning tasks was examined; one elicited overconfident self-evaluations of performance because of salient but misleading aspects of the task and the other was free from misleading aspects. Medial PFC (mPFC), a region associated with self-referential processing, was generally involved in on-line self-evaluations but not specific to accurate or overconfident evaluation. Orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) activity, a region associated with accurate nonsocial judgment, negatively predicted individual differences in overconfidence and was negatively associated with confidence level for incorrect trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn.2009.21359

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beer, J. S., Lombardo, M. V., & Bhanji, J. P.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2010-09-01
Volume
22
Issue
9
Pages
2108-2119
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2132132103
Cited by
104
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5t32mh020006-19)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH020006))
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
self-assessment, medial prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, overconfidence, judgment errors, self-assessment bias, self-referential processing, individual differences, reasoning tasks, confidence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain Mapping, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Judgment, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Self Concept, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review