Cited by 212Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Factor Structure and Initial Validation of a Multidimensional Measure of Difficulties in the Regulation of Positive Emotions: The DERS-Positive

Open access
Weiss, Nicole H., Gratz, Kim L., Lavender, Jason M.·2015·Behavior Modification

Abstract

Emotion regulation difficulties are a transdiagnostic construct relevant to numerous clinical difficulties. Although the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) is a multidimensional measure of maladaptive ways of responding to emotions, it focuses on difficulties with the regulation of negative emotions and does not assess emotion dysregulation in the form of problematic responding to positive emotions. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a measure of clinically relevant difficulties in the regulation of positive emotions (DERS-Positive). Findings revealed a three-factor structure and supported the internal consistency and construct validity of the total and subscale scores.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0145445514566504

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weiss, N. H., Gratz, K. L., & Lavender, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
  • Neuropsychiatric Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Gratz, Kim L.
Venue
Behavior Modification
Published
2015-01-09
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
431-453
ISSN
  • 0145-4455 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4167
OpenAlex
W2075682630
Cited by
212
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7
FWCI
14.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavior Modification (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (L30DA038349, T32DA019426)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
positive emotion regulation, emotional dysregulation, Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, factor structure, scale validation, transdiagnostic constructs, maladaptive emotion regulation, construct validity
MeSH terms
Adult, Affective Symptoms, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Assessment, Social Control, Formal, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review