Cited by 320Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Research

Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Minimal Model Indexes of β-Cell Function and Insulin Sensitivity

Open access
Breda, Elena, Cavaghan, Melissa K., Toffolo, Gianna, Polonsky, Kenneth S., Cobelli, Claudio·2001·Diabetes

Abstract

The simultaneous assessment of quantitative indexes of insulin secretion and action in a single individual is important when quantifying their relative role in the evolution of glucose tolerance in different physiopathological states. Available methods quantify these indexes in relatively nonphysiological conditions, e.g., during glucose clamps or intravenous glucose tolerance tests. Here, we present a method based on a physiological test applicable to large-scale genetic and epidemiologic studies—the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Plasma C-peptide, insulin, and glucose data from a frequently sampled OGTT with 22 samples throughout 300 min (FSOGTT300-22) were analyzed in 11 subjects with various degrees of glucose tolerance. In each individual, two indexes of pancreatic sensitivity to glucose (Φs [109 min-1] and Φd [109]) and the insulin sensitivity index (SI) (105 dl/kg per min per pmol/l) were estimated by using the minimal model of C-peptide secretion and kinetics originally proposed for intravenous graded glucose infusion and the minimal model approach recently proposed for meal/OGTTs. The indexes obtained from FSOGTT300-22 were used as a reference for internal validation of OGTT protocols with reduced sampling schedules. Our results show that 11 samples in a 300-min period (OGTT300-11) is the test of choice because the indexes it provides (Φs = 36 ± 3 [means ± SE]; Φd = 710 ± 111; SI = 10.2 ± 2.4) show excellent correlation and are not statistically different from those of FSOGTT300-22 (Φs = 33 ± 3; Φd = 715 ± 120; SI = 10.1 ± 2.3). In conclusion, OGTT300-11, interpreted with C-peptide and glucose minimal models, provides a quantitative description of β-cell function and insulin sensitivity in a single individual while preserving the important clinical classification of glucose tolerance provided by the standard 120-min OGTT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diabetes.50.1.150

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The C-peptide minimal model allows exploration of the influence of glucose concentrations on insulin secretion after a glucose perturbation.

    “one can use the C-peptide minimal model (4), which allows exploration of the influence of glucose concentrations on insulin secretion, after a glucose perturbation.”
  • The model describing glucose-dependent insulin secretion is linear in both Φd and Φs; doubling Φd or Φs results in doubling SRd or SRs, respectively.

    “the model describing the glucose-dependent insulin secretion (4, 28) is linear in both Φd and Φs; i.e., doubling Φd or Φs results in doubling SRd or SRs, respectively.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Breda, E., Cavaghan, M. K., Toffolo, G., Polonsky, K. S., & Cobelli, C.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2001-01-01
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
150-158
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2132549450
Cited by
320
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 16
FWCI
7.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Chicago
  • National Institutes of Health (1k23dk002742-01)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-31842, DK 20595, DK-02742)
  • NIH Clinical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
oral glucose tolerance test, minimal models, beta-cell function, insulin sensitivity, C-peptide secretion, insulin secretion, glucose tolerance, sampling schedule
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, C-Peptide, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Islets of Langerhans, Male, Models, Biological, Specimen Handling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review