CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 248Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The familial risk of endometriosis

Moen, Mette H., Magnus, Per·1993·Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
DOI 10.3109/00016349309058164
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the occurrence of endometriosis or adenomyosis in mothers and sisters of patients with endometriosis. METHODS: A total of 563 patients with endometriosis were interviewed about endometriosis or adenomyosis in their mothers or sisters. Five hundred and twenty-eight patients (94%) gave information about their relatives. Six patients were adopted and had no knowledge about their relatives. Among 522 patients were seven pairs of sisters, of which only one was included, giving a total of 515 cases. The control group consisted of 149 women without endometriosis documented at a recently diagnostic laparoscopy performed in connection with sterilization. The controls were likewise interviewed about their relatives, and none refused to give information. If a gynecological operation in a relative was reported, medical records were obtained (68%) or a description of the medical history was given by the proband. RESULTS: Endometriosis or adenomyosis was disclosed in 3.9% of mothers of cases and in 0.7% of mothers of controls, in 4.8% of sisters of cases and in 0.6% of sisters of controls. The relative risk of endometriosis in a first-degree relative (expressed as odds ratio), was 7.2 (95% confidence interval 2.1, 24.3). Severe manifestations of endometriosis were found more often among patients with a positive family history than among those without (26% versus 12%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates a seven fold increased risk of endometriosis in mothers and sisters of patients with endometriosis. It is assumed that daughters of patients with endometriosis have a similar risk of developing endometriosis.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/00016349309058164

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Moen, M. H., & Magnus, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
Corresponding author
Moen, Mette H.
ORCID
Venue
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-10
Volume
72
Issue
7
Pages
560-564
ISSN
  • 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0412
DOI
10.3109/00016349309058164
OpenAlex
W1972563403
Cited by
248
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 6307 d)
Locations
  • Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometriosis, adenomyosis, familial risk, family history (medicine), first-degree relatives, genetic susceptibility, endometriosis severity
MeSH terms
Adult, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Norway, Risk Factors, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review