CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,071Sleep and related disordersObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Insomnia and Its Treatment: Prevalence and Correlates

Mellinger, Glen D.·1985·Archives of General Psychiatry
DOI 10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790260019002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Data for this report come from a nationally representative probability sample survey of noninstitutionalized adults, aged 18 to 79 years. The survey, conducted in 1979, found that insomnia afflicts 35% of all adults during the course of a year; about half of these persons experience the problem as serious. Those with serious insomnia tend to be women and older, and they are more likely than others to display high levels of psychic distress and somatic anxiety, symptoms resembling major depression, and multiple health problems. During the year prior to the survey, 2.6% of adults had used a medically prescribed hypnotic. Typically, use occurred on brief occasions, one or two days at a time, or for short durations of regular use lasting less than two weeks. The survey also found a small group of hypnotic users (11% of all users; 0.3% of all adults) who reported using the medication regularly for a year or longer. If we include anxiolytics and antidepressants, 4.3% of adults had used a medically prescribed psychotherapeutic drug that was prescribed for sleep; 3.1% had used an over-the-counter sleeping pill. The majority of serious insomniacs (85%) were untreated by either prescribed or over-the-counter medications.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790260019002

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Mellinger, G. D.
Corresponding author
Mellinger, Glen D.
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
1985-03-01
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
225
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790260019002
OpenAlex
W1964403954
Cited by
1,071
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 29
FWCI
11.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH-29819)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
insomnia, insomnia prevalence, hypnotic medication use, anxiolytics, antidepressants, psychiatric distress, somatic anxiety, major depressive disorder, health problems, sex differences, age differences, chronic drug administration
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Anxiety Disorders, Attitude to Health, Depressive Disorder, Drug Utilization, Nonprescription Drugs, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Drug Prescriptions, Research Design, Sex Factors, Anti-Anxiety Agents, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review