Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 779

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuronal activities in brain-stem cholinergic nuclei related to tonic activation processes in thalamocortical systems

Open access
Steriade, M, Datta, S, Pare, D, Oakson, G, Curro Dossi, RC·1990·The Journal of Neuroscience
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.10-08-02541.1990
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study was performed to examine the hypothesis that thalamic- projecting neurons of mesopontine cholinergic nuclei display activity patterns that are compatible with their role in inducing and maintaining activation processes in thalamocortical systems during the states of waking (W) and rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep associated with desynchronization of the electroencephalogram (EEG). A sample of 780 neurons located in the peribrachial (PB) area of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and in the laterodorsal tegmental (LDT) nucleus were recorded extracellularly in unanesthetized, chronically implanted cats. Of those neurons, 82 were antidromically invaded from medial, intralaminar, and lateral thalamic nuclei: 570 were orthodromically driven at short latencies from various thalamic sites: and 45 of the latter elements are also part of the 82 cell group, as they were activated both antidromically and synaptically from the thalamus. There were no statistically significant differences between firing rates in the PB and LDT neuronal samples. Rate analyses in 2 distinct groups of PB/LDT neurons, with fast (greater than 10 Hz) and slow (less than 2 Hz) discharge rates in W, indicated that (1) the fast-discharging cell group had higher firing rates in W and REM sleep compared to EEG- synchronized sleep (S), the differences between all states being significant (p less than 0.0005); (2) the slow-discharging cell group increased firing rates from W to S and further to REM sleep, with significant difference between W and S (p less than 0.01), as well as between W or S and REM sleep (p less than 0.0005). Interspike interval histograms of PB and LDT neurons showed that 75% of them have tonic firing patterns, with virtually no high-frequency spike bursts in any state of the wake-sleep cycle. We found 22 PB cells that discharged rhythmic spike trains with recurring periods of 0.8–1 sec. Autocorrelograms revealed that this oscillatory behavior disappeared when their firing rate increased during REM sleep. Dynamic analyses of sequential firing rates throughout the waking-sleep cycle showed that none of the full-blown states of vigilance is associated with a uniform level of spontaneous firing rate. Signs of decreased discharge frequencies of mesopontine neurons appeared toward the end of quiet W, preceding by about 10–20 sec the most precocious signs of EEG synchronization heralding the sleep onset. During transition from S to W, rates of spontaneous discharges increased 20 sec before the onset of EEG desynchronization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.10-08-02541.1990

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Steriade, M., Datta, S., Pare, D., Oakson, G., & Curro Dossi, R.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Society for Neuroscience
Published
1990-08-01
Volume
10
Issue
8
Pages
2541-2559
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
DOI
10.1523/jneurosci.10-08-02541.1990
OpenAlex
W1633465816
Cited by
779
References
4
FWCI
14.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (vor, 184 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.