The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 46 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and in-group norms
Open accessAbstract
The present research investigated three approaches to the role of norms in the theory of planned behaviour (TPB). Two studies examined the proposed predictors of intentions to engage in household recycling (Studies 1 and 2) and reported recycling behaviour (Study 1). Study 1 tested the impact of descriptive and injunctive norms (personal and social) and the moderating role of self-monitoring on norm-intention relations. Study 2 examined the role of group norms and group identification and the moderating role of collective self on norm-intention relations. Both studies demonstrated support for the TPB and the inclusion of additional normative variables: attitudes; perceived behavioural control; descriptive; and personal injunctive norms (but not social injunctive norm) emerged as significant independent predictors of intentions. There was no evidence that the impact of norms on intentions varied as a function of the dispositional variables of self-monitoring (Study 1) or the collective self (Study 2). There was support, however, for the social identity approach to attitude-behaviour relations in that group norms predicted recycling intentions, particularly for individuals who identified strongly with the group. The results of these two studies highlight the critical role of social influence processes within the TPB and the attitude-behaviour context.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
37 Own result · 21 No full text of the sources · 15 Own interpretation · 11 Own method · 7 Sources not found · 4 Not checked yet · 4 No basis given
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As shown in Table 2, PBC, attitude, descriptive norm, and personal injunctive norm were all significant predictors of behavioural intentions.”
- Also stated in: § Predicting behavioural intentions. · plain
“In partial support for Hypothesis 1, participants had a stronger intention to engage in household recycling if they had a positive attitude toward household recycling, perceived a high level of control, perceived that significant others performed the behaviour, and felt a personal sense of obligation to engage in household recycling.”
- Also stated in: § ---------------Insert Table 3 about here---------------Discussion · plain
“In line with Hypothesis 1, attitudes, descriptive norm, personal injunctive norm, and PBC all predicted intentions to engage in household recycling.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Predicting behavioural intentions.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Predicting behavioural intentions. · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When all variables were in the regression equation, intention, PBC, and personal injunctive norm emerged as the significant predictors of self-report recycling behaviour.”
- Also stated in: § Predicting self-reported behaviour. · hedged
“However, individuals were also more likely to report engagement in household recycling if they felt a personal sense of obligation to do so.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Predicting self-reported behaviour.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Predicting self-reported behaviour. · hedged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was no evidence that the impact of norms on intentions varied as a function of the dispositional variables of self-monitoring (Study 1) or the collective self (Study 2).”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was support, however, for the social identity approach to attitude-behaviour relations in that group norms predicted recycling intentions, particularly for individuals who identified strongly with the group.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“descriptive and personal injunctive norms (but not social injunctive norm) emerged as significant independent predictors of intentions.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Social injunctive norm was the only variable that did not emerge as an independent predictor in the analysis.”
- Also stated in: § Predicting behavioural intentions. · plain
“However, perceptions of others' approval or disapproval related to performing the behaviour did not impact significantly on participants' intentions to engage in household recycling.”
- Also stated in: § ---------------Insert Table 3 about here---------------Discussion · plain
“However, contrary to expectations, the belief that others would approve of their recycling (i.e., social injunctive norm) did not predict intentions to recycle.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Predicting behavioural intentions.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Predicting behavioural intentions. · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As shown in Table 2, the combination of intention and PBC accounted for a significant proportion of variance in reported recycling behaviour.”
- Also stated in: § Predicting self-reported behaviour. · plain
“In support for Hypothesis 2, people were more likely to engage in the behaviour if they intended to do so and perceived control over performing the behaviour.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Predicting self-reported behaviour.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Predicting self-reported behaviour. · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, self-monitoring was not correlated with intention and behaviour.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was no evidence that the impact of norms on intentions varied as a function of the dispositional variables of self-monitoring (Study 1) or the collective self (Study 2).”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The entry of attitude, descriptive norm, personal injunctive norm and social injunctive norm at Step 2 also accounted for a significant increment of variance in reported behaviour.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Predicting self-reported behaviour.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 25
- Probably not a substantial claim. 18
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As shown in Table 3, the addition of the interaction terms at Step 2 did not account for a significant increase in variance in intentions.”
- Also stated in: § ---------------Insert Table 2 about here--------------- · plain
“Thus, there was no support for the prediction that the effects of social and personal injunctive norms would vary as a function of selfmonitoring (cf.Hypothesis 3).”
- Also stated in: § ---------------Insert Table 3 about here---------------Discussion · plain
“Finally, self-monitoring did not moderate the norm-intention relationships in the TPB.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > ---------------Insert Table 2 about here---------------
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § ---------------Insert Table 2 about here--------------- · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“attitudes, perceived behavioural control, descriptive and personal injunctive norms (but not social injunctive norm) emerged as significant independent predictors of intentions.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As can be seen in Table 4, attitude, perceived behavioural control, descriptive norm, personal injunctive norm, social injunctive norm, and group norm were all correlated with intention.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Data Analysis Overview
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, there was also a direct effect of personal injunctive norm on self-reported behaviour.Although this effect was weaker than the effect of behavioural intention, this finding is contrary to the TPB, which states that the impact of all variables on behaviour will be mediated through intention.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > ---------------Insert Table 3 about here---------------Discussion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As can be seen in Table 1, attitude, perceived behavioural control, descriptive norm, personal injunctive norm, and social injunctive norm were all correlated significantly with both intention and behaviour.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Design
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, group identification, interdependent self, and collective self-esteem were not correlated with intention.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Data Analysis Overview
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Simple slope analysis confirmed this pattern of results.The relationship between group norm and intentions was significant at one SD above the mean on the measure of group identification (t = 2.00, p < .05),but not at one SD below the mean (t = .33,p = .74.).”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > ------------------Insert Table 4 about here--------------Predicting behavioural intentions.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In both studies, both personal injunctive norms and descriptive norms increased the prediction of recycling intentions.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > GENERAL DISCUSSION
plaindirectn = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the present research, there was clear evidence as to the role that perceptions of control in relation to household recycling play in both intentions to recycle and recycling behaviour.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Potential Applications
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The fact that group norms, but not subjective/social injunctive norms, predicted recycling intentions”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > GENERAL DISCUSSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In line with the social identity approach, group norms predicted recycling intentions, but only for individuals who identified strongly with the group.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > GENERAL DISCUSSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Support for the theories of reasoned action and planned behaviour has been established across a wide range of behavioural domains and in a variety of populations (see e.g., Armitage & Conner, 2001;Conner & Armitage, 1998).”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Abstract
What the sources say
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Moreover, research on descriptive norms has focused typically on the prediction of anti-social behaviours such as littering behaviour (Cialdini et al., 1990) or illicit drug use (McMillan & Conner, 2003), with little research on the prediction of pro-social or altruistic behaviours (cf. Warburton & Terry, 2000).”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > The Role of Norms in the Theory of Reasoned Action/Theory of Planned Behaviour The Additional Norms Approach
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the failure to find support for the impact of self-monitoring may reflect problems with the reliability of the self-monitoring scale, which may have limited our ability to detect a moderating effect.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > ---------------Insert Table 3 about here---------------Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“They found that subjective norms predicted intentions to attend class only among high self monitors, with low self monitors' intentions being predicted by their attitudes (see also DeBono & Omoto, 1993).”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Self monitoring.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Prislin & Kovrlija, 1992 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a similar vein, Ybarra and Trafimow (1997) found that priming the collective self versus the private self resulted in individuals being under normative control and attitudinal control respectively.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > The Individual Difference Approach
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Ybarra & Trafimow, 1997
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The characteristics of the sample (e.g., age, occupational status, marital status) were compared to recent Australian census data for the city of Brisbane and were found to be broadly representative of the population (with a slight over-representation of younger, unmarried residents).”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Method Participants
plainn = 164- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Conner and McMillan (1999) have argued that the social injunctive norm is essentially the same construct as the subjective norm typically employed in TPB studies.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > ---------------Insert Table 3 about here---------------Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Conner and McMillan (1999) source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, it should be noted that the measure of social injunctive norm employed did not, like many of the other measures, include a time component and this may have limited the predictive ability of this construct.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > ---------------Insert Table 3 about here---------------Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Research has demonstrated that both descriptive and personal injunctive norms exert an independent influence on intentions over and above the influence of other TPB variables (e.g., Beck & Ajzen, 1991;Conner & McMillan, 1999;Manstead, 2000;Parker et al., 1995;Sheeran & Orbell, 1999).”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > The Role of Norms in the Theory of Reasoned Action/Theory of Planned Behaviour The Additional Norms Approach
What the sources say
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both studies demonstrated support for the TPB and the inclusion of additional normative variables: attitudes, perceived behavioural control, descriptive and personal injunctive norms (but not social injunctive norm) emerged as significant independent predictors of intentions.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Abstract
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, this effect is consistent with Stern's (2000) Value-Belief-Norm theory, which posits that activation of a sense of moral obligation to act is sufficient to elicit the relevant environmental behaviour without reference to an explicit behavioural intention.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > ---------------Insert Table 3 about here---------------Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Stern's (2000) source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“In addition, these studies have demonstrated the importance of a number of other variables including self-identity (Mannetti et al., 2004;Terry et al., 1999), perceived availability of recycling facilities (Knussen et al., 2004), and group norms and social identity (Terry et al., 1999).”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > The Context of Recycling Behaviour
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, it should also be noted that past research has failed to provide a full test of the TPB by examining the intention-behaviour relationship that is specified in the model.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > The Context of Recycling Behaviour
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the participants who completed the first questionnaire, 129 (79%) completed the follow-up questionnaire.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Method Participants
plainn = 164- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Cialdini et al. (1991) argued that stable individual differences, such as the degree to which individuals are guided by external or internal cues, impact on the salience of both personal and social injunctive norms and the extent to which these different norms predict behaviour.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > ---------------Insert Table 3 about here---------------Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cialdini et al. (1991) source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although this effect was weaker than the effect of behavioural intention, this finding is contrary to the TPB, which states that the impact of all variables on behaviour will be mediated through intention.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > ---------------Insert Table 3 about here---------------Discussion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, it is important to acknowledge that the interactions were tested using correlated variables.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > ---------------Insert Table 3 about here---------------Discussion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“although both scales possessed adequate reliability”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Injunctive Norms and the Collective Self
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, social influence does not simply reflect perceived pressure from significant others, but also reflects perceptions that other people engage in the behaviour themselves (descriptive norms) and through the construction of internalised moral principles (personal norms).”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > GENERAL DISCUSSION
plainn = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“given potential problems associated with using regression models to test for additional predictors within the TPB (see Trafimow, 2004)”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Strengths and Limitations
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Trafimow, 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The data from two multivariate outliers were excluded from the analysis.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Data Analysis Overview
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most notably, the present study used only a small number of items to measure several of the constructs, such as the additional types of norms, and some measures employed did not display optimal levels of reliability, which may have limited the impact of certain constructs.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Strengths and Limitations
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Centred variables, calculated as deviations from the mean, were used to ensure that multicollinearity between the predictors and interaction terms did not distort the results of the analysis (Aiken & West, 1991).”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > ---------------Insert Table 2 about here---------------
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Aiken & West, 1991
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To reduce the effects of response bias, some of the items were negatively worded.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Design
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These results highlight the ways in which the social identity approach and the additional norms approach provide critical insights into the processes by which norms influence behavioural decision making.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Conclusion
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These results support the argument that social factors are important within the theory of planned behaviour and support the inclusion of additional sources of social influence into the TPB (see e.g., Manstead, 2000;Rivis & Sheeran, 2003).”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > GENERAL DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Manstead, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Rivis & Sheeran, 2003 source
plaincorrelationaln = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“From a social identity approach, the perceived norms of a behaviourally relevant reference group should influence intentions, particularly when the individual identifies strongly with that reference group.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Study 2
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Terry & Hogg, 1996 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results of the present research support the view that social influence is important within the TPB and dispel the belief that norms cannot play a consistently impactful role in the relationship between attitudes and action.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Conclusion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Household recycling is a pro-social or altruistic behaviour with a moral or ethical component.
“with little research on the prediction of pro-social or altruistic behaviours”
“have been found to play a particularly important role in the prediction of behaviours with a moral or ethical component such as environmental behaviour.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The characteristics of the Study 2 sample (e.g., age, occupational status, marital status) were representative of the general population.
“In addition, as in Study 1, the characteristics of the sample (e.g., age, occupational status, marital status) were representative of the general population.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“more strongly identified group members are more likely to intend to engage in ingroup normative behaviors, such as recycling (Terry et al., 1999; White et al., 2009) and sustainable agricultural practices (Fielding et al., 2008b).”
From A Social Identity Analysis of Climate Change and Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors: Insights and Opportunities (2016) · cites this paper as White et al., 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Predicting behavioural intentions.
“As shown in Table 2, PBC, attitude, descriptive norm, and personal injunctive norm were all significant predictors of behavioural intentions.”
§ SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE TPB Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: The role of descriptive, injunctive, and ingroup norms > Conclusion
“| 1 | Attitude | .71 | .50 | .50 | 31.03*** 5, 155 .12+ | | |”
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3352 · Cited by 36,647
Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions
Aiken, L., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1037/10520-147 · Cited by 24,912
From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I. (1985) · Action Control · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 · Cited by 19,057
The Social psychology of intergroup relations
Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,577
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466601164939 · Cited by 9,970
New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior
Stern, P. C. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175 · Cited by 8,682
Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015 · Cited by 5,965
Normative Influences on Altruism
Schwartz, S. H. (1977) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60358-5 · Cited by 5,364
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- 10.1086/296148 · DOI
- Manstead A. S. R., 2000, Attitude, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership, 11
- Terry D. J., 2000, Attitudes, behaviour, and social context: The role of norms and group membership, 67
- Turner J. C., 1991, Social influence
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 522
Franceschinis, C., Liebe, U., Thiene, M., et al. (2022) · Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics · doi:10.1111/1467-8489.12466 · Cited by 18
Apolinário, S., Yoshikuni, A. C., & Larieira, C. L. C. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107772 · Cited by 18
When peer norms work? Coherent groups facilitate normative influences on cyber aggression
Dang, J., & Liu, L. (2020) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.21920 · Cited by 23
Maulina, A., Sukoco, I., Hermanto, B. A., et al. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su151914227 · Cited by 18
A Study of Consumer Repurchase Behaviors of Smartphones Using Artificial Neural Network
Lee, H. J. (2020) · Information · doi:10.3390/info11090400 · Cited by 26
Srun, P., & Kurisu, K. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11061518 · Cited by 19
Roşu, M.-M., Ianole-Călin, R., Dinescu, R., Bratu, A., Papuc, R.-M., & Cosma, A. (2021) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math9161950 · Cited by 19
Maran, D. A., Butt, M., & Begotti, T. (2023) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440231207444 · Cited by 24
Foran, A., Muldoon, O. T., & O’Donnell, A. T. (2021) · Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1186/s40337-021-00399-4 · Cited by 17
Lima, M. L., & Branco, C. (2018) · PsyEcology Bilingual Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1080/21711976.2017.1412574 · Cited by 17
Riles, J. M., Funk, M. E., & Davis, W. M. (2018) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751.2018.1554904 · Cited by 16
Pandey, P., & Rai, A. K. (2023) · FIIB Business Review · doi:10.1177/23197145231196066 · Cited by 22
Using rich media to motivate fair-trade purchase
Han, T., & Stoel, L. (2017) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/jrim-05-2016-0057 · Cited by 16
Gauer, V. H., Axsen, J., Dütschke, E., Long, Z., & Kelber, A. (2023) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2023.103048 · Cited by 20
Jun, J., & Arendt, S. W. (2019) · Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management · doi:10.1080/19368623.2019.1662354 · Cited by 15
Harter, M., Contzen, N., & Inauen, J. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101360 · Cited by 21
Understanding the role and influence of social norms: lessons for NRM
Minato, W., Curtis, A. L., & Allan, C. (2012) · Local Environment · doi:10.1080/13549839.2012.714758 · Cited by 16
Situational social influence leading to non-compliance with conservation rules
Arlidge, W. N. S., Arlinghaus, R., Kurvers, R. H. J. M., Nassauer, A., Oyanedel, R., & Krause, J. (2023) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2023.08.003 · Cited by 16
Masson, T., & Fritsche, I. (2019) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2501 · Cited by 15
Academic cheating with generative AI: Exploring a moral extension of the theory of planned behavior
Huang, D., Hash, N., Cummings, J. J., & Prena, K. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100424 · Cited by 36
Dispositional and Social Correlates of Digital Status Seeking Among Adolescents
Trekels, J., Nesi, J. L., Burnell, K., Prinstein, M. J., & Telzer, E. H. (2024) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2023.0342 · Cited by 15
Smyth, L., Mavor, K. I., & Platow, M. J. (2018) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2018.1524853 · Cited by 11
Gonzalez, A. J., Vandenbosch, L., & Rousseau, A. (2023) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/00139165231194331 · Cited by 15
Feedback to Minimize Household Waste a Field Experiment in The Netherlands
van der Werff, E., & Lee, C.-Y. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13179610 · Cited by 13
Women’s Rights and Misperceived Gender Norms Under Authoritarianism
Barnett, C. L. (2023) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00104140231193010 · Cited by 15
Li, P., Kao, K., Hsu, H.-H., Thomas, C. L., & Cobb, H. R. (2024) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-024-05716-z · Cited by 15
Bourke, M., Hilland, T. A., & Craike, M. J. (2018) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-018-6075-4 · Cited by 14
Lin, Y. (2021) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2021.2012231 · Cited by 15
Minguez, A., & Sesé, F. J. (2021) · The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/10696679.2020.1859335 · Cited by 13
Predicting the sun-protective decisions of young female Australian beachgoers
Robinson, N. G., White, K. M., Hamilton, K., & Starfelt, L. C. (2014) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105314564811 · Cited by 13
Self-citationBaskin, M. E. B., Hart, T. A., Bajaj, A., Gerlich, R. N., Drumheller, K., & Kinsky, E. S. (2022) · Ethics & Behavior · doi:10.1080/10508422.2021.2020118 · Cited by 14
Kortsch, T., & Händeler, P. (2024) · Gruppe Interaktion Organisation Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO) · doi:10.1007/s11612-024-00735-7 · Cited by 14
Nadro, M., Sivarajah, U., Charles, V., Rana, N. P., & Surucu-Balci, E. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122262 · Cited by 13
Haji, L., & Hayati, D. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.957760 · Cited by 12
Schröder, J. M., Merz, E., Suanet, B., & Wiepking, P. (2023) · Health & Place · doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.103072 · Cited by 17
Urban climate governance informed by behavioural insights: A commentary and research agenda
van der Heijden, J. (2019) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1177/0042098019864002 · Cited by 12
Robertson, A. M., Cruwys, T., Stevens, M. R., & Platow, M. J. (2022) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjc.12406 · Cited by 10
Selvanathan, H. P., & Leidner, B. (2021) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302211017633 · Cited by 12
Yang, F., Yao, S., & Li, Y. (2023) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2023.104623 · Cited by 17
To Donate or to Waste It: Understanding Posthumous Organ Donation Attitude
Alsalem, A., Fry, M., & Thaichon, P. (2020) · Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) · doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.04.001 · Cited by 12
Savari, M., Damaneh, H. E., & Damaneh, H. E. (2025) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109752 · Cited by 12
Oduro-Appiah, K., Afful, A., & Osei-Tutu, H. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1274765 · Cited by 15
An Internet Quiz Game Intervention for Adolescent Alcohol Drinking: A Clustered RCT
Ho, F. K. W., Tung, K. T. S., Wong, R. S. M., Chan, K. L., Wong, W. H. S., Ho, S. Y., Lam, T. H., Mirpuri, S., Voorhees, B. W. V., Fu, K., et al. (2021) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2021-051005 · Cited by 11
Beldad, A. D., & Voutsas, C. (2018) · Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s41347-018-0063-5 · Cited by 11
Rostiani, R., Toyib, J. S., & Khoiriyah, S. (2021) · Journal of Islamic marketing · doi:10.1108/jima-09-2020-0261 · Cited by 18
Designing and evaluating a persuasive child restraint television commercial
Lewis, I. M., Ho, B. S., & Lennon, A. (2015) · Traffic Injury Prevention · doi:10.1080/15389588.2015.1072626 · Cited by 11
Khoury, D. T. D. E., Tabakos, M., Dwyer, J. J. M., & Mountjoy, M. L. (2021) · Journal of American College Health · doi:10.1080/07448481.2021.1951276 · Cited by 11
Students working online for group projects: a test of an extended theory of planned behaviour model
Cheng, E. W. L. (2016) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2016.1150424 · Cited by 12
The common-is-moral association is stronger among less religious people
Eriksson, K., Vartanova, I., Ornstein, P., & Strimling, P. (2021) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-021-00791-0 · Cited by 11
Oke, A., McDonald, S., & Korobilis-Magas, E. (2021) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2021.10.020 · Cited by 10
Can Cryptocurrency Be a Payment Method in a Developing Economy?
Budree, A., & Nyathi, T. N. (2023) · Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations · doi:10.4018/jeco.320223 · Cited by 10
Livingstone, A., & McCafferty, S. (2014) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.10.005 · Cited by 10
Weng, J., Xu, Y., Xie, C., Tian, Y., Wang, F., & Cheng, Y. (2024) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1436909 · Cited by 10
Ethical Climate as Social Norm: Impact on Judgements and Behavioral Intentions in the Workplace
Auzoult, L., & Mazilescu, C.-A. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18116006 · Cited by 10
Hou, J., Ling, Q., & Zhang, C. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.552867 · Cited by 8
Garas, S. R. R. (2024) · EuroMed Journal of Business · doi:10.1108/emjb-09-2023-0251 · Cited by 9
Matović, B., Petrović, A., Damjanović, M., Bulajić, A., & Ilić, V. (2024) · Safety · doi:10.3390/safety10010033 · Cited by 9
Social Media at the Boundaries: Supporting Parents in Managing Youth's Social Media Use.
Yardi, S. (2012) · SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology) · Cited by 9
Debrosse, R., Rossignac‐Milon, M., & Taylor, D. (2018) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2320 · Cited by 9
Analyzing the Impact of Group Norms on Workers’ Safety Behaviors in a Construction Team
Gong, X., Liu, Q., Ye, G., Xiang, Q., & Wang, Y. (2018) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-94589-7_58 · Cited by 10
Guo, Y. Q., Xiang, H., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04352-3 · Cited by 9
Psychological Drivers of Alternative Fuel Vehicles’ Adoption and Ecologically Responsible Use
Saleem, M. A., Ali, R. A., Shah, S. N. A., Zahra, S., Hafeez, M. H., & Nguyen, N. (2021) · Journal of Advanced Transportation · doi:10.1155/2021/9998056 · Cited by 9
Wong, C. F., Mendez, S. E. A., Conn, B. M., Iverson, E., & Lankenau, S. E. (2021) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109053 · Cited by 8
A theoretical model for preventing marine litter behaviour: An empirical evidence from Singapore
Chen, L., Zhou, Q., Yue, L., Wu, M., Huang, R., Yuen, K. F., & Su, R. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139109 · Cited by 8
Like me or near me? Assessing which norm referents best promote energy conservation in the field
Xiao, A. Z., Sparkman, G., & Constantino, S. M. (2023) · Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cresp.2023.100142 · Cited by 8
Context matters: Three ways of how the context influences recycling behaviour
Geiger, J. L. (2020) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · doi:10.33612/diss.131464819 · Cited by 9
Determinants of Sustainable Consumption Behaviour: Review and Conceptual Framework
Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2018) · Advances in business strategy and competitive advantage book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-2662-9.ch011 · Cited by 7
Susmann, M. W., Dixon, G., Bushman, B. J., & Garrett, R. K. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0268601 · Cited by 8
Social norms or individual experience? Which affects individual risk perception of disaster warnings
Hao, Y., & Peng, S.-L. (2025) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2025.107074 · Cited by 10
Guenthner, L., Kühner, C., Masson, T., Fritsche, I., & Zacher, H. (2025) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2025.2536830 · Cited by 12
Capasso, M., Bianchi, M., & Caso, D. (2024) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines12030317 · Cited by 7
Recycling Reinforced: The Synergistic Dynamics of Sustainable Behavior
Enginkaya, E., & Sağlam, M. H. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16093827 · Cited by 12
Selvan, A. M., Susainathan, S., Micheal, M. P. S. S., George, S. S., Rajalingam, S., & Parayitam, S. (2024) · Entrepreneurship Education · doi:10.1007/s41959-024-00123-8 · Cited by 7
Jaich, H., Jastram, S., & Blind, K. (2023) · Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1007/s41471-023-00167-x · Cited by 7
Martens, E., Naeyaert, S., Hove, S. V., et al. (2025) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2025.104137 · Cited by 9
Engaging high-income earners in climate action: Policy insights from survey experiments
Luis Mundaca, T., & Christine Wamsler, B. (2024) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108387 · Cited by 9
Investigation of Attitudes and Behaviors Towards Recycling with Theory Planned Behavior
Yılmaz, V. T., & Arı, E. (2022) · Journal of Economy Culture and Society · doi:10.26650/jecs2021-1042348 · Cited by 7
Infaq during movement lockdown: the perspective from social responsibility theory
Jalil, M. I. A., Lada, S., Pitchay, A. A., Bakri, M. A., Ghazali, M. F., & Hamid, M. R. A. (2022) · International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management · doi:10.1108/imefm-01-2021-0020 · Cited by 7
Conditions and Effects of Norm Internalization
Batzke, M. C. L., & Ernst, A. (2023) · Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation · doi:10.18564/jasss.5003 · Cited by 10
Sebbane, M., Costa, S., & Sirieix, L. (2017) · Décisions Marketing · doi:10.7193/dm.088.35.50 · Cited by 6
The role of social and personal norms in biodiversity conservation: A segmentation of Swiss farmers
Ritzel, C., Kaiser, A., Wang, Y., & Mack, G. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124605 · Cited by 12
Tseng, L. (2017) · Managerial Finance · doi:10.1108/mf-02-2017-0050 · Cited by 7
Antonides, G. (2017) · MDPI eBooks · doi:10.3390/books978-3-03842-584-7 · Cited by 7
Li, J., Su, Q., Zhu, H., Sun, W., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.2416 · Cited by 7
Taillandier‐Schmitt, A., Maisonneuve, C., Dambrun, M., et al. (2012) · Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations · doi:10.1016/s1420-2530(16)30073-5 · Cited by 6
The Social Contagion of Blood Donations: Sustaining Repeated Prosocial BehaviourPreprint
Schröder, J. M., Merz, E., Suanet, B., et al. (2021) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/kjcwh · Cited by 6
Norms in Prosocial Decisions : The Role of Observability, Avoidance, and Conditionality
Andersson, P. A. (2022) · Linköping studies in behavioural science · doi:10.3384/9789179293291 · Cited by 6
Deutchman, P. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/e6krn · Cited by 6
A recycling story: Developing recycling behavior in Turkey with social marketing program
Umut, M. Ö., & Velioğlu, M. N. (2023) · Journal of Public Affairs · doi:10.1002/pa.2900 · Cited by 6
Li, K., Zhang, X., & Wen, Y. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126719 · Cited by 7
Word of mouse! What drives consumer voluntarism to write online reviews?
Rasool, G., & Pathania, A. (2023) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527266.2023.2230482 · Cited by 4
Matsunaga, L. H., Aoki, T., Faiad, C., Aldrich, D. P., Tseng, P.-H., & Aida, J. (2023) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2023.2193149 · Cited by 3
Fan, Z., Min, L., He, W., Shi, T., Yang, Y., & Feng, W. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-89780-w · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- White, K. M., Smith, J. R., Terry, D. J., Greenslade, J. H., & McKimmie, B. M.
- Affiliations
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- University of Exeter (GB)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Corresponding author
- White, Katherine M.
- Venue
- British Journal of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 135-158
- ISSN
- 0144-6665 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8309
- OpenAlex
- W2069651937
- Cited by
- 580
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 13.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.qut.edu.au
- Locations
- British Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- theory of planned behavior, social influence, descriptive norms, injunctive norms, ingroup norms, household recycling, recycling intention, self-monitoring, collective self, group identification, social identity, perceived behavioral control
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Conservation of Natural Resources, Female, Humans, Individuality, Internal-External Control, Male, Middle Aged, Psychological Theory, Public Opinion, Self Concept, Social Facilitation, Social Identification, Social Responsibility, Social Values, Intention, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
