Cited by 118Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsComplement system in diseasesRetinal Development and Disorders

A Non Membrane-Targeted Human Soluble CD59 Attenuates Choroidal Neovascularization in a Model of Age Related Macular Degeneration

Open access
Cashman, Siobhan M., Ramo, Kasmir, Kumar-Singh, Rajendra·2011·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Age related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most common cause of blindness amongst the elderly. Approximately 10% of AMD patients suffer from an advanced form of AMD characterized by choroidal neovascularization (CNV). Recent evidence implicates a significant role for complement in the pathogenesis of AMD. Activation of complement terminates in the incorporation of the membrane attack complex (MAC) in biological membranes and subsequent cell lysis. Elevated levels of MAC have been documented on choroidal blood vessels and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) of AMD patients. CD59 is a naturally occurring membrane bound inhibitor of MAC formation. Previously we have shown that membrane bound human CD59 delivered to the RPE cells of mice via an adenovirus vector can protect those cells from human complement mediated lysis ex vivo. However, application of those observations to choroidal blood vessels are limited because protection from MAC- mediated lysis was restricted only to the cells originally transduced by the vector. Here we demonstrate that subretinal delivery of an adenovirus vector expressing a transgene for a soluble non-membrane binding form of human CD59 can attenuate the formation of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization and murine MAC formation in mice even when the region of vector delivery is distal to the site of laser induced CNV. Furthermore, this same recombinant transgene delivered to the intravitreal space of mice by an adeno-associated virus vector (AAV) can also attenuate laser-induced CNV. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of a non-membrane targeting CD59 having biological potency in any animal model of disease in vivo. We propose that the above approaches warrant further exploration as potential approaches for alleviating complement mediated damage to ocular tissues in AMD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0019078

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several experiments using mouse models of laser-induced CNV have demonstrated that all complement pathways, particularly the alternative and terminal pathways, play a significant role in angiogenesis.

    “Several experiments using mouse models of laser-induced CNV have demonstrated that all complement pathways, particularly the alternative and terminal pathways, play a significant role in angiogenesis [150,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163].”
  • In mice, JNJ-1887 has been shown to reduce laser-induced CNV formation beyond the site of vector delivery, indicating the potential superior coverage of intravitreal versus subretinal gene therapies.

    “In mice, JNJ-1887 has been shown to reduce laser-induced CNV formation beyond the site of vector delivery [150], indicating the potential superior coverage of intravitreal versus subretinal gene therapies.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cashman, S. M., Ramo, K., & Kumar-Singh, R.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2011-04-28
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
e19078
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095317976
Cited by
118
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Research to Prevent Blindness
  • Ögonfonden
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Eye Institute (EY014991, R01EY014991, EY 013887)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Complement system in diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
Keywords
age-related macular degeneration, choroidal neovascularization, CD59, complement system, membrane attack complex, retinal pigment epithelium, adenoviral vector, adeno-associated virus vectors, subretinal gene delivery, intravitreal gene delivery, laser-induced choroidal neovascularization, complement-mediated lysis
MeSH terms
Dependovirus, Adenoviridae, Animals, Cell Line, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Lasers, Macular Degeneration, Retina, Solubility, Genetic Therapy, Complement Membrane Attack Complex, CD59 Antigens, Choroidal Neovascularization, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review