Cited by 672Health disparities and outcomesResilience and Mental HealthEmployment and Welfare Studies

Socioeconomic Status Differences in Vulnerability to Undesirable Life Events

McLeod, Jane D., Kessler, Ronald C.·1990·Journal of Health and Social Behavior

Abstract

Previous research has documented consistently that persons holding low-socioeconomic status (SES) positions are more strongly affected emotionally by undesirable life events than are their higher-status counterparts. Two types of resources have been implicated in this differential vulnerability: financial resources and a broader class of coping resources, including social support and resilient personality characteristics. We present an analysis that disaggregates measure of life events and of SES to identify which events and which components of SES are most important for understanding differential vulnerability. We document that the lower-SES vulnerability persists across all types of personal events. In addition, we find that differential vulnerability is not confined to income but extends to education and occupational status as well. On the basis of these patterns, we conclude that differential vulnerability reflects more than a simple economic reality. Previous research offers speculative evidence that status differences in past and current social environments may explain differential vulnerability, especially through their effects on the socialization of resilient personality characteristics. We propose future research that could help to evaluate the validity of these speculations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2137170

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McLeod, J. D., & Kessler, R. C.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Journal of Health and Social Behavior
Published
1990-06
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
162
ISSN
0022-1465 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013102688
Cited by
672
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 24
FWCI
18.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health and Social Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k02mh000507-08)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (1R01 MH-30479, 1K02 MH00507, T32MH016806)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
Keywords
socioeconomic status, differential vulnerability, coping resources, social support, resilience, financial resources, income, occupational status, social environment
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Social Class, Social Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review