Cited by 475Anesthesia and Sedative AgentsAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity ResearchSleep and Wakefulness Research

Brain mechanisms of propofol-induced loss of consciousness in humans: A positron emission tomographic study

Open access
Fiset, Pierre, Paus, Tomás, Daloze, Thierry, Plourde, Gilles, Meuret, Pascal, Bonhomme, Vincent, Hajj-Ali, Nadine, Backman, Steven B. +1 more·1999·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

In the present study, we used positron emission tomography to investigate changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) during a general anesthetic infusion set to produce a gradual transition from the awake state to unconsciousness. Five right-handed human volunteers participated in the study. They were given propofol with a computer-controlled infusion pump to achieve three stable levels of plasma concentrations corresponding to mild sedation, deep sedation, and unconsciousness, the latter defined as unresponsiveness to verbal commands. During awake baseline and each of the three levels of sedation, two scans were acquired after injection of an H 2 15 O bolus. Global as well as regional CBF were determined and correlated with propofol concentrations. In addition, blood flow changes in the thalamus were correlated with those of the entire scanned volume to determine areas of coordinated changes. In addition to a generalized decrease in global CBF, large regional decreases in CBF occurred bilaterally in the medial thalamus, the cuneus and precuneus, and the posterior cingulate, orbitofrontal, and right angular gyri. Furthermore, a significant covariation between the thalamic and midbrain blood flow changes was observed, suggesting a close functional relationship between the two structures. We suggest that, at the concentrations attained, propofol preferentially decreases rCBF in brain regions previously implicated in the regulation of arousal, performance of associative functions, and autonomic control. Our data support the hypothesis that anesthetics induce behavioral changes via a preferential, concentration-dependent effect on specific neuronal networks rather than through a nonspecific, generalized effect on the brain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.19-13-05506.1999

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A broad range of anesthetics cause metabolic depression of the thalamus.

    “The original theory was motivated by the observation of metabolic depression of the thalamus by a broad range of anesthetics [127–129].”

    From The Biology of General Anesthesia from Paramecium to Primate (2019) · cites this paper as [129]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Gjedde A (1997) The relation between brain f unction and cerebral flow and metabolism. In: C erebrovascular disease (Hunt Bajter H, ed), pp 23-40. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven.
  2. Jones BE (1994) Basic mechanisms of sleep-wake states. In: Principles and practice of sleep medicine (Kryger M H, Roth T, Dement WC, eds), pp 145-162. Philadelphia: Saunders.
  3. Steriade M, Jones EG, L lina ´s RR (1990) Brainstem control of the thal- amus and states of vigilance. In: Thalamic oscillations and signaling (Steriade M, Jones EG, L lina ´s RR, eds), pp 313-364. New York: Wiley.
  4. Talairach J, Tournoux P (1988) Co-planar stereotactic atlas of the hu- man brain. New York: Thieme.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fiset, P., Paus, T., Daloze, T., Plourde, G., Meuret, P., Bonhomme, V., Hajj-Ali, N., Backman, S. B., & Evans, A. C.
Affiliations
  • McGill University Health Centre (CA)
  • Pediatrics and Genetics (US)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1999-07-01
Volume
19
Issue
13
Pages
5506-5513
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1588401088
Cited by
475
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 17
FWCI
22.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
propofol, loss of consciousness, general anesthesia, regional cerebral blood flow, thalamus, midbrain, arousal regulation, sedation, brain networks
MeSH terms
Adult, Anesthesia, General, Carbon Dioxide, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Consciousness, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Electroencephalography, Female, Hemodynamics, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Male, Mesencephalon, Nerve Net, Regional Blood Flow, Thalamus, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Propofol, Anesthetics, Intravenous

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review