CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceCognitive Science and Education ResearchMental Health and Psychiatry

The structure of mind and the role of consciousness.

Open access
Earl, Brian·2019·JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY & BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE
DOI 10.15640/jpbs.v7n2a9
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Journal of Anthropology and Archaeology is a peer-reviewed international journal, which publishes original papers promoting theoretical, methodological and empirical developments in the discipline of socio-cultural anthropology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15640/jpbs.v7n2a9

Cites

133 of 133 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It remains within the bounds of possibility that integrative processes coordinated by the cortex operate largely if not exclusively in an unconscious mode.

    “it remains within the bounds of possibility that integrative processes coordinated by the cortex operate largely if not exclusively in an unconscious mode.”

    From The function(s) of consciousness revisited: insights from a modular/constitutive model using vision as a test case (2026) · cites this paper as Earl, 2019

    Section 2.1 argues that conscious and unconscious information are processed together unconsciously, and the Conclusions say that the mind’s mechanisms determine responses unconsciously. This supports the possibility of unconscious integrative processing, but the cited passages do not identify the cortex as coordinating those processes. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 136 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Bowers, K. S. (1984). On being consciously influenced and informed. In K. S. Bowers and D. Meichenbaum (Eds.), The unconscious reconsidered (pp. 227-272). New York, NY: Wiley.
  2. Bridgeman, B. (2002). Attention and visually guided behavior and distinct systems. In W. Prinz and B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and Performance XIX (pp. 120-135). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Davidson, D. (1970) Mental Events. In L. Foster & J. W. Swanson (Eds.), Essays on Actions and Events (pp. 208-225). Clarendon Press.
  4. Glover, S. (2004). Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 3-24. doi:10.1017/2FS0140525X04000020 · DOI
  5. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, D. A. (2004). Sight Unseen. New York: Oxford University Press.
  6. Gouras, P. (1991). The history of colour vision. In P. Gouras (Ed.), The perception of colour: Vision and visual dysfunction, 6 (pp. 1-9). London: MacMillan.
  7. Gray, J. A. (1995). Consciousness-what is the problem and how should it be addressed? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2, 5-9.
  8. Hassin, R. R., & Sklar, A. Y. (2014). The human unconscious: A functional perspective. In J. W. Sherman, B. Gawronski, and Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 299-313). The Guilford Press.
  9. Reason, J. T. (1984). Lapses of attention in everyday life. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention. New York: Academic Press.
  10. Rossetti, Y. & Pisella, L. (2002). Several 'vision for action' systems: a guide to disociating and integrating dorsal and ventral functions: a tutorial. In W. Prinz and B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (pp. 62-119). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  11. Schwarz, N. (2002). Feelings as information: moods influence judgements and processing strategies. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, and D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgement (pp. 534-547). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Smith, R. L. (1999). A testable mind-brain theory. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 20, 421-36.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Earl, B.
Corresponding author
Earl, Brian
Venue
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY & BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE
Publisher
The Brooklyn Research and Publishing Institute
Published
2019
Volume
7
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 2374-2380 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-2399
DOI
10.15640/jpbs.v7n2a9
OpenAlex
W3008905283
Cited by
5
References
136
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
consciousness, cognitive psychology, mind-brain relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review