Cited by 238Gut microbiota and healthEating Disorders and BehaviorsGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Gut Dysbiosis in Patients with Anorexia Nervosa

Open access
Morita, Chihiro, Tsuji, Hirokazu, Hata, Tomokazu, Gondo, Motoharu, Takakura, Shu, Kawai, Keisuke, Yoshihara, Kazufumi, Ogata, Kiyohito +3 more·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a psychological illness with devastating physical consequences; however, its pathophysiological mechanism remains unclear. Because numerous reports have indicated the importance of gut microbiota in the regulation of weight gain, it is reasonable to speculate that AN patients might have a microbial imbalance, i.e. dysbiosis, in their gut. In this study, we compared the fecal microbiota of female patients with AN (n = 25), including restrictive (ANR, n = 14) and binge-eating (ANBP, n = 11) subtypes, with those of age-matched healthy female controls (n = 21) using the Yakult Intestinal Flora-SCAN based on 16S or 23S rRNA-targeted RT-quantitative PCR technology. AN patients had significantly lower amounts of total bacteria and obligate anaerobes including those from the Clostridium coccoides group, Clostridium leptum subgroup, and Bacteroides fragilis group than the age-matched healthy women. Lower numbers of Streptococcus were also found in the AN group than in the control group. In the analysis based on AN subtypes, the counts of the Bacteroides fragilis group in the ANR and ANBP groups and the counts of the Clostridium coccoides group in the ANR group were significantly lower than those in the control group. The detection rate of the Lactobacillus plantarum subgroup was significantly lower in the AN group than in the control group. The AN group had significantly lower acetic and propionic acid concentrations in the feces than the control group. Moreover, the subtype analysis showed that the fecal concentrations of acetic acid were lower in the ANR group than in the control group. Principal component analysis confirmed a clear difference in the bacterial components between the AN patients and healthy women. Collectively, these results clearly indicate the existence of dysbiosis in the gut of AN patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0145274

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [24]Corder GW, Foreman DI. Comparing Two Unrelated Samples: The Mann Whitney U-test Nonparametric Statistics for Non-Statisticians: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2009 p. 57– 77.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morita, C., Tsuji, H., Hata, T., Gondo, M., Takakura, S., Kawai, K., Yoshihara, K., Ogata, K., Nomoto, K., Miyazaki, K., & Sudo, N.
Affiliations
  • Kyushu University (JP)
  • Yakult Central Institute (JP)
Corresponding author
Sudo, Nobuyuki
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-12-18
Volume
10
Issue
12
Pages
e0145274
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2205656408
Cited by
238
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10
FWCI
5.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
anorexia nervosa, gut dysbiosis, gut microbiota, fecal microbiota, restrictive anorexia nervosa, Bacteroides fragilis group, Lactobacillus plantarum, short-chain fatty acids, acetic acid, propionic acid, Streptococcus, anaerobic bacteria
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Feces, Female, Humans, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult, Dysbiosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review