Cited by 11Gut microbiota and healthClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Clostridioides difficile and neurological disorders: new perspectives

Open access
Biazzo, Manuele, Allegra, Manuela, Deidda, Gabriele·2022·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Abstract

Despite brain physiological functions or pathological dysfunctions relying on the activity of neuronal/non-neuronal populations, over the last decades a plethora of evidence unraveled the essential contribution of the microbial populations living and residing within the gut, called gut microbiota. The gut microbiota plays a role in brain (dys)functions, and it will become a promising valuable therapeutic target for several brain pathologies. In the present mini-review, after a brief overview of the role of gut microbiota in normal brain physiology and pathology, we focus on the role of the bacterium Clostridioides difficile, a pathogen responsible for recurrent and refractory infections, in people with neurological diseases, summarizing recent correlative and causative evidence in the scientific literature and highlighting the potential of microbiota-based strategies targeting this pathogen to ameliorate not only gastrointestinal but also the neurological symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnins.2022.946601

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence is emerging regarding the potential involvement of C. difficile in brain pathologies such as neurodegenerative diseases, multiple sclerosis, and autism spectrum disorder.

    “Evidence is emerging regarding the potential involvement of C. difficile in brain pathologies such as neurodegenerative diseases (e.g. Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease), multiple sclerosis, and autism spectrum disorder (455).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Biazzo, M., Allegra, M., & Deidda, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Siena (IT)
  • National Research Council (IT)
  • University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
Deidda, Gabriele
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2022-09-20
Volume
16
Pages
946601-946601
ISSN
1662-453X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4297906650
Cited by
11
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
Clostridium difficile, gut microbiota, neurological disorders, gut-brain axis, microbiota-based therapy, recurrent infections, neurodegenerative diseases, gut dysbiosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review