Cited by 607Emotions and Moral BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDeception detection and forensic psychology

Composure at Any Cost? The Cognitive Consequences of Emotion Suppression

Richards, Jane M., Gross, James J.·1999·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

We frequently try to appear less emotional than we really are, such as when we are angry with our spouse at a dinner party, disgusted by a boss’s sexist comments during a meeting, or amused by a friend’s embarrassing faux pas in public. Attempts at emotion suppression doubtless have social benefits. However, suppression may do more than change how we look: It also may change how we think. Two studies tested the hypothesis that emotion suppression has cognitive consequences. Study 1 showed that suppression impaired incidental memory for information presented during the suppression period. Study 2 replicated this finding and further showed that suppression increased cardiovascular activation. Mediational analyses indicated that physiological and cognitive effects were independent. Overall, findings suggest that emotion suppression is a cognitively demanding form of self-regulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/01461672992511010

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sympathetic activation was found to be reduced by suppression in comparison to non-suppression, but suppression seems less effective in sympathetic downregulation than other ER strategies.

    “Sympathetic activation was found to be reduced by suppression in comparison to non-suppression (but see [11]), but seems to be less effective in sympathetic downregulation than other ER strategies (e.g., [12,13]).”

    From Effects of differential strategies of emotion regulation (2019) · cites this paper as [11]

  • The sample size is quite small compared with other studies.

    “First of all, the sample size is quite small compared to other studies (e.g., [10,11,13]).”

    From Effects of differential strategies of emotion regulation (2019) · cites this paper as [11]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richards, J. M., & Gross, J. J.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Gross, James J.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
1999-08
Volume
25
Issue
8
Pages
1033-1044
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W1971399204
Cited by
607
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 37
FWCI
7.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
Keywords
emotional suppression, incidental memory, self-regulation, emotion regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review