Cited by 278Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Congruence of BOLD Response across Intertemporal Choice Conditions: Fictive and Real Money Gains and Losses

Open access
Bickel, W. K., Pitcock, J. A., Yi, R., Angtuaco, E. J. C.·2009·Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Intertemporal choice is predicated on the valuation of commodities with respect to delay until their receipt. Subjective value of a future outcome decreases, or is discounted, as a function of that delay (Bickel and Johnson, 2003). Although behavioral studies suggest no difference between the devaluation of real and fictive outcomes, no neuroimaging studies have investigated potential differences in the underlying deliberative process. Here, we compare behavioral and neural correlates of intertemporal valuation of real and hypothetical monetary gains as well as hypothetical losses, which have been posited to involve different mechanisms. Behavioral and neuroimaging sessions were conducted in which participants made intertemporal choice decisions in a gains condition using both real and hypothetical $100 money and in a loss condition using a fictive $100 money. Within-subject comparison of behavioral data revealed no significant difference between levels of discounting across the three conditions. Random-effects analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data of each of the three discounting conditions independently revealed significant signal change in limbic (anterior cingulate, striatum, posterior cingulate) and executive functioning areas (lateral prefrontal cortex), whereas a repeated-measures ANOVA failed to detect differences in signal change across the three discounting conditions after correcting for multiple comparisons. These data support a concordance between real and hypothetical conditions from delay-discounting studies and further suggest a congruence of the fMRI blood oxygen level-dependent signal across brain regions associated with the deliberative process of different forms of intertemporal choice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.5319-08.2009

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bickel WK Johnson MW Heather N Vuchinich R 2003 Junk time: pathological behavior as the interaction of evolutionary and cultural forces Choice, Behavioral Economics and Addictions 249 271 The Netherlands Pergamon, an imprint of Elsevier

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bickel, W. K., Pitcock, J. A., Yi, R., & Angtuaco, E. J. C.
Affiliations
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2009-07-08
Volume
29
Issue
27
Pages
8839-8846
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2088853696
Cited by
278
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 31
FWCI
12.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Arkansas State University
  • University of Arkansas
  • Arkansas Biosciences Institute
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA024080, R01DA011692)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
intertemporal choice, delay discounting, real money, monetary gains and losses, BOLD signal, anterior cingulate cortex, striatum, posterior cingulate cortex, lateral prefrontal cortex, decision-making, neural correlates of choice
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Brain Mapping, Choice Behavior, Decision Making, Economics, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Social Behavior, Temporal Lobe, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review