The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Malleability of Automatic Stereotypes and Prejudice
Abstract
The present article reviews evidence for the malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. In contrast to assumptions that such responses are fixed and inescapable, it is shown that automatic stereotypes and prejudice are influenced by, (a) self- and social motives, (b) specific strategies, (c) the perceiver's focus of attention, and (d) the configuration of stimulus cues. In addition, group members' individual characteristics are shown to influence the extent to which (global) stereotypes and prejudice are automatically activated. This evidence has significant implications for conceptions of automaticity, models of stereotyping and prejudice, and attitude representation. The review concludes with the description of an initial model of early social information processing.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Even automatically activated prejudice and stereotypes can be inhibited when people are perceived more in terms of their particular qualities than primarily as members of social categories.50”
From Reducing Racial Bias Among Health Care Providers: Lessons from Social-Cognitive Psychology (2007) · cites this paper as [50]
Citations
Cites
Journal of personality and social psychology
Armstrong, J. (1988) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(88)90126-4 · Cited by 10,544
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 · Cited by 9,210
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682
(1999) · Cited by 6,104
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
Devine, P. G. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 · Cited by 5,673
Social psychology: handbook of basic principles
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3595 · Cited by 4,970
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-3182 · Cited by 4,740
Wyer, R. S., & Srull, T. K. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315807102 · Cited by 4,211
Handbook of personality theory and research
Wilson, G. (1991) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(91)90043-b · Cited by 3,562
Toward an instance theory of automatization.
Logan, G. D. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.4.492 · Cited by 3,466
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Abelson, R. P., 1989, Attitude strength and function, 361
- Allport, G. W., 1954, The nature of prejudice
- Bargh, J. A., 1989, Unintended thought, 3
- Bargh, J. A., 1997, Advances in social cognition, 1
- Bodenhausen, G. V., 1998, Advances in social cognition, 1
- Brewer, M. B., 1988, Advances in Social Cognition, 1, 1
- Carpenter, S., annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology
- Devine, P. G., 1999, Dual process theories in social psychology, 339
- Fazio, R. H., 1989, Attitude strength and function, 153
- Fiske, S. T., 1999, Dual-process theories in social psychology, 231
- Fiske, S. T., 1984, Social cognition
- Kinder, D. R., 1996, Divided by color
- Krosnick, J. A., 1995, Attitude strength. Antecedents and consequences, 1
- 10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.5 · DOI
- Logan, G. D., 1989, Unintended thought, 52
- Mitchell, J. P., annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association
- Smith, E. R., 1998, The handbook of social psychology, 391
- Wasel, W., 1997, Sprache and Kognition, 3, 198
- Webb, E. J. N. U., 1966, Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692 · Cited by 2,756
(2003) · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225 · Cited by 1,829
“Considerable recent research demonstrates that implicit measures also display some sensitivity to context (see Blair 2002 for a detailed review).”
BackgroundAutomaticity: A Theoretical and Conceptual Analysis.
Moors, A., & Houwer, J. D. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.297 · Cited by 1,535
“, M-consciousness; Block, 1995). On the other hand, the subjective criterion is more relaxed, and therefore it is easier to demonstrate SSA in terms of this criterion. The validity of an indirect-without-direct-effect data pattern as evidence for SSA is dependent on two conditions. The direct measure must detect consc…”
BackgroundPrejudice Reduction: What Works? A Review and Assessment of Research and Practice
Paluck, E. L., & Green, D. P. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163607 · Cited by 1,376
“A number of “(un)consciousness-raising” strategies (Banaji 2001, p. 136) aim to combat implicit prejudice through thought suppression, awareness, reconditioning, and control (see Blair 2002 for a review).”
BackgroundLong-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention
Devine, P. G., Forscher, P. S., Austin, A. J., & Cox, W. T. L. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.06.003 · Cited by 1,259
“In response, the fi eld has witnessed an explosion of empirical efforts to reduce implicit biases (Blair, 2002).”
Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method Variables and Construct Validity
Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167204271418 · Cited by 1,216
“However, the generality of these observations may be constrained by evidence for measurement order effects when situational or contextual factors are altered (Blair, 2002; Bosson et al., 2000).”
BackgroundNosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2001) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.19.6.625.20886 · Cited by 1,110
The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review
Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2007) · Cited by 987
Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias
Peck, T. C., Seinfeld, S., Aglioti, S. M., & Slater, M. (2013) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.016 · Cited by 967
“Pre-exposure to information can influence IAT scores (Blair, 2002) and we hypothesize that the increase in implicit racial bias scores found in the study of Groom et al. (2009) was due not to embodiment, but to the pre-exposure of being placed into a situation that is known for race discrimination.”
BackgroundInfluentialDeutsch, F. M. (2007) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243206293577 · Cited by 929
“For example, when a Chinese woman is observed putting on makeup, gender but not Chinese identity is accessed automatically, whereas Chinese identity but not gender is accessed when she is observed using chopsticks (Blair 2002).”
BackgroundReactions to Counterstereotypic Behavior: The Role of Backlash in Cultural Stereotype Maintenance.
Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.157 · Cited by 959
“Although we expected similar effects for the IAT and the SES, the latter is a trait measure of self-esteem, which may have rendered it somewhat insensitive to the manipulations, compared with the IAT (which has shown contextual effects in the past; for a review, see Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodImplicit measures: A normative analysis and review.
Houwer, J. D., Teige‐Mocigemba, S., Spruyt, A., & Moors, A. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0014211 · Cited by 870
“For instance, to examine the stereotype that women are more likely to study art than math, one can present faces of women as primes and ask participants to decide whether a target word refers to art or math. instructions (see Blair, 2002, for a review).”
BackgroundMaina, I. W., Belton, T. D., Ginzberg, S. P., Singh, A., & Johnson, T. J. (2017) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.009 · Cited by 824
“Though few studies have examined int rventions to reduce bias in providers, 525 research suggests that implicit bias is not a fixed trait but is malleable and can be changed with 526 deliberate effort (Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundDasgupta, N., & Asgari, S. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.003 · Cited by 797
“…past few years more than 40 studies have accumulated that collectively demonstrate the sensi- tivity of automatic attitudes and beliefs, even those that typically operate without people s control, to a wide range of motivational, strategic, and contextual influences (for a review see Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundIto, T. A., & Urland, G. R. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.616 · Cited by 697
“Although participants attending to race and gender both showed the explicit context-updating effects, the effect was larger for participants attending to race, F(1,34) = 9.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA meta-analysis of procedures to change implicit measures
Forscher, P. S., Lai, C. K., Axt, J. R., Ebersole, C. R., Herman, M., Devine, P. G., & Nosek, B. A. (2019) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000160 · Cited by 700
“A related approach to the first category is creating experiences that bring to mind an idea or mindset that will indirectly affirm or counter one’s pre-existing associations (Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundReducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions.
Lai, C. K., Marini, M., Lehr, S. A., Cerruti, C., Shin, J.-E. L., Joy-Gaba, J. A., Ho, A. K., Teachman, B. A., Wojcik, S. P., Koleva, S. P., et al. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0036260 · Cited by 719
Attitude construction: evaluation in context
Schwarz, N. (2007) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.638 · Cited by 627
Self-Knowledge: Its Limits, Value, and Potential for Improvement
Wilson, T. D., & Dunn, E. W. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141954 · Cited by 629
Reducing implicit racial preferences: II. Intervention effectiveness across time
Lai, C. K., Skinner, A. L., Cooley, E., Murrar, S., Brauer, M., Devos, T., Calanchini, J., Xiao, Y. J., Pedram, C., Marshburn, C. K., et al. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000179 · Cited by 624
“This dominant view has changed over the past 15 years to one of implicit malleability, with many studies finding that implicit associations are sensitive to lab-based interventions (for reviews, see Blair, 2002; Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006; Lai, Hoffman, & Nosek, 2013).”
Evaluating Six Common Stereotypes About Older Workers with Meta‐Analytical Data
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2012) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12003 · Cited by 689
Attitudes as Object–Evaluation Associations of Varying Strength
Fazio, R. H. (2007) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.603 · Cited by 798
“The findings (see Blair, 2002 for a detailed review) revealed what has been viewed by some as a surprising sensitivity of implicit measures to immediate contextual factors and, hence, has raised questions about the relative stability versus malleability of automatically activated attitudes.”
BackgroundImplicit social cognition: from measures to mechanisms
Nosek, B. A., Hawkins, C. B., & Frazier, R. S. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.005 · Cited by 578
Kunda, Z., & Spencer, S. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.522 · Cited by 553
“…spontaneously (cf. Bargh, 1999; Devine, 1989), it is now clear that such spontaneous stereotype activation is neither inevitable nor universal (cf. Blair, 2002); it depends on perceivers’ prejudice, goals, cognitive resources, and learned associations (Gilbert & Hixon, 1991; Kawakami, Dovidio,…”
BackgroundThe Bias of Crowds: How Implicit Bias Bridges Personal and Systemic Prejudice
Payne, B. K., Vuletich, H. A., & Lundberg, K. B. (2017) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2017.1335568 · Cited by 583
“(For reviews, see Blair, 2002; Lai, Hoffman, & Nosek, 2013.)”
Socially Situated Cognition: Cognition in its Social Context
Smith, E. R., & Semin, G. R. (2004) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(04)36002-8 · Cited by 531
“Importantly, as a recent review by Blair (2002) has demonstrated, eVects of social contexts on responses to other people (including attitudes and stereotypes) extend to implicit measures (response times, priming tasks, IAT measures) as well as explicit (self-report) measures.”
BackgroundReducing Racial Bias Among Health Care Providers: Lessons from Social-Cognitive Psychology
Burgess, D., van Ryn, M., Dovidio, J., & Saha, S. (2007) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0160-1 · Cited by 495
“Even automatically activated prejudice and stereotypes can be inhibited when people are perceived more in terms of their particular qualities than primarily as members of social categories.(50) Interventions to reduce bias in provider judgment, behavior, and decision making should therefore promote the cognitive strat…”
BackgroundAre Zero Tolerance Policies Effective in the Schools? An Evidentiary Review and Recommendations
Skiba, R. J., Reynolds, C. R., Graham, S., Sheras, P. L., Conoley, J. C., & García‐Vázquez, E. (2006) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e516602012-001 · Cited by 454
Alexandrov, A., Lilly, B., & Babakus, E. (2013) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-012-0323-4 · Cited by 448
Rudman, L. A. (2004) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00279.x · Cited by 445
“Finally, the sensitivity of implicit attitudes to priming effects (i.e., to the influence of contextual factors) has now been well established (Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundImplicit Ingroup Favoritism, Outgroup Favoritism, and Their Behavioral Manifestations
Dasgupta, N. (2004) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/b:sore.0000027407.70241.15 · Cited by 434
“…KEE Social Justice Research [sjr] pp1205-sore-486738 April 29, 2004 22:39 Style file version Nov 28th, 2002 158 Dasgupta et al., 2001a; for a review see Blair, 2003), so too behaviors are also quite malleable depending on the extent to which awareness, control, and motivation are at play.”
BackgroundFitzGerald, C., Martin, A., Berner, D., & Hurst, S. (2019) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-019-0299-7 · Cited by 477
“The results of the IAT are highly context specific, as much research shows [16].”
ResultHow Can Decision Making Be Improved?
Milkman, K. L., Chugh, D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2009) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01142.x · Cited by 461
“However, individuals whose mental or physical environment is shaped by the involvement of a black experimenter rather than a white experimenter show less implicit racial bias (Blair, 2002; Lowery, Hardin, & Sinclair, 2001).”
BackgroundAttitude, Inference, Association: On the Propositional Structure of Implicit Bias
Mandelbaum, E. (2015) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12089 · Cited by 437
“For example, here is Blair (2002) on beliefs as associations: “The second definitional issue that must be”
BackgroundEasier done than undone: Asymmetry in the malleability of implicit preferences.
Gregg, A. P., Seibt, B., & Banaji, M. R. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.1 · Cited by 450
“Much empirical evidence also attests to the remarkable malleability of automatic attitudes (for a review, see Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundGender Differences in Automatic In-Group Bias: Why Do Women Like Women More Than Men Like Men?
Rudman, L. A., & Goodwin, S. A. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.494 · Cited by 444
Are “implicit” attitudes unconscious?
Gawronski, B., Hofmann, W., & Wilbur, C. J. (2006) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2005.11.007 · Cited by 430
Alief in Action (and Reaction)
Gendler, T. S. (2008) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2008.00352.x · Cited by 405
Bauer, N. M. (2014) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12186 · Cited by 399
Contextual variations in implicit evaluation.
Mitchell, J. P., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.3.455 · Cited by 371
“The existing literature on automatic attitude change does not suggest whether automatic attitudes are better viewed as stablebut-malleable representations or as contextually bound, online constructions (Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialGallagher, S. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198846345.001.0001 · Cited by 375
Diversity Science: Why and How Difference Makes a Difference
Plaut, V. C. (2010) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/10478401003676501 · Cited by 398
“Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and”
BackgroundOver Thirty Years Later: A Contemporary Look at Symbolic Racism
Sears, D. O., & Henry, P. J. (2005) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(05)37002-x · Cited by 354
Jost, J. T., Rudman, L. A., Blair, I. V., Carney, D. R., Dasgupta, N., Glaser, J., & Hardin, C. D. (2009) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2009.10.001 · Cited by 353
“…factors that make egalitarianism more likely and its opposite, intergroup bias, less likely (e.g., Amodio et al., 2003, 2004, 2006, 2008; Blair, 2002; Dasgupta & Rivera, 2006; Devine et al., 2002; Dunton & Fazio, 1997; Fazio et al., 1995; Glaser & Knowles, 2008; Hofmann, Gschwendner,…”
Self-citationReducing Automatically Activated Racial Prejudice Through Implicit Evaluative Conditioning
Olson, M. A., & Fázio, R. H. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167205284004 · Cited by 367
“As mentioned earlier, a number of recent studies have demonstrated the malleability of implicit measures of attitudes (Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundDiekman, A. B., Steinberg, M., Brown, E. R., Belanger, A. L., & Clark, E. K. (2016) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868316642141 · Cited by 392
“Like other robust stereotypes (e.g., gender, race), it is difficult to change associations that are based on repeated experience; nonetheless, there should be some flexibility in when these stereotypes are applied, both by individuals and to particular fields or local contexts (e.g., Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundSmith, E. R., & Semin, G. R. (2007) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00490.x · Cited by 336
“…in the face of evidence that (a) even implicitly measured stereotypes, less subject to intentional response biases, are highly context sensitive (Blair, 2002) and that (b) nonsocial concepts, for which social-desirability concerns are not an issue, are also context sensitive (Yeh & Barsalou,…”
BackgroundReducing Implicit Gender Leadership Bias in Academic Medicine With an Educational Intervention
Girod, S. C., Fassiotto, M. A., Grewal, D., Ku, M. C., Sriram, N., Nosek, B. A., & Valantine, H. A. (2016) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000001099 · Cited by 331
Cassam, Q. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198826903.001.0001 · Cited by 328
How Contracts Influence Trust and Distrust
Lumineau, F. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314556656 · Cited by 336
“For instance, the specification of communication processes in the formal contract—such as the frequency, relevance, and timeliness of interactions—facilitates consistent knowledge exchange that reinforces positive evaluation of the partner’s faithfulness (Goo & Huang, 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialUntangling the Links between Narcissism and Self‐esteem: A Theoretical and Empirical Review
Bosson, J. K., Lakey, C. E., Campbell, W. K., Zeigler‐Hill, V., Jordan, C. H., & Kernis, M. H. (2008) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00089.x · Cited by 314
“…differences in respondents’ moods, physical or cognitive states, or immediate prior experiences when they complete these measures, may alter respondents’ implicit self-esteem scores from one administration to the next (see Blair, 2002, for a review of context effects in implicit attitude measures).”
Faking the IAT: Aided and Unaided Response Control on the Implicit Association Tests
Fiedler, K., & Bluemke, M. (2005) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2704_3 · Cited by 313
Peterson, E., Rubie-Davies, C., Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. (2016) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.010 · Cited by 274
Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Consumer Behavior
Strack, F., Werth, L., & Deutsch, R. (2006) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1603_2 · Cited by 303
“Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice.”
BackgroundYearby, R. (2018) · American Journal of Economics and Sociology · doi:10.1111/ajes.12230 · Cited by 336
Fiedler, K., Messner, C., & Bluemke, M. (2006) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463280600681248 · Cited by 307
“However, a recent review (Blair, 2002) suggests that performance on the IAT may be more amenable to voluntary influence than expected.”
BackgroundInfluentialGawronski, B., Deutsch, R., Mbirkou, S., Seibt, B., & Strack, F. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.12.004 · Cited by 306
“Rather, it seems that automatic stereotype activation can be successfully overcome or at least signiWcantly reduced (for a review, see Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundBosson, J. K., Brown, R. P., Zeigler‐Hill, V., & Swann, W. B. (2003) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298860309029 · Cited by 302
“…certain personality and behavioral tendencies that indirectly reveal his or her underlying low self-esteem (for research relevant to state, rather than trait, discrepancies between explicit and implicit evaluations, see Blair, 2002; DeHart, 2002; Jones et al., 2002; Karpinski & Hilton, 2001).”
BackgroundKawakami, K., Phills, C. E., Steele, J. R., & Dovidio, J. F. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.957 · Cited by 300
Priming unconscious racial stereotypes about adolescent offenders.
Graham, S., & Lowery, B. S. (2004) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1023/b:lahu.0000046430.65485.1f · Cited by 313
Strike Three: Discrimination, Incentives, and Evaluation
Parsons, C. A., Sulaeman, J., Yates, M., & Hamermesh, D. S. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.4.1410 · Cited by 293
“Studies of cognitive behavior indicate that presenting the biased party with counter-examples of the stereotype of interest can reduce the severity and/or frequency of the biased behavior (Stephanie A. Goodwin et al, 2000; Irene V. Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundGreenwald, A. G., & Lai, C. K. (2020) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050837 · Cited by 364
“This change was prompted by studies reporting shifts in implicit attitudes, stereotypes, and self-concepts in response to brief interventions, first reviewed by Blair (2002).”
ResultWhat Do Implicit Measures Tell Us?: Scrutinizing the Validity of Three Common Assumptions
Gawronski, B., LeBel, E. P., & Peters, K. R. (2007) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00036.x · Cited by 296
“Additional counterevidence against the assumption that indirect measures assess highly stable representations comes from research demonstrating a high level of context sensitivity for these measures (for reviews, see Blair, 2002; Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006a).”
BackgroundParise, C., & Spence, C. J. (2012) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3140-6 · Cited by 297
“In spite of it’s widely agreed upon name, it should be noted that the IAT compatibility effect reflects the outcome of both explicit and implicit associations (Blair 2002; Fiedler et al. 2006).”
BackgroundSocial Tuning of Automatic Racial Attitudes: The Role of Affiliative Motivation.
Sinclair, S. A., Lowery, B. S., Hardin, C. D., & Colangelo, A. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.583 · Cited by 284
“…were commonly assumed to be born of a lifetime of learning and to be thus virtually immutable (e.g., Devine, 1989), an emerging body of research suggests that they are quite malleable via a range of situational factors, mental strategies, and social motives (for a review, see Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundA systematic review of the effects of non-conscious regulatory processes in physical activity
Rebar, A. L., Dimmock, J. A., Jackson, B., Rhodes, R. E., Kates, A., Starling, J., & Vandelanotte, C. (2016) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2016.1183505 · Cited by 301
“One potential technique for enhancing non-conscious regulation of physical activity is to strengthen automatic associations through evaluative conditioning (Blair, 2002; De Houwer et al., 2001; Hofmann, De Houwer, Perugini, Baeyens, & Crombez, 2010).”
BackgroundHaider, A. H., Sexton, J., Sriram, N., Cooper, L. A., Efron, D. T., Swoboda, S., Villegas, C. V., Haut, E. R., Bonds, M., Pronovost, P. J., et al. (2011) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1248 · Cited by 274
“Unconscious biases are normal and rooted in stereotyping, a cognitive process in which individuals use a social category to acquire, process, and recall information about people.(24) This processing pattern functions unconsciously to help individuals organize complex information.”
BackgroundStewart, B. D., & Payne, B. K. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167208321269 · Cited by 269
Physician Implicit Attitudes and Stereotypes About Race and Quality of Medical Care
Sabin, J. A., Rivara, F. P., & Greenwald, A. G. (2008) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181653d58 · Cited by 325
“Strategies aimed at changing implicit attitudes and stereotypes about race and ethnicity include stimulating social desirability, suppression of known prejudices, and the promotion of counter-stereotypes.(40) Dasgupta and Greenwald(41) exposed individuals to counter-stereotypes, such as positive racialized exemplars (…”
BackgroundThe self-regulation of automatic associations and behavioral impulses.
Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., Gonsalkorale, K., Hugenberg, K., Allen, T. J., & Groom, C. J. (2008) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.115.2.314 · Cited by 281
“Several researchers attributed these effects to contextual variability in the associations activated by a given stimulus or category (Blair, 2002; Ferguson & Bargh, 2007; Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006).”
BackgroundImplicit race attitudes predict trustworthiness judgments and economic trust decisions
Stanley, D. A., Sokol‐Hessner, P., Banaji, M. R., & Phelps, E. A. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1014345108 · Cited by 280
“This is both because the former is a continuous, objective, and quantifiable variable, whereas the latter is categorical (and increasingly subjective), and because implicit attitudes are thought to result from many sources beyond one’s own race, including environmental exposure (25) and personal interactions (26).”
What is the Problem? Prejudice as an Attitude‐in‐Context
Eagly, A. H., & Diekman, A. B. (2005) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470773963.ch2 · Cited by 274
“Because prejudice exists at the intersection of group stereotypes and the requirements of social roles, it is fundamentally responsive to social context (Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundImplicit Bias, Stereotype Threat, and Women in Philosophy
Saul, J. M. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199325603.003.0003 · Cited by 254
“A clear way to break down the stereotypes is to make sure that people are exposed to excellent women in philosophy ( Blair 2002 ; Kang and Banaji 2006 ).”
BackgroundThe effect of priming gender roles on women's implicit gender beliefs and career aspirations
Rudman, L. A., & Phelan, J. E. (2010) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000027 · Cited by 252
“We used the Implicit Association Test (IAT) to measure both stereotypes and self-concept because its sensitivity to context effects and predictive utility is well established (Blair, 2002; Greenwald, Poehlman, Uhlmann, & Banaji, 2009), and it is relatively free from social desirability bias and other types of distorti…”
MethodFriese, M., Hofmann, W., & Schmitt, M. (2008) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463280802556958 · Cited by 270
“On the other hand, several studies show that implicit measures are sensitive to changes in context (e.g., Blair, 2002), procedural elements (e.g., Bluemke & Friese, 2006), and need states (Seibt, Häfner, & Deutsch, 2007).”
BackgroundGay Stereotypes: The Use of Sexual Orientation as a Cue for Gender-Related Attributes
Blashill, A. J., & Powlishta, K. K. (2009) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9684-7 · Cited by 254
“Similarly, when individuals are highly motivated, or when they possess adequate cognitive resources (Blair 2002), they are often able to use controlled processes to inhibit the automatic application of a stereotype, even when they have knowledge of the stereotype.”
BackgroundThe Automaticity of Race and Afrocentric Facial Features in Social Judgments.
Blair, I. V., Judd, C. M., & Fallman, J. L. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.763 · Cited by 243
“Research has shown that many automatic processes are more malleable than once believed (Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundSelf-citationBarden, J., Maddux, W. W., Petty, R. E., & Brewer, M. B. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.5 · Cited by 254
“Recently, researchers have found that manipulation of the social context can moderate what was previously thought to be a ubiquitous automatic racial bias favoring the in-group (for a review, see Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundChallenging implicit and explicit alcohol-related cognitions in young heavy drinkers
Wiers, R. W., Van De Luitgaarden, J., Van Den Wildenberg, E., & Smulders, F. T. Y. (2005) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01064.x · Cited by 238
“Recent research in social cognition has indicated that implicit associations may be more malleable than thought previously (for reviews, see Blair 2002; Wiers et al .”
BackgroundKubota, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Phelps, E. A. (2012) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3136 · Cited by 242
The Affective Dog and Its Rational Tale: Intuition and Attunement
Railton, P. (2014) · Ethics · doi:10.1086/675876 · Cited by 237
Doris, J. M., & The Moral Psychology Research Group (2010) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199582143.001.0001 · Cited by 227
Implicit consumer preferences and their influence on product choice
Friese, M., Wänke, M., & Plessner, H. (2006) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20126 · Cited by 216
“There are numerous other studies that demonstrate that implicit measures more generally are sensitive to changes in the measurement context (e.g., Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundWhat moderates implicit—explicit consistency?
Hofmann, W., Gschwendner, T., Nosek, B. A., & Schmitt, M. (2005) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463280500443228 · Cited by 227
“The studies reviewed on the implicit assessment process provide clear evidence for the notion that implicitly assessed representations are subject to a variety of situational and extraneous influences (Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundFemale entrepreneurship in the digital era
Ughetto, E., Rossi, M., Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2019) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-019-00298-8 · Cited by 205
“…against women, defined as “ social judgments of individual group members that lead people to judge group members consistently, and in an exaggerated way, with group expectations ” (Lee and James 2007, p. 229), often unconsciously arise in the male community and are difficult to avoid (Blair 2002).”
BackgroundNon‐conscious bias in medical decision making: what can be done to reduce it?
Stone, J., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2011) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04026.x · Cited by 247
The Positive Consequences of Negative Stereotypes
Pedulla, D. S. (2014) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0190272513506229 · Cited by 213
“Whereas perceptions of warmth stem from whether one views a group as having the intent of causing harm or providing support, perceptions of competence derive from whether a group is viewed as having the ability to carry out their intentions (Cuddy, Fiske, and Glick 2007).”
BackgroundWill a category cue attract you? Motor output reveals dynamic competition across person construal.
Freeman, J. B., Ambady, N., Rule, N. O., & Johnson, K. L. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0013875 · Cited by 200
“Recent work, however, has challenged the inevitability of this process (Blair, 2002; Macrae & Bodenhausen, 2000).”
BackgroundThe Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality
Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.001.0001 · Cited by 209
Yzerbyt, V., & Demoulin, S. (2010) · Handbook of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002028 · Cited by 133
Tomiyama, A. J., Finch, L. E., Belsky, A. C. I., Buss, J., Finley, C., Schwartz, M. B., & Daubenmier, J. (2015) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.20910 · Cited by 199
“This may have increased motivations to appear non-prejudiced, which can have a small effect on implicit attitudes (27), but if participants had such motives, their explicit attitudes should have also shown decreases.”
BackgroundSmith, M. R., & Alpert, G. P. (2007) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854807304484 · Cited by 199
Virtual race transformation reverses racial in-group bias
Hasler, B. S., Spanlang, B., & Slater, M. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174965 · Cited by 207
Hsueh, M., Yogeeswaran, K., & Malinen, S. K. (2015) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/hcre.12059 · Cited by 228
Legewie, J. (2016) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/687518 · Cited by 187
“…of this argument states that racial cues such as relevant crime events can activate or deactivate often implicit racial predispositions (Gilliam and Iyengar 2000; Blair 2002; Fazio and Olson 2003; Quillian 2006; 4 AnAJS reviewer pointed to a similar situation from his/her own ethnographic research.”
BackgroundSelf-Categorization With a Novel Mixed-Race Group Moderates Automatic Social and Racial Biases
Bavel, J. J. V., & Cunningham, W. A. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167208327743 · Cited by 187
Corneille, O., & Hütter, M. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868320911325 · Cited by 206
“More generally, IAEs are largely dependent on information activated in the immediate context of judgment (e.g., Blair, 2002; Gawronski & Sritharan, 2010; Wittenbrink et al., 2001), depend on currently activated goals (Melnikoff & Bailey, 2017), and show low test–retest reliability when measured on…”
BackgroundSaul, J. M. (2013) · Disputatio · doi:10.2478/disp-2013-0019 · Cited by 184
“13 Blair 2002, Kang and Banaji 2006. control prejudice (Moskowitz and Li).”
BackgroundEliminating automatic racial bias: Making race non-diagnostic for responses to criminal suspects
Plant, E. A., Peruche, B. M., & Butz, D. A. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.07.004 · Cited by 179
“Blair et al. (2001) showed that counter-stereotypic mental imagery resulted in weaker implicit stereotype activation compared to neutral mental imagery or no mental imagery.”
BackgroundStability and Change in Implicit Bias
Vuletich, H. A., & Payne, B. K. (2019) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797619844270 · Cited by 202
“Later research, however, found that implicit tests were malleable in response to mental imagery, shifts in attention and goals, salient exemplars, and other interventions (Blair, 2002; Dasgupta, 2013; Lai, Hoffman, & Nosek, 2013; Payne & Gawronski, 2010).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Blair, I. V.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Corresponding author
- Blair, Irene V.
- ORCID
- Blair, Irene V.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 242-261
- ISSN
- 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7957
- OpenAlex
- W2109792558
- Cited by
- 1,152
- References
- 96
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 64
- FWCI
- 82.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- prejudice, automaticity, social motives, attentional focus, stimulus cues, individual differences, attitude representation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review