Cited by 1,152Social and Intergroup PsychologySocial Power and Status DynamicsDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Malleability of Automatic Stereotypes and Prejudice

Blair, Irene V.·2002·Personality and Social Psychology Review

Abstract

The present article reviews evidence for the malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. In contrast to assumptions that such responses are fixed and inescapable, it is shown that automatic stereotypes and prejudice are influenced by, (a) self- and social motives, (b) specific strategies, (c) the perceiver's focus of attention, and (d) the configuration of stimulus cues. In addition, group members' individual characteristics are shown to influence the extent to which (global) stereotypes and prejudice are automatically activated. This evidence has significant implications for conceptions of automaticity, models of stereotyping and prejudice, and attitude representation. The review concludes with the description of an initial model of early social information processing.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327957pspr0603_8

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 96 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Abelson, R. P., 1989, Attitude strength and function, 361
  2. Allport, G. W., 1954, The nature of prejudice
  3. Bargh, J. A., 1989, Unintended thought, 3
  4. Bargh, J. A., 1997, Advances in social cognition, 1
  5. Bodenhausen, G. V., 1998, Advances in social cognition, 1
  6. Brewer, M. B., 1988, Advances in Social Cognition, 1, 1
  7. Carpenter, S., annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology
  8. Devine, P. G., 1999, Dual process theories in social psychology, 339
  9. Fazio, R. H., 1989, Attitude strength and function, 153
  10. Fiske, S. T., 1999, Dual-process theories in social psychology, 231
  11. Fiske, S. T., 1984, Social cognition
  12. Kinder, D. R., 1996, Divided by color
  13. Krosnick, J. A., 1995, Attitude strength. Antecedents and consequences, 1
  14. 10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.5 · DOI
  15. Logan, G. D., 1989, Unintended thought, 52
  16. Mitchell, J. P., annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association
  17. Smith, E. R., 1998, The handbook of social psychology, 391
  18. Wasel, W., 1997, Sprache and Kognition, 3, 198
  19. Webb, E. J. N. U., 1966, Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 998

Metadata

Authors
Blair, I. V.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Blair, Irene V.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Review
Published
2002-08
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
242-261
ISSN
  • 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7957
OpenAlex
W2109792558
Cited by
1,152
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 64
FWCI
82.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
prejudice, automaticity, social motives, attentional focus, stimulus cues, individual differences, attitude representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review