The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition
Abstract
It is hard to answer the question when the human race started speaking: was it 50,000, 150,000 or 250,000 years ago? And did humanoids start speaking immediately after they were physically able to do so? It is equally hard to tell when we began to write. Was it around 3000 BC judging by the Mesopotamian tablets which date from around that time? Or was it as early as 5000 or 8000 BC if we also include “forerunners” of writing that have been found on small clay objects at sites from Palestine to eastern Iran (Daniels and Bright, 1996)? How difficult these questions may be to answer, what is not contested is that speaking is primary and writing is secondary. This is still the case in modern society: children start to speak first and only later do they learn to write. But writing has become very important nowadays. A human being who cannot write will not be able to participate fully in daily life. And there are situations and contexts in which more importance is attached to the written than to the spoken word.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom
Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190515000094 · Cited by 752
Granena, G., & Long, M. H. (2013) · Second Language Research · doi:10.1177/0267658312461497 · Cited by 475
Interaction and instructed second language acquisition
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444818000125 · Cited by 377
Mobile-assisted language learning: A Duolingo case study
Loewen, S., Crowther, D., Isbell, D. R., Kim, K. M., Maloney, J., Miller, Z. F., & Rawal, H. (2019) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344019000065 · Cited by 368
In Defense of Tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and Real Issues
Long, M. H. (2016) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190515000057 · Cited by 396
Plonsky (2013) · doi:10.1017/s0272263113000399 · Cited by 347
Xiao, Y., & Zhi, Y. (2023) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages8030212 · Cited by 289
THE CASE AGAINST THE CASE AGAINST RECASTS
Goo, J., & Mackey, A. (2013) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263112000708 · Cited by 271
Self-citationBarrot, J. S. (2023) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2021.1936071 · Cited by 248
Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow
Wen, Z. (., Biedroń, A., & Skehan, P. (2017) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444816000276 · Cited by 248
The relevance of second language acquisition theory to the written error correction debate
Polio, C. (2012) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.004 · Cited by 209
THE ROLES OF PHONOLOGICAL SHORT-TERM MEMORY AND WORKING MEMORY IN L2 GRAMMAR AND VOCABULARY LEARNING
Martin, K. I., & Ellis, N. C. (2012) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263112000125 · Cited by 181
Zalbidea, J. (2017) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12389 · Cited by 144
McEown, M. S., Noels, K. A., & Saumure, K. D. (2014) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.06.001 · Cited by 132
Winke, P. M. (2013) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263112000903 · Cited by 121
INCIDENTAL VOCABULARY LEARNING IN SLA: EFFECTS OF FREQUENCY, AURAL ENHANCEMENT, AND WORKING MEMORY
Malone, J. (2018) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263117000341 · Cited by 100
Assessing second-language oral proficiency for research: The Spanish elicited imitation task
Bowden, H. W. (2016) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263115000443 · Cited by 90
Guilloteaux, M.-J. (2013) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2012.12.002 · Cited by 90
Hamrick, P. (2015) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.10.003 · Cited by 89
Selective effects of age of acquisition on morphological priming: evidence for a sensitive period.
Veríssimo, J., Heyer, V., Jacob, G., & Clahsen, H. (2018) · Language Acquisition · doi:10.1080/10489223.2017.1346104 · Cited by 75
New conceptualizations of linguistic giftedness.
Biedroń, A., & Pawlak, M. (2016) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444815000439 · Cited by 70
Vyatkina, N., Hirschmann, H., & Golcher, F. (2015) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.006 · Cited by 70
Teacher vs. Peer Oral Corrective Feedback in the German Language Classroom
Sippel, L., & Jackson, C. N. (2015) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/flan.12164 · Cited by 68
ELICITED IMITATION TASKS AS A MEASURE OF L2 PROFICIENCY: A META-ANALYSIS
Kostromitina, M., & Plonsky, L. (2022) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263121000395 · Cited by 61
Age effects in L2 grammar processing as revealed by ERPs and how (not) to study them.
Meulman, N., Wieling, M., Sprenger, S. A., Stowe, L. A., & Schmid, M. S. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143328 · Cited by 60
Parlak, Ö., & Ziegler, N. (2017) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263116000310 · Cited by 58
PARADIS, J., TULPAR, Y., & ARPPE, A. (2016) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000915000562 · Cited by 55
Foreign language aptitude, acquisitional sequences, and psycholinguistic processes
Skehan, P. (2016) · Bilingual Processing and Acquisition · doi:10.1075/bpa.3.02ske · Cited by 44
Mawlawi Diab, N. (2016) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.12.014 · Cited by 34
Should We Listen or Read? Modality Effects in Implicit and Explicit Knowledge
KIM, K. M., & GODFROID, A. (2019) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12583 · Cited by 34
The role of individual learner differences in explicit language instruction
Roehr‐Brackin, K., Baranowska, K., Pavlekovic, R., & Scheffler, P. (2024) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12963 · Cited by 9
Chapter 3. From Julie to Wes to Alberto: Revisiting the construct of fossilization
Han, Z. (2014) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.39.05ch3 · Cited by 9
Syntactic Networks of Interlanguage Across L2 Modalities and Proficiency Levels
Hao, Y., Wang, X., Wu, M., & Liu, H. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643120 · Cited by 8
Lee, A. H. (2024) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688211051032 · Cited by 6
Language learning in an era of datafication and personalized learning
Fulton, L., Hoffman, D. L., & Paek, S. (2021) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09903-0 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2013-06-17
- OpenAlex
- W1541060002
- Cited by
- 1,124
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 68.38
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.