The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 4 of the 17 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Using Imagination to Understand the Neural Basis of Episodic Memory
Open accessAbstract
Functional MRI (fMRI) studies investigating the neural basis of episodic memory recall, and the related task of thinking about plausible personal future events, have revealed a consistent network of associated brain regions. Surprisingly little, however, is understood about the contributions individual brain areas make to the overall recollective experience. To examine this, we used a novel fMRI paradigm in which subjects had to imagine fictitious experiences. In contrast to future thinking, this results in experiences that are not explicitly temporal in nature or as reliant on self-processing. By using previously imagined fictitious experiences as a comparison for episodic memories, we identified the neural basis of a key process engaged in common, namely scene construction, involving the generation, maintenance and visualization of complex spatial contexts. This was associated with activations in a distributed network, including hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and retrosplenial cortex. Importantly, we disambiguated these common effects from episodic memory-specific responses in anterior medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex and precuneus. These latter regions may support self-schema and familiarity processes, and contribute to the brain's ability to distinguish real from imaginary memories. We conclude that scene construction constitutes a common process underlying episodic memory and imagination of fictitious experiences, and suggest it may partially account for the similar brain networks implicated in navigation, episodic future thinking, and the default mode. We suggest that additional brain regions are co-opted into this core network in a task-specific manner to support functions such as episodic memory that may have additional requirements.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
4 of 17 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Thus episodic memory recall can be conceptually divided into a number of component processes including a sense of subjective time (Tulving, 2002), self-processing (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000), visual imagery (Rubin et al., 2003), narrative structure (Rubin et al., 2003), retrieval of semantic information (Wheeler et al., 1997) and multi-modal details (Wheeler et al., 2000; Gottfried et al., 2004), and feelings of familiarity (Wagner et al., 2005).”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Tulving, 2002 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000 source
- Supportedcites Rubin et al., 2003 source
The citation to Rubin et al. is attached to visual imagery and narrative structure, not the other processes in the citing sentence. The paper’s “Component processes” section identifies visual imagery as a component of autobiographical memory and treats narrative coherence as a distinct feature, measured by whether a memory comes as a coherent story. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.93)
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“have revealed a consistent and distributed network of associated brain regions,”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Maguire, 2001 source
- Partly supportedcites Svoboda et al., 2006 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 3.1 identifies a consistent, distributed network across autobiographical-memory imaging studies. Section 3.4 reports overlap in two regions for past and future thought, but cites only one imaging study directly comparing them; it does not establish a consistent distributed network across studies of both episodic recall and future thinking. The indexed copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cabeza and St Jacques, 2007 source
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“we replicated the well-established episodic memory retrieval network consistently activated in studies of autobiographical memory”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Results > Neuroimaging Data
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Maguire, 2001 source
- Partly supportedcites Rugg et al., 2002 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract (page unavailable) reports that successful episodic recollection is associated with lateral parietal activation and more variable prefrontal activation. It does not establish a consistently activated network in autobiographical-memory studies or compare recall of real memories with recall of objects; the available text points to a PDF for the full article. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Partly supportedcites Svoboda et al., 2006 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction says the meta-analysis identifies shared patterns of brain activation during autobiographical remembering, supporting the citing sentence’s reference to an established retrieval network. The Results and discussion (section 3.1) also describes an autobiographical-memory network. Our copy does not establish the claim’s more specific comparison of real-memory recall with recalled objects. (LLM, conf=0.84)
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Importantly, we disambiguated these common effects from episodic memory-specific responses in anterior medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex and precuneus.”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These latter regions may support self-schema and familiarity processes,”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We conclude that scene construction constitutes a common process underlying episodic memory and imagination of fictitious experiences,”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we identified the neural basis of a key process engaged in common, namely scene construction”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This was associated with activations in a distributed network, including hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and retrosplenial cortex.”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“involving the generation, maintenance and visualisation of complex spatial contexts.”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This study demonstrates that imagining new experiences is a manipulable and useful experimental tool which may prove fruitful in further advancing our understanding of episodic memory and the processes underpinning it, as well as other related cognitive functions”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Buckner and Carroll, 2007 source
- Not matchedcites Hassabis and Maguire, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Much recent interest has focused on the striking overlap among brain regions involved in the retrieval of autobiographical memories, the imagination of novel events, and navigation14, 47, 48.”
From Anchoring the neural compass: coding of local spatial reference frames in human medial parietal lobe (2014) · cites this paper as [48]
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Consistentt(20) = 13.52reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 13.52, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 13.6reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 13.60, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 11.03reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 11.03, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = -4.89reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = −4.89, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.36reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.36, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.41reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.41, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 2.88reported p < .01 · recomputed p = .009
“t(20) = 2.88, p < .01”
- Consistentt(20) = -4.77reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = −4.77, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = -6.67reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = −6.67, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 5.51reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 5.51, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.96reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.96, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 6.17reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 6.17, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 17.85reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 17.85, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 11.18reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 11.18, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 2.42reported p < .03 · recomputed p = .025
“t(20) = 2.42, p < .03”
- Consistentt(20) = 12.99reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 12.99, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 8.67reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 8.67, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.89reported p = .39 · recomputed p = .384
“t(20) = −0.89, p = .39”
- Consistentt(20) = 0.51reported p = .62 · recomputed p = .616
“t(20) = 0.51, p = .62”
- Consistentt(20) = -1.97reported p = .06 · recomputed p = .063
“t(20) = −1.97, p = .06”
- Consistentt(20) = -1reported p = .33 · recomputed p = .329
“t(20) = −1.00, p = .33”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.47reported p = .64 · recomputed p = .643
“t(20) = −0.47, p = .64”
- Consistentt(20) = 1.75reported p = .1 · recomputed p = .095
“t(20) = 1.75, p = .10”
- Consistentt(20) = 3.86reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 3.86, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.26reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.26, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 1.09reported p = .29 · recomputed p = .289
“t(20) = 1.09, p = .29”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.69reported p = .5 · recomputed p = .498
“t(20) = −0.69, p = .50”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.59reported p = .56 · recomputed p = .562
“t(20) = −0.59, p = .56”
- Consistentt(20) = 0.26reported p = .8 · recomputed p = .798
“t(20) = 0.26, p = .80”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.3reported p = .77 · recomputed p = .767
“t(20) = −0.30, p = .77”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.
Citations
Cites
A default mode of brain function
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.676 · Cited by 12,190 · cited 4×
“…2005), episodic future thinking (Atance and O’Neill, 2001; Addis et al., 2007; Schacter and Addis, 2007; Szpunar et al., 2007), the default mode (Raichle et al., 2001) and daydreaming (Mason et al., 2007), leading to suggestions that it performs a general function (Buckner and Carroll, 2007;…”
BackgroundInfluential(1978) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 8,010
Episodic memory: from mind to brain
Tulving, E. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114 · Cited by 4,950 · cited 11×
“…theory of mind (Kumaran and Maguire, 2005; Amodio and Frith, 2006) and episodic future thinking (Addis et al., 2007) suggesting that the amPFC and PCC might be supporting pro- cesses related to the self (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000) and mental time travel (Wheeler et al., 1997; Tulving, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system
Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.107.2.261 · Cited by 4,089 · cited 7×
“…a purely created imagined experience does not have the same reliance or effect on the imaginer’s self-schema compared with a real episodic memory (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Gallagher, 2000) although both likely involve the adoption of an egocentric viewpoint (Burgess, 2006) on the part…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMeeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition
Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1884 · Cited by 3,782 · cited 2×
“…bears a striking resemblance to networks found to support self-reflection (Johnson et al., 2002), theory of mind (Kumaran and Maguire, 2005; Amodio and Frith, 2006) and episodic future thinking (Addis et al., 2007) suggesting that the amPFC and PCC might be supporting pro- cesses related…”
BackgroundPhilosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science.
Gallagher, S. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01417-5 · Cited by 2,881 · cited 4×
“Moreover, by using rich imaginary memories as a well matched comparison task we were able to isolate processes specific to episodic memory, such as the use of self-schema (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Gallagher, 2000), a sense of familiarity and mental time travel (Tulving, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWandering minds: the default network and stimulus-independent thought
Mason, M. F., Norton, M. I., Van Horn, J. D., Wegner, D. M., Grafton, S. T., & Macrae, C. N. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1131295 · Cited by 2,792 · cited 4×
“, 2001), and perhaps even daydreaming (Mason et al., 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialBuckner, R. L., & Carroll, D. C. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.004 · Cited by 2,691
The human hippocampus and spatial and episodic memory
Burgess, N., Maguire, E. A., & O'Keefe, J. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00830-9 · Cited by 2,401 · cited 3×
“…network (also replicated in this study with the RM RO contrast) has also been activated in a variety of other circumstances including navigation (Burgess et al., 2002; Hartley et al., 2003; Spiers and Maguire, 2006), spatial tasks (Maguire et al., 2003; Kumaran and Maguire, 2005), episodic…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationRemembering the past to imagine the future: the prospective brain
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2213 · Cited by 2,394 · cited 1×
“…a key component of episodic memory recall lends additional support to constructive theories of episodic memory (Bartlett, 1932; Schacter et al., 1998) and the recently proposed constructive episodic simulation function of the episodic memory system (Schacter and Addis, 2007; Schacter et al., 2007).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Bartlett FC (1932) Remembering (Cambridge UP, Cambridge).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 751
Familiarity modulates the functional relationship between theory of mind and autobiographical memory
Rabin, J. S., & Rosenbaum, R. S. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.002 · Cited by 76
“Based on these findings, it was suggested that midline regions may help to distinguish actual experiences from imagined ones (see also Hassabis et al., 2007).”
Imaging the human hippocampus with optically-pumped magnetoencephalography
Barry, D. N., Tierney, T. M., Holmes, N., Boto, E., Roberts, G., Leggett, J., Bowtell, R. W., Brookes, M. J., Barnes, G. R., & Maguire, E. A. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116192 · Cited by 76
Self-citationInducing involuntary and voluntary mental time travel using a laboratory paradigm
Cole, S. N., Staugaard, S. R., & Berntsen, D. (2015) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-015-0564-9 · Cited by 88
Berryhill, M. E., Picasso, L., Arnold, R. J., Drowos, D. B., & Olson, I. R. (2010) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.01.004 · Cited by 76
“…activated in neuroimaging studies of constructed experience (Abraham, Schubotz, & von Cramon, 2008; Addis et al., 2007; Botzung et al., 2008; Hassabis et al., 2007; Okuda et al., 2003; Szpunar & McDermott, 2008); see Figure 1 for lesion tracings and the Supplementary Materials for detailed…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBellana, B., Liu, Z. ‐., Diamond, N. B., Grady, C. L., & Moscovitch, M. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23445 · Cited by 75
“…as episodic retrieval and future imagining, thus accounting for the neural overlap between execution of these functions and activity of the DMN [Andrews-Hanna et al., 2014b; Binder et al., 2009; Buckner and Carroll, 2007; Cabeza and Moscovitch, 2013; Hassabis et al., 2007; Schacter, et al., 2012].”
BackgroundResultDifferentiable Processing of Objects, Associations, and Scenes within the Hippocampus
Dalton, M. A., Zeidman, P., McCormick, C., & Maguire, E. A. (2018) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0263-18.2018 · Cited by 73
“…constructing mental representations of scenes (Maguire and Mullally, 2013; Zeidman and Maguire, 2016), imagining the future (Schacter et al., 2012; Hassabis et al., 2007), decision-making (McCormick et al., 2016; Mullally and Maguire, 2014) and even mind-wandering (Karapanagiotidis et al., 2017).”
BackgroundSelf-citationAbraham, A., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004741 · Cited by 75
“Moreover, anterior mPFC and the PCC have also been reported when recalling real events relative to imagining fictitious events [13].”
BackgroundLee, S., Parthasarathi, T., & Kable, J. W. (2021) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1273-20.2021 · Cited by 74
“Here, we investigate the hypothesis that imagination consists of at least two distinct processes: a constructive process, by which a novel future event is mentally formed, often by combining specific aspects of past experience (Addis et al., 2007; Hassabis et al., 2007; Schacter et al., 2007), and an evaluative proces…”
BackgroundThe neural basis of vivid memory is patterned on perception
Buchsbaum, B. R., Lemire-Rodger, S., Fang, C., & Abdi, H. (2012) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00253 · Cited by 74
“Following each mental replay attempt, participants pressed a button indicating on a scale of 1–4 (“1” = poor memory and “4” = excellent memory) the vividness and accuracy of their attempt to replay the cued video clip (Chadwick, Hassabis, & Maguire, 2011 ; Hassabis, Kumaran, & Maguire, 2007 ).”
Bertossi, E., Aleo, F., Braghittoni, D., & Ciaramelli, E. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.12.015 · Cited by 74
“…any event, whether or not located in subjective time, such as the ability to generate and visualize coherent spatial contexts (“scene construction”; Hassabis et al., 2007b), and to recover and integrate the journal homepage:…”
BackgroundAttout, L., Fias, W., Salmon, É., & Majerus, S. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092049 · Cited by 72
“26) reflecting stronger demands on visual processing and visual control [43].”
BackgroundNeural activity associated with self, other, and object-based counterfactual thinking
Brigard, F. D., Spreng, R., Mitchell, J. P., & Schacter, D. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.075 · Cited by 59
Kameda, T., Inukai, K., Higuchi, S., Ogawa, A., Kim, H., Matsuda, T., & Sakagami, M. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1602641113 · Cited by 68
Eck, J., Richter, M., Straube, T., Miltner, W. H. R., & Weiß, T. (2011) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2011.01.026 · Cited by 73
“Because medial temporal lobe structures are crucial for declarative and associative memory processes and for the detailed construction of mental images [19,39,65], we assume that pain patients, because of their greater amount of pain experience, generated more detailed and vivid mental scenes for pain descriptors in r…”
BackgroundOptimizing agent behavior over long time scales by transporting value
Hung, C.-C., Lillicrap, T., Abramson, J., Wu, Y., Mirza, M., Carnevale, F., Ahuja, A., & Wayne, G. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13073-w · Cited by 90
Precuneus stimulation alters the neural dynamics of autobiographical memory retrieval
Hebscher, M., Ibrahim, C., & Gilboa, A. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116575 · Cited by 66
Garrido, M. I., Barnes, G. R., Kumaran, D., Maguire, E. A., & Dolan, R. J. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.016 · Cited by 72
“…cognitive processes – including autobiographical memory (e.g. (Bonnici et al., 2012); Maguire (2014); (Nieuwenhuis and Takashima, 2011)), imagination (Hassabis et al., 2007), spatial navigation (Doeller et al., 2008)), goal-directed decision making (Roy et al., 2012), schema-based memory formation…”
BackgroundSelf-citationIrish, M., Halena, S., Kamminga, J., Tu, S., Hornberger, M., & Hodges, J. R. (2015) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.08.004 · Cited by 77
“…in the construction of atemporal scenes resonates with functional neuroimaging studies in which the centrality of the hippocampus, albeit particularly on the right hand side, has been emphasised (Hassabis et al., 2007a; Mullally et al., 2012a; Mullally et al., 2014; Summerfield et al., 2010).”
InfluentialSöderlund, H., Moscovitch, M., Kumar, N., Mandic, M., & Levine, B. (2011) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.20927 · Cited by 68
“Previous research suggests hippocampal activation can be expected during memories this recent (~2 weeks; Hassabis et al., 2007).”
BackgroundBrain activation profiles during kinesthetic and visual imagery: An fMRI study
Kilintari, M., Narayana, S., Abbas Babajani-feremi, A., Rezaie, R., & Papanicolaou, A. C. (2016) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2016.06.009 · Cited by 76
“However, neither interpretation of the function of the posterior cingulate could explain the observed decrease in its activation during imagery tasks in our study: first, because in introspection tasks like retrieval and imagery the DMN network is expected to show activation rather than the reverse (Laird et al., 2011…”
ResultViard, A., Desgranges, B., Eustache, F., & Piolino, P. (2012) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2012.05.004 · Cited by 71
“The right hippocampus may be driven by initial spatial or relational processing of complex visual scenes (Hassabis et al., 2007; Binder et al., 2005; Köhler et al., 2005), the spatial context of recalled/imagined episodes being retrieved early in the construction process (Weiler et al.”
InfluentialWhat differentiates episodic future thinking from complex scene imagery?
Vito, S. D., Gamboz, N., & Brandimonte, M. A. (2012) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.01.013 · Cited by 79
Mashal, N., Vishne, T. H., & Laor, N. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00818 · Cited by 67
“…2014 | Volume 8 | Article 818 | 2 The precuneus has also been linked to episodic memory retrieval (Shallice et al., 1994), processing of mental imagery (Hassabis et al., 2007; Johnson et al., 2007; Burgess, 2008), and visuo-spatial memory functions (Vincent et al., 2006; Epstein et al., 2007).”
BackgroundRemembering and imagining alternative versions of the personal past
Jacques, P. L. S., Carpenter, A. C., Szpunar, K. K., & Schacter, D. L. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.06.015 · Cited by 66
Three brain states in the hippocampus and cortex
Kay, K., & Frank, L. M. (2018) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22956 · Cited by 69
Silson, E. H., Gilmore, A. W., Kalinowski, S. E., Steel, A., Kidder, A., Martin, A. D., & Baker, C. I. (2018) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1219-18.2018 · Cited by 63
“In the current experiment, this was achieved by asking participants to both remember past and imagine future events, as both tasks have been associated with the construction of elaborate mental scenes (e.g., Hassabis et al., 2007).”
BackgroundMethodProcessing counterfactual and hypothetical conditionals: An fMRI investigation
Kulakova, E., Aichhorn, M., Schurz, M., Kronbichler, M., & Perner, J. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.060 · Cited by 66
“…construction of a visual scene in absence of the appropriate external stimulus, a cognitive process which is called 'mental imagery' (Thomas, 2010) and is a subcomponent of scene construction, the process of mentally generating and maintaining a complex and coherent scene (Hassabis et al., 2007).”
Evidence supporting a time-limited hippocampal role in retrieving autobiographical memories
Gilmore, A. W., Quach, A., Kalinowski, S. E., González-Araya, E. I., Gotts, S. J., Schacter, D. L., & Martin, A. D. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2023069118 · Cited by 75
“No main effects were observed [largest F-statistic: F(1, 39) = 2.”
InfluentialStudying the freely-behaving brain with fMRI
Maguire, E. A. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.009 · Cited by 63
“Studying how people engage in other critical functions such as imagining and planning for the future (Hassabis and Maguire, 2007, 2009; Hassabis et al., 2007a; Schacter and Addis, 2007), social interactions (Frith, 2007; Frith and Frith, 2006; Frith and Singer, 2008) and also more practical…”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Journey of the Default Mode Network: Development, Function, and Impact on Mental Health
Azarias, F. R., Almeida, G. H. D. R., de Melo, L. F., Rici, R. E. G., & Maria, D. A. (2025) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology14040395 · Cited by 103
“Thus, in this perspective, we combine many of these findings to suggest that the DMN is at the center of the interaction between the external and internal worlds [62].”
Sreekumar, V., Nielson, D. M., Smith, T. A., Dennis, S. J., & Sederberg, P. B. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-32879-0 · Cited by 64
Volitional activation of remote place representations with a hippocampal brain–machine interface
Lai, C., Tanaka, S., Harris, T. D., & Lee, A. K. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adh5206 · Cited by 70
Remembering Preservation in Hippocampal Amnesia
Clark, I. A., & Maguire, E. A. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033739 · Cited by 68
“Hippocampal engagement during scene construction/simulation tasks has been confirmed in fMRI studies of healthy participants (Addis et al. 2007, Hassabis et al. 2007a).”
InfluentialSelf-citationTsujimoto, S., Genovesio, A., & Wise, S. P. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1230-12.2012 · Cited by 65
“Neuroimaging results support the idea that “internal” or self-referential signals occur in the human PFp, especially its medial parts (Gilbert et al., 2006; Burgess et al., 2007; Hassabis et al., 2007; Mason et al., 2007; Raichle and Snyder, 2007; Boorman et al., 2009).”
ResultThe hippocampus and exploration: dynamically evolving behavior and neural representations
Johnson, A., Varberg, Z., Benhardus, J., Maahs, A., & Schrater, P. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00216 · Cited by 61
“The first process is functionally similar to mental imagery (Hassabis et al., 2007b; Schacter and Addis, 2007) while the second process process is functionally similar to the computations that contribute to memory consolidation (Squire and Alvarez, 1995; Nadel and Moscovitch, 1997; Tse et al.,…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBeaty, R. E., Seli, P., & Schacter, D. L. (2018) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-018-1075-7 · Cited by 67
Individual differences in visual imagery determine how event information is remembered
Sheldon, S., Amaral, R., & Levine, B. (2017) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2016.1178777 · Cited by 58
“This interpretation is in line with the established role of spatial processing in creating a viable “context” or space for one to remember (Hassabis et al., 2007; Hassabis et al., 2014; Mullally & Maguire, 2013; Mullally, Vargha-Khadem, & Maguire, 2014).”
ResultNeural bases of autobiographical support for episodic recollection of faces
Trinkler, I., King, J. A., Doeller, C. F., Rugg, M. D., & Burgess, N. (2009) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.20556 · Cited by 61
“The precuneus and parietal occipital sulcus have long been associated with memory retrieval, imagery and ‘‘attention to internal representations’’ (Fletcher et al., 1995; Burgess et al., 2001b; Maguire, 2001; Wagner et al., 2005; Wallentin et al., 2006; Byrne et al., 2007; Hassabis et al., 2007).”
BackgroundMental Time Travel and language evolution: a narrative account of the origins of human communication
Ferretti, F., Adornetti, I., Chiera, A., Nicchiarelli, S., Magni, R., Valeri, G., & Marini, A. (2017) · Language Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2017.01.002 · Cited by 64
“Neuroimaging studies with healthy subjects showed that many of the brain regions active when people remember the past are also active when they envision the future (Addis et al., 2007; Buckner and Carroll, 2007; Hassabis et al., 2007a, b).”
BackgroundA Predictive Processing Model of Episodic Memory and Time Perception
Fountas, Z., Sylaidi, A., Nikiforou, K., Seth, A. K., Shanahan, M., & Roseboom, W. (2022) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_01514 · Cited by 61
Episodic memory and event construction in aging and amnesia
Romero, K., & Moscovitch, M. (2012) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.05.002 · Cited by 58
The retrieval of perceptual memory details depends on right hippocampal integrity and activation
St‐Laurent, M., Moscovitch, M., & McAndrews, M. P. (2016) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2016.08.010 · Cited by 64
Martin, C. B., Mirsattari, S. M., Pruessner, J. C., Pietrantonio, S., Burneo, J. G., Hayman-Abello, B. A., & Köhler, S. (2012) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.030 · Cited by 59
Mental simulation of routes during navigation involves adaptive temporal compression
Arnold, A. E. G. F., Iaria, G., & Ekstrom, A. D. (2016) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.009 · Cited by 58
McCrory, E. J. P., Puetz, V. B., Maguire, E. A., Mechelli, A., Palmer, A. L., Gerin, M. I., Kelly, P. A., Koutoufa, I., & Viding, E. M. (2017) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.117.201798 · Cited by 61
Self-citationRe-imagining the future: repetition decreases hippocampal involvement in future simulation
van Mulukom, V., Schacter, D. L., Corballis, M. C., & Addis, D. R. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069596 · Cited by 53
“Together, these regions have also been described as the ‘core’ network, reflecting the overlapping contributions of these regions to memory and simulation [5,6].”
BackgroundResultInfrastructural intelligence: Contemporary entanglements between neuroscience and AI
Bruder, J. (2017) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.06.004 · Cited by 58
Functional anatomy of temporal organisation and domain-specificity of episodic memory retrieval
Kwok, S. C., Shallice, T., & Macaluso, E. (2012) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.025 · Cited by 56
Self-imagining enhances recognition memory in memory-impaired individuals with neurological damage.
Grilli, M. D., & Glisky, E. L. (2010) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/a0020318 · Cited by 60
Does hippocampal volume explain performance differences on hippocampal-dependant tasks?
Clark, I. A., Monk, A. M., Hotchin, V., Pizzamiglio, G., Liefgreen, A., Callaghan, M. F., & Maguire, E. A. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117211 · Cited by 51
Self-citationEpisodic future thinking as a predictor of children’s prospective memory
Nigro, G., Brandimonte, M. A., Cicogna, P., & Cosenza, M. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2013.10.013 · Cited by 55
Autobiographical memory and future thinking
D’Argembeau, A. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139021937.022 · Cited by 60
Palombo, D. J., Hayes, S. M., Peterson, K. M., Keane, M. M., & Verfaellie, M. H. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhw381 · Cited by 49
“This finding aligns with and extends prior studies suggesting that the MTL may not be involved in future-oriented mental time travel (Hassabis et al. 2007; D’Argembeau et al. 2008; Nyberg et al. 2010).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialRubin, R. D., Schwarb, H. D., Lucas, H. D., Dulas, M. R., & Cohen, N. J. (2017) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci7070082 · Cited by 59
Pathologies of hyperfamiliarity in dreams, delusions and déjà vu
Gerrans, P. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00097 · Cited by 57
“This view is supported by evidence that damage to neural circuitry known to be essential for episodic memory also impairs imagination (Hassabis and Maguire, 2007, 2009; Hassabis et al., 2007; Maguire et al., 2010; Maguire and Hassabis, 2011).”
BackgroundCortical thickness is associated with poor insight in first-episode psychosis
Buchy, L., Ad-Dab’bagh, Y., MALLA, A. K., Lepage, C., Bodnar, M. D., Joober, R., Sergerie, K., Evans, A. C., & Lepage, M. (2010) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.10.016 · Cited by 53
“Functional imaging studies in healthy samples have suggested that the precuneus subserves self-processing operations (Cavanna and Trimble, 2006; Hassabis et al., 2007; Wolf et al., 2009), including evaluating one’s emotional experiences (Ochsner et al.”
BackgroundFerretti, F., Adornetti, I., Chiera, A., Nicchiarelli, S., Valeri, G., Magni, R., Vicari, S., & Marini, A. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00944 · Cited by 53
Escaping the Past: Contributions of the Hippocampus to Future Thinking and Imagination
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Szpunar, K. K. (2017) · The Hippocampus from Cells to Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50406-3_14 · Cited by 54
“…that amnesic patients with hippocampal damage also exhibit deficits when imagining future experiences and novel scenes (e.g., Andelman et al. 2010; Hassabis et al. 2007b; Kurzcek et al. 2015; Race et al. 2011; but for evidence of intact future imagining in amnesics, see Squire et al. 2010).”
BackgroundDelusional Attitudes and Default Thinking
Gerrans, P. (2013) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.12010 · Cited by 52
Rzepa, E., Tudge, L., & McCabe, C. (2015) · The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyv092 · Cited by 53
“Additionally, correlational analysis of the key nodes within the DMN revealed that the posterior cingulate cortex is involved in retrieving and integrating information from other subsystems implicated in selfreferential thoughts and episodic memory (Hassabis et al., 2007; Buckner et al., 2008).”
BackgroundMemory Retrieval in Mice and MenPreprint
Ben-Yakov, A., Dudai, Y., & Mayford, M. R. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a021790 · Cited by 54
“The abundance of evidence linking episodic retrieval to mental construction or simulation of future/fictitious events (Hassabis and Maguire 2007, 2009; Hassabis et al. 2007; Schacter and Addis 2007; Schacter et al. 2008; Buckner 2010; Rabin et al. 2010; Szpunar 2010; Viard et al. 2012) has led to a renewed emphasis on…”
Language, Memory, and Mental Time Travel: An Evolutionary Perspective
Corballis, M. C. (2019) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00217 · Cited by 54
“People with destruction of the hippocampus show striking difficulties in recalling past events or imaging future ones (Tulving, 2002; Wearing, 2005; Corkin, 2013), as well as in imagining fictitious scenes (Hassabis et al., 2007)—although impairment of the ability to imagine personal past or future events has also bee…”
BackgroundPrefrontal contributions to the stability and variability of thought and conscious experience
Zamani, A., Carhart-Harris, R. L., & Kalina Christoff, A. (2021) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-021-01147-7 · Cited by 49
Monk, A. M., Dalton, M. A., Barnes, G. R., & Maguire, E. A. (2020) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01634 · Cited by 50
Self-citationTasks activating the default mode network map multiple functional systems
Mancuso, L., Cavuoti-Cabanillas, S., Liloia, D., Manuello, J., Buzi, G., Duca, S., Cauda, F., & Costa, T. (2022) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-022-02467-0 · Cited by 53
“…Rugg and Vil-berg 2013; Spreng et al. 2015; Kim 2016; Murphy et al. 2018), mental simulation and scene construction (Hassabis and Maguire 2007; Hassabis et al. 2007; Spreng and Grady 2010; Gerlach et al. 2011), Theory of Mind (ToM) and social cognition (Saxe and Kanwisher 2003; Rilling et al.…”
Bouizegarene, N., Ramstead, M. J. D., Constant, A., Friston, K. J., & Kirmayer, L. J. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1345480 · Cited by 93
“…under the active inference framework have mostly involved the prediction of auditory (Näätänen, 1990), visual (Stagg et al., 2004), or somatosensory stimuli (Akatsuka et al., 2007), or rudimentary event sequences consisting of a succession of objects in scenes (Kumaran and Maguire, 2007).”
BackgroundDissociable roles of default-mode regions during episodic encoding
Maillet, D., & Rajah, M. N. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.050 · Cited by 50
“These thoughts may recruit cognitive processes that have been associated with PCC, LTC and IPL such as, scene construction (Hassabis et al., 2007), memory retrieval (Kim, 2012; Wagner et al.”
InfluentialIs the self special in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex? An fMRI study
Yaoi, K., Osaka, N., & Osaka, M. (2009) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470910903027808 · Cited by 50
“, 2002; Kelley et al., 2002). However, as shown above, this experiment demonstrated similar activation patterns and BOLD signal changes in the DMPFC across referential conditions. Which processes does the DMPFC undertake during the referential task? Based on some earlier studies, Northoff & Bermpohl (2004) concluded t…”
ResultDifferential Impairment of Remembering the Past and Imagining Novel Events after Thalamic Lesions
Weiler, J. A., Boris Suchan, A., Koch, B., Schwarz, M., & Daum, I. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2011.21633 · Cited by 53
“■”
BackgroundInfluentialHopkins, R. (2024) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198896173.001.0001 · Cited by 63
Verfaellie, M. H., Knoff, A. A. W., Reid, A. G., Race, E., & Keane, M. M. (2019) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2019.01.028 · Cited by 47
The dimensions of episodic simulation
Mahr, J. B. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104085 · Cited by 50
The Contextual Association Network Activates More for Remembered than for Imagined Events
Gilmore, A. W., Nelson, S. M., & McDermott, K. B. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu223 · Cited by 48
“Further, the only consistent differences that have been observed are in the direction of greater activity for future events than for remembered events (Addis et al. 2007; Hassabis et al. 2007; Szpunar et al. 2007; Addis et al. 2009; Szpunar et al. 2009; Weiler et al. 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialSheldon, S., Vandermorris, S., Al-Haj, M., Cohen, S., Winocur, G., & Moscovitch, M. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.005 · Cited by 50
“, 2012) as well as in patients with brain damage or deterioration (Addis et al., 2009b; Hassabis et al., 2007).”
Improving Hippocampal Memory Through the Experience of a Rich Minecraft Environment
Clemenson, G. D., Henningfield, C. M., & Stark, C. E. L. (2019) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00057 · Cited by 53
“As the hippocampus plays a role in spatial mental imagery, including the ability to perceive objects or scenes from different perspectives (Hassabis et al., 2007; Bird et al., 2010; Summerfield et al., 2010) which may depend on the complexity of the scene or objects (Kim et al.”
BackgroundVerbal Paired Associates and the Hippocampus: The Role of Scenes
Clark, I. A., kim, M.-S., & Maguire, E. A. (2018) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01315 · Cited by 52
“Findings over the last decade have since linked scenes to the hippocampus in relation to autobiographical memory (Hassabis, Kumaran, & Maguire, 2007; Hassabis & Maguire, 2007) but also widely across cognition, including perception (McCormick et al., 2017; Mullally et al., 2012; Graham et al.,…”
Self-citationPreoperative Prediction of Verbal Episodic Memory Outcome Using fMRI
Binder, J. R. (2011) · Neurosurgery Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.nec.2010.12.002 · Cited by 47
“, (13,15,30,33,38,39,47,51,53,64,65,87,97,101,107,120,125,128,137,140,144)), although fMRI of this region is not without technical challenges.”
Scene construction in schizophrenia.
Raffard, S., D’Argembeau, A., Bayard, S., Boulenger, J., & der Linden, M. V. (2010) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/a0019113 · Cited by 53
“Hassabis and Maguire (2007) recently argued that “scene construction” is a core process that not only underlies our ability to remember the past and to imagine the future, but also supports any task that requires a rich “recollection-like” experience.”
BackgroundScene construction in developmental amnesia: An fMRI study
Mullally, S. L., Vargha‐Khadem, F., & Maguire, E. A. (2013) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.11.001 · Cited by 54
“While P01 (Hassabis et al., 2007; Mullally et al., 2012) and controls (Hassabis, Kumaran, & Maguire, 2007) described scene construction as effortless and natural, Jon reported that he found the process effortful, and describes it as something which he has had to train himself to accomplish (Maguire…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationIzuma, K., Kennedy, K., Fitzjohn, A., Sedikides, C., & Shibata, K. (2018) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000114 · Cited by 48
Common Neural Representations for Visually Guided Reorientation and Spatial Imagery
Vass, L. K., & Epstein, R. A. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv343 · Cited by 45
Identifying the cognitive processes underpinning hippocampal-dependent tasks.
Clark, I. A., Hotchin, V., Monk, A. M., Pizzamiglio, G., Liefgreen, A., & Maguire, E. A. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000582 · Cited by 49
Self-citationLewis, J. W., Talkington, W. J., Puce, A., Engel, L. R., & Frum, C. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21570 · Cited by 50
“These regions may enable the encoding and/or monitoring of dynamic situational relationships with objects (or agents), regardless of the sensory input modality, consistent with their reported roles in mental imagery and episodic memory retrieval (Wakusawa et al, 2009 ; Walther, Caddigan, Fei-Fei, & Beck, 2009 ; Hassab…”
BackgroundErnst, A., Botzung, A., Gounot, D., Sellal, F., Blanc, F., Seze, J. D., & Manning, L. (2012) · Multiple Sclerosis International · doi:10.1155/2012/820240 · Cited by 44
Marini, A., Ferretti, F., Chiera, A., Magni, R., Adornetti, I., Nicchiarelli, S., Vicari, S., & Valeri, G. (2018) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.07.003 · Cited by 44
Neural correlates of the self-reference effect: evidence from evaluation and recognition processes
Yaoi, K., Osaka, M., & Osaka, N. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00383 · Cited by 41
“…significant activation in previous studies that used self-referential paradigms (Zysset et al., 2002; Schmitz et al., 2004; Seger et al., 2004; Yaoi et al., 2009) and known to be involved in the retrieval of episodic or autobiographical memory (Maguire and Mummery, 1999; Hassabis et al., 2007).”
BackgroundResultWanting or having to: The role of goal self-concordance in episodic future thinking
Ernst, A., Philippe, F. L., & D’Argembeau, A. (2018) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.10.004 · Cited by 48
How Imagination and Memory Shape the Moral Mind
O’Connor, B. B., & Fowler, Z. (2022) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683221114215 · Cited by 41
Neural Systems for Visual Scene Recognition
Epstein, R. A. (2014) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262027854.003.0006 · Cited by 43
Boccia, M., Guariglia, C., Sabatini, U., & Nemmi, F. (2015) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-015-1021-z · Cited by 42
de Souza Silva, M. A., Huston, J. P., Wang, A.-L., Petri, D., & Chao, O. Y.-H. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv112 · Cited by 41
“2009; Neunuebel and Knierim 2014), neuroimaging (Cabeza et al. 2002; Hassabis et al. 2007), lesion (Ergorul and Eichenbaum 2004; Fortin et al.”
BackgroundLefort‐Besnard, J., Bassett, D. S., Smallwood, J., Margulies, D. S., Derntl, B., Gruber, O., Aleman, A., Jardri, R., Varoquaux, G. P., Thirion, B., et al. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23870 · Cited by 41
“Hence, the present investigation at subnode resolution points to an aberration of multi-modal integration of perceptionaction cycles, more closely linked to DAN and SN function, rather than to imaginationbased thought processes, more closely linked to DMN function (Hassabis et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMedial prefrontal cortex: adding value to imagined scenarios
Lin, W.-J., Horner, A. J., Bisby, J. A., & Burgess, N. (2015) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00836 · Cited by 40
Gauthier, B., Pestke, K., & van Wassenhove, V. (2018) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy320 · Cited by 43
Doerig, N., Schlumpf, Y., Spinelli, S., Späti, J., Brakowski, J., Quednow, B. B., Seifritz, E., & Grosse Holtforth, M. (2014) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nst123 · Cited by 37
“, 2006; Cabeza and St Jacques, 2007) and studies showing the brain’s ability to distinguish real from imaginary memories (Hassabis et al., 2007) are consistent with this interpretation.”
ResultSymptom Attribution in first episode psychosis: A cortical thickness study
Buchy, L., Ad-Dab’bagh, Y., Lepage, C., MALLA, A. K., Joober, R., Evans, A. C., & Lepage, M. (2012) · Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.09.009 · Cited by 39
“Cortical abnormalities in this network suggest that flat affect misattribution may be explained as the failure of self-processing mechanisms (Kircher et al., 2000, 2002; Kjaer et al., 2002; Cavanna and Trimble, 2006; Hassabis et al., 2007; Wolf et al., 2009).”
InfluentialResting-State Functional Connectivity
Biswal, B. B. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-397025-1.00335-3 · Cited by 44
A role for affect in the link between episodic simulation and prosociality
Gaesser, B., DiBiase, H. D., & Kensinger, E. A. (2016) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2016.1254246 · Cited by 37
“Given that episodic simulation and episodic memory draw on many of the same cognitive processes (Atance & O’Neill, 2001; Conway, 2009; Hassabis et al., 2007; Schacter et al., 2012; Szpunar, 2010), it raises the possibility that the effect of affective valence elicited by simulated future events on…”
BackgroundMethodThe Hippocampus and Social Cognition
Laurita, A. C., & Spreng, R. N. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50406-3_17 · Cited by 42
Mental time travel, language, and evolution
Corballis, M. C. (2019) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107202 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Hassabis, D., Kumaran, D., & Maguire, E. A.
- Affiliations
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hassabis, Demis
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2007-12-26
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 52
- Pages
- 14365-14374
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC2571957
- OpenAlex
- W1982298223
- Cited by
- 744
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 55
- FWCI
- 15.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (071173)
- Brain Research Trust
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- episodic memory, imagination, scene construction, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, retrosplenial cortex, anterior medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus, episodic future thinking, default mode network, self-processing
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-25 (prompt extract-v2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review