The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 4 of the 17 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Using Imagination to Understand the Neural Basis of Episodic Memory
Open accessAbstract
Functional MRI (fMRI) studies investigating the neural basis of episodic memory recall, and the related task of thinking about plausible personal future events, have revealed a consistent network of associated brain regions. Surprisingly little, however, is understood about the contributions individual brain areas make to the overall recollective experience. To examine this, we used a novel fMRI paradigm in which subjects had to imagine fictitious experiences. In contrast to future thinking, this results in experiences that are not explicitly temporal in nature or as reliant on self-processing. By using previously imagined fictitious experiences as a comparison for episodic memories, we identified the neural basis of a key process engaged in common, namely scene construction, involving the generation, maintenance and visualization of complex spatial contexts. This was associated with activations in a distributed network, including hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and retrosplenial cortex. Importantly, we disambiguated these common effects from episodic memory-specific responses in anterior medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex and precuneus. These latter regions may support self-schema and familiarity processes, and contribute to the brain's ability to distinguish real from imaginary memories. We conclude that scene construction constitutes a common process underlying episodic memory and imagination of fictitious experiences, and suggest it may partially account for the similar brain networks implicated in navigation, episodic future thinking, and the default mode. We suggest that additional brain regions are co-opted into this core network in a task-specific manner to support functions such as episodic memory that may have additional requirements.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
13 Own result · 4 Own method · 3 Not checked yet · 2 Partly supported · 1 Supported so far · 1 No full text of the sources · accuracy not yet measured
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Thus episodic memory recall can be conceptually divided into a number of component processes including a sense of subjective time (Tulving, 2002), self-processing (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000), visual imagery (Rubin et al., 2003), narrative structure (Rubin et al., 2003), retrieval of semantic information (Wheeler et al., 1997) and multi-modal details (Wheeler et al., 2000; Gottfried et al., 2004), and feelings of familiarity (Wagner et al., 2005).”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Tulving, 2002 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000 source
- Supportedcites Rubin et al., 2003 source
The citation to Rubin et al. is attached to visual imagery and narrative structure, not the other processes in the citing sentence. The paper’s “Component processes” section identifies visual imagery as a component of autobiographical memory and treats narrative coherence as a distinct feature, measured by whether a memory comes as a coherent story. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.93)
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“have revealed a consistent and distributed network of associated brain regions,”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Maguire, 2001 source
- Partly supportedcites Svoboda et al., 2006 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 3.1 identifies a consistent, distributed network across autobiographical-memory imaging studies. Section 3.4 reports overlap in two regions for past and future thought, but cites only one imaging study directly comparing them; it does not establish a consistent distributed network across studies of both episodic recall and future thinking. The indexed copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cabeza and St Jacques, 2007 source
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“we replicated the well-established episodic memory retrieval network consistently activated in studies of autobiographical memory”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Results > Neuroimaging Data
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Maguire, 2001 source
- Partly supportedcites Rugg et al., 2002 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract (page unavailable) reports that successful episodic recollection is associated with lateral parietal activation and more variable prefrontal activation. It does not establish a consistently activated network in autobiographical-memory studies or compare recall of real memories with recall of objects; the available text points to a PDF for the full article. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Partly supportedcites Svoboda et al., 2006 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction says the meta-analysis identifies shared patterns of brain activation during autobiographical remembering, supporting the citing sentence’s reference to an established retrieval network. The Results and discussion (section 3.1) also describes an autobiographical-memory network. Our copy does not establish the claim’s more specific comparison of real-memory recall with recalled objects. (LLM, conf=0.84)
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Importantly, we disambiguated these common effects from episodic memory-specific responses in anterior medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex and precuneus.”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These latter regions may support self-schema and familiarity processes,”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We conclude that scene construction constitutes a common process underlying episodic memory and imagination of fictitious experiences,”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we identified the neural basis of a key process engaged in common, namely scene construction”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This was associated with activations in a distributed network, including hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and retrosplenial cortex.”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“involving the generation, maintenance and visualisation of complex spatial contexts.”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This study demonstrates that imagining new experiences is a manipulable and useful experimental tool which may prove fruitful in further advancing our understanding of episodic memory and the processes underpinning it, as well as other related cognitive functions”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Buckner and Carroll, 2007 source
- Not matchedcites Hassabis and Maguire, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Much recent interest has focused on the striking overlap among brain regions involved in the retrieval of autobiographical memories, the imagination of novel events, and navigation14, 47, 48.”
From Anchoring the neural compass: coding of local spatial reference frames in human medial parietal lobe (2014) · cites this paper as [48]
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Consistentt(20) = 13.52reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 13.52, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 13.6reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 13.60, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 11.03reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 11.03, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = -4.89reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = −4.89, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.36reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.36, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.41reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.41, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 2.88reported p < .01 · recomputed p = .009
“t(20) = 2.88, p < .01”
- Consistentt(20) = -4.77reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = −4.77, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = -6.67reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = −6.67, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 5.51reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 5.51, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.96reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.96, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 6.17reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 6.17, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 17.85reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 17.85, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 11.18reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 11.18, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 2.42reported p < .03 · recomputed p = .025
“t(20) = 2.42, p < .03”
- Consistentt(20) = 12.99reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 12.99, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 8.67reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 8.67, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.89reported p = .39 · recomputed p = .384
“t(20) = −0.89, p = .39”
- Consistentt(20) = 0.51reported p = .62 · recomputed p = .616
“t(20) = 0.51, p = .62”
- Consistentt(20) = -1.97reported p = .06 · recomputed p = .063
“t(20) = −1.97, p = .06”
- Consistentt(20) = -1reported p = .33 · recomputed p = .329
“t(20) = −1.00, p = .33”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.47reported p = .64 · recomputed p = .643
“t(20) = −0.47, p = .64”
- Consistentt(20) = 1.75reported p = .1 · recomputed p = .095
“t(20) = 1.75, p = .10”
- Consistentt(20) = 3.86reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 3.86, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.26reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.26, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 1.09reported p = .29 · recomputed p = .289
“t(20) = 1.09, p = .29”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.69reported p = .5 · recomputed p = .498
“t(20) = −0.69, p = .50”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.59reported p = .56 · recomputed p = .562
“t(20) = −0.59, p = .56”
- Consistentt(20) = 0.26reported p = .8 · recomputed p = .798
“t(20) = 0.26, p = .80”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.3reported p = .77 · recomputed p = .767
“t(20) = −0.30, p = .77”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.
Citations
Cites
A default mode of brain function
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.676 · Cited by 12,190 · cited 4×
“…2005), episodic future thinking (Atance and O’Neill, 2001; Addis et al., 2007; Schacter and Addis, 2007; Szpunar et al., 2007), the default mode (Raichle et al., 2001) and daydreaming (Mason et al., 2007), leading to suggestions that it performs a general function (Buckner and Carroll, 2007;…”
BackgroundInfluential(1978) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 8,010
Episodic memory: from mind to brain
Tulving, E. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114 · Cited by 4,950 · cited 11×
“…theory of mind (Kumaran and Maguire, 2005; Amodio and Frith, 2006) and episodic future thinking (Addis et al., 2007) suggesting that the amPFC and PCC might be supporting pro- cesses related to the self (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000) and mental time travel (Wheeler et al., 1997; Tulving, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system
Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.107.2.261 · Cited by 4,089 · cited 7×
“…a purely created imagined experience does not have the same reliance or effect on the imaginer’s self-schema compared with a real episodic memory (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Gallagher, 2000) although both likely involve the adoption of an egocentric viewpoint (Burgess, 2006) on the part…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMeeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition
Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1884 · Cited by 3,782 · cited 2×
“…bears a striking resemblance to networks found to support self-reflection (Johnson et al., 2002), theory of mind (Kumaran and Maguire, 2005; Amodio and Frith, 2006) and episodic future thinking (Addis et al., 2007) suggesting that the amPFC and PCC might be supporting pro- cesses related…”
BackgroundPhilosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science.
Gallagher, S. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01417-5 · Cited by 2,881 · cited 4×
“Moreover, by using rich imaginary memories as a well matched comparison task we were able to isolate processes specific to episodic memory, such as the use of self-schema (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Gallagher, 2000), a sense of familiarity and mental time travel (Tulving, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWandering minds: the default network and stimulus-independent thought
Mason, M. F., Norton, M. I., Van Horn, J. D., Wegner, D. M., Grafton, S. T., & Macrae, C. N. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1131295 · Cited by 2,792 · cited 4×
“, 2001), and perhaps even daydreaming (Mason et al., 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialBuckner, R. L., & Carroll, D. C. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.004 · Cited by 2,691
The human hippocampus and spatial and episodic memory
Burgess, N., Maguire, E. A., & O'Keefe, J. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00830-9 · Cited by 2,401 · cited 3×
“…network (also replicated in this study with the RM RO contrast) has also been activated in a variety of other circumstances including navigation (Burgess et al., 2002; Hartley et al., 2003; Spiers and Maguire, 2006), spatial tasks (Maguire et al., 2003; Kumaran and Maguire, 2005), episodic…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationRemembering the past to imagine the future: the prospective brain
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2213 · Cited by 2,394 · cited 1×
“…a key component of episodic memory recall lends additional support to constructive theories of episodic memory (Bartlett, 1932; Schacter et al., 1998) and the recently proposed constructive episodic simulation function of the episodic memory system (Schacter and Addis, 2007; Schacter et al., 2007).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Bartlett FC (1932) Remembering (Cambridge UP, Cambridge).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 751
Sleep facilitates spatial memory but not navigation using the Minecraft Memory and Navigation task
Simon, K. C. N. S., Clemenson, G. D., Zhang, J., Sattari, N. S., Shuster, A. E., Clayton, B., Alzueta, E., Dulai, T., de Zambotti, M., Stark, C. E. L., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2202394119 · Cited by 24
“We also did not find an interaction between training time and environment [F(3, 82) = 0.”
BackgroundInfluentialHippocampal orchestration of associative and sequential memory networks for episodic retrieval
Kim, J. S., & Lee, S. A. (2023) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112989 · Cited by 19
Deconstructing the nature of episodic foresight deficits associated with chronic opiate use
Mercuri, K., Terrett, G., Bailey, P. E., Henry, J. D., Curran, V. H., & Rendell, P. G. (2016) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjc.12110 · Cited by 19
“In the Hassabis et al. (2007a) measure, the atemporal and future scenario conditions have similar scene construction demands but in the narrative condition, these demands are substantially reduced because the scenario structure is provided in this condition but has to be self-generated in the other…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThree Emotional Stories: Reflections on Memory, the Imagination, Narrative, and the Self
Hustvedt, S. (2011) · Neuropsychoanalysis · doi:10.1080/15294145.2011.10773674 · Cited by 19
Damage to right medial temporal structures disrupts the capacity for scene construction—a case study
Irish, M., Mothakunnel, A., Dermody, N., Wilson, N., Hodges, J. R., & Piguet, O. (2017) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22722 · Cited by 19
“Preferential activation of the right hippocampus has been observed during future simulation relative to past retrieval (Addis et al., 2007) and for the imagination of vivid scenes relative to objects (Hassabis et al., 2007a), offering important clues regarding potential laterality effects.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialChan, I. Y. S., Dong, Z., & Chen, H. (2024) · Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tust.2024.105675 · Cited by 18
Simulating the best and worst of times: the powers and perils of emotional simulation
Wardell, V., Grilli, M. D., & Palombo, D. J. (2022) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2022.2088796 · Cited by 19
“Neurally, both processes are supported by a “core” network, including the medial temporal lobes, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and lateral temporal and parietal regions (Hassabis et al., 2007; Schacter et al., 2007; Stawarczyk & D’Argembeau, 2015).”
BackgroundA new method of localizing brain activity using the scalp EEG data
Vartanov, A. (2022) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2022.11.036 · Cited by 18
Medial Temporal Lobe Contributions to Future Thinking: Evidence from Neuroimaging and Amnesia
Verfaellie, M. H., Race, E., & Keane, M. M. (2012) · Psychologica Belgica · doi:10.5334/pb-52-2-3-77 · Cited by 17
“As highlighted above, Hassabis, Kumaran, and Maguire (2007) and Hassabis, Kumaran, Vann et al. (2007) have offered evidence for the role of the MTL in imag-”
BackgroundCharacterizing Strategy Use During the Performance of Hippocampal-Dependent Tasks
Clark, I. A., Monk, A. M., & Maguire, E. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02119 · Cited by 18
Self-citationSubjective Time in Dementia: A Critical Review
Liu, L., Bulley, A., & Irish, M. (2021) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci11111502 · Cited by 19
“The hippocampus is also heavily implicated in the construction of spatially coherent scenes or layouts, which provide the spatial backdrop for past and future event constructions [50], yet has further been suggested to represent temporal order information and to support the temporal organization of memories [53,54].”
BackgroundWaidergoren, S., Segalowicz, J., & Gilboa, A. (2012) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.040 · Cited by 20
Deficits in remembering the past and imagining the future in patients with prefrontal lesions
Rasmussen, K. W., & Berntsen, D. (2016) · Journal of Neuropsychology · doi:10.1111/jnp.12108 · Cited by 23
Empathic responding and hippocampal volume in young children.
Stern, J. A., Botdorf, M., Cassidy, J. A., & Riggins, T. (2019) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000684 · Cited by 19
Sparing of spatial mental imagery in patients with hippocampal lesionsPreprint
Kim, S., Borst, G., Thompson, W. L., Hopkins, R. O., Kosslyn, S. M., & Squire, L. R. (2013) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.031633.113 · Cited by 21
“The fact that our patients had hippocampal volume reductions similar to what has been reported for P01 and Jon (40%–50”
BackgroundInfluentialWimmer, L., Currie, G., Friend, S., & Ferguson, H. J. (2021) · Imagination Cognition and Personality · doi:10.1177/0276236621996244 · Cited by 18
“We applied an imaginability task introduced by Hassabis et al. (2007).”
MethodŠtillová, K., Jurák, P., Chládek, J., Halámek, J., Telecká, S., & Rektor, I. (2012) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-012-0890-z · Cited by 17
Encoding-Stage Crosstalk Between Object- and Spatial Property-Based Scene Processing Pathways
Linsley, D. A., & MacEvoy, S. P. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu034 · Cited by 17
“…of scenes’ spatial properties (Aguirre et al. 1998; Epstein and Kanwisher 1998; Kravitz et al. 2011; Mullally and Maguire 2011, 2013; Park et al. 2011), as well as processing of scenes’ contextual associations (Aminoff et al. 2007; Hassabis et al. 2007; Summerfield et al. 2010; Howard et al. 2011).”
BackgroundNeurocognitive bases of future oriented cognition
Bubić, A., & Abraham, A. (2014) · Hrčak Portal of scientific journals of Croatia (University Computing Centre) · Cited by 17
Reorganization of the thalamocortical network in musicians
Tanaka, S., & Kirino, E. (2017) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2017.03.027 · Cited by 20
Not single brain areas but a network is involved in language: Applications in presurgical planning
Alemi, R., Batouli, S. A. H., Behzad, E., Ebrahimpoor, M., & Oghabian, M. A. (2018) · Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.009 · Cited by 16
Remembering rewarding futures: A simulation‐selection model of the hippocampus
Jung, M. W., Lee, H., Jeong, Y., Lee, J. W., & Lee, I. (2018) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.23023 · Cited by 16
Generative Replay for Compositional Visual Understanding in the Prefrontal-Hippocampal CircuitPreprint
Schwartenbeck, P., Baram, A. B., Liu, Y., Mark, S., Müller, T., Dolan, R. J., Botvinick, M., Kurth-Nelson, Z. L., & Behrens, T. E. J. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.06.06.447249 · Cited by 18
“This is perhaps most strikingly demonstrated in natural scene understanding tasks, such as imagining novel viewpoints, in which HC and mPFC are causally engaged (Hassabis et al., 2007; Hassabis & Maguire, 2009; Lee, Buckley, et al., 2005; Lee, Bussey, et al., 2005).”
BackgroundLi, C., Cheng, T.-H. Z., & Tsai, C. (2019) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.04.014 · Cited by 20
Decreased beta-band activity is correlated with disambiguation of hidden figures
Minami, T., Noritake, Y., & Nakauchi, S. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.12.026 · Cited by 16
Bray, L. C. J., Quoy, M., Harris, F. C., & Goodman, P. H. (2010) · Frontiers in Neural Circuits · doi:10.3389/fncir.2010.00122 · Cited by 17
“…hippocampal navigational system for generic short-term memory as a way-station to manipulation and long-term consolidation (and reconsolidation) in the neocortex (Buzsaki, 2005; Samsonovich and Ascoli, 2005), and possibly even human creativity (Balter, 2010) and imagination (Hassabis et al., 2007).”
Make-Believing Virtual Realities
Turner, S., Huang, C., Burrows, L., & Turner, P. (2016) · Human-computer interaction series · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-29553-4_3 · Cited by 18
A2C: Attention-Augmented Contrastive Learning for State Representation Extraction
Chen, H., Liu, Y.-D., Zhou, Z.-T., & Zhang, M. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10175902 · Cited by 15
“At the cognitive level, humans tend to use experience to build a model at the spiritual level (induction) and deduce the future through the learned model (deduction) [42,43].”
BackgroundInvolvement of cortical midline structures in the processing of autobiographical information
Araujo, H. F., Kaplan, J. T., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. (2014) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.481 · Cited by 17
Episodic future thinking and future-based decision-making in a case of retrograde amnesia
Luca, F. D., Benuzzi, F., Bertossi, E., Braghittoni, D., di Pellegrino, G., & Ciaramelli, E. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.08.007 · Cited by 16
“An important question is how SG managed to construct complex fictitious experiences, a task amnesic patients cannot do (Hassabis et al., 2007).”
BackgroundThe Neuroscience of Imaginative Thought: An Integrative Framework
Raffaelli, Q., Wilcox, R. R., & Andrews‐Hanna, J. R. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108580298.021 · Cited by 16
Episodic Memory and Unrestricted Learning
Brown, S. A. B. (2023) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1017/psa.2023.16 · Cited by 18
Scene construction and autobiographical memory retrieval in autism spectrum disorder
Agron, A. M., Martin, A. D., & Gilmore, A. W. (2023) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.3066 · Cited by 17
“…interdigitated with, those associated with scene construction (Figure 2b), which canonically include ventral medial parietal cortex (sometimes referred to as the retrosplenial complex or retrosplenial cortex), parahippocampal cortex, and portions of the angular gyrus (e.g., Hassabis et al., 2007).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialReward and Novelty Enhance Imagination of Future Events in a Motivational-Episodic Network
Bulganin, L., & Wittmann, B. C. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143477 · Cited by 14
“Volumes were centred on peak voxels identified in prior motivational and episodic future imagination studies ([29,30,31], Methods in S1 File).”
BackgroundLife review therapy enhances mental time travel in patients with schizophrenia
Chen, G., Liu, L., Cui, J., Chen, T., Qin, X., Gan, J.-C., Bi, B., Neumann, D. L., Shum, D., Wang, Y., et al. (2017) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.10.002 · Cited by 16
Brien, A. R., Hutchins, T. L., & Westby, C. E. (2020) · Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools · doi:10.1044/2020_lshss-20-00062 · Cited by 20
Hippocampal activity during memory and visual perception: The role of representational content
Gardette, J., Cousin, É., Bourgin, J., Torlay, L., Pichat, C., Moreaud, O., & Hot, P. (2022) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2022.09.004 · Cited by 13
Imagining counterfactual worlds in autism spectrum disorder.
Black, J., Williams, D. M., & Ferguson, H. J. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000500 · Cited by 16
“The scene construction task described by Hassabis, Kumaran, and Maguire (2007), and used by Lind et al. (2014) among individuals with ASD, was used as a measure of imagination.”
MethodMemory, Relational Representations, and the Long Reach of the Hippocampus
Rubin, R. D., & Cohen, N. J. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50406-3_11 · Cited by 19
Immel, A.-S., Altgassen, M., Meyer, M. J., Endedijk, H. M., & Hunnius, S. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105481 · Cited by 12
Pyke, A. A., Fincham, J. M., & Anderson, J. R. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.046 · Cited by 13
“On the other hand, a general function of default network regions may be to support mental imagery (Daselaar et al., 2010; Hassabis et al., 2007).”
Schurr, R., Nitzan, M., Eliahou, R., Spinelli, L., Seeck, M., Blanke, O., & Arzy, S. (2018) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2018.00011 · Cited by 17
“Whereas, early studies of memory functions focused on the hippocampus, various studies have since established the existence of a largescale brain network supporting MTT-related processes (Buckner and Carroll, 2007; Hassabis et al., 2007a; Arzy et al., 2009a; Schacter and Addis, 2009; Spreng et al., 2009; Nyberg et al.…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialUsing Story-Based Interventions to Improve Episodic Memory in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Prelock, P., & Hutchins, T. L. (2018) · Seminars in Speech and Language · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1628365 · Cited by 14
Construing counterfactual worlds: The role of abstraction
Gilead, M., Liberman, N., & Maril, A. (2012) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.1862 · Cited by 15
Decreased associative processing and memory confidence in aphantasiaPreprint
Wittmann, B. C., & Şatırer, Y. (2022) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.053610.122 · Cited by 19
“Associative processes in episodic memory involve mental visual reconstruction (Tulving 2002; Hassabis et al. 2007; Karanian and Slotnick 2015; St-Laurent et al. 2015; Wing et al. 2015).”
BackgroundTarailis, P., Lory, K. S., Unschuld, P. G., Michel, C. M., & Bréchet, L. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-97240-8 · Cited by 16
“Given this context, it is not surprising that individuals with Alzheimer’s disease experience disturbances in episodic autobiographical memory for past experiences 7,67,68 and face challenges in imagining novel scenarios that may occur in the future 13,66,69 .”
Schema-Related Eye Movements Support Episodic Simulation
Wynn, J. S., van Genugten, R. D. I., Sheldon, S., & Schacter, D. L. (2021) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2022.103302 · Cited by 14
Evaluating the impact of short educational videos on the cortical networks for mathematics
Amalric, M., Roveyaz, P., & Dehaene, S. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2213430120 · Cited by 16
“However, we note that part of this network (AG, precuneus, PCC) is active during high-level language processing and participates in a slow semantic integration system which is thought to store the meanings of passages or movies in episodic memory (60, 61) and replay them in imagination (62).”
BackgroundEpisodic memory without autonoetic consciousness
Brigard, F. D. (2024) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2023.0410 · Cited by 14
“[38], in which five patients with hippocampal amnesia showed profoundly impoverished mental simulations when it came to imagining new experiences.”
Schacter, D. L. (2013) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12168 · Cited by 13
Anderson, A. J., & Lin, F. V. (2019) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101788 · Cited by 13
Hypomanic-like experiences and spontaneous emotional mental imagery
O’Donnell, C., Simplicio, M. C. D., & Heyes, S. B. (2020) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.003 · Cited by 13
Mnemicity versus temporality: Distinguishing between components of episodic representations.
Mahr, J. B., & Schacter, D. L. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001215 · Cited by 13
Imaging the future: Does a qualitative analysis add to the picture?
McKinlay, A., McVittie, C., & Sala, S. D. (2009) · Journal of Neuropsychology · doi:10.1348/174866409x468395 · Cited by 13
“No, it’s like I’m kind of floating : : : (Hassabis et al., 2007, p. 1727) In Extract 1, P03 begins by stating that he can see the sky.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialMaintaining fixation does not increase demands on working memory relative to free viewing
Armson, M. J., Ryan, J. D., & Levine, B. (2019) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.6839 · Cited by 13
Simonsen, Ø. W., Czajkowski, R., & Witter, M. P. (2022) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-022-02578-8 · Cited by 10
“2003), imagining fictitious experiences (Hassabis et al. 2007), and it is a part of the default mode network (Raichle et al.”
BackgroundSerino, S., & Riva, G. (2016) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-160676 · Cited by 11
“This is consistent with results showing that the ability to simulate future autobiographical scenarios is based on the activity of medial temporal lobes [99–101], which is the earliest area affected by the neuropathological process in AD.”
The role of mental simulation in primate physical inference abilitiesPreprint
Rajalingham, R., Piccato, A., & Jazayeri, M. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.01.14.426741 · Cited by 12
“one that is synchronous with the dynamics of an unobserved external process, which may be computationally distinct from “offline” or 475 asynchronous simulation processes thought to be relevant for imagination (Hassabis et al., 2007; Shepard & Metzler, 1971) or counterfactual reasoning (Gerstenberg & Tenenbaum, 2017).”
BackgroundEllamil, M., Fox, K. C. R., Dixon, M. L., Pritchard, S., Todd, R. M., Thompson, E. T., & Kalina Christoff, A. (2017) · MindRxiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31231/osf.io/45awd · Cited by 12
Carbone, F., Pitt, A., Nyhout, A., Friend, S., Smith, M., & Ferguson, H. J. (2025) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218251333747 · Cited by 12
“As in Experiment 1, creativity was assessed using the AUT (George and Wiley, 2019; Guildford, 1967), imaginability using Hassabis et al.’s scene construction task (2007), openness to new evidence using a trait hypothesis-testing task (Galinsky & Moskowitz, 2000), and cognitive flexibility using the…”
Daviddi, S., Yaya, G., Sperduti, M., & Santangelo, V. (2024) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-024-09653-3 · Cited by 12
Conscious experience in sleep and wakefulness
Siclari, F., Bassetti, C. L., & Tononi, G. (2013) · Schweizer Archiv für Neurologie und Psychiatrie · doi:10.4414/sanp.2012.00137 · Cited by 10
Prevention of catastrophic interference and imposing active forgetting with generative methods
Sukhov, S. V., Leontev, M., Miheev, A., & Sviatov, K. V. (2020) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2020.03.024 · Cited by 10
Mueller-Greene, C. (2022) · Journal of Literary Theory · doi:10.1515/jlt-2022-2025 · Cited by 11
Mind wandering in reading: An embodied approach
Trasmundi, S. B., & Toro, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2023.1061437 · Cited by 16
“, 2016), as well as in imagination of novel scenarios and situations (Buckner and Carroll, 2007; Hassabis et al., 2007; Buckner et al., 2008; Buckner, 2010), and in constructing new spatial scenes (Hassabis and Maguire, 2009) and finally in imagining potential future experiences (Schacter et al.”
BackgroundHuman and animal research into sex-specific effects of child abuse
Cooke, B. M., & Weathington, J. M. (2014) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.03.004 · Cited by 11
“The hippocampus is believed to form a spatio-temporally extended multi-modal representation of ongoing experience and recent events (Eichenbaum, 2004; Hassabis et al., 2007).”
Toward an embodiment-disembodiment taxonomy
Stocker, K. (2012) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-012-0495-3 · Cited by 11
An adaptive function of mental time travel: Motivating farsighted decisions
Benoit, R. G., Berkers, R. M. W. J., & Paulus, P. C. (2018) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x1700125x · Cited by 10
Testing covariance models for MEG source reconstruction of hippocampal activity
O’Neill, G. C., Barry, D. N., Tierney, T. M., Mellor, S., Maguire, E. A., & Barnes, G. R. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-96933-0 · Cited by 11
Self-citationNeural correlates of repeated retrieval of emotional autobiographical events
Bradley, M. M., Sambuco, N., & Lang, P. J. (2022) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108203 · Cited by 11
Visualizing Compassion: Episodic Simulation as Contemplative Practice
Wilson‐Mendenhall, C. D., Dunne, J. D., & Davidson, R. J. (2022) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-022-01842-6 · Cited by 14
“This subsystem is also implicated in constructing scenes during imagined experiences of plausible personal events (Hassabis et al., 2007) and immersing in imagined, multimodal emotional situations (Wilson-Mendenhall et al.”
BackgroundBatista, A. X., Bazán, P. R., Conforto, A. B., Martin, M. D. G. M., Simon, S. S., Hampstead, B. M., Figueiredo, E. G., & Miotto, E. C. (2019) · Neural Plasticity · doi:10.1155/2019/4172569 · Cited by 11
“Moreover, the PCC is recruited during the recollection processing on recognition tasks [49] and on retrieval of real episodic memories rather than constructed ones [50].”
BackgroundIndustriousness Moderates the Link Between Default Mode Network Subsystem and Creativity
Huo, T., Li, Y., Zhuang, K., Li, S., Wang, X., Ren, Z., Liu, Q., Yang, W., & Qiu, J. (2019) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.11.049 · Cited by 11
From spatial navigation via visual construction to episodic memory and imagination
Arbib, M. A. (2020) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s00422-020-00829-7 · Cited by 12
Representational dynamics of memories for real-life events
Jeunehomme, O., Heinen, R. M., Stawarczyk, D., Axmacher, N., & D’Argembeau, A. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.105391 · Cited by 9
Chevtaeva, E., & Guillet, B. D. (2023) · Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research · doi:10.1177/10963480231211739 · Cited by 10
“Previous studies have referred to the process of imagining the future by various names, including “imagination” (Hassabis et al., 2007), “episodic foresight” (Hudson et al., 2011), “future thoughts” (P. M. Szpunar & Szpunar, 2016), and “mental time travel” (Suddendorf et al., 2009); this study…”
A double dissociation between semantic and spatial cognition in visual to default network pathwaysPreprint
Alam, T. R. G., Krieger‐Redwood, K., Varga, D., Gao, Z., Horner, A. J., Hartley, T., de Schotten, M. T., Sliwinska, M. W., Pitcher, D., Margulies, D. S., et al. (2024) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.94902.3 · Cited by 19
“In contrast, scene construction, thought to be a key component of episodic recollection, is associated with a medial temporal (MT) subsystem ( Andrews-Hanna et al., 2010b ; D’Argembeau et al., 2010 ; Hassabis et al., 2007 ; Zhang et al., 2022 ).”
True and intentionally fabricated memories
Justice, L. V., Morrison, C. M., & Conway, M. A. (2012) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.734832 · Cited by 10
Remote memory and temporal lobe epilepsy
McAndrews, M. P. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580286.003.0013 · Cited by 11
Li, K., Laird, A. R., Price, L. R., McKay, D., Blangero, J., Glahn, D. C., & Fox, P. T. (2016) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2016.00137 · Cited by 10
“Core areas of the DMN, including the posterior cingulate cortex, inferior parietal lobules, and medial temporal lobes, have also been shown to be involved in scene construction of past and fictitious events (Hassabis et al., 2007; Kim, 2012; Andrews-Hanna et al., 2014).”
BackgroundContributions of Episodic Memory to Imagining the Future
McLelland, V. C., Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118332634.ch14 · Cited by 11
“In contrast, the scene construction task (Hassabis et al., 2007) involves provision of the general scenario and the participant is required to build upon the pre‐constructed scene, at times receiving prompts about visuospatial information (Berryhill et al., 2010; Hurley, Maguire, and Vargha‐Khadem,…”
BackgroundInfluentialCase-Based Decision Neuroscience
Bhui, R. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-812098-9.00004-8 · Cited by 10
“…2003; Schacter and Addis, 2007; Szpunar et al., 2007; Addis et al., 2007), and hippocampal amnesics are typically quite impaired in episodic prospection (Talland, 1965; Klein et al., 2002; Hassabis et al., 2007; Addis et al., 2009; Andelman et al., 2010; Kwan et al., 2010; Race et al., 2011, 2013).”
BackgroundEvolutionary Perspectives on Prospective Cognition
Thom, J. M., & Clayton, N. S. (2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190241537.003.0014 · Cited by 9
“This is consistent with work demonstrating hippocampal activity during episodic recall and prospective simulation of the future (e.g. Addis et al., 2007), and also in imagination of an event without any specified time (Hassabis et al., 2007a).”
BackgroundResultMusz, E., Loiotile, R. E., Chen, J., & Bedny, M. (2022) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhac048 · Cited by 8
Yaoi, K., Osaka, M., & Osaka, N. (2013) · Journal of Physiology - Paris · doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2013.09.002 · Cited by 7
“Yaoi et al./Journal of Physiology - Paris 107 (2013) 517– 525 (Maddock, 1999) and in the retrieval or encoding of autobiographical memory (Hassabis et al., 2007; Maguire and Mummery, 1999).”
Episodic memory and the witness trump card
Henry, J., & Craver, C. F. (2018) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x17001376 · Cited by 9
Arnold, A. E. G. F., Ekstrom, A. D., & Iaria, G. (2018) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00292 · Cited by 10
“Prospection is theorized to rely on functional interactions between a multi-regional network across the brain (Hassabis et al., 2007; Schacter et al., 2012; Brown et al., 2016).”
BackgroundGerrans, P. (2009) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470478509.neubb002046 · Cited by 10
A short natural history of mental time travels: a journey still travelled?
Osvath, M., & Johansson, M. (2024) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2023.0402 · Cited by 10
Distributed Cortical Regions for the Recall of People, Places, and Objects
Kidder, A., Silson, E. H., Nau, M., & Baker, C. I. (2025) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0496-24.2024 · Cited by 8
“…2019a,b; Steel et al., 2021), visual scene perception (Baldassano et al., 2013; Epstein and Baker, 2019; Silson et al., 2019a), scene construction (Hassabis et al., 2007), processing of spatial and other contextual associations (Bar and Aminoff, 2003), navigation (Epstein, 2008; Epstein and…”
The Effect of Object Type on Building Scene Imagery—an MEG Study
Monk, A. M., Barnes, G. R., & Maguire, E. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.592175 · Cited by 8
Self-citationCompromised future thinking: another cognitive cost of temporal lobe epilepsy
Rayner, G., Antoniou, M., Jackson, G. D., & Tailby, C. (2022) · Brain Communications · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcac062 · Cited by 9
McDermott, K. B., & Gilmore, A. W. (2015) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/bs.plm.2015.03.004 · Cited by 8
Communication as Navigation: A New Role for Consciousness in Language
Cosentino, E., & Ferretti, F. (2013) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-013-9166-y · Cited by 8
“…by neuroimaging studies, which have proved that both recalling the past and anticipating the future activate the same areas of the brain (Addis et al. 2007; Botzung et al. 2008; Buckner and Carroll 2007; Hassabis et al. 2007; Okuda et al. 2003; Schacter et al. 2007, 2008; Szpunar et al. 2007).”
BackgroundPostma, A., & Koenderink, J. J. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-801638-1.00001-x · Cited by 9
Kim, D., Jeong, W., Kim, J. S., & Chung, C. K. (2020) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2020.591675 · Cited by 8
“Additionally, the posterior cingulate, inferior parietal cortex, and lateral temporal cortex were recruited during the construction of the mental scenes, which is the process that could be required in the memory encoding (Hassabis et al., 2007).”
BackgroundHealey, M. L., Howard, E., Ungrady, M. B., Olm, C. A., Nevler, N., Irwin, D. J., & Grossman, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.598131 · Cited by 8
A clinically applicable functional MRI memory paradigm for use with pediatric patients
Shurtleff, H. A., Poliakov, A. V., Barry, D., Wright, J. N., Warner, M. H., Novotny, E. J., Marashly, A., Buckley, R. T., Goldstein, H. E., Hauptman, J. S., et al. (2021) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108461 · Cited by 8
Implausible future events in a confabulating patient with an anterior communicating artery aneurysm
Cole, S. N., Fotopoulou, A., Oddy, M., & Moulin, C. J. A. (2013) · Neurocase · doi:10.1080/13554794.2012.741259 · Cited by 8
“Neuropsychological investigations have found parallel deficits in episodic future thinking and episodic memory (e.g. Hassabis et al., 2007b; Levine et al., 1998; Tulving, 1985, 2000).”
BackgroundThe wandering mind: Mental time travel, theory of mind, and language
Corballis, M. C. (2021) · Scientific Repository of Open Access of Portugal (RCAAP) · doi:10.31447/as00032573.2012205.07 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Hassabis, D., Kumaran, D., & Maguire, E. A.
- Affiliations
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hassabis, Demis
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2007-12-26
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 52
- Pages
- 14365-14374
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC2571957
- OpenAlex
- W1982298223
- Cited by
- 744
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 55
- FWCI
- 15.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (071173)
- Brain Research Trust
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- episodic memory, imagination, scene construction, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, retrosplenial cortex, anterior medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus, episodic future thinking, default mode network, self-processing
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-25 (prompt extract-v2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review