Cited by 725COVID-19 and Mental HealthHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Psychological impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome on health workers in a tertiary hospital

Open access
Chong, Mian-Yoon, Wang, Wen-Chih, Hsieh, Wen-Chien, Lee, Chun-Yi, Chiu, Nien-Mu, Yeh, Wei-Chiang, Huang, Tiao-Lai, Wen, Jung-Kwang +1 more·2004·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: The sudden emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) caused international anxiety owing to its highly contagious and pandemic transmission. Health workers are vulnerable and are at high risk of infection. Aims: To assess SARS-related stress and its immediate psychological impact and responses among health workers. Method: Health workers in a tertiary hospital affected by SARS were invited to complete a questionnaire designed to evaluate exposure experience, psychological impact and psychiatric morbidity. The risk and rates of psychiatric morbidity were estimated for exposure experience. Results: Altogether, 1257 health workers successfully completed the survey. In the initial phase of the outbreak, when the infection was spreading rapidly, feelings of extreme vulnerability, uncertainty and threat to life were perceived, dominated by somatic and cognitive symptoms of anxiety. During the ‘repair’ phase, when the infection was being brought under control, depression and avoidance were evident. The estimated prevalence of psychiatric morbidity measured by the Chinese Health Questionnaire was about 75%. Conclusions: The outbreak of SARS could be regarded as an acute episode of a bio-disaster, leading to a significantly high rate of psychiatric morbidity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.185.2.127

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chong, M.-Y., Wang, W.-C., Hsieh, W.-C., Lee, C.-Y., Chiu, N.-M., Yeh, W.-C., Huang, T.-L., Wen, J.-K., & Chen, C.-L.
Affiliations
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW)
Corresponding author
Chong, Mian-Yoon
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2004-08
Volume
185
Issue
2
Pages
127-133
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2108084326
Cited by
724
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 129 · 2021: 278 · 2020: 162 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
SARS, healthcare workers, psychological impact, psychiatric morbidity, occupational stress, anxiety, depression, infection exposure, tertiary care hospital
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Attitude of Health Personnel, Mental Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Medical Staff, Hospital, Middle Aged, Occupational Diseases, Perception, Risk Factors, Taiwan, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review