The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Malleability of Automatic Stereotypes and Prejudice
Abstract
The present article reviews evidence for the malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. In contrast to assumptions that such responses are fixed and inescapable, it is shown that automatic stereotypes and prejudice are influenced by, (a) self- and social motives, (b) specific strategies, (c) the perceiver's focus of attention, and (d) the configuration of stimulus cues. In addition, group members' individual characteristics are shown to influence the extent to which (global) stereotypes and prejudice are automatically activated. This evidence has significant implications for conceptions of automaticity, models of stereotyping and prejudice, and attitude representation. The review concludes with the description of an initial model of early social information processing.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Even automatically activated prejudice and stereotypes can be inhibited when people are perceived more in terms of their particular qualities than primarily as members of social categories.50”
From Reducing Racial Bias Among Health Care Providers: Lessons from Social-Cognitive Psychology (2007) · cites this paper as [50]
Citations
Cites
Journal of personality and social psychology
Armstrong, J. (1988) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(88)90126-4 · Cited by 10,544
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 · Cited by 9,210
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682
(1999) · Cited by 6,104
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
Devine, P. G. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 · Cited by 5,673
Social psychology: handbook of basic principles
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3595 · Cited by 4,970
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-3182 · Cited by 4,740
Wyer, R. S., & Srull, T. K. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315807102 · Cited by 4,211
Handbook of personality theory and research
Wilson, G. (1991) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(91)90043-b · Cited by 3,562
Toward an instance theory of automatization.
Logan, G. D. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.4.492 · Cited by 3,466
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Abelson, R. P., 1989, Attitude strength and function, 361
- Allport, G. W., 1954, The nature of prejudice
- Bargh, J. A., 1989, Unintended thought, 3
- Bargh, J. A., 1997, Advances in social cognition, 1
- Bodenhausen, G. V., 1998, Advances in social cognition, 1
- Brewer, M. B., 1988, Advances in Social Cognition, 1, 1
- Carpenter, S., annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology
- Devine, P. G., 1999, Dual process theories in social psychology, 339
- Fazio, R. H., 1989, Attitude strength and function, 153
- Fiske, S. T., 1999, Dual-process theories in social psychology, 231
- Fiske, S. T., 1984, Social cognition
- Kinder, D. R., 1996, Divided by color
- Krosnick, J. A., 1995, Attitude strength. Antecedents and consequences, 1
- 10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.5 · DOI
- Logan, G. D., 1989, Unintended thought, 52
- Mitchell, J. P., annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association
- Smith, E. R., 1998, The handbook of social psychology, 391
- Wasel, W., 1997, Sprache and Kognition, 3, 198
- Webb, E. J. N. U., 1966, Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 998
Implicit self-esteem compensation: Automatic threat defense
Rudman, L. A., Dohn, M. C., & Fairchild, K. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.798 · Cited by 178
“As a result, it should not be surprising that correlations between implicit and explicit measures are heterogeneous (Blair, 2002; Fazio & Olson, 2003) and moderated by factors such as self-presentation concerns (Nosek, 2005).”
BackgroundGetting Explicit About the Implicit
Uhlmann, E. L., Leavitt, K., Menges, J. I., Koopman, J., Howe, M. D., & Johnson, R. E. (2012) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428112442750 · Cited by 190
“Low test-retest reliabilities can also be theoretically meaningful, reflecting the tendency for implicit measures to tap into implicit cognitive or affective states rather than stable traits to a certain extent (Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundDotsch, R., & Wigboldus, D. H. J. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.003 · Cited by 178
“The Role of Affect To explain discriminating behaviors, social psychological research has focused mainly on social cognitive processes and concepts, such as categorization and stereotyping (see Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundThe transmission of racial attitudes within the family.
Castelli, L., Zogmaister, C., & Tomelleri, S. (2009) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0014619 · Cited by 175
“As such, children might benefit from interventions aimed at changing parents’ implicit attitudes (Blair, 2002; Gawronski, Deutsch, Mbirkou, Seibt, & Strack, 2008; Kawakami, Phills, Steele, & Dovidio, 2007; Rudman, Ashmore, & Gary, 2001).”
The Neural Basis of Implicit Attitudes
Stanley, D. A., Phelps, E. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2008) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00568.x · Cited by 174
“Of great interest are behavioral studies that demonstrate variation in implicit attitudes as a function of social context and the goals and motivations of the participant (Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundWait, what? Assessing stereotype incongruities using the N400 ERP component
White, K. R. G., Crites, S. L., Taylor, J. H., & Corral, G. (2009) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsp004 · Cited by 173
“, Blair, I.V., Chapleau, K.M. (2004). Automatic stereotypes vs.”
Using implicit bias training to improve attitudes toward women in STEM
Jackson, S. M., Hillard, A. L., & Schneider, T. R. (2014) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-014-9259-5 · Cited by 177
“Existing research suggests that diversity training that focuses on education through disconfirming stereotypes (Blair 2002; Rudman et al. 2001) and increasing awareness of implicit bias (Carnes et al.”
BackgroundRacial-ethnic biases, time pressure, and medical decisions
Stepanikova, I. (2012) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.1177/0022146512445807 · Cited by 168
Six Lessons for a Cogent Science of Implicit Bias and Its Criticism
Gawronski, B. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691619826015 · Cited by 272
A High Bar or a Double Standard? Gender, Competence, and Information in Political Campaigns
Ditonto, T. (2016) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-016-9357-5 · Cited by 165
Intergroup Perception and Cognition
Kawakami, K., Amodio, D. M., & Hugenberg, K. (2017) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2016.10.001 · Cited by 186
“…that exposure to a category representation, whether it be an actual ingroup or outgroup member, a photograph, or a category label, is sufficient to activate associated conceptual characteristics (Blair, 2002; Blair & Banaji, 1996; Kawakami & Dovidio, 2001; Macrae, Bodenhausen, & Milne, 1995).”
Background“Math is hard!” The effect of gender priming on women's attitudes
Steele, J. R., & Ambady, N. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.06.003 · Cited by 161
“…such as the context-dependent nature of White participants' implicit bias towards Blacks, and has often made use of strong manipulations, including anti-bias interventions or visual imagery (Blair, 2002; Kawakami, Dovidio, Moll, Hermsen, & Russin, 2000; Kawakami, Phills, Steele, & Dovidio, 2005).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCan we undo our first impressions? The role of reinterpretation in reversing implicit evaluations.
Mann, T. C., & Ferguson, M. J. (2015) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000021 · Cited by 171
“…for the context-dependence of implicit evaluations (e.g., Blair, Ma, & Lenton, 2001; Dasgupta & Greenwald, 2001; Ferguson & Wojnowicz, 2011; Wittenbrink, Judd, & Park, 2001; see Blair, 2002, for a review) does not address the topic of how easily implicit evaluations can reflect new information.”
Developmental Sources of Implicit Attitudes
Rudman, L. A., Phelan, J. E., & Heppen, J. B. (2007) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167207307487 · Cited by 161
“…respect to priming manipulations, exposure to admired Blacks and disliked Whites (Dasgupta & Greenwald, 2001), violent and misogynistic rap music (Rudman & Lee, 2002), and vividly imagining heroic women (Blair, Ma, & Lenton, 2001) have modified implicit associations (see Blair, 2002, for a review).”
BackgroundBlair, I. V., Havranek, E. P., Price, D. W., Hanratty, R., Fairclough, D. L., Farley, T., Hirsh, H. K., & Steiner, J. F. (2013) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2012.300812 · Cited by 160
“Laboratory research in social psychology shows that implicit bias is potentially malleable and does respond to changes in situational cues and social norms.(42) These TABLE 2—Levels of Implicit and Explicit Ethnic/Racial Bias Among PCPs”
Self-citationWood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001017 · Cited by 169
Implicit motivation to control prejudice
Glaser, J., & Knowles, E. D. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.01.002 · Cited by 158
“More recent research has suggested some meaningful variability (Blair, 2002; Devine et al., 2002) and opportunities for altering the content of those implicit stereotypes (e.”
BackgroundSocial Constraints on the Direct Perception of Emotions and Intentions
Gallagher, S., & Varga, S. (2013) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-013-9203-x · Cited by 152
“bias, down to the level of perceptual processes (Barden et al. 2004; Blair 2002; Bargh 1999).”
BackgroundImplicit Gender Bias and the Use of Cardiovascular Tests Among Cardiologists
Daugherty, S. L., Blair, I. V., Havranek, E. P., Furniss, A., Dickinson, L. M., Karimkhani, E., Main, D. S., & Masoudi, F. A. (2017) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.117.006872 · Cited by 150
“Implicit bias is modifiable in experimental settings using counterstereotyping exercises; however, these methods have not been applied in a clinical setting.(61) Furthermore, changing bias among all healthcare professionals is an ambitious task.”
MethodSelf-citationSubtle Discrimination in the Workplace: A Vicious Cycle
Jones, K. P., Arena, D. F., Nittrouer, C., Alonso, N. M., & Lindsey, A. (2017) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/iop.2016.91 · Cited by 152
“For instance, allies can engage in a variety of cognitive techniques to reduce their own implicit bias such as disassociating stereotypic information with stigmatized individuals, recalling favorable counterstereotypes, and practicing mindfulness (Blair, 2002; Lueke & Gibson, 2016).”
BackgroundFeng, S., Park, C. Y., Liu, Y., & Tsvetkov, Y. (2023) · Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.656 · Cited by 149
Self-reports are better measurement instruments than implicit measures
Corneille, O., & Gawronski, B. (2024) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-024-00376-z · Cited by 191
Implicit-Bias Remedies: Treating Discriminatory Bias as a Public-Health Problem
Greenwald, A. G., Dasgupta, N., Dovidio, J. F., Kang, J., Moss‐Racusin, C. A., & Teachman, B. A. (2022) · Gothic.net · doi:10.1177/15291006211070781 · Cited by 176
“Between the publication of a literature review by Blair (2002) and a collection of 17 experimental studies by Lai et al. (2014), empirical findings from studies of implicit-bias-reducing interventions were widely interpreted as supporting a conclusion that implicit biases are malleable (meaning…”
Conrey, F. R., & Smith, E. R. (2007) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.718 · Cited by 157
“The plausibility of the latter assumption has been weakened in hypothesized to allow relatively little deliberative post-processing, show great malleability (e.g., Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundImplicit Attitudes Toward Arab-Muslims and the Moderating Effects of Social Information
Park, J., Felix, K. J., & Lee, G. (2007) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973530701330942 · Cited by 146
“Recently, many researchers have reported that automatic attitudes or stereotypes are malleable (see Blair, 2002, for a review). We explore whether implicit attitudes toward this particular ethno-religious group can be moderated, as exhibited in other studies. As previously mentioned, the literature on attitudes toward…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialKlein, O., Doyen, S., Leys, C., da Gama, P. A. M. D. S., Miller, S., Questienne, L., & Axel Cleeremans, B. (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612463704 · Cited by 151
“There are many instances of such effects in the social psychology literature (see Blair, 2002; Dijksterhuis & Bargh, 2001; Wheeler & DeMaree, 2009 for reviews).”
BackgroundPatterns of Implicit and Explicit Attitudes: IV. Change and Stability From 2007 to 2020
Charlesworth, T. E. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2022) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976221084257 · Cited by 138
“After all, a major contribution of social-psychological theory has been the demonstration of short-term malleability or “context effects” on attitudes (e.g., Blair, 2002; Schwarz, 2007).”
BackgroundImplicit Science Stereotypes Mediate the Relationship between Gender and Academic Participation
Lane, K. A., Goh, J. X., & Driver‐Linn, E. (2011) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0036-z · Cited by 160
“Even if implicit stereotypes are in place, they are not invariant (Blair, 2002; Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006).”
BackgroundSibley, C. G., & Liu, J. H.-F. (2007) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.459 · Cited by 143
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Depression: The Integrated Perspective
Cox, W. T. L., Abramson, L. Y., Devine, P. G., & Hollon, S. D. (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612455204 · Cited by 142
“…through the use of automatic, nonintentional methods to reduce automatic, nonintentional stereotyping (e.g., Araya, Akrami, Ekehammar, & Hedlund, 2002; Clerkin & Teachman, 2010; Olson & Fazio, 2006; for reviews, see Blair, 2002; Hertel & Mathews, 2011; Paluck & Green, 2009; Shalev & Bargh, 2011).”
BackgroundA New Look at Emotional Intelligence: A Dual-Process Framework
Fiori, M. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868308326909 · Cited by 155
“Indeed, automatic responses are not immutable and rigid, but they are sensitive to the characteristics of the context as well as other characteristics, such as the perceiver’s goals and focus of attention (Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundWhy researchers should think "real-time": A cognitive rationale.
Schwarz, N. (2012) · Cited by 141
Scharrer, E., & Ramasubramanian, S. (2015) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12103 · Cited by 141
“Social psychological research on motivational approaches to prejudice reduction informs us that negation training, emphasis on self-enhancement goals, and motivation to appear nonprejudiced can curb or change even implicit prejudice (Blair, 2002; Stewart & Payne, 2008).”
BackgroundHarvey, M. G., Novičević, M. M., Buckley, M. R., & Fung, H. (2005) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2005.05.004 · Cited by 142
“Inpatriate stereotyping and stigmatization can be moderated by various events including home-country managers’: (1) motivation to form and maintain positive intercultural relationships; (2) efforts to promote counter-stereotypes; (3) focus of attention; and (4) contextual cues (Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundSalmon, P., Peters, S., Clifford, R., Iredale, W., Gask, L. L., Rogers, A. E., Dowrick, C. F., Hughes, J. G., & Morriss, R. K. (2007) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-006-0094-z · Cited by 139
“Extensive social psychology research confirms that attitudes, even stereotypical and negative ones, are contextually dependent.(24) Never-”
BackgroundDiscrimination and the Implicit Association Test
Rudman, L. A., & Ashmore, R. D. (2007) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430207078696 · Cited by 139
“For example, they are sensitive to context and conditioning, just as attitudes and prejudice are (Blair, 2002; Fazio & Olson, 2003).”
BackgroundImplicit Attitudes and Beliefs Adapt to Situations
Dasgupta, N. (2013) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407236-7.00005-x · Cited by 152
“With the advent of the twenty-first century, new research from several research laboratories including mine began to challenge assumptions about the immutability of implicit attitudes (for reviews, see Blair, 2002; Dasgupta, 2009; Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006).”
BackgroundCarton, A. M., & Rosette, A. S. (2011) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.0745 · Cited by 139
Dasgupta, N., & Rivera, L. M. (2008) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2008.26.1.112 · Cited by 147
“Specifically, while extant research has shown that brief exposure to counterstereotypic individuals decreases implicit bias on average (Blair, 2002; Dasgupta, in press), it has not examined whether the effectiveness of these situations depends on individual differences among perceivers, such as…”
Meißner, F., Grigutsch, L. A., Koranyi, N., Müller, F., & Rothermund, K. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02483 · Cited by 155
“…Blacks, women, gays, or the elderly) is also at odds with the finding that more or less all attitudes, beliefs, and stereotypes are context-specific (Blair, 2002; Wigboldus et al., 2003; Casper et al., 2010, 2011; Kornadt and Rothermund, 2011, 2015; Müller and Rothermund, 2012; Gawronski and…”
BackgroundDasgupta, N., & Rivera, L. M. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.268 · Cited by 137
Bauer, N. M. (2017) · Journal of Women Politics & Policy · doi:10.1080/1554477x.2016.1268875 · Cited by 142
“…individuals do not automatically rely on feminine stereotypes when making a judgment about a woman; but rather, stereotype reliance depends on the reliance and salience of a particular stereotype to a decision-making task (Kunda and Spencer 2003; Brewer 1988; Sinclair and Kunda 1999; Blair 2002).”
BackgroundSalmon, P., Peters, S., Rogers, A., Gask, L., Clifford, R., Iredale, W., Dowrick, C., & Morriss, R. (2007) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/cmm015 · Cited by 132
Continuous dynamics in the real-time perception of race
Freeman, J. B., Pauker, K., Apfelbaum, E. P., & Ambady, N. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.002 · Cited by 132
“…thought to be an inevitable consequence of the perception of others (Allport, 1954), but recent work has sought evidence for the avoidable nature of categorization in the hopes that this could mitigate prejudice (e.g., Blair, 2002; Kurzban, Tooby, & Cosmides, 2001; Macrae & Bodenhausen, 2000 ).”
BackgroundA face with a cue: exploring the inevitability of person categorization
Martin, D. S., & Macrae, C. N. (2007) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.445 · Cited by 131
“As one would expect of such a dispute, the views expressed by the opposing camps were decidedly polarized (see Bargh, 1999; Blair, 2002; Macrae & Bodenhausen, 2000).”
BackgroundInfluentialMoral Learning: Conceptual foundations and normative relevance
Railton, P. (2016) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.015 · Cited by 136
Rydell, R. J., McConnell, A. R., Strain, L. M., Claypool, H. M., & Hugenberg, K. (2006) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.393 · Cited by 126
“However, it is possible that implicit attitudes change in a non-linear fashion, and instead, suddenly change once a certain threshold is reached (Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundMauss, I. B., Evers, C., Wilhelm, F. H., & Gross, J. J. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167205283841 · Cited by 184
“Second, the IAT has good psychometric properties, including adequate stability across time (e.g., Greenwald et al., 1998; Greenwald & Farnham, 2000; but see Blair, 2002; Dasgupta & Asgari, 2004, for situational influences on IAT scores).”
BackgroundThe surprisingly limited malleability of implicit racial evaluations
Joy-Gaba, J. A., & Nosek, B. A. (2010) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000020 · Cited by 123
“Given the sheer volume of studies, there is little doubt that Blair’s (2002) conclusion about the malleability of implicit social cognition is correct.”
BackgroundCesario, J., Plaks, J. E., Hagiwara, N., Navarrete, C. D., & Higgins, E. T. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610378685 · Cited by 125
“These data are consistent with other research showing flexibility in response to priming (e.g., Blair, 2002; Sinclair, Lowery, Hardin, & Colangelo, 2005), but, at the same time, our study goes beyond this earlier work by showing, for the first time, the influence of the person’s physical…”
ResultHouwer, J. D. (2006) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2005.12.002 · Cited by 125
Societal and Managerial Implications of Implicit Social Cognition: Why Milliseconds Matter
Chugh, D. (2004) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/b:sore.0000027410.26010.40 · Cited by 123
“While implicit bias, as measured by the IAT, appears to be an individual difference to some extent, it is also prone to situational influences (Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundCarr, P. B., Dweck, C. S., & Pauker, K. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0028849 · Cited by 134
State Authenticity in Everyday Life
Lenton, A. P., Slabu, L., & Sedikides, C. (2015) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2033 · Cited by 138
“This is why we label the opposite of self-alienation ‘self-attunement’ rather than ‘self-awareness’: Awareness implies a conscious process (Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundCategorizing Others: The Dynamics of Person Construal.
Quinn, K. A., & Macrae, C. N. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.467 · Cited by 120
Implicit affect in organizations☆
Barsade, S. G., Ramarajan, L., & Westen, D. (2009) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2009.06.008 · Cited by 123
“That is, implicit affective experiences are not fixed, but can be changed based on situational factors and other boundary conditions (Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundLiberty and Justice for All? Implications of Exposure to the U.S. Flag for Intergroup Relations
Butz, D. A., Plant, E. A., & Doerr, C. E. (2007) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167206296299 · Cited by 119
“…© 2007 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc. 96 Extensive work has documented that the concepts, attitudes, and goals that are associated with stimuli are effortlessly and automatically activated on exposure to that stimuli (e.g., Bargh, 1990; Blair, 2002; Devine, 2001).”
BackgroundPerspective taking can increase stereotyping: The role of apparent stereotype confirmation
Skorinko, J. L. M., & Sinclair, S. A. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.009 · Cited by 119
An integrated threat model of explicit and implicit attitudes
Aberson, C. L., & Gaffney, A. M. (2008) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.582 · Cited by 118
An eye for the I: Preferential attention to the eyes of ingroup members.
Kawakami, K., Williams, A., Sidhu, D. M., Choma, B. L., Rodríguez‐Bailón, R., Cañadas, E., Chung, D., & Hugenberg, K. (2014) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0036838 · Cited by 128
“Whereas previous research has often inferred categorical and individuation processes based on downstream consequences such as the activation of stereotypes, affective responses, negative evaluations, and discrimination (Bargh, 1999; Blair, 2002; Devine, 1989; Kawakami, Dovidio, & Dijksterhuis, 2003; Kawakami et al., 2…”
BackgroundAutomatic associations and panic disorder: Trajectories of change over the course of treatment.
Teachman, B. A., Marker, C. D., & Smith-Janik, S. B. (2008) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013113 · Cited by 113
“While there is now considerable evidence that automatic associations are malleable (see Blair, 2002), we still assume that sustained change in automatic associations (as opposed to temporary shifts) requires a fair amount of practice of new associations.”
The Effect of Context on the Silver Ceiling: A Role Congruity Perspective on Prejudiced Responses
Diekman, A. B., & Hirnisey, L. (2007) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167207303019 · Cited by 118
“Contextual variation has recently sparked much interest, with several clear experimental demonstrations that even implicit attitudes vary with context (Blair, 2002; Mitchell, Nosek, & Banaji, 2003).”
BackgroundSocially Situated Cognition in Perspective
Semin, G. R., & Smith, E. R. (2013) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2013.31.2.125 · Cited by 117
(Why) do I think what you think? Epistemic social tuning and implicit prejudice.
Lun, J., Sinclair, S. A., Whitchurch, E., & Glenn, C. R. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.957 · Cited by 116
“Although individuals have limited conscious awareness or control of these attitudes, a growing body of research has begun to show that they are responsive to the apparent beliefs of individuals in one’s social context (Blair, 2002; Devine, 2001; Lowery et al., 2001).”
BackgroundNánay, B. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198809500.001.0001 · Cited by 121
Ramasubramanian, S., & Oliver, M. B. (2007) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213260701283244 · Cited by 110
“However, even automatically activated prejudicial responses can be suppressed under appropriate situational and motivational circumstances (Blair, 2002; Devine & Monteith, 1999) The current study explores the role of media literacy training and counter-stereotypical media exemplars in decreasing prejudicial responses.”
InfluentialAikhenvald, A. Y. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.1 · Cited by 108
Ethnic hierarchies, ethnic prejudice, and social dominance orientation
Snellman, A., & Ekehammar, B. (2005) · Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/casp.812 · Cited by 108
“Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Accepted 9 December 2004 individuals or situations; their malleability has been extensively investigated and proved by using cognitive techniques like IAT, primed Stroop task, sequential priming and word completion tasks (Blair, 2002).”
Gender and Social‐Cognitive Development
Leaper, C. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy219 · Cited by 114
Herbst, K. C., Finkel, E. J., Allan, D., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/660854 · Cited by 109
The Contact Hypothesis Revisited
Henry, P. J., & Hardin, C. D. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01795.x · Cited by 107
“Recent research has challenged the dual-process assumption that implicit prejudice is impervious to change by demonstrating that it can be reduced or even reversed by social context (reviewed in Blair, 2002).”
Riley, T. (2010) · cIRcle (University of British Columbia) · doi:10.14288/1.0055749 · Cited by 109
Stuck in a rut: Perseverative response tendencies and the neuroticism-distress relationship.
Robinson, M. D., Wilkowski, B. M., Kirkeby, B. S., & Meier, B. P. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.78 · Cited by 112
The base rate principle and the fairness principle in social judgment
Cao, J., & Banaji, M. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.1524268113 · Cited by 93
Being What You Say: The Effect of Essentialist Linguistic Labels on Preferences
Walton, G. M., & Banaji, M. R. (2004) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.22.2.193.35463 · Cited by 106
Kawakami, K., Dovidio, J. F., & van Kamp, S. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.05.004 · Cited by 104
Implicit alcohol-related cognitions in a clinical sample of heavy drinkers
Houwer, J. D., Crombez, G., Koster, E. H. W., & Beul, N. D. (2004) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2004.05.001 · Cited by 104
Goal-Dependent and Goal-Independent Effects of Irrelevant Evaluations
Klauer, K. C., & Musch, J. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167202289009 · Cited by 103
“(2001), dissociations of this kind bear on two issues of considerable debate: (a) the extent to which the automatic activation of attitudes is malleable (Blair, 2001) and in particular goal-dependent and (b) whether the processing of evaluative information must be assumed to differ from cognitive processing.”
BackgroundInfluentialResponsibility for implicit bias
Holroyd, J., Scaife, R., & Stafford, T. (2017) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12410 · Cited by 106
“For example, some studies have suggested that the presence of pictures depicting counter‐stereotypical exemplars reduces negative biases (Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundDoes the Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety measure trait and state variance?
Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2004) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.525 · Cited by 105
“Nevertheless, the results of both studies are at odds with the evidence for a strong dependence of attitude- and stereotype-IATs on situational manipulations (see Blair, 2002, for an overview).”
ResultChanging one's prejudiced ways: Awareness, affect, and self-regulation
Monteith, M. J., & Mark, A. Y. (2005) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463280500229882 · Cited by 100
“Automatic stereotyping and prejudice effects are not inevitable (Blair, 2002), a conclusion underscored by—for example—the discovery of individual differences that moderate automatic stereotyping effects (e.g., motivations to control prejudice, Amodio, Harmon-Jones, & Devine, 2003; Devine, Plant,…”
BackgroundHarga-diri (Self-esteem) Terancam dan Perilaku Menghindar
Srisayekti, W., & Setiady, D. A. (2015) · Jurnal Psikologi · doi:10.22146/jpsi.7169 · Cited by 99
“Pengukuran melalui cara ini memerlukan kontrol penuh partisipan dan partisipan dapat mengendalikan proses pengambilan keputusan untuk menekan perilaku prasangka dan stereotyping (lihat Bargh dkk., 1996; Blair, 2002; Hebl dkk., 2002).”
BackgroundDo men and women have different philosophical intuitions? Further data
Adleberg, T., Thompson, M., & Nahmias, E. (2014) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2013.878834 · Cited by 104
“There is some evidence that counter-stereotype exemplars can counteract both implicit biases and stereotype threat (Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundBurns, M. D., Monteith, M. J., & Parker, L. R. M. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.003 · Cited by 107
“Although researchers have very thoroughly investigated the malleability of automatic stereotype activation (Blair, 2002) and the reduction of implicit bias (e.”
BackgroundGeneralization of Positive and Negative Attitudes Toward Individuals to Outgroup Attitudes
Stark, T., Flache, A., & Veenstra, R. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167213480890 · Cited by 99
“This line of research has shown that people base their expectations about unknown members of outgroups on the perceptions they have about that group in general until more knowledge about the individual person becomes available (Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundRudman, L. A. (2004) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/b:sore.0000027406.32604.f6 · Cited by 98
“Blair, I. V. (2002).”
The influence of experimentally created extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test
Han, A., Olson, M. A., & Fázio, R. H. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.04.006 · Cited by 98
Gifted and Maladjusted? Implicit Attitudes and Automatic Associations Related to Gifted Children
Preckel, F., Baudson, T. G., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., & Glock, S. (2015) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831215596413 · Cited by 88
“However, implicit attitude measures (De Houwer, 2006) as well as implicit attitudes are malleable (Blair, 2002); the one and only attitude does not exist because attitudes are context-dependent evaluations.”
BackgroundI like you, I like you not: Understanding the formation of context-dependent automatic attitudes
Rydell, R. J., & Gawronski, B. (2008) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930802355255 · Cited by 97
“Moreover, the present research shows that evaluatively heterogeneous representations, based on different experiences across different contexts, may be responsible for the high context sensitivity of automatic evaluations in previous research (see Blair, 2002; Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006, for reviews). Specifically,…”
BackgroundInfluentialCognitive processes in associative and categorical priming: A diffusion model analysis.
Voß, A., Rothermund, K., Gast, A., & Wentura, D. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0029459 · Cited by 108
Implicit Social Cognition and Law
Lane, K. A., Kang, J., & Banaji, M. R. (2007) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112748 · Cited by 96
Maddux, W. W., Barden, J., Brewer, M. B., & Petty, R. E. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.05.002 · Cited by 96
Beyond prejudice: Toward a sociocultural psychology of racism and oppression.
Adams, G., Biernat, M., Branscombe, N. R., Crandall, C. S., & Wrightsman, L. S. (2008) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/11681-012 · Cited by 99
Changing Our Implicit Minds: How, When, and Why Implicit Evaluations Can Be Rapidly Revised
Cone, J., Mann, T. C., & Ferguson, M. J. (2017) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2017.03.001 · Cited by 107
“…it would seem that there are a dizzying number of demonstrations in the literature of implicit evaluations appearing to be highly malleable in response to features of the current context or one’s current goals (for review, see Blair, 2002; Ferguson & Fukukura, 2012; Gawronski & Sritharan, 2010).”
BackgroundIs Beautiful Always Good? Implicit Benefits of Facial Attractiveness
van Leeuwen, M. L., & Macrae, C. N. (2004) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.22.6.637.54819 · Cited by 99
“category–based manner (Bargh, 1999; Blair, 2002; Bodenhausen & Macrae, 1998; Greenwald & Banaji, 1995).”
Politics in the Mind's Eye: Imagination as a Link between Social and Political Cognition
Petersen, M. B., & Aarøe, L. (2013) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055413000026 · Cited by 97
“Importantly, however, previous research has repeatedly and convincingly demonstrated that the explicit process of imagination has the power to enhance opinion effects of content in implicit memory (Blair 2002).”
ResultStern, C., West, T. V., Jost, J. T., & Rule, N. O. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031187 · Cited by 99
Mind the gap: Increasing associations between the self and blacks with approach behaviors.
Phills, C. E., Kawakami, K., Tabi, E., Nadolny, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022159 · Cited by 92
“…Whites (Greenwald et al., 1998; Kawakami, Dion, & Dovidio, 1998; Kawakami & Dovidio, 2001), a number of strategies exist that can successfully reduce these types of negative implicit racial associations (Blair, 2002; Kawakami et al., 2000; Kawakami, Phills, et al., 2007; Wittenbrink et al., 2001).”
BackgroundInfluentialTheorizing Moral Cognition: Culture in Action, Situations, and Relationships
Luft, A. (2020) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/2378023120916125 · Cited by 95
“…when we intentionally want to control our perceptions of others, for example, to suppress unwanted stereotypes because of conflicting personal value commitments to equality (Amodio and Devine 2010; Amodio and Swencionis 2018; Blair 2002; Devine 1989; Eberhardt 2019; Macrae and Bodenhausen 2000).”
BackgroundWorkplace Ageism: Discovering Hidden Bias
Malinen, S. K., & Johnston, L. C. (2013) · Experimental Aging Research · doi:10.1080/0361073x.2013.808111 · Cited by 109
“However, there is increasing evidence that implicit attitudes can be malleable in response to various motivational and contextual influences (see Blair, 2002, for a review).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Blair, I. V.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Corresponding author
- Blair, Irene V.
- ORCID
- Blair, Irene V.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 242-261
- ISSN
- 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7957
- OpenAlex
- W2109792558
- Cited by
- 1,152
- References
- 96
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 64
- FWCI
- 82.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- prejudice, automaticity, social motives, attentional focus, stimulus cues, individual differences, attitude representation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review