PreprintCited by 44Food composition and propertiesConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingPotato Plant Research

Effect of rice cooking methods on postprandial glycaemic response, satiety and palatability, and chewed particle size distribution

Open access
Lu, Louise Weiwei, Venn, Bernard, Lu, Jun, Monro, John, Rush, Elaine·2017·Nutrients

Preprint — published as 10.3390/nu9050475 · Paper page

Abstract

Background: Globally, hot cooked refined rice is consumed in large quantities and is a major contributor to dietary glycaemic load. This study aimed to compare the glycaemic potency of hot and cold stored parboiled rice to widely available medium grain white rice. Method: Twenty-eight healthy volunteers participated in a three treatment experiment where postprandial blood glucose was measured over 120 minutes after consumption of 140g of rice. Three rice samples were freshly cooked medium-grain white rice, freshly cooked parboiled rice, and parboiled rice stored overnight at 4 ºC. All rice was served warm at 65 ºC. Chewing time was recorded. Results: The 24-hours cold-stored and reheated parboiled rice resulted in a 42% and 12% lower blood glucose concentration trajectory than freshly cooked medium-grain white rice and freshly cooked parboiled rice. Chewing time for 10g cold stored parboiled rice was 6 seconds (25%) longer and was considered more palatable, visually appealing and better tasting than freshly cooked medium grain (all P<0.05). Conclusions:. For regular consumers of rice reheating cooked rice after cold storage would lower the dietary glycaemic load and long term may reduce risk for type 2 and gestational diabetes. More trials are needed to identify the significance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.20944/preprints201704.0092.v1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Analogous findings have been reported for rice and potatoes: cooling and/or reheating can increase resistant starch and lower postprandial glycemia in controlled studies, although the magnitude varies by food type and experimental design.

    “Analogous findings have been reported for rice and potatoes: cooling and/or reheating can increase resistant starch and lower postprandial glycemia in controlled studies, although the magnitude varies by food type and experimental design [24,25,26,27].”

    From Does Resistant Starch Formed by Cooling Pasta Decrease the Postprandial Glycemic Response in Type 1 Diabetes? A Randomized Single-Blind Crossover Study (2026) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Introduction describes cooling and reheating as making rice starch more resistant to digestion, and Results §3.2 reports lower glycaemic response for reheated parboiled rice than for freshly cooked medium-grain white rice. But reheating did not significantly lower glycaemic response compared with freshly cooked parboiled rice; the paper does not report a measured increase in resistant starch from its treatment. This source addresses rice, not the sentence’s separate reference to potatoes. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The absolute and relative increase in resistant starch may differ between rice and pasta depending on amylose content and cooling protocol.

    “Second, the absolute and relative increase in resistant starch may differ between rice and pasta depending on amylose content and the cooling protocol; studies in non-diabetic populations confirm that both variety and preparation method influence resistant starch formation and glycemic response [24,25,27,28].”

    From Does Resistant Starch Formed by Cooling Pasta Decrease the Postprandial Glycemic Response in Type 1 Diabetes? A Randomized Single-Blind Crossover Study (2026) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Discussion (page not provided) says resistant starch in rice may depend on heating–cooling cycles and amylose content. The paper does not compare resistant-starch increases in rice and pasta or establish their absolute or relative differences; pasta appears only in a reference title. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Parackal, S.M.; Smith, C.; Parnell, W.R. A profile of New Zealand 'Asian' participants of the 2008/09 Adult National Nutrition Survey: Focus on dietary habits, nutrient intakes and health outcomes. Public Health Nutr. 2015, 18, 893-904. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  2. Englyst, K.; Liu, S.; Englyst, H.N. Nutritional characterization and measurement of dietary carbohydrates. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 61, S19-S39. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  3. Burton, P.M.; Monro, J.A.; Alvarez, L.; Gallagher, E. Glycemic Impact and Health: New Horizons in White Bread Formulations. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2011, 51, 965-982. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  4. Wolever, T.; Jenkins, A. Analysis of glycemic index methodology. J. AOAC Int. 2010, 93, 29A. [PubMed]
  5. Grundy, S. Pre-diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular risk. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012, 59, 635-643. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  6. Phillips, L.; Deane, A.; Jones, K.; Rayner, C.; Horowitz, M. Gastric emptying and glycaemia in health and diabetes mellitus. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2015, 11, 112-128. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  7. Zhu, Y.; Hsu, W.; Hollis, J. The impact of food viscosity on eating rate, subjective appetite, glycemic response and gastric emptying rate. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e67482. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  8. Tamura, M.; Singh, J.; Kaur, L.; Ogawa, Y. Impact of structural characteristics on starch digestibility of cooked rice. Food Chem. 2016, 191, 91-97. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  9. Tan, V.; Ooi, D.; Kapur, J.; Wu, T.; Chan, Y.; Henry, C.; Lee, Y. The role of digestive factors in determining glycemic response in a multiethnic Asian population. Eur. J. Nutr. 2015, 1-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  10. Sajilata, M.; Singhal, R.; Kulkarni, P. Resistant starch-A review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2006, 5, 1-17. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  11. Riva, M.; Fessas, D.; Schiraldi, A. Starch retrogradation in cooked pasta and rice. Cereal Chem. 2000, 77, 433-438. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  12. Lu, L.; Monro, J.; Lu, J.; Rush, E. Effect of Cold Storage, Reheating, and Particle Sizes on In Vitro Glucose Release and Starch Digestibility among Five Rice Products in Auckland, New Zealand. J. Rice Res. 2016, 4, 171.
  13. Wolever, T.M.; Jenkins, D.J. The use of the glycemic index in predicting the blood glucose response to mixed meals. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1986, 43, 167-172. [PubMed]
  14. Larsen, H.; Rasmussen, O.; Rasmussen, P.H.; Alstrup, K.; Biswas, S.; Tetens, I.; Thilsted, S.; Hermansen, K. Glycaemic index of parboiled rice depends on the severity of processing: Study in type 2 diabetic subjects. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000, 54, 380-385. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  15. Chitra, M.; Singh, V.; Ali, S.Z. Effect of processing paddy on digestibility of rice starch by in vitro studies. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 47, 414-419. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  16. Ranawana, V.; Monro, J.; Mishra, S.; Henry, C. Degree of particle size breakdown during mastication may be a possible cause of interindividual glycemic variability. Nutr. Res. 2010, 30, 246-254. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  17. Ranawana, V.; Leow, M.; Henry, C. Mastication effects on the glycaemic index: Impact on variability and practical implications. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 68, 137-139. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  18. Kataoka, M.; Venn, B.; Williams, S.; Te Morenga, L.; Heemels, I.; Mann, J. Glycaemic responses to glucose and rice in people of Chinese and European ethnicity. Diabet. Med. 2013, 30, e101-e107. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  19. Venn, B.; Wallace, A.; Monro, J.; Perry, T.; Brown, R.; Frampton, C.; Green, T. The glycemic load estimated from the glycemic index does not differ greatly from that measured using a standard curve in healthy volunteers. J. Nutr. 2006, 136, 1377-1381. [PubMed]
  20. Venn, B.; Green, T. Glycemic index and glycemic load: Measurement issues and their effect on diet-disease relationships. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 61, 122-131. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  21. Parker, B.; Sturm, K.; MacIntosh, C.; Feinle, C.; Horowitz, M.; Chapman, I. Relation between food intake and visual analogue scale ratings of appetite and other sensations in healthy older and young subjects. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 58, 212-218. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  22. Brouns, F.; Bjorck, I.; Frayn, K.N.; Gibbs, A.L.; Lang, V.; Slama, G.; Wolever, T.M. Glycaemic index methodology. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2005, 18, 145-171. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  23. Boers, H.; ten Hoorn, J.; Mela, D. A systematic review of the influence of rice characteristics and processing methods on postprandial glycaemic and insulinaemic responses. Br. J. Nutr. 2015, 114, 1035-1045. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  24. Derycke, V.; Vandeputte, G.; Vermeylen, R.; De Man, W.; Goderis, B.; Koch, M.; Delcour, J. Starch gelatinization and amylose-lipid interactions during rice parboiling investigated by temperature resolved wide angle X-ray scattering and differential scanning calorimetry. J. Cereal Sci. 2005, 42, 334-343. [CrossRef] · DOI
  25. Heinemann, R.; Fagundes, P.; Pinto, E.; Penteado, M.; Lanfer-Marquez, U. Comparative study of nutrient composition of commercial brown, parboiled and milled rice from Brazil. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2005, 18, 287-296. [CrossRef] · DOI
  26. Bornhorst, G.; Singh, R. Bolus formation and disintegration during digestion of food carbohydrates. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2012, 11, 101-118. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  27. Madhu, V.; Shirali, A.; Pawaskar, P.; Madi, D.; Chowta, N.; Ramapuram, J. Mastication Frequency and Postprandial Blood Sugar Levels in Normoglycaemic and Dysglycaemic Individuals: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2016, 10, OC06. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  28. Suzuki, H.; Fukushima, M.; Okamoto, S.; Takahashi, O.; Shimbo, T.; Kurose, T.; Yamada, Y.; Inagaki, N.; Seino, Y.; Fukui, T. Effects of thorough mastication on postprandial plasma glucose concentrations in nonobese Japanese subjects. Metabolism 2005, 54, 1593-1599. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  29. Marathe, C.; Rayner, C.; Jones, K.; Horowitz, M. Relationships between gastric emptying, postprandial glycemia, and incretin hormones. Diabetes Care 2013, 36, 1396-1405. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  30. Zenel, A.M.; Stewart, M.L. High amylose white rice reduces post-prandial glycemic response but not appetite in humans. Nutrients 2015, 7, 5362-5374. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  31. Chiu, Y.-T.; Stewart, M.L. Effect of variety and cooking method on resistant starch content of white rice and subsequent postprandial glucose response and appetite in humans. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 22, 372-379. [PubMed]
  32. Miquel-Kergoat, S.; Azais-Braesco, V.; Burton-Freeman, B.; Hetherington, M. Effects of chewing on appetite, food intake and gut hormones: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiol. Behav. 2015, 151, 88-96. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, L. W., Venn, B., Lu, J., Monro, J., & Rush, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
  • Plant & Food Research (NZ)
Corresponding author
Lu, Louise Weiwei
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2017-04-17
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
475-475
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2613799402
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Tuwhera (Auckland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Potato Plant Research
Keywords
parboiled rice, cold storage, reheating, postprandial glycemic response, glycemic load, satiety, palatability, chewing time, particle size distribution, type 2 diabetes risk, gestational diabetes mellitus
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Cold Temperature, Female, Hot Temperature, Humans, Male, Particle Size, Oryza, Satiety Response, Taste, Postprandial Period, Young Adult, Food Storage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review