Cited by 127Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionSocial and Intergroup PsychologyPersonality Traits and Psychology

Not all self‐affirmations were created equal: The cognitive and social benefits of affirming the intrinsic (vs. extrinsic) self

Schimel, Jeff, Arndt, Jamie, Banko, Katherine M., Cook, Alison·2004·Social Cognition

Abstract

Three studies investigated whether affirming the self intrinsically (vs. extrinsically) would reduce defensive concerns and improve cognitive and social functioning in evaluative contexts. Study 1 found that an intrinsic self-affirmation reduced self-handicapping and increased performance on a threatening serial subtraction task relative to an extrinsic self-affirmation. Study 2 replicated the effects of Study 1, showing that an intrinsic (vs. extrinsic) self-affirmation increased women's performance on a math test under conditions that arouse stereotype threat. A third study extended these findings to threatening social contexts. Focusing participants on intrinsic (vs. extrinsic) aspects of self reduced thoughts about social rejection prior to an evaluative social interaction. Discussion focused on the need for further investigation into the multifaceted nature of the self and self-esteem.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/soco.22.1.75.30984

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-affirmation appears to reduce stereotype threat among students in laboratory situations.

    “Given the evidence that self-aYrmation appears to reduce stereotype threat among students in laboratory situations (Martens et al., 2006;Schimel et al., 2004)”

    From The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory (2006) · cites this paper as Schimel et al., 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schimel, J., Arndt, J., Banko, K. M., & Cook, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Missouri (US)
Venue
Social Cognition
Published
2004-02
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
75-99
ISSN
0278-016X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107190688
Cited by
127
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Cognition (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
self-affirmation, self-esteem, self-handicapping, stereotype threat, mathematics achievement, social rejection, evaluative context, cognitive performance, social functioning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review