Cited by 157Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsTactile and Sensory Interactions

Brief body-scan meditation practice improves somatosensory perceptual decision making

Mirams, Laura, Poliakoff, Ellen, Brown, Richard J., Lloyd, Donna M.·2013·Consciousness and Cognition

Abstract

We have previously found that attention to internal somatic sensations (interoceptive attention) during a heart beat perception task increases the misperception of external touch on a somatic signal detection task (SSDT), during which healthy participants erroneously report feeling near-threshold vibrations presented to their fingertip in the absence of a stimulus. However, it has been suggested that mindful interoceptive attention should result in more accurate somatic perception, due to its non-evaluative and controlled nature. To investigate this possibility, 62 participants completed the SSDT before and after a period of brief body-scan mindfulness meditation training, or a control intervention (listening to a recorded story). The meditation intervention reduced tactile misperception and increased sensitivity during the SSDT. This finding suggests that the perceptual effects of interoceptive attention depend on its particular nature, and raises the possibility that body-scan meditation could reduce the misperception of physical symptoms in individuals with medically unexplained symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.concog.2012.07.009

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 82 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mirams, L., Poliakoff, E., Brown, R. J., & Lloyd, D. M.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Mirams, Laura
Venue
Consciousness and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
348-359
ISSN
1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119670385
Cited by
157
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Consciousness and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Leverhulme Trust
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/D524432/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
body scan meditation, interoceptive attention, medically unexplained symptoms, somatic sensation
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Attention, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensory Thresholds, Signal Detection, Psychological, Statistics, Nonparametric, Meditation, Touch Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review