Cited by 64Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAction Observation and Synchronization

Autism spectrum disorder and interoception: Abnormalities in global integration?

Hatfield, Timothy R, Brown, Rhonda F, Giummarra, Melita J, Lenggenhager, Bigna·2019·Autism

Abstract

Research over the past three decades has seen a revived interest in the way the human body—and the way in which it is perceived—interacts with aspects of our experience. Consequently, interoception (i.e. the perception of physiological feedback from the body) has recently been shown to be associated with a wide range of cognitive, emotional, and affective functions, making it broadly relevant to the study of autism spectrum disorder. Although limited qualitative accounts and empirical studies suggest that individuals with autism spectrum disorder encounter abnormalities when perceiving and integrating physiological feedback from their bodies, other studies have suggested that people with/without autism spectrum disorder do not differ in interoceptive ability after accounting for alexithymia. In this article, we discuss the newly recognized importance of interoception in autism spectrum disorder with a focus on how deficits in the perception of bodily feedback might relate to the core features and co-occuring psychopathology of autism spectrum disorder. Finally, a new integrated theory is advanced which posits that people with autism spectrum disorder may experience a reduced capacity to integrate interoceptive information that may result in a narrow attentional bodily focus and reduced motivational and behavioral drives.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362361317738392

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hatfield, T. R., Brown, R. F., Giummarra, M. J., & Lenggenhager, B.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Hatfield, Timothy R
Venue
Autism
Published
2017-11-15
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
212-222
ISSN
  • 1362-3613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7005
OpenAlex
W2770302805
Cited by
64
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, interoception, physiological feedback, alexithymia, attention, motivational drive, co-occurring psychopathology
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Child, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Humans, Models, Psychological, Perception, Sense of Coherence, Interoception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review