Cited by 264Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMobile Health and mHealth Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of a mobile phone and web program on symptom and functional outcomes for people with mild-to-moderate depression, anxiety and stress: a randomised controlled trial

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mobile phone-based psychological interventions enable real time self-monitoring and self-management, and large-scale dissemination. However, few studies have focussed on mild-to-moderate symptoms where public health need is greatest, and none have targeted work and social functioning. This study reports outcomes of a CONSORT-compliant randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy of myCompass, a self-guided psychological treatment delivered via mobile phone and computer, designed to reduce mild-to-moderate depression, anxiety and stress, and improve work and social functioning. METHOD: Community-based volunteers with mild-to-moderate depression, anxiety and/or stress (N = 720) were randomly assigned to the myCompass program, an attention control intervention, or to a waitlist condition for seven weeks. The interventions were fully automated, without any human input or guidance. Participants' symptoms and functioning were assessed at baseline, post-intervention and 3-month follow-up, using the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale and the Work and Social Adjustment Scale. RESULTS: Retention rates at post-intervention and follow-up for the study sample were 72.1% (n = 449) and 48.6% (n = 350) respectively. The myCompass group showed significantly greater improvement in symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress and in work and social functioning relative to both control conditions at the end of the 7-week intervention phase (between-group effect sizes ranged from d = .22 to d = .55 based on the observed means). Symptom scores remained at near normal levels at 3-month follow-up. Participants in the attention control condition showed gradual symptom improvement during the post-intervention phase and their scores did not differ from the myCompass group at 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The myCompass program is an effective public health program, facilitating rapid improvements in symptoms and in work and social functioning for individuals with mild-to-moderate mental health problems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN 12610000625077.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-244x-13-312

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Participant flow diagram.
Figure 1 Participant flow diagram.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Estimated marginal DASS means for the intervention and attention control groups.
Figure 2 Estimated marginal DASS means for the intervention and attention control groups.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Estimated marginal WSAS means for the intervention and attention control groups.
Figure 3 Estimated marginal WSAS means for the intervention and attention control groups.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing: National mental health reform 2011-2012: strengthening primary mental health care services. 2011, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia
  2. International Telecommunication Union: The World in 2011: ICT facts and figures. 2011, Geneva: International Telecommunication Union

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Proudfoot, J., Clarke, J., Birch, M.-R., Whitton, A. E., Parker, G., Manicavasagar, V., Harrison, V., Christensen, H., & Hadzi-Pavlovic, D.
Affiliations
  • Black Dog Institute (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Proudfoot, Judith
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2013-11-18
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
312-312
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122677855
Cited by
264
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 10
FWCI
28.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (510135)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
self-guided treatment, mild to moderate depression, anxiety, stress, work functioning, social functioning, automated intervention, treatment retention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Self Care, Severity of Illness Index, Social Adjustment, Stress, Psychological, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Program Evaluation, Treatment Outcome, Internet, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review