Cited by 86Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and Memory

Elements of episodic-like memory in animal models

Crystal, Jonathon D.·2009·Behavioural Processes

Abstract

Representations of unique events from one's past constitute the content of episodic memories. A number of studies with non-human animals have revealed that animals remember specific episodes from their past (referred to as episodic-like memory). The development of animal models of memory holds enormous potential for gaining insight into the biological bases of human memory. Specifically, given the extensive knowledge of the rodent brain, the development of rodent models of episodic memory would open new opportunities to explore the neuroanatomical, neurochemical, neurophysiological, and molecular mechanisms of memory. Development of such animal models holds enormous potential for studying functional changes in episodic memory in animal models of Alzheimer's disease, amnesia, and other human memory pathologies. This article reviews several approaches that have been used to assess episodic-like memory in animals. The approaches reviewed include the discrimination of what, where, and when in a radial arm maze, dissociation of recollection and familiarity, object recognition, binding, unexpected questions, and anticipation of a reproductive state. The diversity of approaches may promote the development of converging lines of evidence on the difficult problem of assessing episodic-like memory in animals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.09.009

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The unexpected question experiment by Zentall et al. (2001) only deals with short-time delays between encoding and question, whereas episodic memory is defined as a long-term memory system.

    “However, as pointed out by Crystal (2009), episodic memory is defined as a long-term memory system and the unexpected question experiment carried out by Zentall et al. (2001) only deals with short-time delays between the encoding event and the experimental question.”

    From Keeping track of time: evidence for episodic-like memory in great apes (2010) · cites this paper as Crystal 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crystal, J. D.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
Crystal, Jonathon D.
Venue
Behavioural Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
80
Issue
3
Pages
269-277
ISSN
0376-6357 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970883095
Cited by
86
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Processes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Tekes
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
episodic-like memory, animal models of memory, memory assessment, radial maze, object recognition, binding, Alzheimer's disease, amnesia
MeSH terms
Animals, Bees, Cognition, Arvicolinae, Mental Recall, Maze Learning, Recognition, Psychology, Models, Animal, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review