Cited by 205Information Systems Theories and ImplementationTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourUsability and User Interface Design

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Capturing the Complexity of Malleable IT Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory for Individuals1

Schmitz, Kurt W., Teng, James T. C., Webb, Kimberly J.·2016·MIS Quarterly

DOI 10.25300/misq/2016/40.3.07

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The confluence of widely available malleable technology and the “bring your own device” (BYOD) trend creates a new dynamic for information technology innovation in the workplace. Nontechnical users are empowered to adapt pliable technology in the course of normal usage episodes. We develop a theoretical perspective of adaptation behaviors by extending the adaptive structuration theory (AST) to the level of individuals, and present a topology of adaptation behaviors to capture the rich landscape of this emerging phenomenon. Based on this new theoretical perspective, we propose a research model and perform a survey study targeting young professionals to empirically investigate adaptation of malleable IT by users. Our findings reveal the compounding effects of four distinct adaptation behaviors including the insight that task adaptation mediates the effect of technology adaptation on individual performance. This study contributes by providing a theoretical framework for examining adaptation behaviors, extending AST to the level of individuals, and addressing specific criticisms of AST in the information systems literature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.25300/misq/2016/40.3.07

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Untitled work
(1984) · Cited by 21,166
Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192 · Cited by 9,150
Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4 · Cited by 7,806
Personality Structure: Emergence Of The 5-Factor Model
Digman, J. M. (1990) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221 · Cited by 6,731
DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE.
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256701 · Cited by 6,068
Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249689 · Cited by 6,006
The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.398 · Cited by 4,957
Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600 · Cited by 4,760
Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers
Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00153 · Cited by 4,022
Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory
DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.2.121 · Cited by 3,879
Democratizing Innovation
von Hippel, E. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2333.001.0001 · Cited by 3,768
Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis
He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0078 · Cited by 3,737
A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.9.2.204 · Cited by 3,575
Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the “IT” in IT Research—A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact
Orlikowski, W. J., & Iacono, C. S. (2001) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.12.2.121.9700 · Cited by 2,751
Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study1
Compeau, D., Higgins, C. A., & Huff, S. L. (1999) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249749 · Cited by 2,631
The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Toward Verbal and Statistical Correspondence
Venkatraman, N. V. (1989) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279078 · Cited by 2,373
Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from Observations of CT Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology Departments
Barley, S. R. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392767 · Cited by 2,315
Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0428 · Cited by 2,224
Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments
Barley, S. R. (2007) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511618925.007 · Cited by 2,119
The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Towards Verbal and Statistical Correspondence
Venkatraman, N. V. (2018) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 2,041
When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies1
Leonardi, P. M. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/23043493 · Cited by 1,889
THE AMBIDEXTROUS ORGANIZATION
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1997) · Journal of Business Strategy · doi:10.1108/eb039871 · Cited by 1,848
Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure.
Kirton, M. J. (1976) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.61.5.622 · Cited by 1,786
Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity
Hirschman, E. C. (1980) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208816 · Cited by 1,714
The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation
Leonard, D., & Sensiper, S. (1998) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41165946 · Cited by 1,702
Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation
Lavie, D., & Rosenkopf, L. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.22083085 · Cited by 1,478
Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2002) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3094913 · Cited by 1,446
A Comprehensive Conceptualization of Post-Adoptive Behaviors Associated with Information Technology Enabled Work Systems1
Jasperson, J., Carter, & Zmud, R. W. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148694 · Cited by 1,433
Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations
Orlikowski, W. J., & Robey, D. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.2.143 · Cited by 1,320
Windows of Opportunity: Temporal Patterns of Technological Adaptation in Organizations
Tyre, M. J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.98 · Cited by 1,135
Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test
Burton‐Jones, A., & Straub, D. W. (2006) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0096 · Cited by 1,096
The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation1
LEONARD, D. (2000) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-7111-8.50013-5 · Cited by 1,094
Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making.
Bandura, A., & Wood, R. E. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.56.5.805 · Cited by 1,076
The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage
Igbaria, M. (1995) · Omega · doi:10.1016/0305-0483(95)00035-6 · Cited by 1,064
A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems
Jasperson, J., Carter, P. E., & Zmud, R. W. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.5555/2017264.2017272 · Cited by 1,035
How Believing in Ourselves Increases Risk Taking: Perceived Self-Efficacy and Opportunity Recognition
Krueger, N. F., & Dickson, P. R. (1994) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1994.tb00810.x · Cited by 1,003
Trust and satisfaction, two stepping stones for successful e-commerce relationships: A longitudinal exploration
Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2009) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1080.0188 · Cited by 990
Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization
Leonard‐Barton, D. (1988) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(88)90006-6 · Cited by 947
A Foundation for the Study of IT Effects: A New Look at DeSanctis and Poole’s Concepts of Structural Features and Spirit
Bentley University, U., Markus, M. L., Silver, M., & Fordham University (2008) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00176 · Cited by 927
Technology Adaptation: The Case of a Computer-Supported Inter-Organizational Virtual Team1
Majchrzak, A., Rice, R. E., Malhotra, A., King, N. E., & Ba, S. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250948 · Cited by 912
Understanding User Responses to Information Technology: A Coping Model of User Adaptation1
Beaudry, A., & Pinsonneault, A. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148693 · Cited by 869 · cited 1×
“T Beaudry and Pisonneault (2005) Individual Adapting the work: Modifying procedures and routines.”
Background
Moving Beyond Intentions and Toward The Theory of Trying: Effects of Work Environment and Gender on Post-Adoption Information Technology Use1
Ahuja, M. K., & Bennett, J. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148691 · Cited by 818 · cited 1×
“The first two steps employ the CFA method for a series of nested CFA-models (Bagozzi and Phillips 1982; Brooke et al. 1988).”
Method
Understanding Variation in Managers' Ambidexterity: Investigating Direct and Interaction Effects of Formal Structural and Personal Coordination Mechanisms
Mom, T. J. M., Bosch, F. A. J. V. D., & Volberda, H. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0427 · Cited by 805
The Ambivalent Ontology of Digital Artifacts1
Kallinikos, J., Aaltonen, A., & Marton, A. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.2.02 · Cited by 780
Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making.
Bandura, A., & Wood, R. E. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.805 · Cited by 746
Capturing Flexibility of Information Technology Infrastructure: A Study of Resource Characteristics and Their Measure
Duncan, N. B. (1995) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1995.11518080 · Cited by 735
Reconceptualizing Compatibility Beliefs in Technology Acceptance Research1
Karahanna, E., Agarwal, R., & Angst, C. M. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148754 · Cited by 727
Intellectual Capital Architectures and Ambidextrous Learning: A Framework for Human Resource Management
Kang, S., & Snell, S. A. (2008) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00776.x · Cited by 669
TACIT KNOWLEDGE AS A SOURCE OF COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN THE NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION.
Berman, S. L., Down, J., & Hill, C. W. L. (2002) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069282 · Cited by 657
How Believing in Ourselves Increases Risk Taking: Perceived Self-Efficacy and Opportunity Recognition
Krueger, N. F., & Dickson, P. R. (1994) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1994.tb01849.x · Cited by 632
Exploratory and Exploitative Learning in New Product Development: A Social Capital Perspective on New Technology Ventures in China
Atuahene‐Gima, K., & Murray, J. Y. (2007) · Journal of International Marketing · doi:10.1509/jimk.15.2.1 · Cited by 617
A Framework and Guidelines for Context-Specific Theorizing in Information Systems Research
Hong, W., Chan, F. K. Y., Thong, J. Y. L., Chasalow, L. C., & Dhillon, G. (2014) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2013.0501 · Cited by 609
Reconsidering the Trade-off Between Expertise and Flexibility: a Cognitive Entrenchment Perspective
Dane, E. (2010) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.35.4.zok579 · Cited by 603
The Web of Computing: Computer Technology as Social Organization
Kling, R., & Scacchi, W. (1982) · Advances in computers · doi:10.1016/s0065-2458(08)60567-7 · Cited by 586
Giddens's structuration theory and information systems research
Jones, M., & Karsten, H. (2008) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.5555/2017378.2017385 · Cited by 570
Understanding Fit and Appropriation Effects in Group Support Systems via Meta-Analysis1
Dennis, A. R., Wixom, B. H., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2001) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250928 · Cited by 567
Adoption of WAP-enabled mobile phones among Internet users
Teo, T. S. H., & Pok, S. H. (2003) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2003.08.005 · Cited by 553
Dispositional Factors in Internet Use: Personality Versus Cognitive Style1
McElroy, J. C., Hendrickson, A. R., Townsend, A. M., & Demarie, S. M. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148821 · Cited by 508
Conversations with Anthony Giddens: Making Sense of Modernity
Neocleous, M., Giddens, A., & Pierson, C. (2000) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2654463 · Cited by 470
Understanding the Role of Individual Innovativeness in the Acceptance of IT‐Based Innovations: Comparative Analyses of Models and Measures*
Yi, M. Y., Fiedler, K. D., & Park, J.-S. (2006) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5414.2006.00132.x · Cited by 461
Technology Features as Triggers for Sensemaking
Griffith, T. L. (1999) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2202132 · Cited by 456
Organizational Mechanisms for Enhancing User Innovation in Information Technology1
Nambisan, S., Agarwal, R., & Tanniru, M. R. (1999) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249468 · Cited by 452
Giddens’s Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research 1
Hsieh, J. J. P.-A., Rai, A., & Keil, M. (2008) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148831 · Cited by 446
Exploration and Exploitation
Rhee, M., & Kim, T. (2016) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_388-1 · Cited by 438
The adoption of mobile healthcare by hospital's professionals: An integrative perspective
Wu, I., Li, J.-Y., & Fu, C.-Y. (2011) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2011.03.003 · Cited by 429
Effects of Task Experience and Group Experience on Group Performance, Member Ability, and Recognition of Expertise
Littlepage, G. E., Robison, W., & Reddington, K. (1997) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1997.2677 · Cited by 367
Information System Use–Related Activity: An Expanded Behavioral Conceptualization of Individual-Level Information System Use
Barki, H., Titah, R., & Boffo, C. (2007) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0122 · Cited by 362
User involvement competence for radical innovation
Lettl, C. U. (2007) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2007.01.004 · Cited by 311
Domain knowledge: Evolving themes and emerging concerns.
Alexander, P. (1992) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2701_4 · Cited by 299
The Evolving Nature of the Computer Self-Efficacy Construct: An Empirical Investigation of Measurement Construction, Validity, Reliability and Stability Over Time.
Marakas, G. M., Johnson, R. D., & Clay, P. F. (2007) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00112 · Cited by 298
Evolving Work Routines: Adaptive Routinization of Information Technology in Healthcare
Goh, J. M., Gao, G. G., & Agarwal, R. (2011) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1110.0365 · Cited by 282
Understanding User Revisions When Using Information System Features: Adaptive System Use and Triggers1
Sun, H. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41703463 · Cited by 273
Applying Adaptive Structuration Theory to Investigate the Process of Group Support Systems Use
Gopal, A., Bostrom, R. P., & Chin, W. W. (1992) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1992.11517967 · Cited by 249
The Nature and Determinants of IT Acceptance, Routinization, and Infusion
Saga, V. L., & Zmud, R. W. (1993) · Cited by 244
Reconceptualizing compatability beliefs in technology acceptance research
Karahanna, E., Agarwal, R., & Angst, C. M. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.5555/2017317.2017319 · Cited by 202
A Meta-Theory for Understanding Information Systems Within Sociotechnical Systems
Bostrom, R. P., Gupta, S., & Thomas, D. M. (2009) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222260102 · Cited by 202
Women's career development: Can theoretically derived variables predict persistence in engineering majors?
Schaefers, K. G., Epperson, D. L., & Nauta, M. M. (1997) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.44.2.173 · Cited by 196
Facilitation, GSS, and Training as Sources of Process Restrictiveness and Guidance for Structured Group Decision Making: An Empirical Assessment
Wheeler, B. C., & Valacich, J. S. (1996) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.7.4.429 · Cited by 183
The Adoption and Use of IT Artifacts: A New Interaction-Centric Model for the Study of User-Artifact Relationships
Al‐Natour, S., & Benbasat, I. (2009) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00208 · Cited by 182
On the Identity of Technological Objects and User Innovations in Function
Faulkner, P., & Runde, J. (2009) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.40632318 · Cited by 179
Identifying the ideal fit between mobile work and mobile work support
Yuan, Y., Archer, N., Connelly, C. E., & Zheng, W. (2010) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2009.12.004 · Cited by 164
Computerization, productivity, and quality of work-life
Kraut, R. E., Dumais, S., & Koch, S. (1989) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/63342.63347 · Cited by 163
Adoption and Utilization of Commercial Software Packages: Exploring Utilization Equilibria, Transitions, Triggers, and Tracks
Lassila, K. S., & Brancheau, J. C. (1999) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1999.11518246 · Cited by 160
Hacking, Mashing, Gluing: Understanding Opportunistic Design
Hartmann, B., Doorley, S., & Klemmer, S. (2008) · IEEE Pervasive Computing · doi:10.1109/mprv.2008.54 · Cited by 160
Building Better Business Cases for IT Investments
Ward, J. M., Daniel, E. M., & Peppard, J. (2008) · Open Research Online (The Open University) · Cited by 131
Vital Signs for Virtual Teams: An Empirically Developed Trigger Model for Technology Adaptation Interventions1
Thomas, D. M., & Bostrom, R. P. (2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20721417 · Cited by 122
The Effect of Mental Practice and Goal Setting as a Transfer of Training Intervention on Supervisors’ Self‐efficacy and Communication Skills: An Exploratory Study
Morin, L., & Latham, G. P. (2000) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00032 · Cited by 107
Governance-Knowledge Fit in Systems Development Projects
Tiwana, A. (2008) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0164 · Cited by 104
Structure and agency in management accounting research: A response to Boland's interpretive act
Scapens, R. W., & Macintosh, N. B. (1996) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(95)00049-6 · Cited by 99
Assessing the effects of self-efficacy and competence on individual satisfaction with computer use: an IT student perspective
Shih, H. (2004) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.025 · Cited by 84
Understanding and managing diversity among groups at work: key issues for organisational training and development
Moore, S. (1999) · Journal of European Industrial Training · doi:10.1108/03090599910272086 · Cited by 67
How firms shape knowledge to explore and exploit: a study of knowledge flows, knowledge stocks and innovative performance across units
van Wijk, R., Jansen, J. J. P., Bosch, F. A. J. V. D., & Volberda, H. (2012) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2012.718666 · Cited by 62
The Minnesota GDSS Research Project: Group Support Systems, Group Processes, and Outcomes
DeSanctis, G., Poole, M. S., & Zigurs, I. (2008) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00177 · Cited by 61
The contingent effect of personal IT innovativeness and IT self-efficacy on innovative use of complex IT
Wang, W., Li, X., & Hsieh, J. P.-A. (2011) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2011.566940 · Cited by 59
Modifications and innovations to technology artifacts
Desouza, K. C., Awazu, Y., & Ramaprasad, A. (2006) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2006.09.002 · Cited by 58
UGIS: Understanding the nature of user-generated information systems
DesAutels, P. (2011) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2010.12.003 · Cited by 55
User involvement in developing mobile and temporarily interconnected systems
Henfridsson, O., & Lindgren, R. (2009) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00337.x · Cited by 55
Beyond Routine: Symbolic Adoption, Extended Use, and Emergent Use of Complex Information Systems in the Mandatory Organizational Context
Wang, W., & Hsieh, J. J. P.-A. (2006) · Digital Archive @ GSU · Cited by 53
Is Task Autonomy Beneficial for Creativity? Prior Task Experience and Self-Control as Boundary Conditions
Chang, J. W., Huang, D. W., & Choi, J. N. (2012) · Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal · doi:10.2224/sbp.2012.40.5.705 · Cited by 52
The security implications of BYOD
Tokuyoshi, B. (2013) · Network Security · doi:10.1016/s1353-4858(13)70050-3 · Cited by 48
Individual Adaptation of Information Technology
Bhattacherjee, A., & Harris, M. L. (2015) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · Cited by 32
Task, technology, and tailoring in communicative action: An in-depth analysis of group communication
Germonprez, M., & Zigurs, I. (2008) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2008.03.002 · Cited by 26
Exploration and Exploitation During Sequential Search
Dam, G., & Kording, K. P. (2009) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01021.x · Cited by 24
Managing the dynamics of mutual adaptation of technology and organisation in information systems development projects
Bygstad, B. (2005) · Software Process Improvement and Practice · doi:10.1002/spip.234 · Cited by 12
Collaborative end-user development on handheld devices
Ahmadi, N., Repenning, A., & Ioannidou, A. (2008) · IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) · doi:10.1109/vlhcc.2008.4639093 · Cited by 5

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

King, 2014, Field Notes: ‘Rogue’ Employees Want IT to Lighten Up Already, Computerworld
Kock, 2015, WarpPLS 5.0 User Manual
Vick, 1984, Introduction: A Software Engineering Environment, xi

Sorted by citations

Adaptive Folk Theorization as a Path to Algorithmic Literacy on Changing Platforms
DeVito, M. A. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3476080 · Cited by 196
Wearable device adoption among older adults: A mixed-methods study
Farivar, S., Abouzahra, M., & Ghasemaghaei, M. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102209 · Cited by 161
Information Technology Identity: A Key Determinant of IT Feature and Exploratory Usage
Carter, M., Petter, S., Grover, V., & Thatcher, J. B. (2020) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2020/14607 · Cited by 143
How and why trust matters in post-adoptive usage: The mediating roles of internal and external self-efficacy
Tams, S., Thatcher, J. B., & Craig, K. (2017) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2017.07.004 · Cited by 118
The role of information technology use for increasing consumer informedness in cross-border electronic commerce: An empirical study
Han, J. H., & Kim, H.-M. (2019) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100826 · Cited by 112

See all 205

Authors: Schmitz, K. W., Teng, J. T. C., & Webb, K. J.
Affiliations: Georgia State University (US)
The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
Texas Wesleyan University (US)
ORCID: Schmitz, Kurt W.
Webb, Kimberly J.
Venue: MIS Quarterly
Publisher: MIS Quarterly
Published: 2016-09-01
Volume: 40
Issue: 3
Pages: 663-686
ISSN: 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
2162-9730
DOI: 10.25300/misq/2016/40.3.07
OpenAlex: W2565743042
Cited by: 205
References: 106
Citations by year: 2026: 23 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 6
FWCI: 55.27
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: MIS Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords: adaptive structuration theory, technology adaptation, Bring Your Own Device, behavioral adaptation, task adaptation, individual performance, young professionals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Capturing the Complexity of Malleable IT Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory for Individuals1

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks