The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Malleability of Automatic Stereotypes and Prejudice
Abstract
The present article reviews evidence for the malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. In contrast to assumptions that such responses are fixed and inescapable, it is shown that automatic stereotypes and prejudice are influenced by, (a) self- and social motives, (b) specific strategies, (c) the perceiver's focus of attention, and (d) the configuration of stimulus cues. In addition, group members' individual characteristics are shown to influence the extent to which (global) stereotypes and prejudice are automatically activated. This evidence has significant implications for conceptions of automaticity, models of stereotyping and prejudice, and attitude representation. The review concludes with the description of an initial model of early social information processing.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Even automatically activated prejudice and stereotypes can be inhibited when people are perceived more in terms of their particular qualities than primarily as members of social categories.50”
From Reducing Racial Bias Among Health Care Providers: Lessons from Social-Cognitive Psychology (2007) · cites this paper as [50]
Citations
Cites
Journal of personality and social psychology
Armstrong, J. (1988) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(88)90126-4 · Cited by 10,544
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 · Cited by 9,210
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682
(1999) · Cited by 6,104
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
Devine, P. G. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 · Cited by 5,673
Social psychology: handbook of basic principles
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3595 · Cited by 4,970
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-3182 · Cited by 4,740
Wyer, R. S., & Srull, T. K. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315807102 · Cited by 4,211
Handbook of personality theory and research
Wilson, G. (1991) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(91)90043-b · Cited by 3,562
Toward an instance theory of automatization.
Logan, G. D. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.4.492 · Cited by 3,466
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Abelson, R. P., 1989, Attitude strength and function, 361
- Allport, G. W., 1954, The nature of prejudice
- Bargh, J. A., 1989, Unintended thought, 3
- Bargh, J. A., 1997, Advances in social cognition, 1
- Bodenhausen, G. V., 1998, Advances in social cognition, 1
- Brewer, M. B., 1988, Advances in Social Cognition, 1, 1
- Carpenter, S., annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology
- Devine, P. G., 1999, Dual process theories in social psychology, 339
- Fazio, R. H., 1989, Attitude strength and function, 153
- Fiske, S. T., 1999, Dual-process theories in social psychology, 231
- Fiske, S. T., 1984, Social cognition
- Kinder, D. R., 1996, Divided by color
- Krosnick, J. A., 1995, Attitude strength. Antecedents and consequences, 1
- 10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.5 · DOI
- Logan, G. D., 1989, Unintended thought, 52
- Mitchell, J. P., annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association
- Smith, E. R., 1998, The handbook of social psychology, 391
- Wasel, W., 1997, Sprache and Kognition, 3, 198
- Webb, E. J. N. U., 1966, Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 998
Lawyer, Interrupted: Gender Bias in Oral Arguments at the US Supreme Court
Patton, D. J., & Smith, J. L. (2017) · Journal of Law and Courts · doi:10.1086/692611 · Cited by 54
Combating Automatic Autobiographical Associations
Hu, X., Rosenfeld, J. P., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612443834 · Cited by 54
“…of IATs, participants were exposed to stimuli and procedures that ran counter to their presumed automatic biases; such manipulations influenced IAT outcomes without respondents having any specific conscious goal of controlling their performance (e.g., Blair, 2002; Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2005).”
BackgroundYam, K.-C., Fehr, R., & Barnes, C. M. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037109 · Cited by 53
“Furthermore, our findings support the contention that stereotyping is a malleable process by revealing that supervisors who are “owls” are least affected by this morning bias (Blair, 2002).”
MethodResultChanging Implicit and Explicit Prejudice
Sritharan, R., & Gawronski, B. (2010) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000017 · Cited by 58
“, Gawronski & LeBel, 2008; Gawronski & Strack, 2004), significant changes have been shown to be possible to some extent (for reviews, see Blair, 2002; Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006a). According to the APE model, changes in spontaneous affective reactions can be due to (1) momentary changes in the activated pattern of…”
BackgroundInfluentialGawronski, B., & Hahn, A. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429452925-2 · Cited by 58
“However, the available evidence suggests that implicit measures are at least as susceptible to contextual influences as explicit measures (for reviews, see Blair, 2002; Gawronski & Sritharan, 2010).”
BackgroundPicture-IAT versus Word-IAT: Level of stimulus representation influences on the IAT
Foroni, F., & Bel-Bahar, T. (2009) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.626 · Cited by 65
“…IAT versions might not measure the exact same ‘‘attitudes’’ but different representations elicited by the relation of the specific stimuli sets to be classified and the category labels (e.g., Blair, 2002; Devos & Ma, 2008; Steffens et al., 2004; see also De Houwer, 2002; Govan & Williams, 2004).”
BackgroundBrondolo, E. N., Ng, W. K. M., Jean-Pierre, K.-L., & Lane, R. (2016) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/14852-006 · Cited by 53
Policy Insights From Advances in Implicit Bias Research
Payne, B. K., & Vuletich, H. A. (2017) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732217746190 · Cited by 61
“These individuals provide counterstereotypical examples, which have been shown to reduce implicit biases (Blair, 2002; Dasgupta & Greenwald, 2001).”
BackgroundReducing Implicit Racial Preferences: II. Intervention Effectiveness Across TimePreprint
Lai, C. K., Skinner, A. L., Cooley, E., Murrar, S., Bräuer, M., Devos, T., Calanchini, J., Xiao, Y. J., Pedram, C., Marhsburn, C., et al. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2712520 · Cited by 52
Bauer, N. M. (2013) · Politics and the Life Sciences · doi:10.2990/32_1_22 · Cited by 54
Castelli, L., & Tomelleri, S. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.006 · Cited by 50
“The actual presence of other individuals significantly modified spontaneous responses demonstrating that changes in the surrounding social environment were effective in producing a positive shift in automatic intergroup attitudes (Blair, 2002; Lowery et al., 2001).”
BackgroundEducational Psychology: Using Insights from Implicit Attitude Measures
Glock, S., & Kovacs, C. (2013) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-013-9241-3 · Cited by 59
“Although automatic in nature, implicit attitudes can be changed and controlled through such effortful cognitive processes (Blair 2002), which might develop to more automatic process with practice (Kawakami et al. 2000).”
BackgroundSocial context and the self-regulation of implicit bias
Allen, T. J., Sherman, J. W., & Klauer, K. C. (2010) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430209353635 · Cited by 51
“In response to these findings, social psychologists have turned to investigating factors that might attenuate implicit bias (e.g., Blair, 2002; Sherman et al., 2008).”
BackgroundAttending to emotional expressions: no evidence for automatic capture in the dot-probe task
Tannert, S., & Rothermund, K. (2017) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2017.1314932 · Cited by 51
“ditionally automatic phenomena rather than global, rigid, and unconditionally automatic biases (Blair, 2002; Casper, Rothermund, & Wentura, 2010, 2011; Müller & Rothermund, 2012; Wittenbrink, Judd, & Park, 2001).”
BackgroundRoefs, A., Stapert, D., Isabella, L. A. S., Wolters, G., Wojciechowski, F. L., & Jansen, A. T. M. (2004) · Eating Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2004.10.001 · Cited by 53
“As these authors also suggest, their and similar findings (see Blair, 2002 for a review) cast doubt on the idea of the existence of a single true attitude.”
BackgroundResultUnconscious bias in the classroom : Evidence and opportunities
Dee, T. S., & Gershenson, S. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.57912/23891580 · Cited by 51
Linguistic Justice and Analytic Philosophy
Chiesa, F., & Galeotti, A. E. (2018) · Philosophical Papers · doi:10.1080/05568641.2018.1438443 · Cited by 51
“The bias is implicit whenever a stereotype, either favorable or unfavorable, about a certain group is automatically associated to members belonging to that group, and affects one’s understanding, actions and decisions in a way that typically takes place below our introspective radar (Blair 2002; Rudman 2004; Beattie 2…”
BackgroundImplicit Attitudes Reflect Associative, Non‐associative, and Non‐attitudinal Processes
Calanchini, J., & Sherman, J. W. (2013) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12053 · Cited by 51
“…variability, or predictiveness of the measures must also be due only to associations in memory (e.g., the same stimuli activate different associations, the same associations are activated to a different extent, or the associations themselves are altered; Blair, 2002; Gawronski & Sritharan, 2010).”
BackgroundModel-free and model-based learning processes in the updating of explicit and implicit evaluations
Kurdi, B., Gershman, S. J., & Banaji, M. R. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1820238116 · Cited by 52
“For instance, implicit evaluations have been shown to be situationally malleable (16).”
BackgroundGamer, J., Schmukle, S. C., Luka-Krausgrill, U., & Egloff, B. (2008) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223890802248786 · Cited by 49
“Furthermore, they corroborate the results of studies that have shown that implicit associations (as assessed by the IAT) are sensitive to interventions (Blair, 2002; Westberg, Lundh, & Jönsson, 2007; but see also Schmukle & Egloff, 2004).”
ResultKurdi, B., & Banaji, M. (2017) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2017.1373555 · Cited by 24
“…different and almost completely disjoint literature using the experimental approach to implicit social cognition, which has documented myriad ways in which contextual influences can modulate implicit social attitudes and stereotypes (for reviews, see Blair, 2002; Lai, Hoffman, & Nosek, 2013).”
Ranking Exercises in Philosophy and Implicit Bias
Saul, J. M. (2012) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2012.01564.x · Cited by 48
Effects of Threat to a Valued Social Identity on Implicit Self-Esteem and Discrimination
Smurda, J., Wittig, M. A., & Gökalp, G. (2006) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430206062076 · Cited by 48
“Rather considerable recent research demonstrates that implicit measures display sensitivity to context (see Blair, 2002 for a detailed review). For example, implicit measures of racial attitudes respond appropriately to experimental manipulations designed to reduce racial bias (e.g. see Dambrun & Guimond, 2004; Dasgup…”
BackgroundInfluentialDessel, P. V., Ye, Y., & Houwer, J. D. (2018) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550617752064 · Cited by 48
A Founding Penalty: Evidence from an Audit Study on Gender, Entrepreneurship, and Future Employment
Kacperczyk, A. J., & Younkin, P. (2021) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.1456 · Cited by 47
Martens, A., Greenberg, J., & Allen, J. J. B. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868308323224 · Cited by 51
Unsupervised Discovery of Implicit Gender Bias
Field, A., & Tsvetkov, Y. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.44 · Cited by 58
Boye, K. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.13 · Cited by 52
Charlesworth, T. E. S., Navon, M., Rabinovich, Y., Lofaro, N., & Kurdi, B. (2022) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-022-01851-2 · Cited by 46
“1 3 of implicit and explicit attitudes (Blair, 2002; Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006).”
BackgroundRobinson, M. D., Meier, B. P., Zetocha, K., & McCaul, K. D. (2005) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2703_2 · Cited by 46
“This was in part due to our concerns related to contextual effects on IAT performance (e.g., Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundBeyond banning the box: A conceptual model of the stigmatization of ex-offenders in the workplace
Baur, J. E., Hall, A. V., Daniels, S. R., Buckley, M. R., & Anderson, H. J. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.08.002 · Cited by 46
Happiness as a Belief System: Individual Differences and Priming in Emotion Judgments
Robinson, M. D., & Kirkeby, B. S. (2005) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167204274081 · Cited by 46
“The order of the tasks was guided by the assumption that cognitive processes are quite malleable (Blair, 2002; Robinson & Neighbors, in press), and therefore, it makes sense to assess them prior to the collection of other variables.”
A public versus private administration of the implicit association test
Boysen, G. A., Vogel, D. L., & Madon, S. (2006) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.318 · Cited by 66
The Role of Self-Involvement in Shifting IAT Effects
Marini, M., Rubichi, S., & Sartori, G. (2012) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000163 · Cited by 45
Appetitive and regulatory processes in young adolescent drinkers
van Hemel-Ruiter, M. E., de Jong, P. J., & Wiers, R. W. H. J. (2010) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.08.002 · Cited by 48
“By now, there is abundant evidence that implicit measures are highly sensitive to context effects, such that the same object can elicit different automatic evaluations, depending on the context in which it is encountered (Blair, 2002; Ferguson & Bargh, 2007; Mitchell, Nosek, & Banaji, 2003).”
BackgroundMuir, C. P., Carton, A. M., & Liu, J. T. (2015) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0275 · Cited by 47
Automatic Cognitive Processes and Nonverbal Communication
Lakin, J. L. (2006) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412976152.n4 · Cited by 47
“, race, sex; Brewer, 1988; Fiske & Neuberg, 1990) is processed automatically in most cases, simply seeing a member of a stereotyped group can activate, without awareness, thoughts and feelings about that group (Blair, 2002; Devine, 1989; Fiske, 1998).”
BackgroundGschwendner, T., Hofmann, W., & Schmitt, M. (2008) · Journal of Individual Differences · doi:10.1027/1614-0001.29.2.70 · Cited by 45
Reducing Implicit Prejudice by Blurring Intergroup Boundaries
Hall, N. R., Crisp, R. J., & Suen, M.-W. (2009) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973530903058474 · Cited by 45
Lakens, D. (2014) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2014.32.supp.168 · Cited by 45
“Social cognition is situated and context dependent (Barsalou, 1999; Mesquita, Barrett, & Smith, 2010; Schwarz, 2007), and an important question in social priming research is how this context dependency can be explained (e.g., Bargh, 2006; Blair, 2002; Loersch & Payne, 2011; Mitchell, Nosek, & Banaji, 2003).”
BackgroundEvidentiality in Nakh-Daghestanian Languages
Forker, D. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.23 · Cited by 44
Avoiding stimulus confounds in Implicit Association Tests by using the concepts as stimuli
Steffens, M. C., Kirschbaum, M., & Glados, P. (2008) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466607x226998 · Cited by 46
Glock, S., & Kleen, H. (2019) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.04.010 · Cited by 58
Quinn, K. A., Mason, M. F., & Macrae, C. N. (2009) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.596 · Cited by 44
Implicit conscientiousness predicts academic performance
Vianello, M., Robusto, E., & Anselmi, P. (2009) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.11.019 · Cited by 48
Ghane, S., Kolk, A. M. M., & Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (2009) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-009-0053-1 · Cited by 44
“In social psychological literature, misreports of beliefs and attitudes have often been ascribed to self-presentation demand [7], the tendency of respondents to present themselves in a socially desirable manner.”
BackgroundGawronski, B., Deutsch, R., & Seidel, O. (2005) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167205274689 · Cited by 44
“Challenging this assumption, however, recent research has shown that spontaneous evaluations assessed with implicit measures are highly sensitive to contextual influences (for a review, see Blair, 2002).”
ResultPolicy Implications of Implicit Social Cognition
Nosek, B. A., & Riskind, R. G. (2012) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/j.1751-2409.2011.01037.x · Cited by 55
“This means that it is a function of both the preexisting content inside the person and the social circumstance in which it occurred (Blair, 2002; Gawronski & Sritharan, 2010; Lewin, 1943).”
BackgroundMechanisms of Group Membership and Exemplar Exposure Effects on Implicit Attitudes
Gonsalkorale, K., Allen, T. J., Sherman, J. W., & Klauer, K. C. (2010) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000023 · Cited by 43
“An accumulated body of evidence has since shown that scores on implicit attitude measures are responsive to variations among respondents, stimuli, and context (see Blair, 2002; Sherman, Gawronski, Gonsalkorale, Hugenberg, Allen, & Groom, 2008).”
BackgroundAge differences in right-wing authoritarianism and their relation to emotion recognition.
Ruffman, T., Wilson, M., Henry, J. D., Dawson, A. J., Chen, Y., Kladnitski, N., Myftari, E., Murray, J. E., Halberstadt, J. B., & Hunter, J. A. (2015) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000107 · Cited by 40
Wang, C. S., Whitson, J., Anicich, E. M., Kray, L. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2017) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721416676578 · Cited by 51
“malleability of stereotypes (Blair, 2002) offers routes to challenge stigma and transform a psychological liability into an asset.”
BackgroundSequential Stereotype Priming: A Meta-Analysis
Kidder, C. K., White, K. R. G., Hinojos, M. R., Sandoval, M., & Crites, S. L. (2017) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868317723532 · Cited by 48
Tinkler, J. E., Li, Y. E., & Mollborn, S. (2007) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1177/019027250707000413 · Cited by 42
DeLancey, S. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.27 · Cited by 42
A Different Kind of Disadvantage: Candidate Race, Cognitive Complexity, and Voter Choice
Crowder‐Meyer, M., Gadarian, S. K., Trounstine, J. L., & Vue, K. (2018) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-018-9505-1 · Cited by 45
Racial disparities in student outcomes in British higher education: examining Mindsets and bias
Mahmud, A., & Gagnon, J. D. (2020) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1796619 · Cited by 43
“Unconscious bias and thinking play a central role in restraining the ability to think and respond flexibly and adaptively, whether it be concerning people, or with regards to thinking, problem-solving, reasoning, evaluating, and creating (Blair 2002; Devine 2012).”
BackgroundLarsen, H., Engels, R. C. M. E., Wiers, R. W. H. J., Granic, I., & Spijkerman, R. (2012) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03805.x · Cited by 44
Climate Control: Gender and Racial Bias in Engineering?Preprint
Williams, J. C., Li, S., Rincon, R., & Finn, P. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4014946 · Cited by 43
Evidence and Evidentiality in Quechua Narrative Discourse
Howard, R. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.11 · Cited by 41
Zhang, Y., & Wang, X. (2024) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/jpbm-08-2023-4690 · Cited by 43
Changes in medical student implicit attitudes following a health equity curricular intervention
Leslie, K. F., Sawning, S., Shaw, M. A., Martin, L. J., Simpson, R. C., Stephens, J. E., & Jones, V. (2017) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2017.1403014 · Cited by 34
Qualitative Analysis of Student Pharmacists’ Reflections of Harvard’s Race Implicit Association Test
Avant, N. D., Weed, E., Connelly, C., Hincapie, A. L., & Penm, J. H.-D. (2018) · Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2018.02.002 · Cited by 42
Kurdi, B., & Banaji, M. R. (2019) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000151 · Cited by 43
Priming Unconscious Racial Stereotypes About Adolescent OffendersPreprint
Graham, S., & Lowery, B. S. (2004) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.601902 · Cited by 41
Exerting Control Over Allegedly Automatic Associative Processes
Forgas, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Tice, D. M. (2011) · doi:10.4324/9780203837962-23 · Cited by 40
Racial Aspects of Police Shootings
Fridell, L. A. (2016) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12189 · Cited by 40
“2 Unlike explicit biases, implicit biases are not necessarily based on animus or hostility toward the group and the biases can manifest outside of conscious awareness (Blair, 2002; Devine, 1989; Dovidio, Kawakami, Smoak, and Gaertner, 2009; Rudman, 2004).”
Intergroup Contact, Media Exposure, and Racial Attitudes
Ramasubramanian, S. (2012) · Journal of Intercultural Communication Research · doi:10.1080/17475759.2012.707981 · Cited by 40
“Prior research demonstrated that willingness to express prejudice without compunction depends on situational factors, such as perceived social norms, motives, and focus of attention (Blair, 2002; Devine, Monteith, Zuwerink, & Elliot, 1991).”
BackgroundThe Systems of Evaluation Model A Dual-Systems Approach to Attitudes
McConnell, A. R., & Rydell, R. J. (2014) · Cited by 40
Reach Out and Reduce Prejudice: The Impact of Interpersonal Touch on Intergroup Liking
Seger, C. R., Smith, E. R., Percy, E. J., & Conrey, F. R. (2014) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2013.856786 · Cited by 39
“Several studies find that implicit attitudes toward racial groups are quite malleable (e.g., Blair, 2002), and our findings support this notion.”
Impact of culture on supplier selection decision making
Carter, J. R., Maltz, A., Maltz, E. N., Goh, M., & Yan, T. (2010) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09574091011089790 · Cited by 40
“Social psychologists maintain that cultural bias is inevitable unless people are knowledgeable of cultural stereotypes and will consciously monitor and inhibit activation of stereotypes (Devine, 1989; Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundEvidentials and Epistemic Modality
Wiemer, B. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.4 · Cited by 39
Calanchini, J., Gonsalkorale, K., Sherman, J. W., & Klauer, K. C. (2013) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.1941 · Cited by 38
“Although implicitly measured bias was once assumed to be highly stable (Bargh, 1999; Dovidio & Fazio, 1992; Fazio, Jackson, Dunton, & Williams, 1995), subsequent research has shown that it is, in fact, malleable (Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundHow do People Evaluate Objects? A Brief Review
Houwer, J. D. (2009) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00162.x · Cited by 40
Craeynest, M., Crombez, G., Haerens, L. L., & Bourdeaudhuij, I. D. (2007) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.05.003 · Cited by 38
“First, although both groups were tested in the same class context and at the same moment in time, it should be noted that implicit attitudes are not stable constructs, but that they may change in function of several conditions (Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundSelf-Esteem Depends on the Beholder: Effects of a Subtle Social Value Cue
Weisbuch, M., Sinclair, S., Skorinko, J. L. M., & Eccleston, C. P. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.021 · Cited by 41
“…strategic manipulation than self-report measures (e.g., Fazio, Jackson, Dunton , & Williams, 1995), implicit measures have been shown to be valid (Fazio & Olson, 2003; Poehlman, Uhlmann, Greenwald, & Banaji, 2007) and sensitive to fluctuations in the social context (for a review, see Blair, 2002).”
Vari, J., & Tamburelli, M. (2020) · Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development · doi:10.1080/01434632.2020.1829632 · Cited by 41
Experimental Studies of Media Stereotyping Effects
Ramasubramanian, S., & Murphy, C. J. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-404681-8.00017-0 · Cited by 37
Explicit Control of Implicit Responses
Wallaert, M., Ward, A. C., & Mann, T. L. (2010) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000022 · Cited by 37
“A growing body of literature suggests that so-called automatic stereotypes and prejudice are at least partially amenable to voluntary control (Blair, 2002; Blair, Ma, & Lenton, 2001; Devine, Plant, Amodio, Harmon-Jones, & Vance, 2000; Fazio, Jackson, Dunton, & Williams, 1995; Moskowitz, Gollwitzer, Wasel, & Schaal, 19…”
BackgroundWeighing the stigma of weight: An fMRI study of neural reactivity to the pain of obese individuals
Azevedo, R. T., Macaluso, E., Viola, V., Sani, G., & Aglioti, S. M. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.041 · Cited by 38
“In contrast, implicit measures bypass desirability issues and reflect automatic, or unconscious, attitudes towards specific groups (Bessenoff and Sherman, 2000; Blair, 2002; Greenwald and Banaji, 1995).”
BackgroundDon't ignore the other half: the impact of ingroup identification on implicit measures of prejudice
Sassenberg, K., & Wieber, F. (2005) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.267 · Cited by 37
Anderson, J. (2018) · Australian Psychologist · doi:10.1111/ap.12229 · Cited by 37
“4 Effect size for multiple regressions in this article was calculated from the observed R(2) using software by Soper (2015) based on the work of Cohen (1988). 5 In Study 2, at the request of the human research ethics committee, student participants were not asked about their ethnicity as this factor was deemed to be u…”
MethodResultEllwart, T., Becker, E. S., & Rinck, M. (2004) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2004.08.008 · Cited by 37
Sex and Credit:Is There a Gender Bias in Lending?Preprint
Beck, T., Behr, P., & Madestam, A. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2126489 · Cited by 37
“Consistent with studies of cognitive behavior, there is a psychological cost involved in being biased that increases in cases where it is easier for the biased party to relate to the individual being biased against (Goodwin et al., 2000; Blair, 2002).”
How does anthropomorphism promote consumer responses to social chatbots: mind perception perspective
Li, B., Yao, R., & Nan, Y. (2025) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-04-2024-0583 · Cited by 36
Rydell, R. J., Hamilton, D. L., & Devos, T. (2010) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2010.28.2.161 · Cited by 36
Is Person Categorization Modulated By Exemplar Typicality?
Locke, V., Macrae, C. N., & Eaton, J. L. (2005) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2005.23.5.417 · Cited by 36
“of this process (e.g., Gilbert & Hixon, 1991; Macrae et al., 1997—for comprehensive reviews of this topic, see Bargh, 1999; Blair, 2002), it is widely accepted that the benefits of categorical thinking are considerable.”
MethodBeebee, H., & Saul, J. (2011) · Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) · Cited by 36
Extragrammatical Expression of Information Source
Squartini, M. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.14 · Cited by 35
Some evidence for the nonverbal contagion of racial bias
Willard, G., Isaac, K.-J., & Carney, D. R. (2015) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.04.002 · Cited by 35
“…examine implicit bias as the dependent measure of racial bias because implicit measures, like the IAT, tend to be very sensitive to shifts in the environment or recent learning history—stretching and contracting with relevant shifts in everyday experience (Blair, 2002; Dasgupta & Greenwald, 2001).”
On the Nature of Gender Categorization
Tomelleri, S., & Castelli, L. (2011) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000076 · Cited by 35
“On the other hand, it has been also proposed that some motivational and contextual factors may block such automatic categorization (Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundBading, K. C., Stahl, C., & Rothermund, K. (2019) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2019.1604322 · Cited by 35
“This conception cannot only explain a wide range of IAT effects based on semantic similarity, salience, and perceptual features, but also accounts for their well-knownmalleability (Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundPrime and prejudice: Co‐occurrence in the culture as a source of automatic stereotype priming
Verhaeghen, P., Aikman, S. N., & Gulick, A. E. V. (2010) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466610x524254 · Cited by 35
“…Rudman & Goodwin, 2004; Rudman & Heppen, 2003), one can manipulate affective experiences experimentally and measure its effect on implicit attitudes (e.g., Blair, 2002), one can measure (or manipulate) cognitive consistency and note its effect on implicit attitudes (e.g., Greenwald et al., 2002).”
BackgroundThe Science of Implicit Race Bias: Evidence from the Implicit Association Test
Morehouse, K. N., & Banaji, M. R. (2024) · Daedalus · doi:10.1162/daed_a_02047 · Cited by 43
“66 For example, social psychologist Bernd Wittenbrink and colleagues found that negativity toward Black individuals was lower after watching a movie clip depicting Black Americans in a positive setting (relative to a negative setting).”
BackgroundPriming Effects of Violence on Infrahumanization
Delgado, N., Pérez, A. R., Vaes, J., Leyens, J., & Betancor, V. (2009) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430209344607 · Cited by 34
“As is the case with other kinds of implicit attitudes (Blair, 2002; Wittenbrink, Judd, & Park, 2001), infrahumanization is a contextually dependent bias, which can be activated or inhibited depending on the elements surrounding the assessment situation.”
BackgroundFreng, S., & Esqueda, C. W. (2011) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2010.507265 · Cited by 34
“Finally, because several factors moderate implicit stereotyping (Blair, 2002), we conducted an exploratory investigation into the possibility that motivation to control prejudiced reactions, prejudice level, and previous experience (i.e., knowledge and involvement with Major League Baseball) might…”
BackgroundMethodActivating stereotypes with brand imagery: The role of viewer political identity
Angle, J. W., Dagogo-Jack, S. W., Forehand, M., & Perkins, A. W. (2016) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2016.03.004 · Cited by 38
“Stereotype malleability and political identity Although implicit stereotypes were once assumed immutable (e.g. Bargh, 1999), current research suggests their malleability (Blair, 2002; Dasgupta, 2009; Rudman, Ashmore, & Gary, 2001).”
BackgroundRace, weapons, and the perception of threat
Payne, B. K., & Correll, J. (2020) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2020.04.001 · Cited by 40
Racism in Pain Medicine: We Can and Should Do More
Strand, N. H., Mariano, E. R., Goree, J. H., Narouze, S., Doshi, T. L., Freeman, J. A., & Pearson, A. C. S. (2021) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.02.030 · Cited by 34
“Training should also include experiences that run counter to one’s unconscious biases, such as exposure to and interaction with highly respected and accomplished Black people.(20,21) Implicit bias training has been found to be an effective strategy for changing implicit associations and prejudices,(22) although few st…”
BackgroundClément-Guillotin, C., Rohmer, O., Forestier, C., Guillotin, P., Deshayes, M., & d’Arripe-Longueville, F. (2018) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.06.014 · Cited by 35
“With some time, effort, or intensity of experience, the implicit system may change in an enduring way (Blair, 2002; Devine, Forscher, Austin, & Cox, 2012; Dovidio et al., 2011).”
BackgroundEvidentiality and Its Relations With Other Verbal Categories
Forker, D. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.3 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Blair, I. V.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Corresponding author
- Blair, Irene V.
- ORCID
- Blair, Irene V.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 242-261
- ISSN
- 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7957
- OpenAlex
- W2109792558
- Cited by
- 1,152
- References
- 96
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 64
- FWCI
- 82.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- prejudice, automaticity, social motives, attentional focus, stimulus cues, individual differences, attitude representation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review