Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,506

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline’s Core Properties1

Benbasat, Izak, Zmud, Robert W.·2003·MIS Quarterly

Abstract

We are concerned that the IS research community is making the discipline’s central identity ambiguous by, all too frequently, under-investigating phenomena intimately associated with IT-based systems and over-investigating phenomena distantly associated with IT-based systems. In this commentary, we begin by discussing why establishing an identity for the IS field is important. We then describe what such an identity may look like by proposing a core set of properties, i.e., concepts and phenomena, that define the IS field. Next, we discuss research by IS scholars that either fails to address this core set of properties (labeled as error of exclusion) or that addresses concepts/phenomena falling outside this core set (labeled as error of inclusion). We conclude by offering suggestions for redirecting IS scholarship toward the concepts and phenomena that we argue define the core of the IS discipline.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/30036527

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Albert, 1985, Organizational Identity, Research in Organizational Behavior, 263
  2. Aldrich, 1999, Organizations Evolving
  3. Benbasat, 1996, Rethinking Diversity in Information Systems Research, Information Systems Research, 7, 389, 10.1287/isre.7.4.389 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Jiang, 2002, Virtual Product Experience: Effects of Visual and Functional Control on Perceived Diagnosticity in Electronic Shopping
  5. Kempf, 1998, Consumer Processing of Product Trial and the Influence of Prior Advertising: A Structural Modeling Approach, Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 325, 10.1177/002224379803500304 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Massey, 2001, Technology Matters, 25
  7. Orlikowski, 2001, Desperately Seeking the ‘IT’ in IT Research—A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact, Information Systems Research, 12, 121, 10.1287/isre.12.2.121.9700 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Robey, 1996, Diversity in Information Systems Research: Threat, Promise, and Responsibility, Information Systems Research, 7, 400, 10.1287/isre.7.4.400 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Benbasat, I., & Zmud, R. W.
Venue
MIS Quarterly
Publisher
MIS Quarterly
Published
2003-06-01
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
183-194
ISSN
  • 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-9730
OpenAlex
W2116721563
Cited by
1,506
References
1
FWCI
231.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.