The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 4 of the 17 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Using Imagination to Understand the Neural Basis of Episodic Memory
Open accessAbstract
Functional MRI (fMRI) studies investigating the neural basis of episodic memory recall, and the related task of thinking about plausible personal future events, have revealed a consistent network of associated brain regions. Surprisingly little, however, is understood about the contributions individual brain areas make to the overall recollective experience. To examine this, we used a novel fMRI paradigm in which subjects had to imagine fictitious experiences. In contrast to future thinking, this results in experiences that are not explicitly temporal in nature or as reliant on self-processing. By using previously imagined fictitious experiences as a comparison for episodic memories, we identified the neural basis of a key process engaged in common, namely scene construction, involving the generation, maintenance and visualization of complex spatial contexts. This was associated with activations in a distributed network, including hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and retrosplenial cortex. Importantly, we disambiguated these common effects from episodic memory-specific responses in anterior medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex and precuneus. These latter regions may support self-schema and familiarity processes, and contribute to the brain's ability to distinguish real from imaginary memories. We conclude that scene construction constitutes a common process underlying episodic memory and imagination of fictitious experiences, and suggest it may partially account for the similar brain networks implicated in navigation, episodic future thinking, and the default mode. We suggest that additional brain regions are co-opted into this core network in a task-specific manner to support functions such as episodic memory that may have additional requirements.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
4 of 17 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Thus episodic memory recall can be conceptually divided into a number of component processes including a sense of subjective time (Tulving, 2002), self-processing (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000), visual imagery (Rubin et al., 2003), narrative structure (Rubin et al., 2003), retrieval of semantic information (Wheeler et al., 1997) and multi-modal details (Wheeler et al., 2000; Gottfried et al., 2004), and feelings of familiarity (Wagner et al., 2005).”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Tulving, 2002 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000 source
- Supportedcites Rubin et al., 2003 source
The citation to Rubin et al. is attached to visual imagery and narrative structure, not the other processes in the citing sentence. The paper’s “Component processes” section identifies visual imagery as a component of autobiographical memory and treats narrative coherence as a distinct feature, measured by whether a memory comes as a coherent story. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.93)
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“have revealed a consistent and distributed network of associated brain regions,”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Maguire, 2001 source
- Partly supportedcites Svoboda et al., 2006 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 3.1 identifies a consistent, distributed network across autobiographical-memory imaging studies. Section 3.4 reports overlap in two regions for past and future thought, but cites only one imaging study directly comparing them; it does not establish a consistent distributed network across studies of both episodic recall and future thinking. The indexed copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cabeza and St Jacques, 2007 source
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“we replicated the well-established episodic memory retrieval network consistently activated in studies of autobiographical memory”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Results > Neuroimaging Data
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Maguire, 2001 source
- Partly supportedcites Rugg et al., 2002 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract (page unavailable) reports that successful episodic recollection is associated with lateral parietal activation and more variable prefrontal activation. It does not establish a consistently activated network in autobiographical-memory studies or compare recall of real memories with recall of objects; the available text points to a PDF for the full article. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Partly supportedcites Svoboda et al., 2006 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction says the meta-analysis identifies shared patterns of brain activation during autobiographical remembering, supporting the citing sentence’s reference to an established retrieval network. The Results and discussion (section 3.1) also describes an autobiographical-memory network. Our copy does not establish the claim’s more specific comparison of real-memory recall with recalled objects. (LLM, conf=0.84)
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Importantly, we disambiguated these common effects from episodic memory-specific responses in anterior medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex and precuneus.”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These latter regions may support self-schema and familiarity processes,”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We conclude that scene construction constitutes a common process underlying episodic memory and imagination of fictitious experiences,”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we identified the neural basis of a key process engaged in common, namely scene construction”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This was associated with activations in a distributed network, including hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and retrosplenial cortex.”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“involving the generation, maintenance and visualisation of complex spatial contexts.”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This study demonstrates that imagining new experiences is a manipulable and useful experimental tool which may prove fruitful in further advancing our understanding of episodic memory and the processes underpinning it, as well as other related cognitive functions”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Buckner and Carroll, 2007 source
- Not matchedcites Hassabis and Maguire, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Much recent interest has focused on the striking overlap among brain regions involved in the retrieval of autobiographical memories, the imagination of novel events, and navigation14, 47, 48.”
From Anchoring the neural compass: coding of local spatial reference frames in human medial parietal lobe (2014) · cites this paper as [48]
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Consistentt(20) = 13.52reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 13.52, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 13.6reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 13.60, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 11.03reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 11.03, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = -4.89reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = −4.89, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.36reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.36, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.41reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.41, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 2.88reported p < .01 · recomputed p = .009
“t(20) = 2.88, p < .01”
- Consistentt(20) = -4.77reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = −4.77, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = -6.67reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = −6.67, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 5.51reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 5.51, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.96reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.96, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 6.17reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 6.17, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 17.85reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 17.85, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 11.18reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 11.18, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 2.42reported p < .03 · recomputed p = .025
“t(20) = 2.42, p < .03”
- Consistentt(20) = 12.99reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 12.99, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 8.67reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 8.67, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.89reported p = .39 · recomputed p = .384
“t(20) = −0.89, p = .39”
- Consistentt(20) = 0.51reported p = .62 · recomputed p = .616
“t(20) = 0.51, p = .62”
- Consistentt(20) = -1.97reported p = .06 · recomputed p = .063
“t(20) = −1.97, p = .06”
- Consistentt(20) = -1reported p = .33 · recomputed p = .329
“t(20) = −1.00, p = .33”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.47reported p = .64 · recomputed p = .643
“t(20) = −0.47, p = .64”
- Consistentt(20) = 1.75reported p = .1 · recomputed p = .095
“t(20) = 1.75, p = .10”
- Consistentt(20) = 3.86reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 3.86, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.26reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.26, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 1.09reported p = .29 · recomputed p = .289
“t(20) = 1.09, p = .29”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.69reported p = .5 · recomputed p = .498
“t(20) = −0.69, p = .50”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.59reported p = .56 · recomputed p = .562
“t(20) = −0.59, p = .56”
- Consistentt(20) = 0.26reported p = .8 · recomputed p = .798
“t(20) = 0.26, p = .80”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.3reported p = .77 · recomputed p = .767
“t(20) = −0.30, p = .77”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.
Citations
Cites
A default mode of brain function
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.676 · Cited by 12,190 · cited 4×
“…2005), episodic future thinking (Atance and O’Neill, 2001; Addis et al., 2007; Schacter and Addis, 2007; Szpunar et al., 2007), the default mode (Raichle et al., 2001) and daydreaming (Mason et al., 2007), leading to suggestions that it performs a general function (Buckner and Carroll, 2007;…”
BackgroundInfluential(1978) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 8,010
Episodic memory: from mind to brain
Tulving, E. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114 · Cited by 4,950 · cited 11×
“…theory of mind (Kumaran and Maguire, 2005; Amodio and Frith, 2006) and episodic future thinking (Addis et al., 2007) suggesting that the amPFC and PCC might be supporting pro- cesses related to the self (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000) and mental time travel (Wheeler et al., 1997; Tulving, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system
Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.107.2.261 · Cited by 4,089 · cited 7×
“…a purely created imagined experience does not have the same reliance or effect on the imaginer’s self-schema compared with a real episodic memory (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Gallagher, 2000) although both likely involve the adoption of an egocentric viewpoint (Burgess, 2006) on the part…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMeeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition
Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1884 · Cited by 3,782 · cited 2×
“…bears a striking resemblance to networks found to support self-reflection (Johnson et al., 2002), theory of mind (Kumaran and Maguire, 2005; Amodio and Frith, 2006) and episodic future thinking (Addis et al., 2007) suggesting that the amPFC and PCC might be supporting pro- cesses related…”
BackgroundPhilosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science.
Gallagher, S. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01417-5 · Cited by 2,881 · cited 4×
“Moreover, by using rich imaginary memories as a well matched comparison task we were able to isolate processes specific to episodic memory, such as the use of self-schema (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Gallagher, 2000), a sense of familiarity and mental time travel (Tulving, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWandering minds: the default network and stimulus-independent thought
Mason, M. F., Norton, M. I., Van Horn, J. D., Wegner, D. M., Grafton, S. T., & Macrae, C. N. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1131295 · Cited by 2,792 · cited 4×
“, 2001), and perhaps even daydreaming (Mason et al., 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialBuckner, R. L., & Carroll, D. C. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.004 · Cited by 2,691
The human hippocampus and spatial and episodic memory
Burgess, N., Maguire, E. A., & O'Keefe, J. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00830-9 · Cited by 2,401 · cited 3×
“…network (also replicated in this study with the RM RO contrast) has also been activated in a variety of other circumstances including navigation (Burgess et al., 2002; Hartley et al., 2003; Spiers and Maguire, 2006), spatial tasks (Maguire et al., 2003; Kumaran and Maguire, 2005), episodic…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationRemembering the past to imagine the future: the prospective brain
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2213 · Cited by 2,394 · cited 1×
“…a key component of episodic memory recall lends additional support to constructive theories of episodic memory (Bartlett, 1932; Schacter et al., 1998) and the recently proposed constructive episodic simulation function of the episodic memory system (Schacter and Addis, 2007; Schacter et al., 2007).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Bartlett FC (1932) Remembering (Cambridge UP, Cambridge).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 751
d’Acremont, M., Fornari, E., & Bossaerts, P. L. (2013) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002895 · Cited by 36
“Activity in the default network has been found to increase during tasks of theory of mind, mind wandering, and memory [50,51].”
BackgroundImpaired retrieval monitoring for past and future autobiographical events in older adults.
McDonough, I. M., & Gallo, D. A. (2013) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0032732 · Cited by 37
“In contrast, imagined-future events contain many features regarding the thoughts and reasoning processes (cognitive operations), as well as feelings of emotion and of importance (Addis, Wong, & Schacter, 2008; D’Argembeau & Van der Linden, 2004; Hassabis et al., 2007; McDonough & Gallo, 2010).”
Dissociating the “retrieval success” regions of the brain: Effects of retrieval delay
Huijbers, W., Pennartz, C. M. A., & Daselaar, S. M. (2009) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.006 · Cited by 37
Dafni‐Merom, A., & Arzy, S. (2020) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107477 · Cited by 39
The relationship between hippocampal subfield volumes and autobiographical memory persistence
Barry, D. N., Clark, I. A., & Maguire, E. A. (2020) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.23293 · Cited by 36
“As alluded to previously, a common process underlying imagination, past and future thinking may be the mental construction of scene imagery (Barry & Maguire, 2019a, 2019b; Hassabis & Maguire, 2007; Maguire & Mullally, 2013).”
BackgroundSelf-citationRajalingham, R., Piccato, A., & Jazayeri, M. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33581-6 · Cited by 50
A Link between Visual Disambiguation and Visual Memory
Hegdé, J., & Kersten, D. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4415-09.2010 · Cited by 39
“Many of these regions, including the precuneus, are known to be part of a generic, core memory network for objects and are known to be recruited into various object recognition tasks in a task-specific manner (Cavanna and Trimble, 2006; Hassabis et al., 2007; Roth and Courtney, 2007; Spreng et al., 2009).”
InfluentialA Common Mode of Processing Governing Divergent Thinking and Future Imagination
Roberts, R. P., & Addis, D. R. (2018) · The Cambridge Handbook of the Neuroscience of Creativity · doi:10.1017/9781316556238.013 · Cited by 37
The neural basis of autobiographical memory deficits in transient epileptic amnesia
Milton, F., Butler, C., Benattayallah, A., & Zeman, A. Z. (2012) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.027 · Cited by 35
Pattern similarity and connectivity of hippocampal-neocortical regions support empathy for pain
Wagner, I. C., Rütgen, M., & Lamm, C. (2020) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsaa045 · Cited by 35
“…Rugg and Vilberg, 2012; Kim, 2016) and simulating future (Addis et al., 2007; Szpunar et al., 2014; McCormick et al., 2018) or fictitious events (Hassabis et al., 2007a), and it therefore seems vital for mental construction (Schacter and Addis, 2007; Hassabis and Maguire, 2009; Bird et al.,…”
BackgroundInfluentialSustained activity within the default mode network during an implicit memory task
Yang, J., Weng, X., Zang, Y., Xu, M., & Xu, X. V. (2009) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.05.002 · Cited by 35
“During the resting state, the default mode regions may continuously and spontaneously encode internal thoughts and self-representations, consolidate recent memory traces, retrieve representations in memory and flexibly generate predictions about the present and relevant future (Bar, 2007; Buckner and Carroll, 2007; Ha…”
BackgroundInfluentialElman, J. A., Cohn‐Sheehy, B. I., & Shimamura, A. P. (2012) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.12.013 · Cited by 37
“Interestingly, the precuneus has been associated with scene construction (Hassabis et al., 2007) as well as first-person perspective taking (Vogeley & Fink, 2003).”
BackgroundNarrative as active inferencePreprint
Bouizegarene, N., Ramstead, M. J. D., Constant, A., Friston, K. J., & Kirmayer, L. J. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/47ub6 · Cited by 34
Ernst, A., Blanc, F., Seze, J. D., & Manning, L. (2015) · Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience · doi:10.3233/rnn-140461 · Cited by 35
Narrative construction is intact in episodic amnesia
Keven, N., Kurczek, J., Rosenbaum, R. S., & Craver, C. F. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.028 · Cited by 36
Narrative imagery: Emotional modulation in the default mode network
Sambuco, N., Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2021) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108087 · Cited by 39
Lewis, J. W., Talkington, W. J., Tallaksen, K. C., & Frum, C. (2012) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2012.00027 · Cited by 35
“A related possibility is that downstream imagery and retrieval of episodic memories related to the acoustic scene may have preferentially led to activation of these midline regions (Hassabis et al., 2007).”
BackgroundMore Than Meets the Eye: Art Engages the Social Brain
van Leeuwen, J. E. P., Boomgaard, J., Bzdok, D., Crutch, S. J., & Warren, J. D. (2022) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.738865 · Cited by 42
“, 2012), while bilateral HC damage associated with anterograde amnesia leads to difficulty imagining scenes and objects (Hassabis et al., 2007; Mullally et al., 2012).”
BackgroundSelf and identity in borderline personality disorder: Agency and mental time travel
Gold, N., & Kyratsous, M. (2017) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.12769 · Cited by 31
Haihambo, N. P., Ma, Q., Baeken, C., Deroost, N., Baetens, K., Heleven, E., & Overwalle, F. V. (2021) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsab087 · Cited by 37
“Although prior studies have also investigated imagination about future events (for review, see Hassabis and Maguire, 2009), these studies did not include trait information nor did they ask participants to generate sequences of future social actions (Addis et al., 2007; Hassabis et al., 2007) and did not reveal activat…”
BackgroundMcDonough, I. M., & Gallo, D. (2009) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.38.1.3 · Cited by 34
Serino, S., & Riva, G. (2014) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00033 · Cited by 34
The hippocampus and spatial constraints on mental imagery
Bird, C. M., Bisby, J. A., & Burgess, N. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00142 · Cited by 41
“In the absence of such a context, the encoding of strong (a-contextual egocentric) sensory and affective representations of traumatic events can lead to an increased incidence of subsequent intrusive imagery.”
BackgroundStenstrom, P., Fox, K. C. R., Solomonova, E., & Nielsen, T. (2012) · International journal of dream research · doi:10.11588/ijodr.2012.1.9135 · Cited by 34
The neural basis of temporal order processing in past and future thought
D'Argembeau, A., Jeunehomme, O., Majerus, S., Bastin, C., & Salmon, E. (2015) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00680 · Cited by 32
“On the one hand, there is evidence that the hippocampus is activated when imagining events or scenes that are not located at particular times in the past or future (Summerfield et al., 2010; Hassabis et al., 2007), and a recent study failed to detect significant hippocampal activity when participants placed an imagine…”
BackgroundCEO Analysis of Demis Hassabis of DeepMind Technologies Limited
Aithal, S., & Kumar, K. R. N. (2025) · Poornaprajna International Journal of Teaching & Research Case Studies (PIJTRCS) · doi:10.64818/pijtrcs.3107.8494.0027 · Cited by 33
Gilmore, A. W., Nelson, S. M., Chen, H., & McDermott, K. B. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.06.016 · Cited by 32
“…reported a largely overlapping collection of brain regions that appears to support both the reconstruction of past events and the novel construction of hypothetical future scenarios (Addis et al., 2007, 2009; Hassabis et al., 2007; Szpunar et al., 2007, 2009; see also Benoit and Schacter, 2015).”
Episodic specificity induction and scene construction: Evidence for an event construction account
Madore, K. P., Jing, H. G., & Schacter, D. L. (2018) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.12.001 · Cited by 35
“250–251) noted substantial overlap between the concepts of “scene construction” and “event construction,” but nonetheless drew a distinction between them, noting that: “one of the key measures of scene construction, the spatial coherence index, assesses the spatial integrity of a constructed scene (Hassabis et al., 20…”
BackgroundGaesser, B., Hirschfeld-Kroen, J., Wasserman, E. A., Horn, M., & Young, L. (2019) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsz014 · Cited by 32
“, 2014), atemporal fictitious events (Hassabis et al., 2007; Summerfield et al., 2009, 2010) and counter-factual events (De Brigard et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialUsing hippocampal-striatal loops for spatial navigation and goal-directed decision-making
Chersi, F., & Pezzulo, G. (2012) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-012-0475-7 · Cited by 36
Maillet, D., & Rajah, M. N. (2016) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00935 · Cited by 32
Patients with bipolar disorder show a selective deficit in the episodic simulation of future events
King, M. J., Williams, L.-A., MacDougall, A. G., Ferris, S., Smith, J. R. V., Ziolkowski, N. I., & McKinnon, M. C. (2011) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.05.005 · Cited by 31
Autobiographical memory in multiple sclerosis patients: Assessment and cognitive facilitation
Ernst, A., Blanc, F., Voltzenlogel, V., Seze, J. D., Chauvin, B., & Manning, L. (2012) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602011.2012.724355 · Cited by 32
“…data, we would like to suggest that emphasis put on the role of MVI in AbM and, by the same token, on the posterior cerebral regions (Hassabis et al., 2007), could have compensated for the weakness of the retrieval strategy processes supported by the prefrontal cortex (Botzung et…”
Rabin (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00588 · Cited by 31
“…the amount of detail generated for each event (1= not vivid . . . 4= very vivid) and the other scale assessed the spatial coherence of each event (contiguousness of the spatial context: 1= fragmented scenes . . . 4= continuous scene; Hassabis et al., 2007; not reported in the current study).”
BackgroundInfluentialHills, T. T., & Butterfill, S. (2015) · Current Zoology · doi:10.1093/czoolo/61.2.368 · Cited by 33
Tanaka, S., & Kirino, E. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00328 · Cited by 33
Memory before and after H.M.: an impressionistic historical perspective
Moscovitch, M. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580286.003.0002 · Cited by 35
Abete-Fornara, G., Papagno, C., & Berlingeri, M. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.05.027 · Cited by 30
Maternal sensitivity predicts anterior hippocampal functional networks in early childhood
Wang, Q., Zhang, H., Chong-yaw Wee, A., Lee, A., Poh, J. S., Chong, Y. S., Tan, K. H., Gluckman, P. D., Yap, F. K. P., Fortier, M. V., et al. (2019) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-019-01882-0 · Cited by 31
Episodic mindreading: Mentalizing guided by scene construction of imagined and remembered events
Gaesser, B. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104325 · Cited by 32
Precision functional mapping of human memory systems
Gilmore, A. W., Nelson, S. M., & McDermott, K. B. (2021) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.12.013 · Cited by 27
Memory consolidation in humans: new evidence and opportunities
Maguire, E. A. (2014) · Experimental Physiology · doi:10.1113/expphysiol.2013.072157 · Cited by 36
“…us from inhabiting our imagination (Hassabis et al. 2007b; Mullally et al. 2012) and contemplating the future (Tulving, 1985; Klein et al. 2002; Hassabis et al. 2007b; Rosenbaum et al. 2009; Andelman et al. 2010; Race et al. 2011), as well as impairing the ability to navigate effectively in…”
BackgroundSelf-citationLoughead, J., Luborsky, L. B., Weingarten, C. P., Krause, E. D., German, R. E., Kirk, D., & Gur, R. C. (2010) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503300903470735 · Cited by 31
“Self-schemas are part of the structure of the self and influence both self and interpersonal functioning (Conway & Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Hassabis et al., 2007; Horowitz, 1991; Nelson & Fivush, 2004).”
BackgroundNeural decoding of semantic concepts: a systematic literature review
Rybář, M., & Daly, I. P. (2022) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ac619a · Cited by 35
The parietal opercular auditory-sensorimotor network in musicians: A resting-state fMRI study
Tanaka, S., & Kirino, E. (2017) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2017.11.001 · Cited by 30
The development of asymmetries in past and future thinking.
Burns, P., McCormack, T., Graham, A. J., Fitzpatrick, Á., McGourty, J., & Caruso, E. M. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000464 · Cited by 33
Chersi, F., Donnarumma, F., & Pezzulo, G. (2013) · Adaptive Behavior · doi:10.1177/1059712313488789 · Cited by 30
“To conclude, in spite of some evident limitation such as the restricted capability of mental simulation due to the accumulation of errors, the lack of realistic modelfree behaviour, the simplified value-based computation mechanism and the approximated mapping to anatomical structures, the presented architecture could…”
BackgroundWilson, N., Ramanan, S., Roquet, D., Goldberg, Z.-L., Hodges, J. R., Piguet, O., & Irish, M. (2019) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107327 · Cited by 30
Prayer as an interpersonal relationship: A neuroimaging study
Neubauer, R. L. (2013) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2013.768288 · Cited by 28
“Moreover, a variety of studies indicate that the brain makes a distinction between imagining real and fictitious persons or events, as demonstrated by the specific areas that are activated (Abraham et al., 2008; Benoit et al., 2010; Daselaar et al., 2010; Harris et al., 2008; Hassabis et al., 2007).”
BackgroundRamanan, S., Alaeddin, S., Goldberg, Z.-L., Strikwerda‐Brown, C., Hodges, J. R., & Irish, M. (2018) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2018.06.016 · Cited by 31
Metacognitive Awareness and the Subjective Experience of Remembering in Aphantasia
Siena, M. J., & Simons, J. S. (2024) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_02120 · Cited by 46
“…2007, 2020), where episodic memory retrieval and imagery generation are held to involve common constructive and simulative processes (Pearson, 2019; Hassabis, Kumaran, & Maguire, 2007; Hassabis & Maguire, 2007), by adding hip-pocampally based memory indices that point to the storage locations of…”
BackgroundThe development of episodic future thinking in middle childhood
Ferretti, F., Chiera, A., Nicchiarelli, S., Adornetti, I., Magni, R., Vicari, S., Valeri, G., & Marini, A. (2017) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-017-0842-5 · Cited by 27
Costigan, A. G., Umla‐Runge, K., Evans, J., Hodgetts, C. J., Lawrence, A. D., & Graham, K. S. (2019) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24566 · Cited by 30
“, 2016]; mental scene construction [Hassabis et al., 2007; Palombo et al., 2018]; as well as large-scale spatial navigation in virtual reality environments [Ekstrom et al.”
BackgroundSchoo, L. A., van Zandvoort, M. J. E., Biessels, G. J., Kappelle, L. J., Postma, A., & de Haan, E. H. F. (2010) · Journal of Neuropsychology · doi:10.1348/174866410x504059 · Cited by 28
“Activation patterns in the brain evoked by these tasks all show involvement of the PPC (Hassabis et al., 2007).”
BackgroundYang, Y., Lueken, U., Richter, J., Hamm, A. O., Wittmann, A., Konrad, C., Ströhle, A., Pfleiderer, B., Herrmann, M. J., Lang�, T., et al. (2019) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19020202 · Cited by 31
Knoff, A. A. W., Andrews‐Hanna, J. R., & Grilli, M. D. (2020) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-020-01098-2 · Cited by 33
Exploring the role of space-defining objects in constructing and maintaining imagined scenes
Mullally, S. L., & Maguire, E. A. (2013) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2013.02.013 · Cited by 24
Self-citationIdentifying with fictive characters: structural brain correlates of the personality trait ‘fantasy’
Cheetham, M., Hänggi, J., & Jancke, L. (2014) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nst179 · Cited by 25
Eye movements disrupt episodic future thinking
Vito, S. D., Buonocore, A., Bonnefon, J., & Sala, S. D. (2014) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2014.927888 · Cited by 31
Functional connectivity pattern underlies individual differences in independent self-construal
Li, L.-M. M. W., Luo, S., Ma, J., Lin, Y., Fan, L., Zhong, S., Yang, J., Huang, Y., Gu, L., Fan, L., et al. (2018) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsy008 · Cited by 24
“, 2002) and episodic memory (Hassabis et al., 2007), may promote greater readiness state for high-level inference-based metalizing processes about self (Kelley et al.”
BackgroundThe Neurocognitive Development of Episodic Prospection and Its Implications for Academic Achievement
Prabhakar, J., Coughlin, C. A., & Ghetti, S. (2016) · Mind Brain and Education · doi:10.1111/mbe.12124 · Cited by 28
GAMA: Graph Attention Multi-agent reinforcement learning algorithm for cooperation
Chen, H., Liu, Y., Zhou, Z., Hu, D., & Zhang, M. (2020) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-020-01755-8 · Cited by 25
“The mechanism of decision making and reasoning has attracted a lot of attention in the neuroscience field [3, 20].”
BackgroundDecoding individual identity from brain activity elicited in imagining common experiences
Anderson, A. J., McDermott, K., Rooks, B., Heffner, K. L., Dodell‐Feder, D., & Lin, F. V. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19630-y · Cited by 28
Human’s Intuitive Mental Models as a Source of Realistic Artificial Intelligence and Engineering
Suomala, J., & Kauttonen, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.873289 · Cited by 32
“…(2009) hypothesized that the hippocampus, which is involved in episodic memory retrieval, prefrontal cortices involved in top–down processing and the retrosplenial complex involved in associative processing, are regions which retain prior experiences of a person [see also Hassabis et al. (2007)].”
BackgroundDedifferentiation of emotion regulation strategies in the aging brain
Martins-Klein, B., Ponzio, A., Velasco, R., Kaplan, J., & Mather, M. (2014) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsu129 · Cited by 25
What, if anything, can monkeys tell us about human amnesia when they can’t say anything at all?
Murray, E. A., & Wise, S. P. (2010) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.01.011 · Cited by 26
Neural networks involved in self-judgement in young and elderly adults
Feyers, D., Collette, F., D'Argembeau, A., Majerus, S., & Salmon, É. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.071 · Cited by 27
“…beenassociated with the regeneration of rich contextual associations, with correct source retrieval ([ − 6 − 70 60] Lundstrom et al., 2005), as well as with complex mental imagery, implying re-construction, maintenance and visualisation of complex scenes ([6 − 66 60] Hassabis et al., 2007).”
Sheldon, S., & Levine, B. (2015) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22477 · Cited by 27
“For example, commonalities between retrieving AM and performing higher-order spatial navigation (Hassabis et al., 2007; Spreng et al., 2009) and spatial retrieval tasks (Greenberg et al., 2009; Hoscheidt et al., 2010; Sheldon and Moscovitch, 2012) are typically reported in posterior aspects of the…”
BackgroundB, T. J. S. A., Howard Poizner, A., LYNCH, G. S., Gepshtein, S., & Greenspan, R. J. (2014) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2014.2314297 · Cited by 25
“Indeed, patients with hippocampal amnesia lose the ability to imagine novel experiences [77], reducing their ability to make optimal decisions [78].”
BackgroundHe, R., Chapin, K., Al‐Tamimi, J., Bel, N., Marquié, M., Rosende‐Roca, M., Pytel, V., Tartari, J. P., Alegret, M., Sanabria, Á., et al. (2023) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2023_ajslp-22-00403 · Cited by 23
The auditory scene: An fMRI study on melody and accompaniment in professional pianists
Spada, D., Verga, L., Iadanza, A., Tettamanti, M., & Perani, D. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.08.036 · Cited by 23
“, 2005), which has been linked to familiarity (Hassabis et al., 2007).”
InfluentialDistinctive and Complementary Roles of Default Mode Network Subsystems in Semantic Cognition
Shao, X., Krieger‐Redwood, K., Zhang, M., Hoffman, P., Lanzoni, L., Leech, R., Smallwood, J., & Jefferies, E. (2024) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1907-23.2024 · Cited by 23
“The MT subsystem reliably showed activation in bilateral medial temporal regions, consistent with previous studies showing these regions are important for thinking about events that happened in a speci fi c place and time during episodic retrieval (Hassabis and Maguire, 2007; Hassabis et al., 2007).”
ResultMcCormick, C., & Maguire, E. A. (2021) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107912 · Cited by 22
Self-citationStructural and functional brain network of human retrosplenial cortex
Li, P., Shan, H., Liang, S., Nie, B., Duan, S., Huang, Q., Zhang, T., Sun, X., Feng, T., Ma, L., et al. (2018) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2018.03.016 · Cited by 23
Ernst, A., Scoboria, A., & D’Argembeau, A. (2019) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021819855621 · Cited by 20
Zheng, H., Luo, J., & Yu, R. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00856 · Cited by 26
“Results demonstrated that children aged 4 and 5 were capable of answering the question while only a minority 3-year-old children could successfully complete the task, suggesting that the development of memory facilitates the development of prospection to some extent.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialTransitions in Brain Evolution: Space, Time and Entropy
Jeffery, K. J., & Carlo Rovelli, C. (2020) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2020.04.008 · Cited by 24
“In humans, the capacity to represent space and time together has resulted in a rich capacity for episodic memory –memory for life events [32]– aswell as the ability to formulate detailed representations of things that have not happened yet (planning) or may never happen (imagination [33,34]).”
BackgroundNeural substrates of long-term item and source memory for emotional associates: An fMRI study
Ventura‐Bort, C., Wendt, J., Wirkner, J., König, J., Lotze, M., Hamm, A. O., Dolcos, F., & Weymar, M. (2020) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107561 · Cited by 23
van Mulukom, V., Schacter, D. L., Corballis, M. C., & Addis, D. R. (2015) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1051559 · Cited by 22
The association between past and future oriented thinking: Evidence from autism spectrum disorder
Lind, S. E., & Williams, D. M. (2012) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2012.05.004 · Cited by 24
“Hassabis and Maguire (2007) have suggested that each of these abilities rely on the capacity for “scene construction”, which refers to the generation and maintenance of a coherent, multimodal spatial representation. They also suggest that scene construction may be involved in certain forms of navigation (Hassabis & Ma…”
InfluentialEffects of task complexity on activation of language areas in a semantic decision fMRI protocol
Lopes, T. M., Yasuda, C. L., de Campos, B. M., et al. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.12.020 · Cited by 22
“…of processes, including episodic and visuospatial memory functions (Aggleton and Pearce, 2001; Epstein et al., 2007; Rudge and Warrington , 1991), spatial attention (Small et al., 2003), visual imagery (Burgess, 2008; Hassabis et al., 2007), and others (Buckner et al., 2008; Vogt et al., 2006).”
Marini, A., Ferretti, F., Chiera, A., et al. (2016) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-016-2867-5 · Cited by 22
Ciaramelli, E., Spoglianti, S., Bertossi, E., Generali, N., Telarucci, F., Tancredi, R., Muratori, F., & Igliozzi, R. (2018) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-018-3577-y · Cited by 24
“Both neuroimaging evidence (Hassabis et al. 2007; Summerfield et al. 2010) and neuropsychological evidence on patients with amnesia due to hippocampal damage (Hassabis et al.”
BackgroundChirino‐Pérez, A., Hernandez-Castillo, C. R., Gálvez, V., Contreras, A., Díaz, R., Beltrán‐Parrazal, L., & Fernández-Ruíz, J. (2018) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.14148 · Cited by 24
Acetylcholine efflux from retrosplenial areas and hippocampal sectors during maze exploration
Anzalone, S., Roland, J. J., Vogt, B. A., & Savage, L. M. (2009) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2009.02.023 · Cited by 22
“However, the functional distinctions –both behavioral, neuroimaging, and neurochemical-between the hippocampus and RSC are still suggestive of a cooperative dynamic [2,13,30].”
BackgroundScenes facilitate associative memory and integrationPreprint
Robin, J., & Olsen, R. K. (2019) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.049486.119 · Cited by 23
“…and imagining scenes are also associated with increased hippocampal activity compared to similar tasks involving objects, and to some extent, faces (Hassabis et al. 2007a; Zeidman et al. 2015a,b; Hodgetts et al. 2016; Ross et al. 2018; www.learnmem.org 257 Learning & Memory Dalton et al. 2018;…”
BackgroundMateos, D. M., Krumm, G., Filippetti, V. A., & Gutiérrez, M. (2022) · NeuroSci · doi:10.3390/neurosci3020025 · Cited by 24
“Theta activity is related to novelty detection [118] and to the imagination of fictitious scenes [119].”
BackgroundLadyka‐Wojcik, N., Liu, Z., & Ryan, J. D. (2022) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119497 · Cited by 21
Behavioral, neurological, and psychiatric frailty of autobiographical memory
Markowitsch, H. J., & Staniloiu, A. (2022) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1617 · Cited by 25
Coordinating what we’ve learned about memory consolidation: Revisiting a unified theory
Runyan, J. D., Moore, A. N., & Dash, P. K. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.02.010 · Cited by 25
Pupil dilation as an indicator of future thinking
Haj, M. E., & Moustafa, A. A. (2020) · Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s10072-020-04533-z · Cited by 22
Heine, A., Tamm, S., Wißmann, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2011) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.07.028 · Cited by 22
Dreaming and waking cognition.
Graveline, Y. M., & Wamsley, E. J. (2015) · Translational Issues in Psychological Science · doi:10.1037/tps0000018 · Cited by 21
Repetition-Related Reductions in Neural Activity during Emotional Simulations of Future Events
Szpunar, K. K., Jing, H. G., Benoit, R. G., & Schacter, D. L. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138354 · Cited by 20
“001 with 10 or more contiguous voxels (for a similar approach, see [27]).”
BackgroundThe role of vision in the neural representation of unique entities
Wang, X., Peelen, M. V., Han, Z., Caramazza, A., & Bi, Y. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.05.007 · Cited by 21
“…processing and/or social cognition (Bedny et al., 2009; Buckner and Carroll, 2007; Cabeza et al., 2008; Carter and Huettel, 2013; Cavanna and Trimble, 2006; Hassabis and Maguire, 2007; Hassabis et al., 2007; Lepage et al., 2000; Maguire et al., 2001; Sestieri et al., 2011; Svoboda et al., 2006).”
DiMenichi, B. C., & Tricomi, E. M. (2016) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23396 · Cited by 20
“…network, such as resting-state tasks, [Binder et al., 1999; Greicius et al., 2003; Greicius et al., 2009], tasks requiring episodic memory [Hassabis et al., 2007; Hassabis and Maguire, 2007; Shallice et al., 1994], and even tasks that incorporate semantic memory and processing [Binder and…”
BackgroundBoundary Restriction for Negative Emotional Images Is an Example of Memory Amplification
Takarangi, M. K. T., Oulton, J. M., Green, D. M., & Strange, D. M. (2015) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702615569912 · Cited by 21
Mental time in amnesia: Evidence from bilateral medial temporal damage before and after recovery
Arzy, S., Bick, A. S., & Blanke, O. (2009) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643290903439178 · Cited by 22
“…2009, 26 (6) “scene construction”, involving the generation, maintenance, and visualization of complex spatial contexts (Hassabis & Maguire, 2007), which has also been shown to be critically reliant on the hippocampus and other medial temporal lobe structures (Hassabis et al., 2007a, 2007b).”
BackgroundCoherence in the Visual Imagination
Vertolli, M. O., Kelly, M. A., & Davies, J. (2017) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12569 · Cited by 20
Villena‐González, M., Wang, H.-T., Sormaz, M., Mollo, G., Margulies, D. S., Jefferies, E., & Smallwood, J. (2017) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.11.015 · Cited by 18
“Imaginative processes are oftenhighly integrated states (Schlichting & Preston, 2015): Thinking about the future, for example relies on both episodic (Hassabis et al, 2007a, 2007b) and semantic memory (Irish & Piguet, 2013), as well as affective processes (MacLeod & Byrne, 1996).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Hassabis, D., Kumaran, D., & Maguire, E. A.
- Affiliations
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hassabis, Demis
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2007-12-26
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 52
- Pages
- 14365-14374
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC2571957
- OpenAlex
- W1982298223
- Cited by
- 744
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 55
- FWCI
- 15.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (071173)
- Brain Research Trust
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- episodic memory, imagination, scene construction, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, retrosplenial cortex, anterior medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus, episodic future thinking, default mode network, self-processing
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-25 (prompt extract-v2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review