Cited by 71Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Cognitive interventions targeting brain plasticity in the prodromal and early phases of schizophrenia

Open access
Fisher, Melissa, Loewy, Rachel, Hardy, Kate, Schlosser, Danielle, Vinogradov, Sophia·2013·Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Several important paradigm shifts have occurred in the field of schizophrenia treatment, including an increased focus on early detection, the development of preemptive interventions, and the view of schizophrenia as a neurodevelopmental disease characterized by decreased efficiency and abnormal connectivity in cortical and subcortical neural networks. In this review, we briefly describe some of the neural impairments that contribute to the development of schizophrenia, with an emphasis on the impact of stress and trauma on cognitively vulnerable neural systems. We then present current data on two behavioral interventions that target these critical risk factors and that aim to preempt the onset of schizophrenia in vulnerable individuals or improve the clinical course in recent-onset schizophrenia: cognitive therapy and computerized cognitive training.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143134

Cites

152 of 152 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Brown E under review Increases in cortical gamma oscillatory activity corelate with improved behavior after computerized cognitive training in schizophrenia

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fisher, M., Loewy, R., Hardy, K., Schlosser, D., & Vinogradov, S.
Affiliations
  • San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
Published
2013-03-28
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
435-463
ISSN
  • 1548-5943 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-5951
OpenAlex
W2165398545
Cited by
71
References
152
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH081051, T32MH089920)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
schizophrenia, prodromal symptoms, early-onset schizophrenia, cognitive intervention, neuroplasticity, cognitive therapy, computerized cognitive training, stress, trauma, neurodevelopmental model, neural network connectivity, early detection
MeSH terms
Humans, Neuronal Plasticity, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Prodromal Symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review