Cited by 751Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 4 of the 17 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Using Imagination to Understand the Neural Basis of Episodic Memory

Open access
Hassabis, Demis, Kumaran, Dharshan, Maguire, Eleanor A.·2007·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Functional MRI (fMRI) studies investigating the neural basis of episodic memory recall, and the related task of thinking about plausible personal future events, have revealed a consistent network of associated brain regions. Surprisingly little, however, is understood about the contributions individual brain areas make to the overall recollective experience. To examine this, we used a novel fMRI paradigm in which subjects had to imagine fictitious experiences. In contrast to future thinking, this results in experiences that are not explicitly temporal in nature or as reliant on self-processing. By using previously imagined fictitious experiences as a comparison for episodic memories, we identified the neural basis of a key process engaged in common, namely scene construction, involving the generation, maintenance and visualization of complex spatial contexts. This was associated with activations in a distributed network, including hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and retrosplenial cortex. Importantly, we disambiguated these common effects from episodic memory-specific responses in anterior medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex and precuneus. These latter regions may support self-schema and familiarity processes, and contribute to the brain's ability to distinguish real from imaginary memories. We conclude that scene construction constitutes a common process underlying episodic memory and imagination of fictitious experiences, and suggest it may partially account for the similar brain networks implicated in navigation, episodic future thinking, and the default mode. We suggest that additional brain regions are co-opted into this core network in a task-specific manner to support functions such as episodic memory that may have additional requirements.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4549-07.2007

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

13 Own result · 4 Own method · 3 Not checked yet · 2 Partly supported · 1 Supported so far · 1 No full text of the sources · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 24 claims

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Consistentt(20) = 13.52reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(20) = 13.52, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(20) = 13.6reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(20) = 13.60, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(20) = 11.03reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(20) = 11.03, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(20) = -4.89reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(20) = −4.89, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(20) = 4.36reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(20) = 4.36, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(20) = 4.41reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(20) = 4.41, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(20) = 2.88reported p < .01 · recomputed p = .009

    “t(20) = 2.88, p < .01”

  • Consistentt(20) = -4.77reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(20) = −4.77, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(20) = -6.67reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(20) = −6.67, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(20) = 5.51reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(20) = 5.51, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(20) = 4.96reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(20) = 4.96, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(20) = 6.17reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(20) = 6.17, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(20) = 17.85reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(20) = 17.85, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(20) = 11.18reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(20) = 11.18, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(20) = 2.42reported p < .03 · recomputed p = .025

    “t(20) = 2.42, p < .03”

  • Consistentt(20) = 12.99reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(20) = 12.99, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(20) = 8.67reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(20) = 8.67, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(20) = -0.89reported p = .39 · recomputed p = .384

    “t(20) = −0.89, p = .39”

  • Consistentt(20) = 0.51reported p = .62 · recomputed p = .616

    “t(20) = 0.51, p = .62”

  • Consistentt(20) = -1.97reported p = .06 · recomputed p = .063

    “t(20) = −1.97, p = .06”

  • Consistentt(20) = -1reported p = .33 · recomputed p = .329

    “t(20) = −1.00, p = .33”

  • Consistentt(20) = -0.47reported p = .64 · recomputed p = .643

    “t(20) = −0.47, p = .64”

  • Consistentt(20) = 1.75reported p = .1 · recomputed p = .095

    “t(20) = 1.75, p = .10”

  • Consistentt(20) = 3.86reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(20) = 3.86, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(20) = 4.26reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(20) = 4.26, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(20) = 1.09reported p = .29 · recomputed p = .289

    “t(20) = 1.09, p = .29”

  • Consistentt(20) = -0.69reported p = .5 · recomputed p = .498

    “t(20) = −0.69, p = .50”

  • Consistentt(20) = -0.59reported p = .56 · recomputed p = .562

    “t(20) = −0.59, p = .56”

  • Consistentt(20) = 0.26reported p = .8 · recomputed p = .798

    “t(20) = 0.26, p = .80”

  • Consistentt(20) = -0.3reported p = .77 · recomputed p = .767

    “t(20) = −0.30, p = .77”

30 of 30

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.

Citations

Cites

  • A default mode of brain function

    Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.676 · Cited by 12,190 · cited 4×

    “…2005), episodic future thinking (Atance and O’Neill, 2001; Addis et al., 2007; Schacter and Addis, 2007; Szpunar et al., 2007), the default mode (Raichle et al., 2001) and daydreaming (Mason et al., 2007), leading to suggestions that it performs a general function (Buckner and Carroll, 2007;…”
    BackgroundInfluential
  • Untitled work

    (1978) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 8,010

  • Episodic memory: from mind to brain

    Tulving, E. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114 · Cited by 4,950 · cited 11×

    “…theory of mind (Kumaran and Maguire, 2005; Amodio and Frith, 2006) and episodic future thinking (Addis et al., 2007) suggesting that the amPFC and PCC might be supporting pro- cesses related to the self (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000) and mental time travel (Wheeler et al., 1997; Tulving, 2002).”
    BackgroundMethodInfluential
  • The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system

    Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.107.2.261 · Cited by 4,089 · cited 7×

    “…a purely created imagined experience does not have the same reliance or effect on the imaginer’s self-schema compared with a real episodic memory (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Gallagher, 2000) although both likely involve the adoption of an egocentric viewpoint (Burgess, 2006) on the part…”
    BackgroundMethodInfluential
  • Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition

    Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1884 · Cited by 3,782 · cited 2×

    “…bears a striking resemblance to networks found to support self-reflection (Johnson et al., 2002), theory of mind (Kumaran and Maguire, 2005; Amodio and Frith, 2006) and episodic future thinking (Addis et al., 2007) suggesting that the amPFC and PCC might be supporting pro- cesses related…”
    Background
  • Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science.

    Gallagher, S. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01417-5 · Cited by 2,881 · cited 4×

    “Moreover, by using rich imaginary memories as a well matched comparison task we were able to isolate processes specific to episodic memory, such as the use of self-schema (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Gallagher, 2000), a sense of familiarity and mental time travel (Tulving, 2002).”
    BackgroundMethodInfluential
  • Wandering minds: the default network and stimulus-independent thought

    Mason, M. F., Norton, M. I., Van Horn, J. D., Wegner, D. M., Grafton, S. T., & Macrae, C. N. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1131295 · Cited by 2,792 · cited 4×

    “, 2001), and perhaps even daydreaming (Mason et al., 2007).”
    BackgroundInfluential
  • Self-projection and the brain

    Buckner, R. L., & Carroll, D. C. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.004 · Cited by 2,691

  • The human hippocampus and spatial and episodic memory

    Burgess, N., Maguire, E. A., & O'Keefe, J. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00830-9 · Cited by 2,401 · cited 3×

    “…network (also replicated in this study with the RM RO contrast) has also been activated in a variety of other circumstances including navigation (Burgess et al., 2002; Hartley et al., 2003; Spiers and Maguire, 2006), spatial tasks (Maguire et al., 2003; Kumaran and Maguire, 2005), episodic…”
    BackgroundMethodSelf-citation
  • Remembering the past to imagine the future: the prospective brain

    Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2213 · Cited by 2,394 · cited 1×

    “…a key component of episodic memory recall lends additional support to constructive theories of episodic memory (Bartlett, 1932; Schacter et al., 1998) and the recently proposed constructive episodic simulation function of the episodic memory system (Schacter and Addis, 2007; Schacter et al., 2007).”
    Background
  • Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing

    Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2003) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1218 · Cited by 2,306 · cited 1×

    “…cognitive functions including future thinking (Addis et al., 2007; Szpunar et al., 2007), spatial navigation (Burgess et al., 2002; Hartley et al., 2003), theory of mind (Frith and Frith, 2003), the default network (Raichle et al., 2001), and perhaps even daydreaming (Mason et al., 2007).”
    Background
  • “By using imagining fictitious experiences as a comparison task for episodic memory, it is possible to address some key questions not amenable to previous studies (Addis et al., 2007; Szpunar et al., 2007).”
    BackgroundResultInfluential
  • Neural foundations of imagery

    Kosslyn, S. M., Ganis, G., & Thompson, W. L. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35090055 · Cited by 1,894 · cited 2×

    “…control conditions involving the vivid visualization of acontextual objects which allowed us to distinguish between the processes of “simple” imagery (Kosslyn et al., 2001) (e.g., of objects), and that of complex scene construction and visualization, and attribute the latter to a distributed…”
    Background
  • The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: remembering the past and imagining the future

    Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2007) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2087 · Cited by 1,836 · cited 8×

    “Recollection of this type of memory is widely accepted to be a reconstructive process (Bartlett, 1932; Schacter et al., 1998; Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Rubin et al., 2003; Hassabis and Maguire, 2007; Schacter and Addis, 2007) as opposed to the simple retrieval of a perfect holistic record.”
    BackgroundInfluential
  • Toward a theory of episodic memory: The frontal lobes and autonoetic consciousness.

    Wheeler, M. A., Stuss, D. T., & Tulving, E. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.331 · Cited by 1,751 · cited 5×

    “…theory of mind (Kumaran and Maguire, 2005; Amodio and Frith, 2006) and episodic future thinking (Addis et al., 2007) suggesting that the amPFC and PCC might be supporting pro- cesses related to the self (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000) and mental time travel (Wheeler et al., 1997; Tulving, 2002).”
    BackgroundInfluential
  • Human Brain Function

    Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1997) · Cited by 1,713

  • Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval

    Wagner, A. D., Shannon, B. J., Kahn, I., & Buckner, R. L. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.001 · Cited by 1,571 · cited 4×

    “…not surprisingly given their often highly familiar content, more familiar than imaginary memories, in line with proposals concerning the function of this region derived from studies of recognition memory (Rugg et al., 2002; Wagner et al., 2005; Hornberger et al., 2006; Vincent et al., 2006).”
    BackgroundInfluential
  • Untitled work

    Eichenbaum (2004) · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.028 · Cited by 1,464

  • Patients with hippocampal amnesia cannot imagine new experiences

    Hassabis, D., Kumaran, D., Vann, S. D., & Maguire, E. A. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0610561104 · Cited by 1,414 · cited 15×

    “as the hippocampus (Hassabis et al., 2007) not thought to be”
    BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citation
  • Episodic future thinking

    Atance, C. M., & O'Neill, D. K. (2001) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01804-0 · Cited by 1,300 · cited 5×

    “…2002; Hartley et al., 2003; Spiers and Maguire, 2006), spatial tasks (Maguire et al., 2003; Kumaran and Maguire, 2005), episodic future thinking (Atance and O’Neill, 2001; Addis et al., 2007; Schacter and Addis, 2007; Szpunar et al., 2007), the default mode (Raichle et al., 2001) and…”
    BackgroundResultInfluential
  • The functional neuroanatomy of autobiographical memory: a meta-analysis

    Svoboda, E., McKinnon, M. C., & Levine, B. (2006) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.023 · Cited by 1,274 · cited 8×

    “By contrasting the recall of recent episodic memories to the recall of acontextual objects previously seen in the interview session (RM RO) we replicated the well established episodic memory retrieval network consistently activated in studies of autobiographical memory (Maguire, 2001; Rugg et al., 2002; Svoboda et al.…”
    BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
  • Deconstructing episodic memory with construction

    Hassabis, D., & Maguire, E. A. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.001 · Cited by 1,229 · cited 15×

    “Recollection of this type of memory is widely accepted to be a reconstructive process (Bartlett, 1932; Schacter et al., 1998; Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Rubin et al., 2003; Hassabis and Maguire, 2007; Schacter and Addis, 2007) as opposed to the simple retrieval of a perfect holistic record.”
    BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citation
  • Coherent spontaneous activity identifies a hippocampal-parietal memory network

    Vincent, J. L., Snyder, A. Z., Fox, M. D., Shannon, B. J., Andrews, J. R., Raichle, M. E., & Buckner, R. L. (2006) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00048.2006 · Cited by 959 · cited 2×

    “…not surprisingly given their often highly familiar content, more familiar than imaginary memories, in line with proposals concerning the function of this region derived from studies of recognition memory (Rugg et al., 2002; Wagner et al., 2005; Hornberger et al., 2006; Vincent et al., 2006).”
    Background
  • Neural correlates of self-reflection

    Johnson, S. C. (2002) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awf181 · Cited by 930 · cited 1×

    “In fact the pattern of activation revealed by this contrast bears a striking resemblance to networks found to support self-reflection (Johnson et al., 2002), theory of mind (Kumaran and Maguire, 2005; Amodio and Frith, 2006) and episodic future thinking (Addis et al., 2007) suggesting that the…”
    Result
  • Functional neuroanatomy of remote episodic, semantic and spatial memory: a unified account based on multiple trace theory: A unified account based on multiple trace theory, M. Moscovitch et al.

    Moscovitch, M., Rosenbaum, R. S., Gilboa, A., Addis, D. R., Westmacott, R., Grady, C., McAndrews, M. P., Levine, B., Black, S., Winocur, G., et al. (2005) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00421.x · Cited by 893 · cited 2×

    “Their descriptions were fragmented, lacked a coherent spatial context, and were significantly less rich suggesting that the hippocampus plays a critical role in integrating the disparate elements of a scene into a coherent whole (O’Keefe and Nadel, 1978; Burgess et al., 2001; Eichenbaum, 2004; Moscovitch et al., 2005;…”
    Background
  • Memory's echo: vivid remembering reactivates sensory-specific cortex

    Wheeler, M. E., Petersen, S. E., & Buckner, R. L. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.20.11125 · Cited by 865 · cited 2×

    “…(Conway and PleydellPearce, 2000), visual imagery (Rubin et al., 2003), narrative structure (Rubin et al., 2003), retrieval of semantic information (Wheeler et al., 1997) and multimodal details (Wheeler et al., 2000; Gottfried et al., 2004), and feelings of familiarity (Wagner et al., 2005).”
    Background
  • Spatial memory: how egocentric and allocentric combine

    Burgess, N. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.005 · Cited by 827 · cited 1×

    “…imagined experience does not have the same reliance or effect on the imaginer’s self-schema compared with a real episodic memory (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Gallagher, 2000) although both likely involve the adoption of an egocentric viewpoint (Burgess, 2006) on the part of the imaginer.”
    Background
  • THE COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE OF CONSTRUCTIVE MEMORY

    Schacter, D. L., Norman, K. A., & Koutstaal, W. (1998) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.289 · Cited by 827 · cited 4×

    “…reconstructed along very similar lines to the way imagined events are constructed, dovetailing with the idea that memory is (re)constructive in nature (Bartlett, 1932; Schacter et al., 1998; Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Rubin et al., 2003; Hassabis and Maguire, 2007; Schacter and Addis, 2007).”
    BackgroundInfluential
  • The Well-Worn Route and the Path Less Traveled

    Hartley, T., Maguire, E. A., Spiers, H. J., & Burgess, N. (2003) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00095-3 · Cited by 817 · cited 2×

    “…other high-level cognitive functions including future thinking (Addis et al., 2007; Szpunar et al., 2007), spatial navigation (Burgess et al., 2002; Hartley et al., 2003), theory of mind (Frith and Frith, 2003), the default network (Raichle et al., 2001), and perhaps even daydreaming (Mason et…”
    BackgroundSelf-citation
  • Neural substrates of envisioning the future

    Szpunar, K. K., Watson, J. M., & McDermott, K. B. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0610082104 · Cited by 784 · cited 14×

    “By using imagining fictitious experiences as a comparison task for episodic memory, it is possible to address some key questions not amenable to previous studies (Addis et al., 2007; Szpunar et al., 2007).”
    BackgroundResultInfluential
  • Functional neuroimaging of autobiographical memory

    Cabeza, R., & St Jacques, P. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.02.005 · Cited by 736 · cited 1×

    “Using Imagination to Understand the Neural Basis of”
    Method
  • Belief and recollection of autobiographical memories

    Rubin, D. C., Schrauf, R. W., & Greenberg, D. L. (2003) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03196443 · Cited by 612 · cited 9×

    “Recollection of this type of memory is widely accepted to be a reconstructive process (Bartlett, 1932; Schacter et al., 1998; Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Rubin et al., 2003; Hassabis and Maguire, 2007; Schacter and Addis, 2007) as opposed to the simple retrieval of a perfect holistic record.”
    BackgroundInfluential
  • Conjunction revisited

    Friston, K. J., Penny, W. D., & Glaser, D. E. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.013 · Cited by 578 · cited 2×

    “A standard conjunction analysis (Friston et al., 2005), as implemented in SPM5 and reported at p 0.001, was performed to reveal the regions activated in common between the main scene conditions compared with their respective individual baseline object conditions.”
    BackgroundMethodInfluential
  • Neuroimaging studies of autobiographical event memory

    Maguire, E. A. (2001) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.0944 · Cited by 513 · cited 5×

    “…present study advances efforts to dissociate the functions of the many brain regions consistently activated in studies of episodic memory recall (Maguire, 2001; Svoboda et al., 2006; Cabeza and St Jacques, 2007) and episodic future thinking (Atance and O’Neill, 2001; Addis et al., 2007; Szpunar…”
    BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
  • Memory for events and their spatial context: models and experiments

    Burgess, N., Becker, S., King, J. A., & O'Keefe, J. (2001) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.0948 · Cited by 377 · cited 3×

    “Their descriptions were fragmented, lacked a coherent spatial context, and were significantly less rich suggesting that the hippocampus plays a critical role in integrating the disparate elements of a scene into a coherent whole (O’Keefe and Nadel, 1978; Burgess et al., 2001; Eichenbaum, 2004; Moscovitch et al., 2005;…”
    Background
  • Thoughts, behaviour, and brain dynamics during navigation in the real world

    Spiers, H. J., & Maguire, E. A. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.037 · Cited by 371 · cited 2×

    “…the RM RO contrast) has also been activated in a variety of other circumstances including navigation (Burgess et al., 2002; Hartley et al., 2003; Spiers and Maguire, 2006), spatial tasks (Maguire et al., 2003; Kumaran and Maguire, 2005), episodic future thinking (Atance and O’Neill, 2001; Addis…”
    BackgroundSelf-citation
  • The neural basis of episodic memory: evidence from functional neuroimaging

    Rugg, M. D., Otten, L. J., & Henson, R. N. A. (2002) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1102 · Cited by 326 · cited 5×

    “…not surprisingly given their often highly familiar content, more familiar than imaginary memories, in line with proposals concerning the function of this region derived from studies of recognition memory (Rugg et al., 2002; Wagner et al., 2005; Hornberger et al., 2006; Vincent et al., 2006).”
    BackgroundMethodInfluential
  • The Neuropsychology of autobiographical memory

    GREENBERG, D., & RUBIN, D. (2003) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70860-8 · Cited by 318 · cited 1×

    “…and imagining fictitious experiences share striking similarities in terms of the psychological processes engaged (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Greenberg and Rubin, 2003; Schacter and Addis, 2007) including imagery (Rubin et al., 2003) and the retrieval of relevant semantic information…”
    Background
  • Remembrance of Odors Past

    Gottfried, J. A., Smith, A. P. R., Rugg, M. D., & Dolan, R. J. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(04)00270-3 · Cited by 279 · cited 1×

    “…(Conway and PleydellPearce, 2000), visual imagery (Rubin et al., 2003), narrative structure (Rubin et al., 2003), retrieval of semantic information (Wheeler et al., 1997) and multimodal details (Wheeler et al., 2000; Gottfried et al., 2004), and feelings of familiarity (Wagner et al., 2005).”
    Background
  • Routes to remembering: the brains behind superior memory

    Maguire, E. A., Valentine, E. R., Wilding, J. M., & Kapur, N. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn988 · Cited by 253 · cited 2×

    “…in a variety of other circumstances including navigation (Burgess et al., 2002; Hartley et al., 2003; Spiers and Maguire, 2006), spatial tasks (Maguire et al., 2003; Kumaran and Maguire, 2005), episodic future thinking (Atance and O’Neill, 2001; Addis et al., 2007; Schacter and Addis, 2007;…”
    BackgroundSelf-citation
  • The Human Hippocampus: Cognitive Maps or Relational Memory?

    Kumaran, D., & Maguire, E. A. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1103-05.2005 · Cited by 218

    Self-citation
  • Cortical Representations of Personally Familiar Objects and Places: Functional Organization of the Human Posterior Cingulate Cortex

    Sugiura, M., Shah, N. J., Zilles, K., & Fink, G. R. (2005) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/0898929053124956 · Cited by 167 · cited 5×

    “This is strikingly consistent with other studies that have investigated objects compared with places (Sugiura et al., 2005), and has been attributed to greater attention and focus being directed toward the object when present in isolation (Sugiura et al.”
    BackgroundResultInfluential
  • Neurophysiological correlates of memory for experienced and imagined events

    Conway, M. A., Pleydell-Pearce, C. W., Whitecross, S. E., & Sharpe, H. (2003) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00165-3 · Cited by 156 · cited 1×

    “Moreover, evidence from a previous EEG study (Conway et al., 2003) also suggests that common processes underlie the recall of both real and imaginary events.”
    Background
  • “As such, scene construction likely recruits a set of additional processes underpinned by regions such as the hippocampus (Hassabis et al., 2007) not thought to be involved in simple imagery (Rosenbaum et al., 2004).”
    BackgroundMethod
  • fMRI correlates of retrieval orientation

    HORNBERGER, M., RUGG, M., & HENSON, R. (2006) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.12.009 · Cited by 54 · cited 2×

    “…not surprisingly given their often highly familiar content, more familiar than imaginary memories, in line with proposals concerning the function of this region derived from studies of recognition memory (Rugg et al., 2002; Wagner et al., 2005; Hornberger et al., 2006; Vincent et al., 2006).”
    Background

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bartlett FC (1932) Remembering (Cambridge UP, Cambridge).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 751

Metadata

Authors
Hassabis, D., Kumaran, D., & Maguire, E. A.
Affiliations
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Corresponding author
Hassabis, Demis
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2007-12-26
Volume
27
Issue
52
Pages
14365-14374
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1982298223
Cited by
744
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 55
FWCI
15.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (071173)
  • Brain Research Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
episodic memory, imagination, scene construction, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, retrosplenial cortex, anterior medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus, episodic future thinking, default mode network, self-processing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-25 (prompt extract-v2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review