Cited by 137Social and Intergroup PsychologyGender Diversity and InequalityGender and Feminist Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Disabling the Able: Stereotype Threat and Women's Work Performance

Abstract

Stereotype threat is the risk of confirming a negative stereotype about one’s group as being true of oneself. This laboratory simulation investigated the effect of stereotype threat on women’s performance of a managerial task and explored gender role identification as a moderator of the stereotype threat effect. Specifically, the effect of the stereotype that women are less competent than men in managerial and executive positions was examined. Male and female participants performed a managerial in-basket task in a stereotypically masculine or feminine sex role-typed condition. As hypothesized, women underperformed men in the masculine sex role-typed condition, but not in the feminine sex role-typed condition. These effects were moderated by masculine gender role identification, thus establishing a boundary condition for the stereotype threat effect.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327043hup1902_3

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. 10.1037//0033-295X.95.2.256 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Hefferman M., 2002, Fast Company, 61, 64
  3. 10.1037//0021-9010.74.6.935 · DOI
  4. 10.1037//0021-9010.79.6.826 · DOI
  5. Martell R. F., 1998, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 127
  6. 10.1207/S15327043HUP1603_5 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Schmader T., 2002, Journal of Social Issues, 57, 675
  8. 10.1037//0003-066X.52.6.613 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1037//0022-3514.69.5.797 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1213 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 137

Metadata

Authors
Bergeron, D. M., Block, C. J., & Echtenkamp, A.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Venue
Human Performance
Published
2006-04
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
133-158
ISSN
  • 0895-9285 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7043
OpenAlex
W2023241025
Cited by
137
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
17.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Human Performance (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
stereotype threat, gender role identification, gender stereotypes, boundary conditions, gender differences in leadership

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review