Cited by 442Vagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchGastrointestinal motility and disordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Activation in vagal afferents and central autonomic pathways: Early responses to intestinal infection with Campylobacter jejuni

Goehler, Lisa E., Gaykema, Ronald P.A., Opitz, Noel, Reddaway, Rebecca, Badr, Nadia, Lyte, Mark·2005·Brain, Behavior, and Immunity

Abstract

Abundant evidence now supports the idea that multiple pathways or mechanisms underlie communication from the immune system to the brain. The presence of a variety of mechanisms suggests that they may each contribute something different to immunosensory signaling. For instance, brain mediated immune signal transduction is dependent upon the presence of circulating mediators whereas peripheral sensory nerves are more likely to be important early on in an infection, prior to elevation of circulating cytokines, or in local infections within the terminal fields of these nerves. To test the hypothesis that local infection in the gut activates vagal sensory neurons, we assessed expression of the neuronal activation marker c-Fos in neurons in the vagal sensory ganglia and in the primary sensory relay nucleus for the vagus, the nucleus of the solitary tract (nTS) in mice treated orally either with saline or live Campylobacter jejuni (C. jejuni). Male CF1 mice were inoculated orally with either C. jejuni or saline, and c-Fos expression in the vagal sensory neurons and brain 4-12 h later was assessed via immunohistochemistry. Oral inoculation with C. jejuni led to a significant increase in c-Fos expression in neurons bilaterally in the vagal ganglia, in the absence of elevated levels of circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines. C. jejuni treatment activated neurons in the nTS, as well as in brain regions associated with primary viscerosensory pathways and the central autonomic network. These findings provide evidence that peripheral sensory neurons contribute an early signal to the brain regarding potential pathogens.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbi.2004.09.002

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gut bacteria can interact with and activate the vagus nerve, thereby exerting effects upstream to the central nervous system.

    “gut bacteria can interact with and activate the vagus nerve, thereby exerting effects upstream to the CNS.”
  • Changes in enteric neuron activity perceived by the vagus nerve are essential for mediating satiety, stress, and mood.

    “Changes in enteric neuron activity perceived by the vagus nerve are essential for mediating satiety, stress, and mood (12, 58, 59).”
  • Vagal sensory neuron activation via Campylobacter jejuni gut inoculation of mice resulted in direct activation of the neuronal activation marker c-Fos in the vagal sensory ganglia and the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) in the medulla oblongata.

    “vagal sensory neuron activation via Campylobacter jejuni gut inoculation of mice resulted in direct activation of the neuronal activation marker c-Fos in the vagal sensory ganglia and the primary sensory relay nucleus for the vagus nerve, the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) in the medulla oblongata (Goehler et al., 2005).”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Goehler et al., 2005

  • Gut bacteria utilize vagal afferents to alter hosts' emotional and behavioral responses, as evidenced by changes in c-Fos expression in vagal afferent cell bodies after oral Campylobacter jejuni.

    “Evidence that gut bacteria utilize vagal afferents to alter their hosts' emotional and behavioral responses comes from studies observing changes in c-Fos expression in the cell bodies of vagal afferents following oral administration of Campylobacter jejuni (Goehler et al., 2005).”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Goehler et al., 2005

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goehler, L. E., Gaykema, R. P. A., Opitz, N., Reddaway, R., Badr, N., & Lyte, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Hennepin County Medical Center (US)
  • Minnesota State University, Mankato (US)
Corresponding author
Goehler, Lisa E.
Venue
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-07
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
334-344
ISSN
0889-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969140399
Cited by
442
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 13
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r21mh064648-02)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-50431, MH64648, R01MH050431)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
Campylobacter jejuni, vagal afferents, vagal afferent neurons, c-fos, nucleus tractus solitarius, central autonomic network, gut-brain signaling, intestinal infection, vagal ganglia, peripheral sensory neurons
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Campylobacter Infections, Cecum, Ganglia, Autonomic, Male, Vagus Nerve, Neuroimmunomodulation, Campylobacter jejuni, Cytokines, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos, Enteric Nervous System, Visceral Afferents, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review