Cited by 56Coffee research and impactsNutritional Studies and DietAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Coffee consumption and stroke risk: A meta‐analysis of epidemiologic studies

Open access
Kim, Byungsung, Nam, Yunjung, Kim, Junga, Choi, Hyunrim, Won, Changwon·2012·Korean Journal of Family Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coffee is one of the most widely consumed beverages in the world, and contains caffeine and phenolic compounds. Many studies on the association between coffee consumption and risk of stroke have been reported, however, more research is needed to further explore many studies' inconsistent results. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to verify the relationship between coffee consumption and stroke. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, using the keywords "coffee" or "caffeine" for the exposure factors, and "transient ischemic attack" or "stroke" or "acute cerebral infarction" or "cardiovascular events" for the outcome factors. We included prospective cohort and case-control studies published between 2001 and July 2011 in this review. The search was limited to English language. RESULTS: Among 27 articles identified for this review, only 9 studies met the inclusion criteria, all of which were cohort studies. When using all cohort studies, the pooled relative risk (RR) of stroke for the highest vs. lowest category of coffee consumption was 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 0.91). When subgroup analysis was performed, for Europeans, increased coffee drinking showed a preventive effect on stroke occurrence with RR 0.82 (95% CI, 0.74 to 0.92); RR for women 0.81 (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.93); for ischemic stroke 0.80 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.90); and for those drinking 4 cups or more per day 0.83 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.91). CONCLUSION: We found that coffee consumption of 4 cups or more per day showed a preventive effect on stroke in this meta-analysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4082/kjfm.2012.33.6.356

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar results were obtained in the meta-analysis by Kim et al. (2012).

    “Similar results were obtained in the meta-analysis by Kim et al. (2012)”

    From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Kim et al. (2012)

  • Among the prospective cohort studies included in the meta-analyses, none reported a positive association between coffee consumption and the risk of stroke of any type.

    “Among the prospective cohort studies included in the meta-analyses above, none reported a positive association (increased risk) between coffee consumption and the risk of stroke of any type.”

    From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Kim et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, B., Nam, Y., Kim, J., Choi, H., & Won, C.
Affiliations
  • Department of Family Medicine, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kyung Hee University (KR)
Venue
Korean Journal of Family Medicine
Published
2012
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
356
ISSN
  • 2005-6443 (ISSN-L)
  • 2092-6715
OpenAlex
W2069143474
Cited by
56
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Korean Journal of Family Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
coffee consumption, stroke risk, caffeine, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, acute cerebral infarction, stroke prevention, phenolic compounds, dose-response relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review