The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 4 of the 17 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Using Imagination to Understand the Neural Basis of Episodic Memory
Open accessAbstract
Functional MRI (fMRI) studies investigating the neural basis of episodic memory recall, and the related task of thinking about plausible personal future events, have revealed a consistent network of associated brain regions. Surprisingly little, however, is understood about the contributions individual brain areas make to the overall recollective experience. To examine this, we used a novel fMRI paradigm in which subjects had to imagine fictitious experiences. In contrast to future thinking, this results in experiences that are not explicitly temporal in nature or as reliant on self-processing. By using previously imagined fictitious experiences as a comparison for episodic memories, we identified the neural basis of a key process engaged in common, namely scene construction, involving the generation, maintenance and visualization of complex spatial contexts. This was associated with activations in a distributed network, including hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and retrosplenial cortex. Importantly, we disambiguated these common effects from episodic memory-specific responses in anterior medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex and precuneus. These latter regions may support self-schema and familiarity processes, and contribute to the brain's ability to distinguish real from imaginary memories. We conclude that scene construction constitutes a common process underlying episodic memory and imagination of fictitious experiences, and suggest it may partially account for the similar brain networks implicated in navigation, episodic future thinking, and the default mode. We suggest that additional brain regions are co-opted into this core network in a task-specific manner to support functions such as episodic memory that may have additional requirements.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
13 Own result · 4 Own method · 3 Not checked yet · 2 Partly supported · 1 Supported so far · 1 No full text of the sources · accuracy not yet measured
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Thus episodic memory recall can be conceptually divided into a number of component processes including a sense of subjective time (Tulving, 2002), self-processing (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000), visual imagery (Rubin et al., 2003), narrative structure (Rubin et al., 2003), retrieval of semantic information (Wheeler et al., 1997) and multi-modal details (Wheeler et al., 2000; Gottfried et al., 2004), and feelings of familiarity (Wagner et al., 2005).”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Tulving, 2002 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000 source
- Supportedcites Rubin et al., 2003 source
The citation to Rubin et al. is attached to visual imagery and narrative structure, not the other processes in the citing sentence. The paper’s “Component processes” section identifies visual imagery as a component of autobiographical memory and treats narrative coherence as a distinct feature, measured by whether a memory comes as a coherent story. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.93)
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“have revealed a consistent and distributed network of associated brain regions,”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Maguire, 2001 source
- Partly supportedcites Svoboda et al., 2006 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 3.1 identifies a consistent, distributed network across autobiographical-memory imaging studies. Section 3.4 reports overlap in two regions for past and future thought, but cites only one imaging study directly comparing them; it does not establish a consistent distributed network across studies of both episodic recall and future thinking. The indexed copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cabeza and St Jacques, 2007 source
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“we replicated the well-established episodic memory retrieval network consistently activated in studies of autobiographical memory”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Results > Neuroimaging Data
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Maguire, 2001 source
- Partly supportedcites Rugg et al., 2002 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract (page unavailable) reports that successful episodic recollection is associated with lateral parietal activation and more variable prefrontal activation. It does not establish a consistently activated network in autobiographical-memory studies or compare recall of real memories with recall of objects; the available text points to a PDF for the full article. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Partly supportedcites Svoboda et al., 2006 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction says the meta-analysis identifies shared patterns of brain activation during autobiographical remembering, supporting the citing sentence’s reference to an established retrieval network. The Results and discussion (section 3.1) also describes an autobiographical-memory network. Our copy does not establish the claim’s more specific comparison of real-memory recall with recalled objects. (LLM, conf=0.84)
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Importantly, we disambiguated these common effects from episodic memory-specific responses in anterior medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex and precuneus.”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These latter regions may support self-schema and familiarity processes,”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We conclude that scene construction constitutes a common process underlying episodic memory and imagination of fictitious experiences,”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we identified the neural basis of a key process engaged in common, namely scene construction”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This was associated with activations in a distributed network, including hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and retrosplenial cortex.”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“involving the generation, maintenance and visualisation of complex spatial contexts.”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Abstract
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This study demonstrates that imagining new experiences is a manipulable and useful experimental tool which may prove fruitful in further advancing our understanding of episodic memory and the processes underpinning it, as well as other related cognitive functions”
§ Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Buckner and Carroll, 2007 source
- Not matchedcites Hassabis and Maguire, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Much recent interest has focused on the striking overlap among brain regions involved in the retrieval of autobiographical memories, the imagination of novel events, and navigation14, 47, 48.”
From Anchoring the neural compass: coding of local spatial reference frames in human medial parietal lobe (2014) · cites this paper as [48]
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Consistentt(20) = 13.52reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 13.52, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 13.6reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 13.60, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 11.03reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 11.03, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = -4.89reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = −4.89, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.36reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.36, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.41reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.41, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 2.88reported p < .01 · recomputed p = .009
“t(20) = 2.88, p < .01”
- Consistentt(20) = -4.77reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = −4.77, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = -6.67reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = −6.67, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 5.51reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 5.51, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.96reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.96, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 6.17reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 6.17, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 17.85reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 17.85, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 11.18reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 11.18, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 2.42reported p < .03 · recomputed p = .025
“t(20) = 2.42, p < .03”
- Consistentt(20) = 12.99reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 12.99, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 8.67reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 8.67, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.89reported p = .39 · recomputed p = .384
“t(20) = −0.89, p = .39”
- Consistentt(20) = 0.51reported p = .62 · recomputed p = .616
“t(20) = 0.51, p = .62”
- Consistentt(20) = -1.97reported p = .06 · recomputed p = .063
“t(20) = −1.97, p = .06”
- Consistentt(20) = -1reported p = .33 · recomputed p = .329
“t(20) = −1.00, p = .33”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.47reported p = .64 · recomputed p = .643
“t(20) = −0.47, p = .64”
- Consistentt(20) = 1.75reported p = .1 · recomputed p = .095
“t(20) = 1.75, p = .10”
- Consistentt(20) = 3.86reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 3.86, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.26reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.26, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 1.09reported p = .29 · recomputed p = .289
“t(20) = 1.09, p = .29”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.69reported p = .5 · recomputed p = .498
“t(20) = −0.69, p = .50”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.59reported p = .56 · recomputed p = .562
“t(20) = −0.59, p = .56”
- Consistentt(20) = 0.26reported p = .8 · recomputed p = .798
“t(20) = 0.26, p = .80”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.3reported p = .77 · recomputed p = .767
“t(20) = −0.30, p = .77”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.
Citations
Cites
A default mode of brain function
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.676 · Cited by 12,190 · cited 4×
“…2005), episodic future thinking (Atance and O’Neill, 2001; Addis et al., 2007; Schacter and Addis, 2007; Szpunar et al., 2007), the default mode (Raichle et al., 2001) and daydreaming (Mason et al., 2007), leading to suggestions that it performs a general function (Buckner and Carroll, 2007;…”
BackgroundInfluential(1978) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 8,010
Episodic memory: from mind to brain
Tulving, E. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114 · Cited by 4,950 · cited 11×
“…theory of mind (Kumaran and Maguire, 2005; Amodio and Frith, 2006) and episodic future thinking (Addis et al., 2007) suggesting that the amPFC and PCC might be supporting pro- cesses related to the self (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000) and mental time travel (Wheeler et al., 1997; Tulving, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system
Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.107.2.261 · Cited by 4,089 · cited 7×
“…a purely created imagined experience does not have the same reliance or effect on the imaginer’s self-schema compared with a real episodic memory (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Gallagher, 2000) although both likely involve the adoption of an egocentric viewpoint (Burgess, 2006) on the part…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMeeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition
Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1884 · Cited by 3,782 · cited 2×
“…bears a striking resemblance to networks found to support self-reflection (Johnson et al., 2002), theory of mind (Kumaran and Maguire, 2005; Amodio and Frith, 2006) and episodic future thinking (Addis et al., 2007) suggesting that the amPFC and PCC might be supporting pro- cesses related…”
BackgroundPhilosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science.
Gallagher, S. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01417-5 · Cited by 2,881 · cited 4×
“Moreover, by using rich imaginary memories as a well matched comparison task we were able to isolate processes specific to episodic memory, such as the use of self-schema (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Gallagher, 2000), a sense of familiarity and mental time travel (Tulving, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWandering minds: the default network and stimulus-independent thought
Mason, M. F., Norton, M. I., Van Horn, J. D., Wegner, D. M., Grafton, S. T., & Macrae, C. N. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1131295 · Cited by 2,792 · cited 4×
“, 2001), and perhaps even daydreaming (Mason et al., 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialBuckner, R. L., & Carroll, D. C. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.004 · Cited by 2,691
The human hippocampus and spatial and episodic memory
Burgess, N., Maguire, E. A., & O'Keefe, J. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00830-9 · Cited by 2,401 · cited 3×
“…network (also replicated in this study with the RM RO contrast) has also been activated in a variety of other circumstances including navigation (Burgess et al., 2002; Hartley et al., 2003; Spiers and Maguire, 2006), spatial tasks (Maguire et al., 2003; Kumaran and Maguire, 2005), episodic…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationRemembering the past to imagine the future: the prospective brain
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2213 · Cited by 2,394 · cited 1×
“…a key component of episodic memory recall lends additional support to constructive theories of episodic memory (Bartlett, 1932; Schacter et al., 1998) and the recently proposed constructive episodic simulation function of the episodic memory system (Schacter and Addis, 2007; Schacter et al., 2007).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Bartlett FC (1932) Remembering (Cambridge UP, Cambridge).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 751
Egidi, G., & Caramazza, A. (2016) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00982 · Cited by 8
Facilitating Episodic Simulation in Anxiety: Role of Sensory Scaffolding and Scenario Modality
Ji, J., Meyer, M., & Teachman, B. (2020) · International Journal of Cognitive Therapy · doi:10.1007/s41811-020-00070-x · Cited by 7
“To successfully engage with such interventions, participants must comprehend the verbal sentences while engaging in simultaneous scene construction, maintenance, updating, and visualization (Hassabis et al. 2007).”
BackgroundHow to distinguish memory representations? A historical and critical journey
Trakas, M. (2019) · Voluntas Revista Internacional de Filosofia · doi:10.5902/2179378639849 · Cited by 9
Ants Can Anticipate the Following Quantity in an Arithmetic Sequence
Cammaerts, M., & Cammaerts, R. (2021) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs11020018 · Cited by 7
“Functional magnetic resonance imaging brain studies showed increased activity in a brain network, including the hippocampus, when people recalled episodic memory and imagined future episodes [8].”
BackgroundPretend play: More imitative than imaginative
Adair, H. V., & Carruthers, P. (2022) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.12417 · Cited by 12
Mizrahi, T., & Axelrod, V. (2022) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-022-02569-9 · Cited by 7
“Note that the type of design we employed has been widely and successfully used in research of selfgeneration cognition and autobiographical memory (Gilboa et al. 2004; Addis et al. 2007, 2009; Hassabis et al. 2007; Spreng and Grady 2009; Weiler et al. 2010; Gerlach et al. 2011; Palombo et al. 2018).”
MethodCasadio, C., Patané, I., Candini, M., Lui, F., Frassinetti, F., & Benuzzi, F. (2024) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-024-06806-x · Cited by 7
Corballis, M. C. (2019) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2019.00046 · Cited by 7
“, 2011), and also when they simply construct imaginary scenes (Hassabis et al., 2007).”
BackgroundAdornetti, I., Chiera, A., Altavilla, D., Deriu, V., Marini, A., Valeri, G., Magni, R., & Ferretti, F. (2021) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-021-01013-w · Cited by 7
Lovat, T., & Fleming, D. J. M. (2015) · Creative Education · doi:10.4236/ce.2015.611108 · Cited by 7
“Hassabis et al. (2007), for instance, used advanced brain scanning technology to trace similarities and differences in pre-frontal cortical activity between imagined fictitious experiences and episodic memory.”
BackgroundRetrospective Inference as a Form of Bounded Rationality, and Its Beneficial Influence on Learning
FitzGerald, T. H. B., Penny, W. D., Bonnici, H. M., & Adams, R. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2020.00002 · Cited by 8
“Here, in addition to playing a role in constructing imagined future scenarios [43], the explicit representation of events or episodes in the past may be essential for updating beliefs about current and future states or learning time-invariant properties of an agent’s environment [17].”
BackgroundSimulator Training of Novice Drivers: A Longitudinal Study
Allen, R. W., Park, G. D., Cook, M. L., & Fiorentino, D. D. (2012) · Advances in transportation studies · Cited by 7
Déjà vu and prescience in a case of severe episodic amnesia following bilateral hippocampal lesions
Curot, J., Pariente, J., Hupé, J., Lotterie, J.-A., Mirabel, H., & Barbeau, E. J. (2019) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2019.1673426 · Cited by 8
“Hassabis, Kumaran, and Maguire (2007), in a functional MRI study, demonstrated that the construction of new scenes involves a network comprising the hippocampus, the parahippocampal gyrus, the retrosplenial cortex and the posterior parietal cortex.”
BackgroundHe, R., Yuan, X., & Hinzen, W. (2023) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2023_ajslp-23-00066 · Cited by 6
Durkin, C., Apicella, M., Baldassano, C. A., Kandel, E. R., & Daphna Shohamy, A. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2413871122 · Cited by 6
“One strong candidate for a network of structures is the DMN, which is implicated in tasks that require drawing on internally - constructed information such as autobiographical memory (23), abstract thought (24, 25), and narrative interpretation (17, 20).”
Rolls, E. T. (2025) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106492 · Cited by 8
Imagery in the entropic associative memory
Pineda, L. A., & Morales, R. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-36761-6 · Cited by 9
“…relies on a distributed memory network involving the hippocampus, the parahippocampal gyrus and the retrosplenial cortex, which supports not only memory register and retrieval but also is involved in the generation, maintenance and visualization of complex spatial context and imagination 15 .”
BackgroundAmaya, I. A., Schmidt, M. E., Bartossek, M. T., Kemmerer, J., Kirilina, E. P., Nierhaus, T., & Schmidt, T. T. (2023) · Imaging Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/imag_a_00033 · Cited by 8
Thom, J. M., & Clayton, N. S. (2014) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2014.09.006 · Cited by 6
Facets of Subjective Health Horizons Are Differentially Linked to Brain Volume
Düzel, S., Drewelies, J., Gerstorf, D., Demuth, I., Kühn, S., & Lindenberger, U. (2018) · GeroPsych · doi:10.1024/1662-9647/a000191 · Cited by 7
Space–time interaction: visuo-spatial processing affects the temporal focus of mind wandering
Vannucci, M., Pelagatti, C., Chiorri, C., & Brugger, P. (2018) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-018-1080-x · Cited by 8
Episodic foresight and stroke.
Lyons, A. D., Henry, J. D., Robinson, G. A., Rendell, P. G., & Suddendorf, T. (2019) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000495 · Cited by 6
Autonomy and control across cognition
Barr, N., Beaty, R. E., & Seli, P. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-816400-6.00002-x · Cited by 6
Organization of a Latent Space structure in VAE/GAN trained by navigation data
Kojima, H., & Ikegami, T. (2022) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2022.04.012 · Cited by 7
“[19, 20] revealed that episodic memory and imagery shared the same neural basis.”
BackgroundShelley, L. E., & Nitz, D. A. (2021) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.23339 · Cited by 6
“Episodic memory formation, while dependent on HPC, nevertheless appears to be a process distributed across multiple brain regions (Hassabis et al., 2007).”
BackgroundCharacterising strategy use during the performance of hippocampal-dependent tasksPreprint
Clark, I. A., Monk, A. M., & Maguire, E. A. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/807990 · Cited by 6
“402 Neuroimaging studies have also documented hippocampal engagement during the 403 construction of scene imagery (Hassabis et al., 2007b; Zeidman and Maguire, 2016; Barry et 404 al., 2018; Clark et al., 2018; Dalton et al., 2018).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationWhy do people pirate? A neuroimaging investigation
Eres, R., Louis, W. R., & Molenberghs, P. (2016) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2016.1179671 · Cited by 5
Opening the closed mind? Effects of reading literary fiction on need for closure and creativity
Wimmer, L., Currie, G., Friend, S., & Ferguson, H. J. (2022) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2022.2087309 · Cited by 7
“Imaginability was assessed using an episodic future thinking task devised by Hassabis et al. (2007).”
MethodNeural Networks Implicated in Autobiographical Memory Training
Cîrneci, D., Onu, M., Papasteri, C., Georgescu, D., Poalelungi, C., Sofonea, A., Puşcaşu, N., Tanase, D., Rădeanu, T., Toader, M.-Y., et al. (2022) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0137-22.2022 · Cited by 6
“, 2010) and given the shared neural substrates for recall and imagination (Hassabis et al., 2007), we predict that similar changes in connectivity of brain networks regardless of how much the odor-evoked recalled episodes overlap with reality.”
BackgroundBouffard, N. R., Fidalgo, C., Brunec, I. K., Lee, A. C. H., & Barense, M. D. (2023) · Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition · doi:10.1080/13825585.2023.2170966 · Cited by 6
Almeida, M. T. D., Seeber, M., Gschwend, K., Maurer, R., Faulmann, I., & Burra, N. (2023) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2023.1062064 · Cited by 5
“As stated earlier, the implication of the parietal cortex in recalling scenes from an egocentric point of view (Spiers and Maguire, 2007b), as well as the implication of the parahippocampus in landmark processing and scene construction of imagined scenes in fMRI studies (Rosenbaum et al., 2004; Hassabis et al., 2007;…”
BackgroundResultDetails in hand: how does gesturing relate to autobiographical memory?
Güneş‐Acar, N., Göksun, T., & Tekcan, A. Í. (2024) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2024.2385029 · Cited by 6
“When recal-ling personal past events, scenes are generated to package information and once these scenes are created, then multimodal descriptions of the events are integrated into a cohesive whole (Hassabis et al., 2007).”
InfluentialCordonnier, A., Barnier, A. J., & Sutton, J. D. (2015) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1085587 · Cited by 5
Autobiographical memory in children with Idiopathic Generalised Epilepsy
Gascoigne, M. B., Barton, B., Webster, R., Gill, D. S., & Lah, S. S. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.010 · Cited by 5
Stern, E. R., Muratore, A. F., Taylor, S. F., Abelson, J. L., Hof, P. R., & Goodman, W. K. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu115 · Cited by 7
“Indeed, multiple prior studies of event imagination have successfully employed approaches similar to the current study (Addis et al. 2007; Hassabis et al. 2007; D’Argembeau et al. 2008; D’Argembeau et al. 2010; Addis et al. 2011).”
Bai, F., Watson, D. R., & Zhang, Z. (2009) · Future Neurology · doi:10.2217/fnl.09.36 · Cited by 5
Neurotypical subjective experience is caused by a hippocampal simulation
Faw, M., & Faw, B. (2016) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1412 · Cited by 7
Goal-Directed Sequences in the Hippocampus
Schmidt, B., Wikenheiser, A. M., & Redish, A. D. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-812098-9.00006-1 · Cited by 5
Mental travels and the cognitive basis of language
Corballis, M. C. (2018) · Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems · doi:10.1075/is.17030.cor · Cited by 5
Neuropsychological features of mind wandering in left-, right- and extra temporal lobe epilepsy
Luelsberg, F., Krakau, S., Chaieb, L., Witt, J., von Wrede, R. D., Fell, J., & Helmstaedter, C. (2021) · Seizure · doi:10.1016/j.seizure.2021.12.013 · Cited by 5
Increased Pupil Size during Future Thinking in a Subject with Retrograde Amnesia
Boutoleau‐Bretonnière, C., Lamy, E., & Haj, M. E. (2022) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci12010115 · Cited by 5
“This assumption is supported by research demonstrating how future thinking is typically more effortful and involves more cognitive processing and reconstruction time than past thinking [31,32].”
BackgroundBenítez‐Burraco, A. (2019) · European Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.103828 · Cited by 5
Martin, C. B., Fiacconi, C. M., & Köhler, S. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118332634.ch9 · Cited by 5
Silson, E. H., Steel, A., Kidder, A., Gilmore, A. W., & Baker, C. I. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/554915 · Cited by 5
The role of hippocampal-vmPFC neural dynamics in building mental representationsPreprint
Monk, A. M., Dalton, M. A., Barnes, G. R., & Maguire, E. A. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.04.30.069765 · Cited by 5
Self-citationScrivener, C. L., & Silson, E. H. (2025) · Imaging Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/imag_a_00507 · Cited by 4
“…Places1/2, like the ventral component, are associated with scene-construction or contextual association, whereas People1/2, like the dorsal component, are associated with more social and potentially semantic processing ( Andrews-Hanna et al., 2010; Bar & Aminoff, 2003; Hassabis et al., 2007).”
Memories or decisions? Bridging accounts of frontopolar function
Boschin, E. A., Ainsworth, M., Galeazzi, J. M., & Buckley, M. J. (2025) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2025.109119 · Cited by 5
“FPC activation has been consistently associated with episodic retrieval (Düzel et al., 1999; Hassabis et al., 2007; Henson et al., 1999; Johnson and Rugg, 2007; Kapur et al., 1995; Lepage et al., 2000; Okuda et al., 2003; Rugg et al., 2002).”
Scene construction ability in neurotypical and autistic adults
Smith, M. K., Cameron, L., & Ferguson, H. J. (2023) · Autism · doi:10.1177/13623613231216052 · Cited by 4
“According to Hassabis et al. (2007), episodic simulation of atemporal, fictitious scenes which are not self-relevant does not require self-projection.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEye movements reinstate remembered locations during episodic simulation
Wynn, J. S., & Schacter, D. L. (2024) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105807 · Cited by 6
Route-planning and the comparative study of future-thinking
Thom, J. M., & Clayton, N. S. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00144 · Cited by 4
Gordon, R. G., Duff, M. C., & Cohen, N. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198737865.003.0023 · Cited by 4
Burke, M. R., & Coats, R. O. (2015) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-015-4495-2 · Cited by 4
“Our results support a number of neuroimaging studies that suggest a role for the rostral medial prefrontal cortex in “internal” or self-referential signals (Gilbert et al. 2006; Burgess et al. 2007; Hassabis et al. 2007; Mason et al. 2007; Raichle and Snyder 2007; Boorman et al. 2009), but further contributes to the l…”
ResultShould context hold a special place in hippocampal memory?
Dulas, M. R., Schwarb, H. D., Cannavale, C. N., & Cohen, N. J. (2021) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/bs.plm.2021.07.001 · Cited by 3
The Neural Basis of Autobiographical Memory
Iriye, H., & Jacques, P. L. S. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198784845.003.0007 · Cited by 5
Nitz, D. A. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-1292-2_2 · Cited by 4
Spreng, R. N., Mar, R. A., & Kim, A. (2008) · Cited by 4
Development of Episodic Memory: Processes and Implications
Coughlin, C. A., Leckey, S., & Ghetti, S. (2018) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119170174.epcn404 · Cited by 5
Mental navigation and telekinesis with a hippocampal map-based brain-machine interfacePreprint
Lai, C., Tanaka, S., Harris, T. D., & Lee, A. K. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.04.07.536077 · Cited by 4
“…possible scenarios (Schacter et al., 2007, 2012; Hamrick, 2019) The hippocampus is a brain region that is critical for memory and imagination (Hassabis et al., 2007a, 2007b; Addis et al., 2007; Schacter et al., 2007) and it holds a model of the environment (also called a cognitive map…”
BackgroundThe vividness of visualisations and autistic trait expression are not strongly associated
Bouyer, L. N., Pellicano, E., Saurels, B. W., Schwarzkopf, D. S., & Arnold, D. H. (2025) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2025.103821 · Cited by 3
“They noted that brain regions involved in visual imagery are also active during tasks that have been linked to creative imagination (e. g., Fulford et al., 2018; Hassabis et al., 2007).”
Lambda abstraction as a factor in human uniqueness
Bayırlı, İ. K. (2023) · Biolinguistics · doi:10.5964/bioling.11205 · Cited by 2
“…of an experiment in which patients with amnesia associated with bilateral hippo campal damage were compared to a controlled group in their ability to construct imag inary experiences, Hassabis et al. (2007) note that patients with hippocampal amnesia show deficit in imagining novel experiences.”
A matter of precision? Scene imagery in individuals with high‐functioning autism spectrum disorder
Faustmann, L. L., & Altgassen, M. (2024) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.3119 · Cited by 4
“Following the procedure of Lind et al. (2014b), the task was rated according to the scoring scheme of (Hassabis, Kumaran, & Maguire, 2007a).”
BackgroundMethodYe, Q., Fidalgo, C., Byrne, P., Muñoz, L., Cant, J. S., & Lee, A. C. H. (2024) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.109000 · Cited by 3
“…particular the hippocampus, in not only the perception of scenes (for reviews, see Epstein and Baker, 2019; Lee et al., 2012a,b), but also in the use of imagination to construct fictitious experiences (Hassabis et al., 2007a), future scenes, and events (Addis et al., 2007; Staresina et al., 2011).”
BackgroundTrasmundi, S. B. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009528450 · Cited by 3
La fragilidad de la memoria: creencias falsas y memoria autobiográfica, una revisión preliminar
Fernández, J. N., Villanea, M. S., & Trías, J. F. (2018) · Universitas Psychologica · doi:10.11144/javeriana.upsy17-4.fmcf · Cited by 3
Thinking about service encounters boosts talking about them
Söderlund, M., & Mattsson, J. (2019) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/jcm-04-2018-2655 · Cited by 3
Rifkin‐Graboi, A., Khng, K. H., Cheung, P., Tsotsi, S., Sun, H. Q., Kwok, F. Y., Yu, Y., Xie, H., Yang, Y., Chen, M., et al. (2019) · Learning Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/23735082.2019.1674907 · Cited by 3
Wilson, N., Ahmed, R. M., Piguet, O., & Irish, M. (2021) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci12010020 · Cited by 4
“Episodic memory and scene construction are closely connected, as reflected by the significant overlap of their neural substrates [1,5] and parallel impairments observed in clinical populations ([9], but see [10]).”
BackgroundComplex visual discrimination is impaired after right, but not left, anterior temporal lobectomy
Gardette, J., Mosca, C., Asien, C., Borg, C., Mazzola, L., Convers, P., Gal, G., Banjac, S., Baciu, M. V., Durocher, B., et al. (2023) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.23569 · Cited by 3
“…spatial scenes in memory (Hassabis, Kumaran, Vann, & Maguire, 2007b; Ross et al., 2018; Taylor et al., 2007; Zeidman & Maguire, 2016), imagination (Hassabis, Kumaran, & Maguire, 2007a; Hassabis, Kumaran, Vann, & Maguire, 2007b; Zeidman & Maguire, 2016), and visual perception (Barense et al.,…”
BackgroundZhou, A. X., Rajimehr, R., Firoozi, A., Duncan, J., & Mitchell, D. J. (2025) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2025.109206 · Cited by 5
The missing cue problem in hetero associative memory retrieval
Morales, R., & Pineda, L. A. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-07963-x · Cited by 3
“More generally, Hassabis et al. 30,31 proposed a distributed memory network involving the hippocampus, the parahippocampal gyrus and the retrosplenial cortex, which not only supports memory register and retrieval but also is involved in the generation, maintenance and visualization of complex…”
Functional MRI Studies of Memory in Aging, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Alzheimer’s Disease
Risacher, S. L., Wishart, H. A., & Saykin, A. J. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0345-7_24 · Cited by 3
Binder, J. R. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-68132-8_9 · Cited by 3
Pineda, L. A. (2024) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2023.101204 · Cited by 7
The role of sleep and dreaming in the processing of episodic memory
Stenstrom, P. (2010) · doi:10.71781/18000 · Cited by 3
Book Review: A Timely Dose of Theory in Future Thinking Research
Cole, S. N. (2016) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2016.1245347 · Cited by 3
Episodic Mindreading: Mentalizing Guided by Imagined and Remembered ScenesPreprint
O’Connor, B. B. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/acv9r · Cited by 3
Simulating the best and worst of times: The powers and perils of emotional simulationPreprint
Wardell, V., Grilli, M. D., & Palombo, D. J. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/btvrf · Cited by 3
Mateos, D. M., Krumm, G., Filippeti, V. A., et al. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/u4yjp · Cited by 3
Prospective Cognition and its Links with MemoryPreprint
Addis, D. R., & Tanguay, A. F. N. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/w69nd · Cited by 3
Can a short math video enhance the brain’s mathematical networks?Preprint
Amalric, M., Roveyaz, P., & Dehaene, S. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.08.09.503350 · Cited by 3
“However, we note that part of this network (angular gyrus, precuneus, PCC) is active during high-level language processing and participates in a slow semantic integration system which is thought to store the meanings of passages or movies in episodic memory (58, 59) and replay them in imagination (60).”
BackgroundAmaya, I. A., Schmidt, M. E., Bartossek, M. T., et al. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.07.26.550646 · Cited by 3
“…the anterior division, AV nuclei are linked to the visual cortex via connections to the retrospinal cortex ( Lomi et al., 2023), which is thought to contribute to spatial organization in imagination ( Botzung et al., 2008; D’Argembeau et al., 2008; Hassabis et al., 2007; Szpunar et al., 2007).”
BackgroundMetacognitive Awareness and the Subjective Experience of Remembering in AphantasiaPreprint
Siena, M. J., & Simons, J. S. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/gx4yw · Cited by 3
Akkan, İ., Aydın, Ç., Gülgöz, S., & Göksun, T. (2025) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218251405232 · Cited by 2
“As also noted in Aydin et al. (2023), this is important for the scene construction arguments, stating that an image of the location serves as a scaffold for elaboration with additional details (Hassabis & Maguire, 2007; Rubin et al., 2019).”
Neural activations and representations during episodic versus semantic memory retrieval
Tibon, R., Greve, A., Humphreys, G. F., Quent, J. A., & Henson, R. N. (2026) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02390-4 · Cited by 2
“…in the cluster that emerged in the current exploratory analysis, recall success effects in the critical versus control tasks covered locations within the right posterior AnG, typically observed in episodic recall tasks 30,58–60 , and particularly when episodic events are remembered vividly 61 .”
Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Autobiographical Memory Retrieval: Past, Present, and Future
Addis, D. R., Wiebels, K., & Devitt, A. L. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-4-431-56591-8_10 · Cited by 7
Watching Movies Unfold, a Frame-by-Frame Analysis of the Associated Neural Dynamics
Monk, A. M., Barry, D. N., Vladimir Litvak, A., Barnes, G. R., & Maguire, E. A. (2021) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0099-21.2021 · Cited by 2
“…the pictures-unlinked and patterns-unlinked conditions, since the hippocampus is known to respond strongly to scenes relative to nonscene stimuli (Hassabis et al., 2007a; Graham et al., 2010; Zeidman et al., 2015; Hodgetts et al., 2016; Monk et al., 2021); however, no difference was apparent.”
BackgroundSelf-citationVillar, A. J. R. (2022) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2022.780701 · Cited by 2
Tang, H., Shi, J., Zhang, S., Chen, Y. S., Xiong, T., Wang, X., Chen, Z., Dai, Z., Yao, Z., & Lü, Q. (2024) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2023.0086 · Cited by 2
“This subsystem facilitates memory-based scene construction and the process of peering into the future (Hassabis et al., 2007).”
Shaping the Space: A Role for the Hippocampus in Mental Imagery Formation
Blomkvist, A. (2025) · Vision · doi:10.3390/vision9010002 · Cited by 3
“Supporting research shows that hippocampal lesion leads to an inability to construct spatially coherent scenes [33], and fMRI studies support the involvement of the hippocampus especially in tasks which require a 3D spatial layout [29,30,34–36].”
Hippocampal Sequences and the Cognitive Map
Wikenheiser, A. M., & Redish, A. D. (2014) · Springer series in computational neuroscience · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-1969-7_5 · Cited by 3
The contributions of spatial context and imagery to the recollection of single words
Lalla, A., Robin, J., & Moscovitch, M. (2019) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.23181 · Cited by 2
Special issue for cognition on social, motivational, and emotional influences on memory.
Murty, V. P., Gutchess, A., & Madan, C. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104464 · Cited by 2
Baror, S., Aminoff, E., & Bar, M. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-51890-5_23 · Cited by 3
Action Understanding Promoted by Interoception in Children: A Developmental Model
Zhou, H. X., Gao, Q., Chen, W., & Wei, Q. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.724677 · Cited by 4
Binder, J. R. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-41874-8_17 · Cited by 2
Ma, Q., Kiyama, S., & Makuuchi, M. (2026) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-026-03122-8 · Cited by 2
“We interpret the activation of the parahippocampal regions as reflecting the mental construction of event representations (Hassabis et al. 2007; Hassabis and Maguire 2009).”
Ferretti, F. (2022) · Interdisciplinary evolution research · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-09206-0_4 · Cited by 2
Demichelis, O. P., Grainger, S. A., McKay, K. T., Burr, L. D., Kim, J., & Henry, J. D. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-28183-1 · Cited by 2
Aashat, S., D’Angelo, M. C., Rosenbaum, R. S., & Ryan, J. D. (2024) · Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition · doi:10.1080/13825585.2024.2319892 · Cited by 2
“The precuneus plays a role in mental imagery (Burgess, 2008; Hassabis et al., 2007; Johnson et al., 2007), including shifting attentional resources to different object features and targets within space (Cavanna & Trimble, 2006; Le et al., 1998; Nagahama et al., 1999), which may facilitate the…”
Default Mode Network spatial configuration varies across task domainsPreprint
Mancuso, L., Cavuoti-Cabanillas, S., Liloia, D., Manuello, J., Buzi, G., Duca, S., Cauda, F., & Costa, T. (2021) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.03.17.435799 · Cited by 3
“…et al., 2008, 2007; Spreng et al., 2015; Svoboda et al., 2006; Yang et al., 2013), mental simulation and scene construction (Gerlach et al., 2011; Hassabis et al., 2007; Hassabis and Maguire, 2007; Spreng and Grady, 2010), theory of mind (ToM) and social cognition (Amft et al., 2015; Mar, 2011;…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Hassabis, D., Kumaran, D., & Maguire, E. A.
- Affiliations
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hassabis, Demis
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2007-12-26
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 52
- Pages
- 14365-14374
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC2571957
- OpenAlex
- W1982298223
- Cited by
- 744
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 55
- FWCI
- 15.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (071173)
- Brain Research Trust
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- episodic memory, imagination, scene construction, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, retrosplenial cortex, anterior medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus, episodic future thinking, default mode network, self-processing
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-25 (prompt extract-v2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review