Cited by 403Schizophrenia research and treatmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Functional hypofrontality and working memory dysfunction in schizophrenia

Carter, Cameron S., Perlstein, William, Ganguli, Rohan, Brar, Jaspreet, Mintun, Mark, Cohen, Jonathan D.·1998·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Hypofrontality is a common but not invariable finding in schizophrenia. Inconsistencies in the literature may reflect, in part, the fact that abnormal physiological responses in the prefrontal cortex are best identified under conditions that place well-specified functional demands on this region. METHOD: The authors studied eight patients with schizophrenia and eight matched comparison subjects using [(15)O]H2O positron emission tomography and the "N-back" task, which activates the prefrontal cortex as a function of working memory load in normal subjects. RESULTS: Under low-working-memory-load conditions, the accuracy of both groups in the N-back task was equal, but when the memory load increased, the patients' performance deteriorated more than did that of the comparison subjects. The regional cerebral blood flow response to increased working memory load was significantly reduced in the patients' right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm the importance of using tasks that tap specific cognitive functions, linked to specific neural systems, in studies of brain-behavior relationships in schizophrenia. Hypofrontality is reliably demonstrated in schizophrenia during tasks that engage working memory functions of the prefrontal cortex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.155.9.1285

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the prefrontal cortex, PNN degradation may affect gamma oscillatory activity originating from interneurons expressing parvalbumin.

    “In the prefrontal cortex, PNN degradation may affect gamma oscillatory activity originating from interneurons expressing parvalbumin (Carter et al., 1998; Kim and Webster, 2010; Lewis and Gonzalez-Burgos, 2008; Manoach et al., 1999; Spencer, 2008; Uhlhaas and Singer, 2010; Woo et al., 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carter, C. S., Perlstein, W., Ganguli, R., Brar, J., Mintun, M., & Cohen, J. D.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1998-09-01
Volume
155
Issue
9
Pages
1285-1287
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2099935324
Cited by
403
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
11.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
hypofrontality, schizophrenia, working memory, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, regional cerebral blood flow, n-back task, working memory load, brain-behavior relationship, positron emission tomography
MeSH terms
Humans, Functional Laterality, Memory, Oxygen Radioisotopes, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Regional Blood Flow, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Water, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review