The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Discounting Time and Time Discounting: Subjective Time Perception and Intertemporal Preferences
Abstract
Consumers often make decisions about outcomes and events that occur over time. This research examines consumers' sensitivity to the prospective duration relevant to their decisions and the implications of such sensitivity for intertemporal trade-offs, especially the degree of present bias (i.e., hyperbolic discounting). The authors show that participants' subjective perceptions of prospective duration are not sufficiently sensitive to changes in objective duration and are nonlinear and concave in objective time, consistent with psychophysical principles. More important, this lack of sensitivity can explain hyperbolic discounting. The results replicate standard hyperbolic discounting effects with respect to objective time but show a relatively constant rate of discounting with respect to subjective time perceptions. The results are replicated between subjects (Experiment 1) and within subjects (Experiments 2), with multiple time horizons and multiple descriptors, and with different measurement orders. Furthermore, the authors show that when duration is primed, subjective time perception is altered (Experiment 4) and hyperbolic discounting is reduced (Experiment 3).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Individuals who perceive future events as being farther away in time are more likely to discount rewards at a higher rate (Takahashi, 2005; Zauberman et al., 2009).”
From Individual Differences in Delay Discounting Under Acute Stress: The Role of Trait Perceived Stress (2012) · cites this paper as Zauberman et al., 2009
Citations
Cites
Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting
Laibson, D. (1997) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355397555253 · Cited by 6,122
Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity.
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.54.3.165 · Cited by 5,377 · cited 1×
“…1975; Loewenstein 1996), to differences in cognitive representations between near and future events (Malkoc and Zauberman 2006; Trope and Liberman 2003; Zauberman and Lynch 2005), and to individual differences in time orientation (Carstensen, Isaacowitz, and Charles 1999; Zimbardo and Boyd 1999).”
BackgroundA hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: dynamics of willpower
Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.106.1.3 · Cited by 2,931
Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization
Strotz, R. H. (1955) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2295722 · Cited by 2,834 · cited 1×
“However, we address this point empirically following Experiment 2. or her perception of time is unbiased (i.e., the person perceives a 3-year time horizon as three times longer than a 1- year time horizon), the implied compound annual discount rate for this person is 230% for 1 year and 100% for 3…”
BackgroundSpecious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.
Ainslie, G. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0076860 · Cited by 2,708
Out of Control: Visceral Influences on Behavior
Loewenstein, G. (1996) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0028 · Cited by 2,610
Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271 · Cited by 2,520
Putting Time in Perspective: A Valid, Reliable Individual-Differences Metric
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2015) · Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and Application · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_2 · Cited by 2,147
Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Kahneman, D. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.45 · Cited by 1,228
Support theory: a nonextensional representation of subjective probability
Tversky, A., & Koehler, D. J. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.547 · Cited by 1,167
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- Ainslie George, 1992, Choice Over Time, 57
- 10.1037/0096-3445.129.4.508 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03209393 · DOI
- Block Richard A., 2001, Time and Memory: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology, 59, 10.1093/oso/9780198250357.003.0003 · DOI
- 10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00055-X · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0671 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.ps.35.020184.000245 · DOI
- Gescheider George, A., 1985, Psychophysics: Method, Theory, and Application.
- 10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.279 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.22 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.11.1.59 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511803475.032 · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-3445.126.1.54 · DOI
- 10.1509/jmkr.43.1.59 · DOI
- 10.2307/2118482 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1509/jmkr.43.4.618 · DOI
- 10.1037/0097-7403.10.4.426 · DOI
- 10.1257/aer.89.1.103 · DOI
- Pigou Arthur, C., 1920, The Economics of Welfare.
- 10.2307/271063 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1023/A:1011198414683 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0412 · DOI
- 10.1037/1076-898X.1.1.34 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00060-8 · DOI
- 10.1111/1468-2354.t01-1-00106 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0534 · DOI
- Schwarz Norbert, 2006, Social Psychology: A Handbook of Principles, 1
- Sherover Charles, M., 1975, The Human Experience of Time: The Development of Its Philosophic Meaning.
- 10.1037/h0046162 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mehy.2005.04.040 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.05.056 · DOI
- 10.1016/0165-1765(81)90067-7 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403 · DOI · Paper page
- Turetzky Philip, 1998, Time.
- 10.1016/j.tics.2007.10.004 · DOI
- 10.1086/378617 · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-3445.134.1.23 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Construal-level theory of psychological distance.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0018963 · Cited by 6,618
Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting
Laibson, D. (1997) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355397555253 · Cited by 6,122
The neural mechanisms of inter-temporal decision-making: understanding variability
Peters, J., & Büchel, C. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.03.002 · Cited by 693
Rung, J. M., & Madden, G. J. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000462 · Cited by 358
The Malleability of Intertemporal Choice
Lempert, K. M., & Phelps, E. A. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.09.005 · Cited by 207
van den Bos, W., Rodriguez, C. A., Schweitzer, J. B., & McClure, S. M. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4105-13.2014 · Cited by 178
Maglio, S. J., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0030258 · Cited by 157
TOWARDS A GENERAL MODEL OF TEMPORAL DISCOUNTING
van den Bos, W., & McClure, S. M. (2013) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1002/jeab.6 · Cited by 149
Behavioral trainings and manipulations to reduce delay discounting: A systematic review
Scholten, H., Scheres, A., de Water, E., Graf, U., Granic, I., & Luijten, M. (2019) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-019-01629-2 · Cited by 135
Individual Differences in Delay Discounting Under Acute Stress: The Role of Trait Perceived Stress
Lempert, K. M., Porcelli, A. J., Delgado, M. R., & Tricomi, E. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00251 · Cited by 112
Mechanisms of impulsive choice: II. Time-based interventions to improve self-control
Smith, A. P., Marshall, A. T., & Kirkpatrick, K. (2015) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.010 · Cited by 79
Mechanisms of impulsive choice: I. Individual differences in interval timing and reward processing
Marshall, A. T., Smith, A. P., & Kirkpatrick, K. (2014) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1002/jeab.88 · Cited by 75
The date-delay framing effect in temporal discounting depends on substance abuse
Klapproth, F. (2012) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2012.03.013 · Cited by 29
Goli (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4437617 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Zauberman, G., Kim, B. K., Malkoc, S. A., & Bettman, J. R.
- Affiliations
- Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
- Olin Business School, Washington University in St. Louis
- Fuqua School of Business, Duke University
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 543-556
- ISSN
- 0022-2437
- 1547-7193
- Cited by
- 489
- References
- 10
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review