CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 230

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dispositional Trust and Distrust Distinctions in Predicting High- and Low-Risk Internet Expert Advice Site Perceptions

McKnight, Kacmar, Choudhury·2004·e-Service Journal
DOI 10.2979/esj.2004.3.2.35
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study examines whether some types of dispositional trust/distrust concepts are better than other types at inducing consumers to trust a Web advice provider. We propose and test a model in which dispositional trust and distrust concepts are given separate roles. This unique approach is based on the growing, but untested theoretical consensus that trust and distrust are separate concepts that co-exist yet differ in terms of their emotional makeup. While trust concepts tend to be calm and collected, distrust concepts embody significant levels of fear and insecurity. Based on this difference, we propose that dispositional distrust concepts will be better predictors of high-risk Internet legal advice site perceptions, while the corresponding trust concepts will be better predictors of low-risk Internet legal advice site perceptions. As proposed, the study finds that dispositional trust better predicts low-risk perceptions, while dispositional distrust better predicts high-risk perceptions. For e-commerce advice site research, the findings of this article suggest that perhaps scholars should Not only study dispositional trust but also dispositional distrust.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2979/esj.2004.3.2.35

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Barber, B. The Logic and Limits of Trust. New Rutgers University Press, Brunswick, N. J., 1983.
  2. Berscheid, E. and Graziano, W. "The Initiation of Social Relationships and Interpersonal Attraction," in Social Exchange in Developing Relationships, R. L. Burgess and T. L. Huston (eds.), Academic Press, New York, 1979, pp. 31-60. · DOI
  3. 10.2307/259286 · DOI
  4. Boon, S. D., and Holmes, J. G. The dynamics of interpersonal trust: Resolving uncertainty in the face of risk. In Hinde, R. A. and Groebel, J. (Eds.), Cooperation and prosocial behavior: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1991, pp. 190-211.
  5. Burt, R. S., and Knez, M. "Trust and Third-Party Gossip," in Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, R. M. Kramer and T. R. Tyler (eds.), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1996, pp. 68-89. · DOI
  6. Butler, J. K. "Behaviors, Trust, and Goal Achievement in a Win-Win Negotiating Role-Play." Group and Organization Management (20), 1995, pp. 486-502. · DOI
  7. Clark, M. C., and Payne, R. L. "The Nature and Structure of Workers' Trust in Management." Journal of Organizational Behavior (18), 1997, pp. 205-224. · DOI
  8. 10.2307/249749 · DOI
  9. Constantinople, A. "An Eriksonian Measure of Personality Development in College Students." Developmental Psychology (1), 1969, pp. 57-372. · DOI
  10. Darley, J. M., and Fazio, R. H. "Expectancy Confirmation Processes Arising in the Social Interaction Sequence." American Psychologist (35), 1980, pp. 867-881. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Eayrs, M. A. "Time, Trust and Hazard: Hairdressers' Symbolic Roles," Symbolic Interaction (16), 1993, pp. 19-37. · DOI
  12. 10.2307/3151312 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Gefen, D. "E-Commerce: The Role of Familiarity and Trust," Omega: The International Journal of Management Science (28), 2000, pp. 725-737. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Gefen D, 2002, Database for Advances in Information Systems, 33, 38, 10.1145/569905.569910 · DOI
  15. Grazioli, S., and Jarvenpaa, S. "Perils of Internet Fraud: An Empirical Investigation of Deception and Trust with Experienced Internet Consumers," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (30), 2000, pp. 395-410. · DOI
  16. Grazioli, S., and Wang, A. "Looking Without Seeing: Understanding Unsophisticated Consumers' Success and Failure to Detect Internet Deception," Proceedings of the 22ndInternational Conference on Information Systems, 2001, pp. 193-203.
  17. Hoffman D. L., 1999, Communications of the ACM, 42, 80, 10.1145/299157.299175 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Holmes, J. G. "Trust and the Appraisal Process in Close Relationships," in W. H. Jones and D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in Personal Relationships, 2, 1991. London: Jessica Kingsley, pp. 57-104.
  19. 10.2307/258634 · DOI
  20. 10.2307/259293 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Joreskog, K.G., and Wold, H. "The ML and PLS Techniques for Modeling Latent Variables: Historical and Comparative Aspects," in Systems Under Indirect Observation: Causality, Structure, Prediction, (eds.) K.G. Joreskog and H. Wold, North Holland, New York, 1982, pp. 263-270.
  22. 10.1207/s15324834basp0904_2 · DOI
  23. Kramer, R. M. "Divergent Realities and Convergent Disappointments in the Hierarchic Relation: Trust and the Intuitive Auditor at Work," in Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, R. M. Kramer and T. R. Tyler (eds.), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1996, pp. 216-245. · DOI
  24. 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.569 · DOI
  25. Kraus S. J, 1997, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 58, 10.1177/0146167295211007 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.2307/259288 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Lewis, J. D., and Weigert, A. J. "Social Atomism, Holism, and Trust," The Sociological Quarterly (2l6:4), 1985, pp. 455-471. · DOI
  28. Luhmann, N. Trust and Power, John Wiley, New York, 1979.
  29. Luhmann, N. Essays on Self-Reference, Columbia University Press, New York, 1980.
  30. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H. and Schoorman, F. D. "An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust." Academy of Management Review (20), 1995, pp. 709-734. · DOI · Paper page
  31. McKnight D. H., 2001, Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, 883
  32. 10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81 · DOI · Paper page
  33. McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., and Kacmar, C. J. "The Impact of Initial Consumer Trust on Intentions to Transact with a Web Site: A Trust Building Model." Journal of Strategic Information Systems (11:3-4), 2002b, pp. 297-323.
  34. McKnight D. H., 1998, Academy of Management Review, 23, 473, 10.5465/amr.1998.926622 · DOI · Paper page
  35. McLain D. L., 1999, Public Administration Quarterly, 23, 152
  36. Media Matrix. Internet Consumer Segments Identified for First Time. www.mediamatrix.com/usa/press/ releases/20000417a.jsp, 2000, accessed on 5/24/00.
  37. Mishra, A. K. "Organizational Responses to Crisis: The Centrality of Trust," in R. M. Kramer, T. R. Tyler eds. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1996, pp. 261-287.
  38. Parker-Pope, T. "How to Tell Whether that Online Drugstore is Really a Good Deal," Wall Street Journal, February 16, 2001, p. B1.
  39. Ratnasingham, P. "The Importance of Trust in Electronic Commerce," Internet Research (8), 1998, pp. 313- 321. · DOI
  40. Riker, W. H. "The Nature of Trust," in Perspectives on Social Power, J. T. Tedeschi, (ed.), Aldine, Chicago, 1971, pp. 63-81. · DOI
  41. Rotter, J. B. "A New Scale for the Measurement of Interpersonal Trust," Journal of Personality (35), 1967, pp. 651-665. · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1037/h0031464 · DOI
  43. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S. and Camerer, C. "Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust. Academy of Management Review, (23:3), 1998, pp. 393-404.
  44. Schmitt, R. B. "Lowering the Bar: Lawyers Flood Web, But Many Ads Fail to Tell the Whole Truth," Wall Street Journal, February 15, 2001, pp. A1, A12.
  45. Sitkin, S. B. and Roth, N. L. "Explaining the Limited Effectiveness of Legalistic "Remedies" for Trust / Distrust." Organization Science (4:3), August, 1993, pp. 367-392. · DOI · Paper page
  46. Wang, H., Lee, M. K. O. and Wang, C. Consumer privacy concerns about Internet marketing, Communications of the ACM. (41:3), 1998, pp. 63-70. · DOI
  47. Wrightsman, L. S. "Interpersonal Trust and Attitudes toward Human Nature," in J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, and L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes: Vol. 1: Measures of social psychological attitudes: 1991, pp. 373-412. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. · DOI
  48. Zand, Dale E. "Trust and Managerial Problem Solving," Administrative Science Quarterly (17), 1972, pp. 229-239. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McKnight, Kacmar, & Choudhury
Venue
e-Service Journal
Publisher
Indiana University Press
Published
2004
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
35
ISSN
1528-8226
DOI
10.2979/esj.2004.3.2.35
Cited by
230
References
10

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review