Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,823

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ACSM’s New Preparticipation Health Screening Recommendations from ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, Ninth Edition

Open access
Thompson, Paul D., Arena, Ross, Riebe, Deborah, Pescatello, Linda S.·2013·Current Sports Medicine Reports
DOI 10.1249/jsr.0b013e31829a68cf
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Introduction Previously the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) preparticipation health screening recommendations were cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment and stratification of all people, and a medical examination and symptom-limited exercise testing as part of the preparticipation health screening prior to initiating vigorous-intensity physical activity in individuals at increased risk for occult CVD (14). Individuals at increased risk in these recommendations were men ≥45 yr and women ≥55 yr; those with 2 or more major CVD risk factors; individuals with signs and symptoms of CVD; and those with known cardiac, pulmonary, or metabolic disease. ACSM’s new preparticipation health screening recommendations are as follows: Reduce the emphasis on the need for medical evaluation (i.e., medical examination and exercise testing) as part of the preparticipation health screening process prior to initiating a progressive exercise regimen in healthy, asymptomatic persons; Use the term risk classification to group people as low, moderate, or high risk based upon the presence or absence of CVD risk factors, signs or symptoms, and/or known cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, or metabolic disease; Emphasize identifying those with known disease since they are at greatest risk for an exercise-related cardiac event (Table); Adopt the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation risk stratification scheme for people with known CVD because it considers over all patient prognosis and potential for rehabilitation (16); and Support the public health message that all people should adopt a physically active lifestyle. TABLE: New ACSM GETP9 recommendations for exercise testing in asymptomatic people prior to exercise for individuals at high risk (10).ACSM’s new preparticipation health screening recommendations continue to encourage atherosclerotic CVD risk factor assessment, since such measurements are an important part of the preparticipation health screening process and good medical care but do seek to simplify the preparticipation health screening process in order to remove unnecessary and unproven barriers to adopting a physically active lifestyle (11). There are multiple considerations that have prompted these different points of emphasis. The risk of a cardiovascular event is increased during vigorous-intensity exercise relative to rest, but the absolute risk of a cardiac event is low in healthy individuals. Recommending a medical examination and/or stress test as part of the preparticipation health screening process for all people at moderate to high risk prior to initiating light- to moderate-intensity exercise program implies that being physically active confers greater risk than a sedentary lifestyle (3). Yet the cardiovascular health benefits of regular exercise far outweigh the risks of exercise for the general population (12,13). There is also an increased appreciation that exercise testing is a poor predictor of acute CVD events such as heart attacks and sudden death in asymptomatic individuals probably because such testing detects flow-limiting coronary lesions, whereas sudden cardiac death and acute myocardial infarction are produced usually by the rapid progression of a previously nonobstructive lesion (13). Furthermore there is lack of consensus regarding the extent of the medical evaluation (i.e., medical examination and stress testing) needed as part of the preparticipation health screening process prior to initiating an exercise program even if it is of vigorous intensity (1,5,15). There is also evidence from decision analysis modeling that routine screening using exercise testing prior to initiating an exercise program is not warranted regardless of baseline individual risk (7). These considerations form the basis for the new ACSM preparticipation health screening recommendations that follows (10). Preparticipation Health Screening Recommendations All people wanting to initiate a physical activity program should be screened at minimum by a self-reported medical history or health risk appraisal questionnaire such as the PAR-Q (4) or modified American Heart Association/ACSM Health/Fitness Facility PreparticipationScreening Questionnaire (2) for the presence of risk factors for various cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, and metabolic diseases as well as other conditions (e.g., pregnancy and orthopedic injury) that require special attention when developing the exercise prescription (Ex Rx) (6,8,9). Recommendations for a Medical Examination Prior to Initiating Physical Activity Individuals at moderate risk with two or more CVD risk factors (Figure) should be encouraged to consult with their physician prior to initiating a vigorous-intensity physical activity program. While medical evaluation is taking place, the majority of these people can begin without consulting a physician light- to moderate-intensity physical activity programs such as walking. Individuals at high risk with sy

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/jsr.0b013e31829a68cf

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. 1998, Sports Exerc, 30, 1009, 10.1097/00005768-199806000-00034 · DOI
  2. 2003, Med, 25, 214
  3. 2002, Cardiol, 40, 1531
  4. 2009, Med, 24, 934
  5. 1996, Circulation, 94, 850, 10.1161/01.CIR.94.4.850 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 2007, Circulation, 115, 2358, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.181485 · DOI
  7. 2004, Med, 140, 569
  8. 2001, Clin, 19, 415

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Thompson, P. D., Arena, R., Riebe, D., & Pescatello, L. S.
Venue
Current Sports Medicine Reports
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2013
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
215-217
ISSN
1537-890X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1249/jsr.0b013e31829a68cf
OpenAlex
W2076960677
Cited by
1,823
References
1
FWCI
57.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.