The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 4 of the 17 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Using Imagination to Understand the Neural Basis of Episodic Memory
Open accessAbstract
Functional MRI (fMRI) studies investigating the neural basis of episodic memory recall, and the related task of thinking about plausible personal future events, have revealed a consistent network of associated brain regions. Surprisingly little, however, is understood about the contributions individual brain areas make to the overall recollective experience. To examine this, we used a novel fMRI paradigm in which subjects had to imagine fictitious experiences. In contrast to future thinking, this results in experiences that are not explicitly temporal in nature or as reliant on self-processing. By using previously imagined fictitious experiences as a comparison for episodic memories, we identified the neural basis of a key process engaged in common, namely scene construction, involving the generation, maintenance and visualization of complex spatial contexts. This was associated with activations in a distributed network, including hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and retrosplenial cortex. Importantly, we disambiguated these common effects from episodic memory-specific responses in anterior medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex and precuneus. These latter regions may support self-schema and familiarity processes, and contribute to the brain's ability to distinguish real from imaginary memories. We conclude that scene construction constitutes a common process underlying episodic memory and imagination of fictitious experiences, and suggest it may partially account for the similar brain networks implicated in navigation, episodic future thinking, and the default mode. We suggest that additional brain regions are co-opted into this core network in a task-specific manner to support functions such as episodic memory that may have additional requirements.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
13 Own result · 4 Own method · 3 Not checked yet · 2 Partly supported · 1 Supported so far · 1 No full text of the sources · accuracy not yet measured
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Thus episodic memory recall can be conceptually divided into a number of component processes including a sense of subjective time (Tulving, 2002), self-processing (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000), visual imagery (Rubin et al., 2003), narrative structure (Rubin et al., 2003), retrieval of semantic information (Wheeler et al., 1997) and multi-modal details (Wheeler et al., 2000; Gottfried et al., 2004), and feelings of familiarity (Wagner et al., 2005).”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Tulving, 2002 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000 source
- Supportedcites Rubin et al., 2003 source
The citation to Rubin et al. is attached to visual imagery and narrative structure, not the other processes in the citing sentence. The paper’s “Component processes” section identifies visual imagery as a component of autobiographical memory and treats narrative coherence as a distinct feature, measured by whether a memory comes as a coherent story. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.93)
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“have revealed a consistent and distributed network of associated brain regions,”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Maguire, 2001 source
- Partly supportedcites Svoboda et al., 2006 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 3.1 identifies a consistent, distributed network across autobiographical-memory imaging studies. Section 3.4 reports overlap in two regions for past and future thought, but cites only one imaging study directly comparing them; it does not establish a consistent distributed network across studies of both episodic recall and future thinking. The indexed copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cabeza and St Jacques, 2007 source
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“we replicated the well-established episodic memory retrieval network consistently activated in studies of autobiographical memory”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Results > Neuroimaging Data
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Maguire, 2001 source
- Partly supportedcites Rugg et al., 2002 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract (page unavailable) reports that successful episodic recollection is associated with lateral parietal activation and more variable prefrontal activation. It does not establish a consistently activated network in autobiographical-memory studies or compare recall of real memories with recall of objects; the available text points to a PDF for the full article. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Partly supportedcites Svoboda et al., 2006 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction says the meta-analysis identifies shared patterns of brain activation during autobiographical remembering, supporting the citing sentence’s reference to an established retrieval network. The Results and discussion (section 3.1) also describes an autobiographical-memory network. Our copy does not establish the claim’s more specific comparison of real-memory recall with recalled objects. (LLM, conf=0.84)
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Importantly, we disambiguated these common effects from episodic memory-specific responses in anterior medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex and precuneus.”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These latter regions may support self-schema and familiarity processes,”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We conclude that scene construction constitutes a common process underlying episodic memory and imagination of fictitious experiences,”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we identified the neural basis of a key process engaged in common, namely scene construction”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This was associated with activations in a distributed network, including hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and retrosplenial cortex.”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“involving the generation, maintenance and visualisation of complex spatial contexts.”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This study demonstrates that imagining new experiences is a manipulable and useful experimental tool which may prove fruitful in further advancing our understanding of episodic memory and the processes underpinning it, as well as other related cognitive functions”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Buckner and Carroll, 2007 source
- Not matchedcites Hassabis and Maguire, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Much recent interest has focused on the striking overlap among brain regions involved in the retrieval of autobiographical memories, the imagination of novel events, and navigation14, 47, 48.”
From Anchoring the neural compass: coding of local spatial reference frames in human medial parietal lobe (2014) · cites this paper as [48]
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Consistentt(20) = 13.52reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 13.52, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 13.6reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 13.60, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 11.03reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 11.03, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = -4.89reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = −4.89, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.36reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.36, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.41reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.41, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 2.88reported p < .01 · recomputed p = .009
“t(20) = 2.88, p < .01”
- Consistentt(20) = -4.77reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = −4.77, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = -6.67reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = −6.67, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 5.51reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 5.51, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.96reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.96, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 6.17reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 6.17, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 17.85reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 17.85, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 11.18reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 11.18, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 2.42reported p < .03 · recomputed p = .025
“t(20) = 2.42, p < .03”
- Consistentt(20) = 12.99reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 12.99, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 8.67reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 8.67, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.89reported p = .39 · recomputed p = .384
“t(20) = −0.89, p = .39”
- Consistentt(20) = 0.51reported p = .62 · recomputed p = .616
“t(20) = 0.51, p = .62”
- Consistentt(20) = -1.97reported p = .06 · recomputed p = .063
“t(20) = −1.97, p = .06”
- Consistentt(20) = -1reported p = .33 · recomputed p = .329
“t(20) = −1.00, p = .33”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.47reported p = .64 · recomputed p = .643
“t(20) = −0.47, p = .64”
- Consistentt(20) = 1.75reported p = .1 · recomputed p = .095
“t(20) = 1.75, p = .10”
- Consistentt(20) = 3.86reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 3.86, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.26reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.26, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 1.09reported p = .29 · recomputed p = .289
“t(20) = 1.09, p = .29”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.69reported p = .5 · recomputed p = .498
“t(20) = −0.69, p = .50”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.59reported p = .56 · recomputed p = .562
“t(20) = −0.59, p = .56”
- Consistentt(20) = 0.26reported p = .8 · recomputed p = .798
“t(20) = 0.26, p = .80”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.3reported p = .77 · recomputed p = .767
“t(20) = −0.30, p = .77”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.
Citations
Cites
A default mode of brain function
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.676 · Cited by 12,190 · cited 4×
“…2005), episodic future thinking (Atance and O’Neill, 2001; Addis et al., 2007; Schacter and Addis, 2007; Szpunar et al., 2007), the default mode (Raichle et al., 2001) and daydreaming (Mason et al., 2007), leading to suggestions that it performs a general function (Buckner and Carroll, 2007;…”
BackgroundInfluential(1978) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 8,010
Episodic memory: from mind to brain
Tulving, E. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114 · Cited by 4,950 · cited 11×
“…theory of mind (Kumaran and Maguire, 2005; Amodio and Frith, 2006) and episodic future thinking (Addis et al., 2007) suggesting that the amPFC and PCC might be supporting pro- cesses related to the self (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000) and mental time travel (Wheeler et al., 1997; Tulving, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system
Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.107.2.261 · Cited by 4,089 · cited 7×
“…a purely created imagined experience does not have the same reliance or effect on the imaginer’s self-schema compared with a real episodic memory (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Gallagher, 2000) although both likely involve the adoption of an egocentric viewpoint (Burgess, 2006) on the part…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMeeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition
Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1884 · Cited by 3,782 · cited 2×
“…bears a striking resemblance to networks found to support self-reflection (Johnson et al., 2002), theory of mind (Kumaran and Maguire, 2005; Amodio and Frith, 2006) and episodic future thinking (Addis et al., 2007) suggesting that the amPFC and PCC might be supporting pro- cesses related…”
BackgroundPhilosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science.
Gallagher, S. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01417-5 · Cited by 2,881 · cited 4×
“Moreover, by using rich imaginary memories as a well matched comparison task we were able to isolate processes specific to episodic memory, such as the use of self-schema (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Gallagher, 2000), a sense of familiarity and mental time travel (Tulving, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWandering minds: the default network and stimulus-independent thought
Mason, M. F., Norton, M. I., Van Horn, J. D., Wegner, D. M., Grafton, S. T., & Macrae, C. N. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1131295 · Cited by 2,792 · cited 4×
“, 2001), and perhaps even daydreaming (Mason et al., 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialBuckner, R. L., & Carroll, D. C. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.004 · Cited by 2,691
The human hippocampus and spatial and episodic memory
Burgess, N., Maguire, E. A., & O'Keefe, J. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00830-9 · Cited by 2,401 · cited 3×
“…network (also replicated in this study with the RM RO contrast) has also been activated in a variety of other circumstances including navigation (Burgess et al., 2002; Hartley et al., 2003; Spiers and Maguire, 2006), spatial tasks (Maguire et al., 2003; Kumaran and Maguire, 2005), episodic…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationRemembering the past to imagine the future: the prospective brain
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2213 · Cited by 2,394 · cited 1×
“…a key component of episodic memory recall lends additional support to constructive theories of episodic memory (Bartlett, 1932; Schacter et al., 1998) and the recently proposed constructive episodic simulation function of the episodic memory system (Schacter and Addis, 2007; Schacter et al., 2007).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Bartlett FC (1932) Remembering (Cambridge UP, Cambridge).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Brain's Default Network: Anatomy, Function, and Relevance to Disease
Buckner, R. L., Andrews‐Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1440.011 · Cited by 9,761
“They refer to this process as “scene construction,” a term emphasizing that mental simulation often un-folds in one’s mind as an imagined scene with rich visual and spatial content (see also Hassabis et al. 2007).”
BackgroundBinder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp055 · Cited by 4,060
Functional-anatomic fractionation of the brain’s default network
Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Reidler, J. S., Sepulcre, J., Poulin, R., & Buckner, R. L. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.02.005 · Cited by 2,767
“Consistent with this finding, patients with hippocampal amnesia lack the ability to imagine a coherent scene presumably void of a temporal context (Hassabis et al., 2007b; see also Hassabis et al., 2007a; Addis et al., 2009).”
Spreng, R. N., Mar, R. A., & Kim, A. S. N. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.21029 · Cited by 2,143
Hippocampal sharp wave-ripple: A cognitive biomarker for episodic memory and planning
Buzsáki, G. (2015) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22488 · Cited by 1,759
Daselaar, S. M. (2009) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/neuro.09.013.2009 · Cited by 1,501
“The default network is active during a variety of internally-oriented task conditions, including thinking about the future (Szpunar et al., 2007), self-referential processing (Kelley et al., 2002), and visual imagery ( Hassabis et al., 2007 ).”
Mind-wandering as spontaneous thought: a dynamic framework
Christoff, K., Irving, Z. C., Fox, K. C. R., Spreng, R. N., & Andrews-Hanna, J. R. (2016) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2016.113 · Cited by 1,376
The future of memory: remembering, imagining, and the brain
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., Hassabis, D., Martin, V. C., Spreng, R. N., & Szpunar, K. K. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.11.001 · Cited by 1,398
“For example, in a study that used the Autobiographical Interview as well as measures of scene construction based on prior work by Hassabis et al. (2007b), Squire et al. (2010) reported that amnesic patients with damage to the hippocampus showed an intact ability to create detailed imaginary future…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationWhat does the retrosplenial cortex do?
Vann, S. D., Aggleton, J. P., & Maguire, E. A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2733 · Cited by 1,409
Self-citationThe hippocampus and memory: insights from spatial processing
Bird, C. M., & Burgess, N. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2335 · Cited by 1,313
“A functional-imaging study of this task in healthy adults showed that the hippocampus was activated during the period of imaginatio”
BackgroundThe brain's default network and its adaptive role in internal mentation
Andrews-Hanna, J. R. (2012) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858411403316 · Cited by 1,114
Spreng, R. N., & Grady, C. L. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21282 · Cited by 985
“Notably, there was also substantial involvement of the hippocampal formation for autobiographical memory and prospection: This may be due to the temporal extension of the self and greater recombination of contextualized event details involved in remembering and prospection (Hassabis, Kumaran, & Maguire, 2007 ; Schacte…”
BackgroundParahippocampal and retrosplenial contributions to human spatial navigation
Epstein, R. A. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.004 · Cited by 961
The human imagination: the cognitive neuroscience of visual mental imagery
Pearson, J. (2019) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-019-0202-9 · Cited by 820
Emotion and the prefrontal cortex: an integrative review
Dixon, M. L., Thiruchselvam, R., Todd, R., & Christoff, K. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000096 · Cited by 745
“The network to which it belongs has been linked to scene construction (AndrewsHanna, Reidler, Huang, et al., 2010; Hassabis et al., 2007) and the spontaneous generation of thoughts (Christoff et al.”
BackgroundSchilbach, L., Eickhoff, S. B., Rotarska-Jagiela, A., Fink, G. R., & Vogeley, K. (2008) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.013 · Cited by 615
Szpunar, K. K. (2010) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610362350 · Cited by 663
Evaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process
Ellamil, M., Dobson, C., Beeman, M., & Christoff, K. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.008 · Cited by 611
“Consistent with this, imagining novel, fictitious scenes activates the sameMTL regions as future event simulation (Hassabis et al., 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialAddis, D. R., Pan, L., Vu, M.-A. T., Laiser, N., & Schacter, D. L. (2008) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.026 · Cited by 635
Anterior hippocampus: the anatomy of perception, imagination and episodic memory
Zeidman, P., & Maguire, E. A. (2016) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2015.24 · Cited by 542
Self-citationPlace Cells, Grid Cells, and MemoryPreprint
Moser, M., Rowland, D. C., & Moser, E. I. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a021808 · Cited by 596
“Studies in human subjects show that overlapping hippocampal networks are activated during episodic recall and imagination of fictitious experiences (Hassabis et al. 2007).”
BackgroundEmotion and autobiographical memory
Holland, A. C., & Kensinger, E. A. (2010) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2010.01.006 · Cited by 540
“It is still debated what these more general abilities may be: they could include selfreferential processing [50], cognitive–affective simulation of possible outcomes [233], mind-wandering [237] or the (re)construction of spatial contexts [154].”
Sestieri, C., Corbetta, M., Romani, G. L., & Shulman, G. L. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3335-10.2011 · Cited by 523
“…functional networks for the processing of environmental stimuli, the apparent functional homogeneity of the DMN during environmentally directed tasks (Shulman et al., 1997; Mazoyer et al., 2001) breaks down in tasks that isolate specific internally directed processes (Hassabis et al., 2007).”
BackgroundThe construction system of the brain
Hassabis, D., & Maguire, E. A. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0296 · Cited by 483
Self-citationThe role of the hippocampus in flexible cognition and social behavior
Rubin, R. D., Watson, P. D., Duff, M. C., & Cohen, N. J. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00742 · Cited by 489
“The contribution of the hippocampus to spatial information and navigation has an extensive basis in the literature stemming from early evidence of location-modulated cells in the rodent hippocampus (for review, see Burgess et al., 2002).”
The hippocampal sharp wave-ripple in memory retrieval for immediate use and consolidation
Joo, H. R., & Frank, L. M. (2018) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-018-0077-1 · Cited by 430
Social cognition and the cerebellum: A meta-analysis of over 350 fMRI studies
Overwalle, F. V., Baetens, K., Mariën, P., & Vandekerckhove, M. M. P. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.033 · Cited by 484
Imagining predictions: mental imagery as mental emulation
Moulton, S. T., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0314 · Cited by 421
Adaptive constructive processes and the future of memory
Schacter, D. L. (2012) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0029869 · Cited by 417
“Instead, they represent imaginary scenes or scenarios that might or might not occur to the individual within a particular future time frame (e.g., Addis et al., 2007; Addis, Pan, et al., 2009; Hassabis et al., 2007; Okuda et al., 2003; Spreng & Grady, 2010; Szpunar et al., 2007).”
BackgroundMinds made for sharing: initiating joint attention recruits reward-related neurocircuitry
Schilbach, L., Wilms, M., Eickhoff, S. B., Romanzetti, S., Tepest, R., Bente, G., Shah, N. J., Fink, G. R., & Vogeley, K. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21401 · Cited by 415
“Such self-generated information may also result from activity in retrosplenial cortex, known to be involved in episodic memory (Hassabis, Kumaran, & Maguire, 2007 ), as well as the anterior temporal pole, previously associated with socioemotional knowledge (Zahn et al, 2007 ), also observed for the main effect of JA.”
BackgroundConsidering the role of semantic memory in episodic future thinking: evidence from semantic dementia
Irish, M., Addis, D. R., Hodges, J. R., & Piguet, O. (2012) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aws119 · Cited by 405
“…to remember the past is compromised, such as mild cognitive impairment (Gamboz et al., 2010), mild Alzheimer's disease (Addis et al., 2009b), amnesic patients with medial temporal lobe damage (Tulving, 1985; Hassabis et al., 2007b; Race et al., 2011) and developmental amnesia (Kwan et al., 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe hippocampus: a manifesto for change
Maguire, E. A., & Mullally, S. L. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0033650 · Cited by 393
Self-citationRanganath, C. (2010) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.20852 · Cited by 375
“MODELS IN THIS SPECIAL ISSUE Because BIC is a framework that attempts to explain MTL function across different levels of analysis and research domains, the model shares many features with other models that have been proposed.”
BackgroundMethodRostral and caudal prefrontal contribution to creativity: a meta-analysis of functional imaging data
Gonen-Yaacovi, G., de Souza, L. C., Levy, R., Urbanski, M., Josse, G., & Volle, E. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00465 · Cited by 376
“…also been associated with counterfactual thinking (Gomez Beldarrain et al., 2005; Van Hoeck et al., 2013), prospective memory and future thinking (Hassabis et al., 2007; Schacter et al., 2007; Abraham et al., 2008; Addis et al., 2009; Szpunar et al., 2009; Burgess et al., 2011; Volle et al.,…”
Benoit, R. G., & Schacter, D. L. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.06.034 · Cited by 366
“…the finding that the pattern of brain activation associated with the retrieval of autobiographical memories closely resembles the pattern associated with the simulation of future or fictitious episodes (e.g., Addis et al., 2007; Botzung et al., 2008; Hassabis et al., 2007b; Szpunar et al., 2007).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEvent memory: A theory of memory for laboratory, autobiographical, and fictional events.
Rubin, D. C., & Umanath, S. (2015) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0037907 · Cited by 379
Mental time travel and the shaping of the human mind
Suddendorf, T., Addis, D. R., & Corballis, M. C. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0301 · Cited by 405
The Pivotal Role of Semantic Memory in Remembering the Past and Imagining the Future
Irish, M., & Piguet, O. (2013) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00027 · Cited by 345
“…a dramatic surge of research activity within the last few years, with growing evidence in favor of a link between remembering the past, imagining the future, and engaging in mental simulation processes (Addis et al., 2007; Hassabis and Maguire, 2007; Hassabis et al., 2007; Schacter et al., 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe fallacy of a “task‐negative” network
Spreng, R. N. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00145 · Cited by 320
“…or imagining one’s personal future (Andreasen et al., 1995; Schacter et al., 2007; Spreng et al., 2009), scene construction (Hassabis and Maguire, 2007; Hassabis et al., 2007), social cognition (Iacoboni et al., 2004; Spreng et al., 2009; Spreng and Grady, 2010; Mar, 2011; Andrews-Hanna, in…”
BackgroundZhou, Y., Dougherty, J. H., Hübner, K. F., Bai, B., Cannon, R. L., & Hutson, R. K. (2008) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2008.04.006 · Cited by 340
Race, E., Keane, M. M., & Verfaellie, M. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1145-11.2011 · Cited by 328
“Such investigations would also address the possibility that future-thinking deficits in amnesia reflect impairments in self-projection (Buckner and Carroll, 2007; but see Hassabis et al., 2007b).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWhy do we remember? The communicative function of episodic memory
Mahr, J. B., & Csibra, G. (2017) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x17000012 · Cited by 371
“…example, as mentioned by M&C, the two capacities are supported by the same core network of brain regions (Addis et al. 2007; Benoit & Schacter 2015; Hassabis et al. 2007a; Szpunar et al. 2007), are similarly deficient in amnesic patients (Hassabis et al. 2007b; Klein et al. 2002b; Race et al.…”
InfluentialConcept representation reflects multimodal abstraction: A framework for embodied semantics
Fernandino, L., Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Pendl, S. L., Humphries, C. J., Gross, W. L., Conant, L. L., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv020 · Cited by 305
“…including general semantic processing (Binder et al. 2009), mental scene construction and visuo-spatial imagery (Cavanna and Trimble 2006; Hassabis et al. 2007; Schacter and Addis 2009; Spreng et al. 2009), self-referential processing (Gusnard et al. 2001), and autobiographical memory…”
BackgroundAndrews-Hanna, J. R., Saxe, R., & Yarkoni, T. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.032 · Cited by 313
“, 2009; Seghier and Price, 2012), as well as when individuals simulate novel scenes (Hassabis et al., 2007) and imagine their autobiographical future (Addis et al.”
BackgroundKim, H. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.051 · Cited by 301
“Though many researchers have suggested there is a close relationship between remembering and the defaultmode network (Vincent et al., 2006; Hassabis et al., 2007; Schacter and Addis, 2007), our findings indicate that the association is largely restricted to remembering that significantly involves self-referential”
BackgroundEpisodic simulation of future events is impaired in mild Alzheimer's disease
Addis, D. R., Sacchetti, D. C., Ally, B. A., Budson, A. E., & Schacter, D. L. (2009) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.05.018 · Cited by 287
Anchoring the neural compass: coding of local spatial reference frames in human medial parietal lobe
Marchette, S. A., Vass, L. K., Ryan, J., & Epstein, R. A. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3834 · Cited by 287
Online evaluation of novel choices by simultaneous representation of multiple memories
Barron, H. C., Dolan, R. J., & Behrens, T. E. J. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3515 · Cited by 280
Inductive biases for deep learning of higher-level cognition
Goyal, A., & Bengio, Y. (2022) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2021.0068 · Cited by 300
“Neuroscientists have also accumulated evidence that the hippocampus is involved in replaying sequences (from memory or imagination) for consolidation into cortex [212,213] so that they can be presumably committed to cortical long-term memory and fast inference.”
BackgroundZadbood, A., Chen, J., Leong, Y. C., Norman, K. A., & Hasson, U. (2016) · doi:10.1101/081208 · Cited by 281
The hippocampus and inferential reasoning: building memories to navigate future decisions
Zeithamova, D., Schlichting, M. L., & Preston, A. R. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00070 · Cited by 266
“…(Barense et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2005a,b; Barense et al., 2007; Bussey and Saksida, 2007; Lee et al., 2012), and even short-term planning and imagining of future events (Addis et al., 2007; Hassabis et al., 2007a,b; Addis and Schacter, 2008, 2011; Voss et al., 2011; Johnson et al., 2012).”
BackgroundLieberman, M. D., Straccia, M. A., Meyer, M. L., Du, M., & Tan, K. M. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.021 · Cited by 282
Imagine all the people: how the brain creates and uses personality models to predict behavior
Hassabis, D., Spreng, R. N., Rusu, A. A., Robbins, C. A., Mar, R. A., & Schacter, D. L. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bht042 · Cited by 247
“Participants were then asked to vividly imagine 12 common everyday locations such as a bar, restaurant, or bank, and to describe them in as much detail as possible (Hassabis, Kumaran, Maguire 2007; Hassabis, Kumaran, Vann, et al. 2007).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationZadbood, A., Chen, J., Leong, Y. C., Norman, K. A., & Hasson, U. (2017) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx202 · Cited by 281
“18 and imagination [13,28,33,34] allows us not only to share our memories with others, but also to 424 invent and share imaginary events with others.”
BackgroundMedial frontal cortex: From self-generated action to reflection on one's own performance
Passingham, R. E., Bengtsson, S. L., & Lau, H. C. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.11.001 · Cited by 252
Space, time, and episodic memory: The hippocampus is all over the cognitive map
Ekstrom, A. D., & Ranganath, C. (2017) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22750 · Cited by 278
“There is certainly evidence linking the hippocampus to processing of scenes (e.g., Aly et al., 2013; Barense et al., 2010; Bird et al., 2010; Hassabis et al., 2007a; Preston et al., 2010; Stern et al., 2001; Summerfield et al., 2010), but we cannot understand the significance of this evidence in the absence of well-ar…”
BackgroundInfluentialBzdok, D., Langner, R., Schilbach, L., Jakobs, O., Roski, C., Caspers, S., Laird, A. R., Fox, P. T., Zilles, K., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.046 · Cited by 262
“…et al., 2010), self–other distinction (Ruby and Decety, 2001), the contemplation of others' (Mar, 2011) and one's own (Lombardo et al., 2009) mind states, as well as scene construction processes when envisioning past, fictitious , and future events (Hassabis et al., 2007; Spreng et al., 2009).”
BackgroundThe recursive mind: the origins of human language, thought, and civilization
(2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-1164 · Cited by 252
Bar, M., Aminoff, E., & Schacter, D. L. (2008) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0987-08.2008 · Cited by 246
“…of spatial contexts, and similar networks seem to be involved in remembering past episodes and imagining novel scenes or future events (Addis et al., 2007; Bar, 2007; Buckner and Carroll, 2007; Hassabis et al., 2007; Szpunar et al., 2007) (for review and discussion, see Schacter et al., 2007).”
Memory, Imagination, and Predicting the Future
Mullally, S. L., & Maguire, E. A. (2013) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858413495091 · Cited by 278
Self-citationEpisodic memory and episodic future thinking in adults with autism.
Lind, S. E., & Bowler, D. (2010) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020631 · Cited by 270
Segregation of the human medial prefrontal cortex in social cognition
Bzdok, D., Langner, R., Schilbach, L., Engemann, D. A., Laird, A. R., Fox, P. T., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00232 · Cited by 229
“…et al., 2009) mental states, mental navigation of the body in space (Maguire et al., 1997), semantic processing (Binder et al., 2009), as well as scene construction processes when envisioning past, fictitious, and future events (Hassabis et al., 2007; Spreng et al., 2009; Bzdok et al., 2013).”
BackgroundHippocampal size predicts rapid learning of a cognitive map in humans
Schinazi, V. R., Nardi, D., Newcombe, N. S., Shipley, T. F., & Epstein, R. A. (2013) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22111 · Cited by 231
“…pointing performance and hippocampal volume was partially (but incompletely) mediated by perspective taking ability, suggesting that part of the advantage of a larger right hippocampus is an enhanced ability to construct an egocentric scene from an arbitrary vantage point (Hassabis et al., 2007).”
BackgroundA neural-level model of spatial memory and imagery
Bicanski, A., & Burgess, N. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.33752 · Cited by 230
“Recollection in the BB-model results in visuo-spatial imagery of a coherent scene from a single viewpoint and direction, that is it implements a process of scene construction (Burgess et al., 2001a; Byrne et al., 2007; Schacter et al., 2007; Hassabis et al., 2007; Buckner, 2010) at the neuronal level.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialOn the nature of medial temporal lobe contributions to the constructive simulation of future events
Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0308 · Cited by 226
Kim, H. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.025 · Cited by 230
“Also in line with the current hypothesis concerning the CMS regions is a recent study by Hassabis et al. (2007).”
InfluentialCortical midline involvement in autobiographical memory
Summerfield, J. J., Hassabis, D., & Maguire, E. A. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.033 · Cited by 228
“…memory recall, selfrepresentation, and future thinking (Addis et al., 2007; D'Argembeau et al., 2007; Daselaar et al., 2008; Gilboa et al., 2004; Hassabis et al., 2007a; Johnson et al., 2002; Maguire, 2001a; Northoff et al., 2006; Schacter et al., 2007; Sugiura et al., 2005; Svoboda et al.,…”
InfluentialSelf-citationMertens, L. J., Wall, M. B., Roseman, L., Demetriou, L., Nutt, D. J., & Carhart-Harris, R. L. (2020) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881119895520 · Cited by 208
“…the surrounding posterior cingulate is not just involved in visualspatial navigation, but also a component of the DMN, thought to be involved in self-consciousness, reflective self-awareness, episodic memory and imagination (Cavanna and Trimble, 2006; Hassabis et al., 2007; Utevsky et al., 2014).”
BackgroundAddis, D. R., Musicaro, R. M., Pan, L., & Schacter, D. L. (2010) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0017280 · Cited by 209
Schacter, D. L., Benoit, R. G., De Brigard, F., & Szpunar, K. K. (2015) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2013.12.008 · Cited by 211
Remote Memory and the Hippocampus: A Constructive Critique
Barry, D. N., & Maguire, E. A. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.11.005 · Cited by 210
Self-citationReading fiction and reading minds: the role of simulation in the default network
Tamir, D. I., Bricker, A. B., Dodell-Feder, D., & Mitchell, J. P. (2016) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsv114 · Cited by 212
Frontal pole cortex: encoding ends at the end of the endbrain
Tsujimoto, S., Genovesio, A., & Wise, S. P. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.02.001 · Cited by 217
The current status of the simulation theory of cognition
Hesslow, G. (2011) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2011.06.026 · Cited by 226
Remembering what could have happened: Neural correlates of episodic counterfactual thinking
Brigard, F. D., Addis, D. R., Ford, J. H., Schacter, D. L., & Giovanello, K. S. (2013) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.01.015 · Cited by 206
“…during the construction of episodic simulations has been a consistent result in the episodic memory and future thinking literature (Okuda et al., 2003; Szpunar et al., 2007, Hassabis et al., 2007; Weiler et al., 2010; Addiset al. 2007; Addis et al, 2009; Addis, Cheng, Roberts, & Schacter, 2011).”
ResultUnderstanding Human Cognitive Uniqueness
Laland, K. N., & Seed, A. M. (2021) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-062220-051256 · Cited by 211
Out-of-body-induced hippocampal amnesia
Bergouignan, L., Nyberg, L., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1318801111 · Cited by 199
Retrosplenial cortex codes for permanent landmarks
Auger, S. D., Mullally, S. L., & Maguire, E. A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043620 · Cited by 205
“of RSC in response to the most permanent landmarks, this may help to explain the ubiquity of RSC activations in fMRI studies not only involving scenes and navigation, but also autobiographical memory [46,47] and thinking about the future [76,77].”
BackgroundSelf-citationScrutinizing visual images: The role of gaze in mental imagery and memory
Laeng, B., Bloem, I. M., D’Ascenzo, S., & Tommasi, L. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.01.003 · Cited by 217
Self-reflection and the temporal focus of the wandering mind
Smallwood, J., Schooler, J. W., Turk, D. J., Cunningham, S. J., Burns, P., & Macrae, C. N. (2011) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.12.017 · Cited by 202
The Neural Basis of Personal Goal Processing When Envisioning Future Events
D'Argembeau, A., Stawarczyk, D., Majerus, S., Collette, F., Van der Linden, M., Feyers, D., Maquet, P., & Salmon, E. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21314 · Cited by 194
A New Role for the Parahippocampal Cortex in Representing Space
Mullally, S. L., & Maguire, E. A. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0267-11.2011 · Cited by 197
“This distinction was subsequently affirmed at the neural level, where both the imagination and the viewing of single SD objects (indoor and outdoor) evoked activity within brain regions classically associated with the perception or imagination of full scenes (Epstein and Kanwisher, 1998; Aguirre and D’Esposito, 1999;…”
BackgroundSelf-citationHippocampal contributions to the episodic simulation of specific and general future events
Addis, D. R., Cheng, T., P. Roberts, R., & Schacter, D. L. (2011) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.20870 · Cited by 182
“Moreover, Addis and Schacter (2008) found that while posterior hippocampal activity correlated with the amount of detail comprising both past and future events, anterior hippocampal activity correlated only with the amount of detail comprising future events.”
BackgroundStawarczyk, D., & D’Argembeau, A. (2015) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22818 · Cited by 203
“Most of these regions have been associated with episodic memory retrieval and recent studies suggest that they form a functional subsystem of the DN that supports the construction of detailed mental representations of specific events—episodic simulation or scene construction processes [Andrews-Hanna et al., 2010, 2014…”
InfluentialMedial cortex activity, self-reflection and depression
Johnson, M. K., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Mitchell, K. J., & Levin, Y. (2009) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsp022 · Cited by 194
Concepts and Compositionality: In Search of the Brain's Language of Thought
Frankland, S., & Greene, J. D. (2019) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011829 · Cited by 198
Attenuated Boundary Extension Produces a Paradoxical Memory Advantage in Amnesic Patients
Mullally, S. L., Intraub, H., & Maguire, E. A. (2012) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.001 · Cited by 184
“) [7–9].”
Self-citationRosenbaum, R. S., Gilboa, A., Levine, B., Winocur, G., & Moscovitch, M. (2008) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.028 · Cited by 190
Mental simulation and meaning in life.
Waytz, A., Hershfield, H. E., & Tamir, D. I. (2015) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038322 · Cited by 176
The fate of memory: Reconsolidation and the case of Prediction Error
Fernández, R. S., Boccia, M. M., & Pedreira, M. E. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.004 · Cited by 189
Constructing, Perceiving, and Maintaining Scenes: Hippocampal Activity and Connectivity
Zeidman, P., Mullally, S. L., & Maguire, E. A. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu266 · Cited by 187
“On the basis that scene construction engages the hippocampus during imagination (Hassabis, Kumaran, Vann, et al. 2007, Hassabis, Kumaran, and Maguire 2007), we hypothesized that, in neurologically healthy participants, simply perceiving scenes (without a comparison or discrimination task) may…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationDifferences in Behavior and Brain Activity during Hypothetical and Real Choices
Camerer, C. F., & Mobbs, D. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.11.001 · Cited by 161
“[68] documented an imagination network which was commonly activated by recall of both real and (previously) imagined memories, and also by newly imagined scenarios.”
BackgroundXu, X., Yuan, H., & Lei, X. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep21001 · Cited by 177
The Neuropsychological Connection Between Creativity and Meditation
Horan, R. (2009) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400410902858691 · Cited by 172
“Theta activity appears in the hippocampal formation (Greenstein, Pavlides, & Winson, 1988 , cited in Klimesche, 1996 ; Larson, Wong, & Lynch, 1986 ), an area important in novelty detection (Knight, 1996 ), and in imagining fictitious scenes (Hassabis, Kumaran, & Maguire, 2007 ).”
BackgroundCommon and Unique Neural Correlates of Autobiographical Memory and Theory of Mind
Rabin, J. S., Gilboa, A., Stuss, D. T., Mar, R. A., & Rosenbaum, R. S. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21344 · Cited by 157
Iglói, K., Zaoui, M., Berthoz, A., & Rondi‐Reig, L. (2009) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.20595 · Cited by 182
“…of the hippocampus in both allocentric and sequential egocentric strategies is in agreement with the theoretical proposition of its role in episodic memory and more precisely in its role in spatiotemporal organization of events (Mizumori et al., 1999; Eichenbaum, 2001; Hassabis et al., 2007).”
ResultStice, E., Burger, K., & Yokum, S. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.028 · Cited by 162
Dynamic neural networks supporting memory retrieval
Jacques, P. L. S., Kragel, P. A., & Rubin, D. C. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.039 · Cited by 167
“…previous research has suggested may support self-referential simulations (for a review see Buckner et al., 2008), and the MTL network associated with declarative memory (Kahn et al., 2008; Vincent et al., 2006) and scene construction (Andrews-Hanna et al., 2010; also see Hassabis et al., 2007).”
BackgroundResultKim, H. (2013) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21474 · Cited by 169
“…conceiving of others’ viewpoints (theory of mind), social cognition, mental navigation, deductive and inductive reasoning, and mind-wandering [Binder et al., 2009; Buckner and Carroll, 2007; Buckner et al., 2008; Gusnard, 2005; Hassabis et al., 2007; Legrand and Ruby, 2009; Spreng et al., 2009].”
BackgroundRamanan, S., Piguet, O., & Irish, M. (2017) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858417735514 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Hassabis, D., Kumaran, D., & Maguire, E. A.
- Affiliations
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hassabis, Demis
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2007-12-26
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 52
- Pages
- 14365-14374
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC2571957
- OpenAlex
- W1982298223
- Cited by
- 744
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 55
- FWCI
- 15.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (071173)
- Brain Research Trust
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- episodic memory, imagination, scene construction, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, retrosplenial cortex, anterior medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus, episodic future thinking, default mode network, self-processing
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-25 (prompt extract-v2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review