CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,611

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist

Bauer, Mark S., Damschroder, Laura, Hagedorn, Hildi, Smith, Jeffrey, Kilbourne, Amy M.·2015·BMC Psychology
DOI 10.1186/s40359-015-0089-9PMC PMC4573926
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40359-015-0089-9

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Model of a Hypothesized Pathway of Change
Fig. 1 Model of a Hypothesized Pathway of ChangeCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Balas EA, Boren SA. Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. Yearbook of Medical Informatics. Schattauer: Stuttgart; 2000. p. 65–70.
  2. Grant J, Green L, Mason B. Basic research and health: a reassessment of the scientific basis for the support of biomedical science. Res Eval. 2003;12:217–24. · DOI
  3. Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J Roy Soc Med. 2011;104:510–20. · DOI · Paper page
  4. US Institute of Medicine. Assessing Medical Technologies. Washington: National Academy Press; 1985.
  5. Bauer MS, Williford W, Dawson E, Akiskal H, Altshuler L, Fye C, et al. Principles of effectiveness trials and their implementation in VA Cooperative Study #430, “Reducing the Efficacy-Effectiveness Gap in Bipolar Disorder.”. J Affect Disord. 2001;67:61–78. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Yusuf S, Collins R, Peto R. Why do we need some large, simple randomized trials? Stat Med. 2006;3:409–20. · DOI
  7. Rogers EJ. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.
  8. Woolf SH. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA. 2008;299:211–13.
  9. Eccles MP, Mittman BS. Welcome to implementation science. ImplementationSci. 2006;1:1. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Mason SE, Nicolay CR, Darzi A. The use of Lean and Six Sigma methodologies in surgery: A systematic review. Surgeon. 2015;13(2):91–100. · DOI
  11. D'Andreamatteo A, Ianni L, Lega F, Sargiacomo M. Lean in healthcare: A comprehensive review. Health Policy. 2015; epub ahead of print. · DOI
  12. Shields MC, Patel PH, Manning M, Sacks L. A model for integrating independent physicians into accountable care organizations. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(1):161–72. · DOI
  13. Bridgeland J, Orszag P. Can the government play Moneyball? The Atlantic Monthly, July/August. 2013.
  14. Allen H, Baicker K, Taubman S, Wright B, Finkelstein A. The Oregon health insurance experiment: when limited policy resources provide research opportunities. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2013;38:1183–92. · DOI
  15. Kilbourne AM, Goodrich DE, Lai Z, Almirall D, Nord KM, Bowersox NW, et al. Reengaging veterans with serious mental illness into care: preliminary results from a national randomized trial. Psychiatr Serv. 2015;66:90–3. · DOI
  16. Kirchner E, Ritchie M, Pitcock A, Parker LE, Curran GM, Fortney JC. Outcomes of a partnered facilitation strategy to implement primary care-mental health. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29 suppl 4:S904–12. · DOI
  17. Waxmonsky J, Kilbourne AM, Goodrich DE, Nord KM, Lai Z, Laird C, et al. Enhanced fidelity to treatment for bipolar disorder: results from a randomized controlled implementation trial. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65:81–90. · DOI
  18. Almirall D, Compton SN, Gunlicks-Stoessel M, Duan N, Murphy SA. Designing a pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial for developing an adaptive treatment strategy. Stat Med. 2012;31:1887–902. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Smith MW, Barnett PG. The role of economics in the QUERI program: QUERI Series. Implement Sci. 2008;3:20. · DOI
  20. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994.
  21. Creswell JW, Klassen AC, Plano Clark VL, Clegg Smith K. Best Practices for Mixed Methods Research in the Health Sciences. In: Research NIH OBSS. Bethesda: National Institute of Health; 2011.
  22. Conklin J. Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems. England, Wiley: West Sussex; 2005.
  23. Plsek P. Redesigning health care with insights from the science of complex adaptive systems. In: Institute of Medicine, Crossing the Quality Chasm. Washington: National Academy Press; 2001. p. 309–22.
  24. Damschroder L, Goodrich D, Robinson C, Fletcher C, Lowery J. A systematic exploration of differences in contextual factors related to implementing the MOVE! weight management program in VA: A mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11(1):248. · DOI
  25. Damschroder LJ, Lowery JC. Evaluation of a large-scale weight management program using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). Implement Sci. 2013;8:51. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Meyers DC, Durlak JA, Wandersman A. The quality implementation framework: a synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50(3–4):462–80. · DOI · Paper page
  27. Tabak RG, Khoong EC, Chambers DA, Brownson RC. Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(3):337–50. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Chaudoir SR, Dugan AG, Barr CH. Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: A systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures. Implement Sci. 2013;8(1):22. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Leeman J, Baernholdt M, Sandelowski M. Developing a theory-based taxonomy of methods for implementing change in practice. J Adv Nurs. 2007;58(2):191–200. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Hussey MA, Hughes JP. Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007;28:182–91. · DOI
  31. Parchman ML, Noel PH, Culler SD, Lanham HJ, Leykum LK, Romero RL, et al. A randomized trial of practice facilitation to improve the delivery of chronic illness care in primary care. Impl Sci. 2013;8:93. · DOI
  32. Loudeon K, Treweek S, Sullivan F, Donnan P, Thorpe K, Zwarenstein M. The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose. BMJ. 2015;350:h2147. · DOI · Paper page
  33. Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb 3rd RL, Buys SS, Chia D, Church TR, et al. Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(13):1310–9. · DOI
  34. Kilbourne AM, Goodrich DE, Nord KM, VanPoppelen C, Kyle J, Bauer MS, Waxmonsky JA, Lai Z, Kim HM, Eisenberg D, Thomas MR. Long-term clinical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of two implementation strategies to promote collaborative care attendance in community practices. Admin Policy Mental Health 2014. epub ahead of print. · DOI
  35. Hagedorn HJ, Noorbaloochi S, Baines Simon A, Bangerter A, Stitzer ML, Stetler CB, et al. Rewarding early abstinence in Veterans Health Administration addiction clinics. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013;45:109–17. · DOI
  36. Hagedorn HJ, Stetler CB, Bangerter A, Noorbaloochi S, Stitzer ML, Kivlahan D. An implementation-focused process evaluation of an incentive intervention effectiveness trial in substance use disorders clinics at two Veterans Health Administration medical centers. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2014;9:12. · DOI
  37. Gaglio B, Glasgow RE. Evaluation approaches for dissemination and implementation research. In: Brownson R, Colditz G, Proctor E, editors. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science into Practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 327–56. · DOI
  38. Kitson A, Rycroft-Malone J, Harvey G, McCormack B, Seers K, Titchen A. Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARIHS framework: Theoretical and practical challenges. Implement Sci. 2008;3:1. · DOI · Paper page
  39. Harvey G, Kitson A. Implementing Evidence-Based Practice in Healthcare. Routledge: A Facilitation Guide; 2015. · DOI
  40. US Institute of Medicine. The Learning Helathcare System: Workshop Summary. Washington: National Academy Press; 2007.
  41. US Institute of Medicine Committee on the Learning Health Care System in America. Best Care at Lower Cost. Washington: National Academy Press; 2013.
  42. Fihn SD, Francis J, Clancy C, Nielson C, Nelson K, Rumsfeld J, et al. Insights from advanced analytics at the Veterans Health Administration. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33:1203–11. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bauer, M. S., Damschroder, L., Hagedorn, H., Smith, J., & Kilbourne, A. M.
Venue
BMC Psychology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2015-09-16
Volume
3
Issue
1
ISSN
2050-7283
DOI
10.1186/s40359-015-0089-9
PMC
PMC4573926
Cited by
1,611
References
26
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review