The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 4 of the 17 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Using Imagination to Understand the Neural Basis of Episodic Memory
Open accessAbstract
Functional MRI (fMRI) studies investigating the neural basis of episodic memory recall, and the related task of thinking about plausible personal future events, have revealed a consistent network of associated brain regions. Surprisingly little, however, is understood about the contributions individual brain areas make to the overall recollective experience. To examine this, we used a novel fMRI paradigm in which subjects had to imagine fictitious experiences. In contrast to future thinking, this results in experiences that are not explicitly temporal in nature or as reliant on self-processing. By using previously imagined fictitious experiences as a comparison for episodic memories, we identified the neural basis of a key process engaged in common, namely scene construction, involving the generation, maintenance and visualization of complex spatial contexts. This was associated with activations in a distributed network, including hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and retrosplenial cortex. Importantly, we disambiguated these common effects from episodic memory-specific responses in anterior medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex and precuneus. These latter regions may support self-schema and familiarity processes, and contribute to the brain's ability to distinguish real from imaginary memories. We conclude that scene construction constitutes a common process underlying episodic memory and imagination of fictitious experiences, and suggest it may partially account for the similar brain networks implicated in navigation, episodic future thinking, and the default mode. We suggest that additional brain regions are co-opted into this core network in a task-specific manner to support functions such as episodic memory that may have additional requirements.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
4 of 17 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Thus episodic memory recall can be conceptually divided into a number of component processes including a sense of subjective time (Tulving, 2002), self-processing (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000), visual imagery (Rubin et al., 2003), narrative structure (Rubin et al., 2003), retrieval of semantic information (Wheeler et al., 1997) and multi-modal details (Wheeler et al., 2000; Gottfried et al., 2004), and feelings of familiarity (Wagner et al., 2005).”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Tulving, 2002 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000 source
- Supportedcites Rubin et al., 2003 source
The citation to Rubin et al. is attached to visual imagery and narrative structure, not the other processes in the citing sentence. The paper’s “Component processes” section identifies visual imagery as a component of autobiographical memory and treats narrative coherence as a distinct feature, measured by whether a memory comes as a coherent story. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.93)
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“have revealed a consistent and distributed network of associated brain regions,”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Maguire, 2001 source
- Partly supportedcites Svoboda et al., 2006 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 3.1 identifies a consistent, distributed network across autobiographical-memory imaging studies. Section 3.4 reports overlap in two regions for past and future thought, but cites only one imaging study directly comparing them; it does not establish a consistent distributed network across studies of both episodic recall and future thinking. The indexed copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cabeza and St Jacques, 2007 source
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“we replicated the well-established episodic memory retrieval network consistently activated in studies of autobiographical memory”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Results > Neuroimaging Data
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Maguire, 2001 source
- Partly supportedcites Rugg et al., 2002 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract (page unavailable) reports that successful episodic recollection is associated with lateral parietal activation and more variable prefrontal activation. It does not establish a consistently activated network in autobiographical-memory studies or compare recall of real memories with recall of objects; the available text points to a PDF for the full article. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Partly supportedcites Svoboda et al., 2006 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction says the meta-analysis identifies shared patterns of brain activation during autobiographical remembering, supporting the citing sentence’s reference to an established retrieval network. The Results and discussion (section 3.1) also describes an autobiographical-memory network. Our copy does not establish the claim’s more specific comparison of real-memory recall with recalled objects. (LLM, conf=0.84)
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Importantly, we disambiguated these common effects from episodic memory-specific responses in anterior medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex and precuneus.”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These latter regions may support self-schema and familiarity processes,”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We conclude that scene construction constitutes a common process underlying episodic memory and imagination of fictitious experiences,”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we identified the neural basis of a key process engaged in common, namely scene construction”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This was associated with activations in a distributed network, including hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and retrosplenial cortex.”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“involving the generation, maintenance and visualisation of complex spatial contexts.”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This study demonstrates that imagining new experiences is a manipulable and useful experimental tool which may prove fruitful in further advancing our understanding of episodic memory and the processes underpinning it, as well as other related cognitive functions”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Buckner and Carroll, 2007 source
- Not matchedcites Hassabis and Maguire, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Much recent interest has focused on the striking overlap among brain regions involved in the retrieval of autobiographical memories, the imagination of novel events, and navigation14, 47, 48.”
From Anchoring the neural compass: coding of local spatial reference frames in human medial parietal lobe (2014) · cites this paper as [48]
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Consistentt(20) = 13.52reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 13.52, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 13.6reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 13.60, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 11.03reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 11.03, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = -4.89reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = −4.89, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.36reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.36, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.41reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.41, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 2.88reported p < .01 · recomputed p = .009
“t(20) = 2.88, p < .01”
- Consistentt(20) = -4.77reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = −4.77, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = -6.67reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = −6.67, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 5.51reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 5.51, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.96reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.96, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 6.17reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 6.17, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 17.85reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 17.85, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 11.18reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 11.18, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 2.42reported p < .03 · recomputed p = .025
“t(20) = 2.42, p < .03”
- Consistentt(20) = 12.99reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 12.99, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 8.67reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 8.67, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.89reported p = .39 · recomputed p = .384
“t(20) = −0.89, p = .39”
- Consistentt(20) = 0.51reported p = .62 · recomputed p = .616
“t(20) = 0.51, p = .62”
- Consistentt(20) = -1.97reported p = .06 · recomputed p = .063
“t(20) = −1.97, p = .06”
- Consistentt(20) = -1reported p = .33 · recomputed p = .329
“t(20) = −1.00, p = .33”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.47reported p = .64 · recomputed p = .643
“t(20) = −0.47, p = .64”
- Consistentt(20) = 1.75reported p = .1 · recomputed p = .095
“t(20) = 1.75, p = .10”
- Consistentt(20) = 3.86reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 3.86, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.26reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.26, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 1.09reported p = .29 · recomputed p = .289
“t(20) = 1.09, p = .29”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.69reported p = .5 · recomputed p = .498
“t(20) = −0.69, p = .50”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.59reported p = .56 · recomputed p = .562
“t(20) = −0.59, p = .56”
- Consistentt(20) = 0.26reported p = .8 · recomputed p = .798
“t(20) = 0.26, p = .80”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.3reported p = .77 · recomputed p = .767
“t(20) = −0.30, p = .77”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.
Citations
Cites
A default mode of brain function
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.676 · Cited by 12,190 · cited 4×
“…2005), episodic future thinking (Atance and O’Neill, 2001; Addis et al., 2007; Schacter and Addis, 2007; Szpunar et al., 2007), the default mode (Raichle et al., 2001) and daydreaming (Mason et al., 2007), leading to suggestions that it performs a general function (Buckner and Carroll, 2007;…”
BackgroundInfluential(1978) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 8,010
Episodic memory: from mind to brain
Tulving, E. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114 · Cited by 4,950 · cited 11×
“…theory of mind (Kumaran and Maguire, 2005; Amodio and Frith, 2006) and episodic future thinking (Addis et al., 2007) suggesting that the amPFC and PCC might be supporting pro- cesses related to the self (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000) and mental time travel (Wheeler et al., 1997; Tulving, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system
Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.107.2.261 · Cited by 4,089 · cited 7×
“…a purely created imagined experience does not have the same reliance or effect on the imaginer’s self-schema compared with a real episodic memory (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Gallagher, 2000) although both likely involve the adoption of an egocentric viewpoint (Burgess, 2006) on the part…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMeeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition
Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1884 · Cited by 3,782 · cited 2×
“…bears a striking resemblance to networks found to support self-reflection (Johnson et al., 2002), theory of mind (Kumaran and Maguire, 2005; Amodio and Frith, 2006) and episodic future thinking (Addis et al., 2007) suggesting that the amPFC and PCC might be supporting pro- cesses related…”
BackgroundPhilosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science.
Gallagher, S. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01417-5 · Cited by 2,881 · cited 4×
“Moreover, by using rich imaginary memories as a well matched comparison task we were able to isolate processes specific to episodic memory, such as the use of self-schema (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Gallagher, 2000), a sense of familiarity and mental time travel (Tulving, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWandering minds: the default network and stimulus-independent thought
Mason, M. F., Norton, M. I., Van Horn, J. D., Wegner, D. M., Grafton, S. T., & Macrae, C. N. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1131295 · Cited by 2,792 · cited 4×
“, 2001), and perhaps even daydreaming (Mason et al., 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialBuckner, R. L., & Carroll, D. C. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.004 · Cited by 2,691
The human hippocampus and spatial and episodic memory
Burgess, N., Maguire, E. A., & O'Keefe, J. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00830-9 · Cited by 2,401 · cited 3×
“…network (also replicated in this study with the RM RO contrast) has also been activated in a variety of other circumstances including navigation (Burgess et al., 2002; Hartley et al., 2003; Spiers and Maguire, 2006), spatial tasks (Maguire et al., 2003; Kumaran and Maguire, 2005), episodic…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationRemembering the past to imagine the future: the prospective brain
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2213 · Cited by 2,394 · cited 1×
“…a key component of episodic memory recall lends additional support to constructive theories of episodic memory (Bartlett, 1932; Schacter et al., 1998) and the recently proposed constructive episodic simulation function of the episodic memory system (Schacter and Addis, 2007; Schacter et al., 2007).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Bartlett FC (1932) Remembering (Cambridge UP, Cambridge).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 751
Deconstructing Visual Scenes in Cortex: Gradients of Object and Spatial Layout Information
Harel, A., Kravitz, D. J., & Baker, C. I. (2012) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs091 · Cited by 149
Two distinct scene processing networks connecting vision and memory
Baldassano, C., Esteva, A., Fei-Fei, L., & Beck, D. M. (2016) · eneuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0178-16.2016 · Cited by 144
“…visual scene images (Montaldi et al., 2006; Takashima et al., 2006; Elman et al., 2013; van Assche et al., 2016), learning navigational routes (Burgess et al., 2001; Bray et al., 2015), and even imagining past events or future events in familiar places (Hassabis et al., 2007; Szpunar et al., 2009).”
BackgroundHuijbers, W., Pennartz, C. M. A., Cabeza, R. E. L., & Daselaar, S. M. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017463 · Cited by 165
“In line with previous results [30], we found that the DMN regions generally showed more activity during IntEnc than Ext-Enc conditions.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialA role for the hippocampus in encoding simulations of future events
Martin, V. C., Schacter, D. L., Corballis, M. C., & Addis, D. R. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1105816108 · Cited by 144
Differential engagement of brain regions within a ‘core’ network during scene construction
Summerfield, J. J., Hassabis, D., & Maguire, E. A. (2010) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.01.022 · Cited by 154
“…imagining fictitious and future events, and navigating in large-scale space share a set of brain regions in common that has come to be known as a 'core' network (Addis, Wong, & Schacter, 2007; Hassabis, Kumaran, & Maguire, 2007; Spiers & Maguire, 2006; Szpunar, Watson, & McDermott, 2007).”
Self-citationConstructive memory: past and future
Schacter, D. L. (2012) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2012.14.1/dschacter · Cited by 146
Ellamil, M., Fox, K. C. R., Dixon, M. L., Pritchard, S., Todd, R. M., Thompson, E. T., & Kalina Christoff, A. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.034 · Cited by 149
“…Christoff et al., 2004; Stark and Squire, 2001) and has been associated with memory retrieval (Squire et al., 2004), future thinking (Addis et al., 2009), andmental simulation (Hassabis et al., 2007), which form a large portion of spontaneous thought content (Klinger, 2009; Klinger and Cox, 1987).”
Wandering tales: evolutionary origins of mental time travel and language
Corballis, M. C. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00485 · Cited by 141
“Keywords: default mode network, evolution, gesture, hippocampus, language, mental time travel, mind wandering, Pleistocene”
BackgroundThinking about the future versus the past in personal and non-personal contexts
Abraham, A., Schubotz, R. I., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2008) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.084 · Cited by 146
Above and beyond the concrete: The diverse representational substrates of the predictive brain
Gilead, M., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2019) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x19002000 · Cited by 136
Self-projection and the default network in frontotemporal dementia
Irish, M., Piguet, O., & Hodges, J. R. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2012.11 · Cited by 140
Lind, S. E., Williams, D. M., Bowler, D., & Peel, A. (2013) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000005 · Cited by 157
Modality-specific and modality-independent components of the human imagery system
Daselaar, S. M., Porat, Y., Huijbers, W., & Pennartz, C. M. A. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.239 · Cited by 143
“…underlies an internal mode of cognition (Buckner et al., 2008) mediating various internally-oriented processes , including remembering the past (Hassabis et al., 2007a), envisioning the future (Szpunar et al., 2007), and thinking about another person's perspective (Saxe and Kanwisher, 2003).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialMental time travel into the past and the future in healthy aged adults: An fMRI study
Viard, A., Chételat, G., Lebreton, K., Desgranges, B., Landeau, B., de La Sayette, V., Eustache, F., & Piolino, P. (2011) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2010.10.009 · Cited by 133
Replay, the default mode network and the cascaded memory systems model
Kaefer, K., Stella, F., McNaughton, B. L., & Battaglia, F. P. (2022) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-022-00620-6 · Cited by 132
Brown, T. I., Ross, R. S., Keller, J. B., Hasselmo, M. E., & Stern, C. E. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.6021-09.2010 · Cited by 130
“It may be that varying consistent with studies examining visualization, construction, and identification of complex visual scenes and spatial information (Burgess et al., 2001; Addis et al., 2007; Epstein and Higgins, 2007; Hassabis et al., 2007).”
BackgroundResultEpisodic memory versus episodic foresight: Similarities and differences
Suddendorf, T. (2009) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.23 · Cited by 140
Distinct subdivisions of human medial parietal cortex support recollection of people and places
Silson, E. H., Steel, A., Kidder, A., Gilmore, A. W., & Baker, C. I. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.47391 · Cited by 123
Benoit, R. G., Gilbert, S. J., Volle, E., & Burgess, P. W. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.091 · Cited by 136
“For example, Hassabis et al. (2007) contrasted recollection of autobiographical experiences and of previously imagined, fictional experiences.”
BackgroundOutside Looking In: Landmark Generalization in the Human Navigational System
Marchette, S. A., Vass, L. K., Ryan, J., & Epstein, R. A. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2270-15.2015 · Cited by 125
Age-related neural changes in autobiographical remembering and imagining
Addis, D. R., Roberts, R. P., & Schacter, D. L. (2011) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.021 · Cited by 118
Bilateral hippocampal lesion and a selective impairment of the ability for mental time travel
Andelman, F., Hoofien, D., Goldberg, I., Aizenstein, O., & Neufeld, M. Y. (2010) · Neurocase · doi:10.1080/13554791003623318 · Cited by 120
“The hypothesis of a ‘scene’ as the basic cognitive mechanism underlying the human ability to remember the past and to envision the future was supported by their subsequent fMRI study ( Hassabis, Kumaran, & Maguire, 2007b ).”
BackgroundSt‐Laurent, M., Moscovitch, M., Levine, B., & McAndrews, M. P. (2009) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.032 · Cited by 123
Ally, B. A., Simons, J. S., McKeever, J. D., Peers, P. V., & Budson, A. E. (2008) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.026 · Cited by 117
Huijbers, W., Vannini, P., Sperling, R. A., Pennartz, C. M. A., Cabeza, R. E. L., & Daselaar, S. M. (2012) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.08.021 · Cited by 118
The effect of hippocampal damage in children on recalling the past and imagining new experiences
Cooper, J. M., Vargha-Khadem, F., Gadian, D. G., & Maguire, E. A. (2011) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.008 · Cited by 116
Self-citationThe default network and the combination of cognitive processes that mediate self-generated thought
Axelrod, V., Rees, G., & Bar, M. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0244-9 · Cited by 111
Hebscher, M., Levine, B., & Gilboa, A. (2018) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.03.029 · Cited by 112
“A distributed network of regions are also involved in scene construction, including the hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, retrosplenial and posterior parietal cortices, middle temporal cortices, and medial prefrontal cortex (Hassabis et al., 2007).”
BackgroundDifferential neural circuitry and self-interest in realvshypothetical moral decisions
FeldmanHall, O., Dalgleish, T., Thompson, R., Evans, D., Schweizer, S., & Mobbs, D. (2012) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nss069 · Cited by 113
Scenes, Spaces, and Memory Traces
Maguire, E. A., Intraub, H., & Mullally, S. L. (2015) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858415600389 · Cited by 114
Self-citationArchitectures for functional imagination
Marques, H. G., & Holland, O. E. (2008) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2008.06.016 · Cited by 111
The associative structure of memory for multi-element events.
Horner, A. J., & Burgess, N. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0033626 · Cited by 109
Establishing the Boundaries: The Hippocampal Contribution to Imagining Scenes
Bird, C. M., Capponi, C., King, J. A., Doeller, C. F., & Burgess, N. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0723-10.2010 · Cited by 117
“Neuroimaging and neuropsychological research has revealed a core network involved in imagining events, whether past or future, real or fictitious (Okuda et al., 2003; Addis et al., 2007; Hassabis et al., 2007a,b).”
BackgroundResultSheldon, S., & Moscovitch, M. (2011) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.20985 · Cited by 108
“While one could not use strictly autobiographical information to help complete this task, one could do so by constructing imaginary scenes or scenarios, an activity that recent research has shown also depends on the hippocampus and related structures (Hassabis et al., 2007; Schacter et al., 2007).”
BackgroundHuijbers, W., Pennartz, C. M. A., Rubin, D. C., & Daselaar, S. M. (2011) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.051 · Cited by 112
Shifting visual perspective during retrieval shapes autobiographical memories
St. Jacques, P. L., Szpunar, K. K., & Schacter, D. L. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.028 · Cited by 108
“, 2012), and recruitment of this region also contributes to the ability to construct a complex and realistic scene of the personal past (Hassabis et al., 2007; Summerfield et al., 2009).”
Anderson, A. J., Binder, J. R., Fernandino, L., Humphries, C., Conant, L. L., Aguilar, M., Wang, X., Doko, D., & Raizada, R. D. S. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhw240 · Cited by 111
“…in the current article does not account for detailed aspects of experiential simulation (such as mental imagery) that may be invoked in conceptual tasks (e.g. Louwerse and Hutchinson 2012), episodic memory (e.g. Hassabis et al. 2007), inferences and theory-of-mind (Hagoort and Indefrey 2014).”
BackgroundDifferent categories of living and non-living sound-sources activate distinct cortical networks
Engel, L. R., Frum, C., Puce, A., Walker, N. A., & Lewis, J. W. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.041 · Cited by 113
“Posterior cingulate cortices were also preferentially activated by non-living sound-sources, which are regions previously reported to be associated with various aspects of visual imagery, visual spatial context, and memory (Vogt et al., 1992; Hassabis et al., 2007).”
BackgroundMadore, K. P., Szpunar, K. K., Addis, D. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1612278113 · Cited by 104
Human Medial Orbitofrontal Cortex Is Recruited During Experience of Imagined and Real Rewards
Bray, S., Shimojo, S., & O’Doherty, J. P. (2010) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.01030.2009 · Cited by 107
Rosenbaum, R. S., Kim, A. S. N., & Baker, S. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809324-5.21037-7 · Cited by 111
Investigating the functions of subregions within anterior hippocampus
Zeidman, P., Lutti, A., & Maguire, E. A. (2015) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.09.002 · Cited by 99
Self-citationGenerative replay underlies compositional inference in the hippocampal-prefrontal circuit
Schwartenbeck, P., Baram, A. B., Liu, Y., Mark, S., Müller, T., Dolan, R. J., Botvinick, M., Kurth-Nelson, Z. L., & Behrens, T. E. J. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.09.004 · Cited by 129
The Self-Memory System Revisited
Conway, M., Justice, L. V., & D’Argembeau, A. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198784845.003.0003 · Cited by 125
Imagining fictitious and future experiences: Evidence from developmental amnesia
Maguire, E. A., Vargha‐Khadem, F., & Hassabis, D. (2010) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.06.037 · Cited by 102
“…integration of relevant semantic, contextual and sensory components, stored in their modality specific cortical areas (Wheeler, Petersen, & Buckner, 2000), the product of which has a coherent spatial context (Hassabis, Kumaran, Vann, et al., 2007), and can then later be manipulated and visualised.”
Self-citationLanguage Evolution: A Changing Perspective
Corballis, M. C. (2017) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.01.013 · Cited by 104
The Neural Dynamics of Novel Scene Imagery
Barry, D. N., Barnes, G. R., Clark, I. A., & Maguire, E. A. (2019) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2497-18.2019 · Cited by 102
“…retrieve context-relevant information during scene construction tasks (Bertossi et al., 2016a) – which involve cues that are relatively unconstrained (Hassabis et al., 2007a) – while being also unable to suppress context-irrelevant information while confabulating (Turner et al., 2008), suggests…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationNakao, T., Ohira, H., & Northoff, G. (2012) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00031 · Cited by 102
“…including self-reference (Kelley et al., 2002; Northoff et al., 2006), episodic memory retrieval (Buckner et al., 2008b), envisioning the future (Szpunar et al., 2007), mental imaginary (Hassabis et al., 2007; Daselaar et al., 2010), and mentalizing (Gusnard et al., 2001; Amodio and Frith, 2006).”
BackgroundChen, H., Gilmore, A. W., Nelson, S. M., & McDermott, K. B. (2017) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1534-16.2017 · Cited by 109
“…regions within the medial temporal lobe and medial prefrontal cortex exhibit greater activity during autobiographical memory retrieval than during recognition memory (Conway et al., 1999; Nyberg et al., 2002; Cabeza et al., 2004; Hassabis et al., 2007; Summerfield et al., 2009; Elman et al., 2013).”
BackgroundLearning to remember: The early ontogeny of episodic memory
Mullally, S. L., & Maguire, E. A. (2014) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2013.12.006 · Cited by 108
Self-citationA central role for the retrosplenial cortex in de novo environmental learning
Auger, S. D., Zeidman, P., & Maguire, E. A. (2015) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.09031 · Cited by 99
“, 2009) and imagining future and fictitious events (Addis et al., 2007; Hassabis et al., 2007; Szpunar et al., 2007; Botzung et al., 2008; Summerfield et al., 2009).”
BackgroundSelf-citationForming attitudes via neural activity supporting affective episodic simulations
Benoit, R. G., Paulus, P. C., & Schacter, D. L. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09961-w · Cited by 95
Weiler, J. A., Suchan, B., & Daum, I. (2010) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.20695 · Cited by 93
“Hippocampal activation has been linked to the imagination of future, past, and fictitious events (Addis et al., 2007; Hassabis et al., 2007a; Botzung et al., 2008), although it is as yet unclear whether the degree of hippocampal engagement differs between conditions (Addis et al., 2007; Botzung et…”
BackgroundLlewellyn, S. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12003135 · Cited by 95
“In an fMRI study, Hassabis et al. (2007) demonstrated that imagination and episodic memory share some neural substrates .”
BackgroundBrown, T. I., Gagnon, S. A., & Wagner, A. D. (2020) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.03.006 · Cited by 97
What is the relationship between Aphantasia, Synaesthesia and Autism?
Dance, C. J., Jaquiery, M., Eagleman, D. M., Porteous, D., Zeman, A., & Simner, J. (2021) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2021.103087 · Cited by 89
Autobiographical memory in semantic dementia: A longitudinal fMRI study
Maguire, E. A., Kumaran, D., Hassabis, D., & Kopelman, M. D. (2009) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.020 · Cited by 95
Self-citationThe Default Network Distinguishes Construals of Proximal versus Distal Events
Tamir, D., & Mitchell, J. P. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00009 · Cited by 92
“…of autobiographical memory and future/hypothetical thinking, participants have been explicitly prompted by task instructions to reconstruct the sights, sounds, and subjective experiences that accompanied or might accompany an event (Addis et al., 2007; Hassabis et al., 2007; Szpunar et al., 2007).”
BackgroundDisentangling the neural mechanisms involved in Hinduism- and Buddhism-related meditations
Tomasino, B., Chiesa, A., & Fabbro, F. (2014) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2014.03.013 · Cited by 94
Schmidt, B., Duin, A. A., & Redish, A. D. (2019) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00793.2018 · Cited by 92
“Imaging studies in humans have shown that these same neural networks are activated while imagining the future (Addis et al. 2007; Hassabis et al. 2007; Schacter et al. 2007).”
BackgroundFunctional brain networks contributing to the Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory of Intelligence
Vakhtin, A. A., Ryman, S. G., Flores, R. A., & Jung, R. E. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.055 · Cited by 94
“U N C O R R E C with visualization and imagination ability (Hassabis et al., 2007), likely important to visuo-spatial processing demands of the RPM task.”
Assessing the mechanism of response in the retrosplenial cortex of good and poor navigators
Auger, S. D., & Maguire, E. A. (2013) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2013.08.002 · Cited by 98
“This shows that our classification analysis was not biased towards invariably producing above chance accuracies for permanence.”
Self-citationNeurophysiology of Remembering
Buzsáki, G., McKenzie, S., & Davachi, L. (2022) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-021721-110002 · Cited by 84
“Accordingly, it has been shown that neural activation patterns during future planning largely overlap with activation patterns during memory retrieval tasks (Buckner & Carroll 2007, Hassabis et al. 2007, Schacter et al. 2012).”
BackgroundPatient HC with developmental amnesia can construct future scenarios
Hurley, N. C., Maguire, E. A., & Vargha-Khadem, F. (2011) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.015 · Cited by 91
Self-citationCooperative interactions between hippocampal and striatal systems support flexible navigation
Brown, T. I., Ross, R. S., Tobyne, S. M., & Stern, C. E. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.046 · Cited by 90
“Retrosplenial involvement in the current task is consistent with an involvement in visualization, construction, and identification of complex visual scenes and spatial information (Addis et al., 2007; Burgess et al., 2001; Epstein and Higgins, 2007; Hassabis et al., 2007).”
Robin, J., & Moscovitch, M. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0034886 · Cited by 98
Scene Construction in Amnesia: An fMRI Study
Mullally, S. L., Hassabis, D., & Maguire, E. A. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5522-11.2012 · Cited by 89
“*Data from Hassabis et al. (2007b).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationMemory, scene construction, and the human hippocampus
Kim, S., Dede, A. J. O., Hopkins, R. O., & Squire, L. R. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1503863112 · Cited by 97
A neurocognitive model of meditation based on activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis
Sperduti, M., Martinelli, P., & Piolino, P. (2012) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.09.019 · Cited by 87
Losing sight of the future: Impaired semantic prospection following medial temporal lobe lesions
Race, E., Keane, M. M., & Verfaellie, M. H. (2012) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22084 · Cited by 87
“Indeed, deficits in episodic simulation Hippocampus have been observed in amnesia when probed at both the specific (Hassabis et al., 2007b; Race et al., 2011) and the general (Klein et al., 2002; Andelman et al., 2010) levels, and the hippocampus is engaged during episodic prospection both when…”
InfluentialNeural changes associated with the generation of specific past and future events in depression
Hach, S., Tippett, L. J., & Addis, D. R. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.003 · Cited by 90
“, Johnson and Johnson, 2014), imagined scenes (Hassabis et al., 2007) and vivid, contextually detailed, specific AMs (Addis et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialSchmidt, T. T., Ostwald, D., & Blankenburg, F. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.014 · Cited by 94
“It appears that a similar brain network supports episodic memory processing (Hassabis and Maguire, 2009; Hassabis et al., 2007; Summerfield et al., 2009), simulation of future events (Schacter et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialSpatial scaffold effects in event memory and imagination
Robin, J. (2018) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1462 · Cited by 99
Dalton, M. A., McCormick, C., & Maguire, E. A. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.066 · Cited by 94
“…supporting multiple cognitive functions including episodic memory (Scoville and Milner, 1957), the imagination of fictitious and future experiences (Hassabis et al., 2007; Addis et al., 2007), spatial navigation (Chersi and Burgess, 2015; Maguire et al., 2006), visual perception (Lee et al., 2012;…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationThe Primacy of Spatial Context in the Neural Representation of Events
Robin, J., Buchsbaum, B. R., & Moscovitch, M. (2018) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1638-17.2018 · Cited by 94
“Scenes, the canonical type of spatial context, engage brain areas associated with autobiographical memory and imagination (Hassabis et al., 2007; Spreng et al., 2009; Zeidman et al., 2015; Hodgetts et al., 2016).”
BackgroundEpisodic future thinking is impaired in the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia
Irish, M., Hodges, J. R., & Piguet, O. (2013) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2013.03.002 · Cited by 95
“Similarly, these regions have been implicated in the generation and maintenance of complex and spatially coherent fictitious scenes (Hassabis et al., 2007a), a process whichmay be critical for the recollection of past events, and lends itself to the idea that memory is by nature a constructive…”
InfluentialWeiler, J. A., Boris Suchan, A., & Daum, I. (2010) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.04.013 · Cited by 83
Expertise modulates the neural basis of context dependent recognition of objects and their relations
Bilalić, M., Turella, L., Campitelli, G., Erb, M., & Grodd, W. (2011) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21396 · Cited by 89
“The same area, however, is engaged during autobiographic and episodic memory [Hassabis et al., 2007; Svoboda et al., 2006] as well as in supporting associations related to scene context [Bar, 2009].”
BackgroundNitz, D. A. (2008) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2008.08.007 · Cited by 85
Analogues of mental simulation and imagination in deep learning
Hamrick, J. B. (2019) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.12.011 · Cited by 89
“Mental simulation is a cornerstone of human cognition [3] and is involved in physical reasoning [4,5], spatial reasoning [6], motor control [7], memory [8], scene construction [9], language [10], counterfactual reasoning [11,12], and more.”
Dalton, M. A., D’Souza, A., Lv, J., & Calamante, F. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.76143 · Cited by 91
“The hippocampus has more recently been linked with other roles including imagination of fictitious and future experiences (Hassabis et al., 2007; Addis et al., 2007), visuospatial mental imagery (Dalton et al.”
Episodic Future Thinking in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Terrett, G., Rendell, P. G., Raponi-Saunders, S., Henry, J. D., Bailey, P. E., & Altgassen, M. (2013) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-013-1806-y · Cited by 94
Anderson, A. J., Bruni, E., Lopopolo, A., Poesio, M., & Baroni, M. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.093 · Cited by 77
Memory and Imagination: Perspectives on Constructive Episodic Simulation
Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2020) · The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination · doi:10.1017/9781108580298.008 · Cited by 91
Svoboda, E., & Levine, B. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3452-08.2009 · Cited by 88
“The memories used in this study are recent compared with other patient and neuroimaging studies in which the most recent memories may be years old (but see Rekkas and Constable, 2005; Hassabis et al., 2007).”
ResultRepetition-related reductions in neural activity reveal component processes of mental simulation
Szpunar, K. K., St. Jacques, P. L., Robbins, C. A., Wig, G. S., & Schacter, D. L. (2014) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nst035 · Cited by 79
“…regions are sensitive to processing the scenarios or what participants imagined was happening in an event (e.g. medial prefrontal, posterior cingulate, temporal–parietal and middle temporal cortices are sensitive to the scenarios associated with future social events), people…”
King, M. J., MacDougall, A. G., Ferris, S. M., Levine, B., MacQueen, G. M., & McKinnon, M. C. (2010) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13803391003781874 · Cited by 81
Spontaneous thought as an unconstrained memory process
Mildner, J. N., & Tamir, D. I. (2019) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2019.09.001 · Cited by 83
How the Brain’s Navigation System Shapes Our Visual Experience
Nau, M., Julian, J. B., & Doeller, C. F. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.06.008 · Cited by 79
Chang, X., Shen, H., Wang, L., Liu, Z., Wei, X., Hu, D., & Miao, D. (2014) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2014.03.024 · Cited by 84
Older adults have greater difficulty imagining future rather than atemporal experiences.
Rendell, P. G., Bailey, P. E., Henry, J. D., Phillips, L. H., Gaskin, S., & Kliegel, M. (2012) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0029748 · Cited by 80
Unconscious Imagination and the Mental Imagery Debate
Brogaard, B. “., & Gatzia, D. E. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00799 · Cited by 81
Neuroanatomical Variability of Religiosity
Kapogiannis, D., Barbey, A. K., Su, M. W., Krüeger, F., & Grafman, J. H. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007180 · Cited by 79
“We speculate that people with increased R precuneate volume may also place an emphasis on worldly experiences over the inner life of imagination [58], which, in turn, may predispose them to adopt a non-religious life stance.”
BackgroundThe MNESIS model: Memory systems and processes, identity and future thinking
Eustache, F., Viard, A., & Desgranges, B. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.05.006 · Cited by 94
The human posterior parietal cortex: effective connectome, and its relation to function
Rolls, E. T., Deco, G., Huang, C., & Feng, J. (2022) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhac266 · Cited by 85
“2001), and imagining past events or future events in familiar places (Hassabis et al. 2007; Szpunar et al. 2009).”
BackgroundThe pre/parasubiculum: a hippocampal hub for scene-based cognition?
Dalton, M. A., & Maguire, E. A. (2017) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.06.001 · Cited by 81
“Traditionally associated with episodic memory [1], neuroimaging and neuropsychological studies have consistently implicated the human hippocampus in a range of other functions including the imagination of fictive and future experiences [2,3], navigation [4 ,5], complex spatial perception [6–8] and decision-making [9,1…”
Self-citationIndividual differences in verbal creative thinking are reflected in the precuneus
Chen, Q.-L., Xu, T., Yang, W.-J., Li, Y.-D., Sun, J.-Z., Wang, K.-C., Beaty, R. E., Zhang, Q.-L., Zuo, X.-N., & Qiu, J. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.07.001 · Cited by 79
“, 1994), mental imagery (Burgess, 2008; Hassabis et al., 2007), and metaphor comprehension (Mashal et al.”
Brown, T. I., & Stern, C. E. (2013) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bht041 · Cited by 81
Wang, C., Oyserman, D., Liu, Q., Li, H., & Han, S. (2013) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2013.775966 · Cited by 77
Dynamic representations in networked neural systems
Ju, H., & Bassett, D. S. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-0653-3 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Hassabis, D., Kumaran, D., & Maguire, E. A.
- Affiliations
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hassabis, Demis
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2007-12-26
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 52
- Pages
- 14365-14374
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC2571957
- OpenAlex
- W1982298223
- Cited by
- 744
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 55
- FWCI
- 15.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (071173)
- Brain Research Trust
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- episodic memory, imagination, scene construction, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, retrosplenial cortex, anterior medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus, episodic future thinking, default mode network, self-processing
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-25 (prompt extract-v2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review